Skip to main content

The growth of the black hole is causing debate.

   

.



The growth of the black hole is causing debate. 


Proving the growth of the black hole is very difficult because the observations about the black hole itself are hard to get. So the thing, that astronomers must do with that kind of thing is starting to find an extremely small-size black hole, what is alone in the universe. 

And then they should observe the change in the size of Einstein's loop, which means the area where gravity is affecting the route of the photons. So if that area is growing that means the size of the black hole is growing. The growing mass causes the size of the gravity field is increasing because the gravity would get stronger. 

But the fact is that normally the disk of material, that surrounds the black hole denies sharp observations about the area, what is near the black hole. If we are thinking of the supermassive black holes, what are the center of the galaxy, we must remember that the mass of those black holes is extremely high. And that makes it difficult to find the difference in the size of the gravity field of those objects. So everything is relative. 

If we want to compare supermassive black holes with something, what we know, we can take the sandpit, what weight is tons of sand as an example. The thing in the case of supermassive black holes is that they are like that pile of sand and the material that is dropping in the black hole is like the bucket of sand that we fall on the sandpit. 

Even we feel that the sand that we fall to the sandpile feels heavy, we cannot detect the change of the mass. We must remember that the weight of a supermassive black hole is 10⁵-10⁹ times of the Sun and that means the increase of the mass when the material drops in the black hole are hard to measure. 


https://www.quantamagazine.org/astronomers-debate-how-forbidden-black-holes-grow-20201103/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of