Could salaries increase inflation?

The problem with inflation is that the rise of the salaries is increasing the rise of the prices. Sometimes the labor union has mentioned as the thing that increases inflation. The reason for that is it wants to rise the lowest salaries. The problem is not in the rising the lowest salaries. The problem is when the lowest salaries are rising that thing causes the situation. That for some unknown reasons also all other salaries must raise when the cleaner's salaries are rising.    

This kind of effect is a remarkable thing in work marketing. When the lowest salaries are rising, all other salaries must also rise. And that thing causes that the prices are also rising. The question is why only the lowest salaries cannot be rise and others would remain at the same level? And the interesting thing is this. When some cleaner would get 3-4% rise in the salaries all other actors must get the same money. 

That is an interesting thing. If all salaries rise 3-4%, that thing causes that the markets would transfer that thing at the prices of products. So that thing means that the rise of the payments would transfer, straight to the prices of products. And the thing is that this kind of rise in salaries doesn't have an effect. When the prices will rise the same way with salaries. 

It means the real increase of the purchasing power is zero. And if there is the increasing the taxes. That thing can mean that the rise of salary would turn to negative purchase power. So when we are looking at the things that are discussed in the financial discussions between employers and labor unions we should look at entirety. 

The retail actors are transferring the rising salary paychecks to the prices of products. And of course, raising taxes must notice. When we are calculating the effect of raising salaries on the purchasing power. The purchasing power means how much goods the actor can buy. Many things are affecting that thing. One is the value of the purchase, and the second is the level of the prices. 

What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle said, that the right to give votes must reserve to "free men" because they have the best knowledge about the things, and then about a thousand years after that the voting right expanded to belong also for free women. And that caused a revolution for democracy, but then we have forgotten something, and that is here in the modern time is still many people, who have not right to give votes in any elections.

Those people are handicapped, ward, underage or foreigners, who would not have citizenship, and that's why those people have not right to vote in elections. And that means that the model of Aristotle is still in power. That kind of action, what is limiting the democracy is meant for protecting the state. And this means that they are so-called "necessary evilness", which means that the state must deny the situation, that two million foreigners would come to its territory and votes to the involved in some other country.

But the question is, why youngsters' opinions about the laws are not ever asked? Maybe there is no time for that. But when we are thinking about democracy, and the principle that vote cannot be bought, the answer is a little bit complicated than we ever thought, and the answer would be that there are people, who would buy votes.

Those people would offer more salary, lower taxes and another kind of thing, but there is one problem, the government would need that money, and even the taxes of salaries would be low, the taxes of the food, fuel and another kind of stuff would rise. And this is one thing, what we cannot even think about. If we would want to crush our political opposition, we might call our leaders as the "expert", and that thing would make those people more trusted in the eyes of the great public than world "leader". "

An "Expert" is one of the worlds, which shows real professionalism, and that would be a really good argument in the political discussions. But when we are thinking about "free men", we must realize that in modern times Aristotle would say "free persons" are only capable individuals for making decisions, because they have "right knowledge". But then we should ask, what exactly means "free person"?

Does that mean some businessman or maybe the specialist of administration? Or is it a person, who is a member of the ring, what makes decisions? And who would get the place in this hypothetical ring? Is that the person, who has the right training, and that training could be free to get. But then we must realize, that the high price of those, maybe administrative training would be a good way to eliminate not wanted persons from that training. This is one point of view of those things.

And censorship is a very bad thing in a democracy. If we are thinking election campaigns is not tolerated to deny to print the campaign material of some candidate by using political arguments, rejecting the offer by using argument, that we don't want to print that material we would be childish. If the price of that material would be so high, that person cannot pay it, that will be a very good alternative for political censorship. In this model, political marketing and campaign commercials would be under the heavy tax. And that would make them very expensive.

But if we would give the announcement, that thing would be tax-free, and then the parties, what are under the power would pay a lower price for their commercials because their commercials are interpreted as the announcements. Because opposition cannot pay the prices, their candidates would not get their commercials to the media. And this is the good and non-violent way to make sure, that the same persons would be in the control of the state.

Small writing about Brexit

Small writing about Brexit

Brexit is a good example of cases when the decisions are made too fast. If there would be enough time for that kind of action, those discussions would be made with soundly and sharpness, that the contracts that are needed in those cases would be made that way, that there would not be any surprises after that. When we are thinking cases like contracts between corporations, there is lots of text to read. And there are lots of emails, including lots of suggestions and counter suggestions in that kind of case.

So the discussions in the contracts between the states are not easier at all. When we are thinking about the case, when somebody just wants to leave some union of lands, there are many practical questions, what might be solved anyway. Those problems are in taxes, and especially the VAT, and another is how many bottles ow wine British people can bring to Britain from France?

They are not easy to solve. And when we are thinking things like paying taxes of incoming tools, we might think that British people would begin to buy goods from the Irish companies, and that would be a very good way to avoid taxes. Of course, some people can live near the border, and go to Barbery and bring every single sausage and bread from the other land.

And when we are thinking about things like channel tunnel, the Normandian shops can send the food deliveries to the people of England by using that train and courier service. The same thing can be made in Northern Ireland, and maybe that kind of question should be thought before the beginning of that kind of divorcement. And what we have learned in this case. If people who are making contracts have time to discuss things, the British would not in this situation.

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Society has turned to two class people because the economical middle class is lost. That makes very big differences to things like economical and tax planning. Also, the middle class people had a role to work as the shock absorber between wealthy and poor people, and that causes problems with society.

The middle class has been separated in the higher and lower middle class, what has delivered the information from the poor people to the wealthy persons by natural social contacts, but when the abyss between incoming layers has been growing, that would cause problems to get information that the prizes or taxes are too high to ears of the persons, who make decisions. The problem in parliaments is that the people, who come from wealthy families are over-represented in those institutions.

Wealthy people have more money, and they would pay the membership fees for political parties more often than poor people, who need money for many other targets. This would cause the phenomenon, where politicians are receding from the poor people. If I would be a person, who lives in a one-room flat, I would feel uncomfortable to meet people, who live in own houses, because I would not have a normal social relationship with people, who have a different level of incoming.

The large middle class has also offered good field, where politicians could promise things, and that allowed the popularity, and if politician betrays the permissions, this thing can cause the there are no votes. And that's why politician must think carefully about permissions because the betraying those things can cause the dropping from parliament.

The problem is that there are less wealthy people than poor people, and the paradox is that wealthy people are funding the campaigns of politicians. But the votes come from poor people, and if a politician would just please wealthy people, that would cause the end of funding the campaign, but if the campaign pleases only the wealthy people, the means the loss of votes.

Loss of a normal social relationship, with normal discussions, would cause that those people would not have information, what is going on in the poor people neighborhood. And that causes fear mutually because every people have prejudice, and this is the thing, what trolls would benefit effectively. But when we are thinking about the loss of middle class people that causes economical problems, because of the role of middle class people has been acting as the financial reserve.

If the government needs more money, it would collect more taxes from the middle class people, and in the years, when there is not so big need for money the tax level can be decreased. But when we are talking about the thing like the federal reserve, there are many things, where those words are pointing. Of course, that means the central bank of the USA, but also that means the bumper, what gives limits how the economy can move, or it can mean the money what can use right away for some urgent building sites or other urgent targets.

One version of the reserve is marginal, where the level of taxes can move. When the level of taxes are planned the planner would calculate the minimum and maximum levels for taxes, and when the decisions of the level are made, the level of collecting the money would keep low, because that level can rise in the next year.

If we would think this way, the person, who determines the level of taxes operates in two year periods. In the first year, the level of taxes is determined, and on the second year, the determiner would check how those calculations connected to reality, and then adjust the levels of collecting taxes. This is one way to think about the role of middle-class people in the socio-economical field.

How the making money with bitcoins happen in theory

How the making money with bitcoins happen in theory

1. The trade with bitcoins is similar to the normal trade with currencies

The idea of making money by selling and buying the currency is very interesting. The method is simple, and the operators would need only compare the courses of the currency, and buy some currency from the international marketing.

Then that person must find the currency, where is able to get a better price, and then sell that currency. If the man is making that thing, there would be problems with the data, what must follow all the time. But there is an answer to every problem with this kind of things, and the answer is the algorithm.

2. Algorithms can revolutionize this kind of trade

When we are thinking about artificial intelligence, that thing would ever get tired. And it would find every change in the courses of currency, and when we are thinking about artificial currencies like bitcoins and other things, what is operating on the internet.

We must understand that those things are only the same kind of currency, what the normal person would handle in every day. The bitcoins and other things are able to buy and sell as the customer wants, and this makes possible to use them as the normal currency.

3. Something has been forgotten

Bitcoins are the common name for each virtual currencies, and this makes very attractive to use them for avoiding taxes. That means that the price of the jobs can also be paid by using Bitcoins.

Sometimes people are worried that those currencies can be used in the illegal narcotics and another kind of trade, which must not be shown to the public eye. And in those cases, the bitcoins are of course an effective tool for that thing, where the origin of the money wanted to hide.

3.1 The purpose of Bitcoins has been good, but if somebody misuses them, that can cause big profits to criminals.

Bitcoins are created for supporting international trade, and the mission of those virtual currencies is that the banks or private persons can transfer money over the borders without bureaucracy. That means that those persons can save a certain sum of bitcoins in the account, and then travel to another country.

If there is an office, what accepts those bitcoins, they will buy those things. And the idea is similar to traveler's cheques, but the operation with that thing is easier if there is firm, what will buy and sell those currencies. When the customer wants to put the money to the bitcoin account, that person buys those things, and when that person would want to draw out that currency, the operator just buys those things back.

4. People who are breaking the law have own rules, and if they will catch about avoiding taxes or some other criminal activities, there are very bad problems ahead.

And the persons, who want to avoid taxes can make own version of the Bitcoins if they want. In this version, the virtual currencies are used as the money storage, where it is easy to transform back to cash. That means that they can send the Bitcoin, what might be some photographs of the gambling mark or playing card. Then the other part of the deal would send the sums to the group of bank accounts because the Bitcoin might have value.

The ace in the playing card might mean millions, and maybe number five means 5000. And that is the illegal or unofficial version of the virtual currency. This kind of versions is really interesting versions of the virtual currencies.

The paradox of poor people is that in the wealthiest states lives poorest people

The paradox of poor people is that in the wealthiest states lives poorest people

1. The natural resource-based economics would not need a highly educated labor force

When people are talking about the wealthy states and people, they are facing a paradox, that in the richest countries lives poorest people. This is a very interesting point of view when we are looking at the segmentation of material and capital in the world. The difference between the poorest and richest people in some nations is very huge, and this advantage is seen also in western countries.

This is the thing, what is somehow interesting because when we are looking at the gross national product, nations are very wealthy. But that money would not benefit individuals, and of course, there is a possibility to get social benefits, but those benefits are coming only if the person is filling the papers, and knows how to seek them. And this is a really interesting thing.

If the person is living in the country, which is really well-known about its natural resources is a higher probability to born poor than the wealthy person, and this is one of the greatest paradoxes on Earth. The thing is that in those nations, who have the greatest natural resources, have the poorest education in the world is something really prominent. The reason for that is that drilling the oil is no need to educated people and because the wealth of those nations is coming from natural resources, there is no need for higher education.

When entire production is made with people, who don't have education, the worker is easy to replace. That thing is a suitable model in some oil fields, but if the nation would not have great natural resources, it must find another source for its incomes. The high-tech industry needs trained people, and that is the reason, why the western world has the superior against those nations, what the main production consists only things like oil and minerals.

If the product of the high-tech industry is immaterial things like computer programs and other things like marketing pages, that means that there is a need for the people, who are working in multiple areas. That means that if we would want to market those programs and other things to a foreign country, we have two possibilities. Of course, we can teach other people to talk our own language or make the homepages by using those people own language. If somebody wants to buy things like screwdrivers from the Internet, that person needs to read, what kind of tools is wanted.

2. Everybody makes mistakes

In this case, there are differences in tools, and if the ordered tools are metered in inches, they are not suitable for tools, what are made for metric systems. If the buyer would not know the difference of inches and centimeters, that would cause very bad problems in the working place. The thing is that if the person makes work, where the most important thing is to be sharp and make complicated codes or write texts, where are complicated things like customs orders or legal things, there must be realized, that in this kind of things is possible to make mistakes.

And people must live with that thing. Nobody is perfect and in some cases, even the best are making mistakes. Of course, is embarrassing, if the person would have to pay more about the merchandise because the customer forgets to mention something, or put some number in the form, and that might cause extra prices.

Some of those extra prices are caused because in the shipment forms are forgotten to mention, that the information about the order is taken from some certain homepages, and if the stuff is ordered by using that information the customer would get it at a lower price.  Those things cause sometimes reclamation because somebody had to pay more, but the maker of the text must live with that thing.

About drugs and marketing the things with them

About drugs and marketing the things with them

The thing is that everything, what is prohibited addicts people, and because we are curious, we want to test everything, what is prohibited. And I personally live in Finland, where marijuana is strictly prohibited, I have sometimes thought that how many people in Finland would travel to the Netherlands every year to smoke that thing. How many people would travel to Amsterdam if marijuana is not legal in that country?  The thing is that this kind of situation, that Marijuana is legal in the Netherlands, but prohibited in other countries has bought very much money to that country because the drug tourists have bought also much other merchandise from that country.

And the drugs are good business for the weapon dealers and another kind of things in the business world. The thing is that keeping the drugs illegal would the government offer jobs for law enforcement, and that is the good thing for the gun sellers. But in fact, I know that many people are thinking, that I will always want to legalize drugs. The thing is that drugs are things that are like alcohol and tobacco. There are many people who don't use those merchandises even if they are legal.

And that thing is a very good thing to think when we are walking on the streets. Many people are not smoke cigarettes or use alcohol. The thing is that every drug is different, and that's why we must speak them as a different kind of products. Heroin and cannabis are not the same, and legalization don't mean that those merchandises would be sold in every market along with candies and other products like lemonade.

And this is the thing, what we are always using arguments when we are saying that some person is naive or childish. But then we must realize, that every time when we are writing something about drugs, we are always thinking that every drug is similar. And the legalization of marijuana is always thing, what is actually the same as the legalization of heroin. After this, we must say, that the legalization of any drug doesn't mean that the drug can sell everybody, who wants to sell those things.

Maybe the legalization of heroin is done in some countries, but the thing is that those persons, who use that thing, must register themselves as users, and that stuff is sold only from the drugstores. And that thing is allowed only for the people, who already are users. With marijuana is the problem, that the government wants to collect the taxes from those leaves. And if the marijuana is legalized, the persons who farm it must pay the taxes as other businessmen do. But the thing is that most users are using that kind of drugs like marijuana.

Critics about the legalization of cannabis

Critics about the legalization of cannabis

The idea of the legalize cannabis or more precisely to say Marijuana is to bring that thing under the government supervision and out of the hands of criminals. The purpose of this act is to decrease the records of the violence, and of course, at the same time decrease the number of prisoners, but the thing is that some people don't understand that the farming of marijuana can be made by industrial purposes. The thing is that private farming is not prohibited might be very good news for the people, who want to smoke marijuana.

But the thing, what is not often mentioned, is that farming cannabis bushes for industrial purposes is a very easy thing and that kind of thing can make marijuana the next generation tobacco, what would replace the cigarettes in the list of the products of Philip Morris and other tobacco producers. That kind of things is not noticed in the act of legalizing marijuana.

The reason, why marijuana was criminalized was actually that it makes people sleepy, and that caused problems if a person is driving the car. But also the cannabis bush is growing anywhere and that makes easy to avoid taxes, and the thing about cannabis is that the farming that vegetable is easier than tobacco, and this product is used also in the medicals, what is used in the withdrawal therapy.

The problem with cannabis is that thing cases addiction in the same way as the tobacco, and if that thing is sold as the cigarettes it can cause similar health problems with cigarettes. And the thing with this kind of product is that the people, who are making strategies for the national health problems are afraid that the production and selling the cannabis as the replacing product of the tobacco would also make possible that the things like lung cancer become more common.