Could the increase in the speed of electrons cause the slowing of the time? (Time dilation)

Could the increase in the speed of electrons cause the slowing of the time? (Time dilation)

The creature that can stop the time in its body would seem a really bad joke. But there is a theoretical possibility, that if some creature could increase the speed of electrons in the layers, it could make the time-slowing effect in the area, what is inside that creature or layer. The effect of how this thing works would be interesting to know, because if it would be caused because the speed of electrons is rising, that would allow us to make the craft, what stands in the stable position, and stops the time inside it. Or in the wildest dreams, we could turn to some kind of atomic man, who can stop the time in the body.

But what that effect would look like, if we would look at the object, where the time has been stopped? That is what we don't know. We could stop the time by using particle accelerator, which will accelerate the capsule to the speed of near the speed of light, and if there would be problems with magnets, the result would be the great explosion. And if we could create an electromagnetic black hole, where we could go inside, the risk would be that the entire planet would pull in that monster.

If we could do that same thing by increasing the speed of electrons, that thing would be much safer. In this text, I will follow the philosophical way to handle things, and that means that creatures can be living or it can be formed the non-living material. And here we are facing one of the most fascinating things in the world, what we ever thought before. That thing is that gravity and speed are slowing time, so would the thing that time moves slower on Earth than in space would cause that there is more energy near Earth than in space.

But when we are thinking about the effect of gravity on the particles, we must realize that there must be something, what makes atoms elding slower in the high speed, or actually at the speed, what is near the speed of light. This thing has been confirmed by sending super heavy atoms what could be existed only a couple of nanosecond traveling the cyclotrons, and the highly radioactive materials have existed longer when the accelerator would drive them at extremely high speed than the atoms, what has been in a stable position.

When we are thinking that the time is moving slower in the moving aircraft, we are right. Atom clocks, what is put inside flying aircraft have worked slower than the atom clocks, which has been in stable places. And the difference between the clocks can meter even the aircraft has flown a single time around the world. So what if the mass of aircraft would increase? That should mean that the atom clock inside the heavier aircraft would move slower, than the atom clock, what has been in the light aircraft. And this has been created one very interesting idea in the mind of physicians. The idea is, what if the aircraft would pump more weight by using electromagnetic radiation.

The idea is that if the electricity would be pumped in some particle, the weight of that particle would increase. This is the thing, why an electromagnetic black hole is possible, but the needed electric power is so huge, that we cannot make that thing true in a thousand years.

There is a theoretical possibility that if we would create the ball-shaped capsule, and take it to the right point of the Earth on a certain day, the very thin gamma-ray burst (GRB:s) would give it that energy. But the prediction of those GRB:s is really difficult (read impossible), and the capsule must be in the absolute right point in the absolute right time.

Theoretically, very thin GRB could pass the Earth between the atoms, and we could not even see that thing. But if we would send the ball-shaped craft, what is covered by using gold leaf, that thing could be possible to create enough energy for creating a black hole. But this thing is pure theory, or rather saying, produce of imagination.

And if that happens to the aircraft, what is using atom clock, that means that the time in the clock would turn slower. So even if the atom clock itself would be protected against the electromagnetic radiation, it must adjust in the case, that aircraft would be targeted by high-power electromagnetic radiation. The needed energy would be the same, what the aircraft would capacitate during the around the Earth flight. That thing would cause problems in high-accuracy meterings, where is used GPS-system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02tchltLm3c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbyxQiMpkio

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Fullerene based hydride materials are giving new ideas for researchers of technology.

Fullerene based hydride materials are giving new ideas for researchers of technology.

Silicon-carbon hybrid fullerenes can revolutionize materials and electric production. Those materials can be used as the fusion devices as well as creating the extreme hard layers.

Fullerenes and silicon are very interesting materials because both of them can be used as creating special layers for layers. If we think about graphene, what is one atom layer of carbon on the layer, that thing would make a very hard surface. And the thing is that the graphene can put on the surface as the dust, where the pencil would cover the entire layer, and then the laser would remove other atom layers away until there would be one atom layer of carbon on the surface.

That thing can revolutionize things like material research.  Graphene has many targets for use from the tools to the layers of aircraft and space technology. The lightweight and extremely hard surfaces have many kinds of purposes in every target from everyday life to space technology. It can use to create harder components for mobile devices but the problem is how to remove extra atom layers from the graphite?

But the thing, what makes graphene more fascinating is that the technology, what is used to create this material can be used also for creating one atom layers from other elements. That means that the graphene would be very nice material itself, but it can be used in the same way the part of hybrid materials. In some scenarios, the graphene layer would be covered by a similar one atom layer of silicon, which makes the layer a very lightweight solar panel.

This kind of thing makes possible to create revolutionary aircraft and another kind of solutions. That kind of technology would improve the abilities of the long-range aircraft like U-2, which are used for extremely long-range intelligence operations. The graphene itself gives to that plane very hard covering layer, but if those layers could also produce electricity, that means that the layer would give more benefit to that aircraft.

One of the things is that those aircraft would need less fuel, and they can even shut down their engines during the flight because the solar panels would give electricity to the systems of that aircraft. And if the aircraft can glide in some parts of their missions, they would make longer operations.

Silicon- carbon hybrid fullerene would make possible to create an extremely small-sized fusion device, which can be launched by using simply the light. And this thing would make it interesting. That thing can use in the spacecraft, what is operating like "Orion", but uses fusion devices for giving the thrust. Replacing fission bombs by fusion, that vehicle could be more ecological.

But when we are thinking about the extremely large fullerene ball, what have billions of carbon atoms, we might think the situation, where that ball would cover by using the silicon atoms. Or it is simply put inside the silicon ball, that thing could make an interesting phenomenon. If there are small antennas inside the fullerene ball, what can be the metal atoms, that thing could create the electric arc inside that ball, and then there would be some gas like deuterium and tritium (or lithium), it can start the fusion reaction.

Of course, there is no need to be billions of carbon atoms in this kind of fullerene ball. Normal 110 atom fullerene, where is another layer of silicon atoms would make possible to create this kind of fusion reactor, which can have very many solutions like in the fusion rockets to nuclear weapons. The fusion rocket would shoot those fullerene pallets behind the spacecraft, and then the radio impulse would hit to them, which causes the explosion. But the silicon layer would make possible to use pure light in that kind of device.

What the artificial brains would look like?

What the artificial brains would look like?

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Artificial brains could look like a group of computers in some warehouse.

When we are thinking about the outfit of the artificial brains, we might think that they look like real brains of the human or animal. In fact, they might look like a group of computers, which is stored in some warehouse, and there could be two groups of computers. The group number one is the group, which simulates the brain core, and the second one group of those PCs are simulating the mirror neurons.

What the artist claims about the picture is not necessary, what it really portraits, is the thing, what gives money to the researchers of the art, and this is the thing, what we must realize. Sometimes also the researchers would claim that they are only the artists, and that kind of things are good to keep in mind. There are many people, who are afraid things like artificial intelligence, and that's the reason, why this kind of research is sometimes covered as the art.

This is the major thing, why some paintings and pictures are causing problems for the researchers. When we are seeing some images, what are claimed to portrait some kind of computer game level or something like that, we might think that the thing is really, what the artist claims, but sometimes there is something strange about those images.

The two groups of PCs are simulating neurons and mirror-neurons.

For the people, who are not taking a look at things like neurology or some kind of aerodynamics, might think that there is really some kind of computer game, but then we might realize that the things in the world of computers are not like they are in nature. One of the things is that neurons and other things might look very different if they have a natural origin than if they would be modeled by computers. In fact, the artificial neurons can actually be the computers, which are operating as the couple.

That means that the first computer can be the primary neuron, and the other one might work as the mirror neuron. This might cause the attempt to create artificial brains doesn't look like anything than the warehouse, where is a group of computers. The first group simulates the brain core, and the second group of computers would simulate the mirror neurons.

After that, the computers would be connected and communicate together by using a WLAN network, but there is one very interesting detail in the action of human brains, the prime neurons would change their place, and actually, the mirror neurons, or the neurons, what are in deeper in the brains would send the data, what is collected from the senses to the brain core, and then the brain core would send the message to the mirror-neurons for the actions, what the observation must cause. So this process is quite easy to model by using the standard computers, which can be placed in some storage.

The quantum processor would act like human brains.

The quantum processor would act like human brains.


The quantum processor is actually a copy of the human brains. There are two layers of microprocessors, what are communicating together. The upper layer is like the brain core and the lower layer would be like the bottom of the brains. And in theory, this is the thing, what could make the quantum processor possible, if the operating system would support that two or more layer 3D structure, what is in structural and operationally copy of the human brains.  About attempts to make a copy of human brains by using transistors is a very interesting question. The problem is that if we would want that transistors would replace neurons, we must remember one thing.

The thing is that we would need 30 to 500 billion transistors for replacing each neuron. And maybe in somewhere in future, we would have nanotechnical way produced transistors for making fully functioning copy of human brains, and in fact, there are persons, who attempted to make similar structures by using transistors and other technical components.

And the thing is that the transistors and later microchips are connected in the 3D-structure, what is filled with polymer. The role of the polymer is to insulate the metal structure from the electromagnetic radiation. And the fat has the same role in human brains.  The human brains are so effective because many neurons would handle the problems at the same time.

This means that the data goes in the human brains in simultaneous rows what comes one after one in the mirror neurons, what brings the thing in the knowledge, and the structure of human brains have been used for creating the quantum processors. But the thing is that we cannot create the operating system for that thing. The quantum processor would have the 3D structure, and it can be like two layers of microprocessors, which are connected together.

The thing is that by using this kind of technology the scientists attempted to create artificial brains, what are learning things like human brains. And this thing has been problematic because even the best and the most powerful computers in the world only the fraction of the transistors, what are needed for creating that structure, and of course, there would be needed the operating system, what will teach that thing to operate.

The artificial intelligence is a strange thing because if it wanted to create that it can spontaneously learn things like humans do, the hardware and software must have more advantages. There is a possibility to create programs and operating system, what can be taught to make decisions on the car, what travels on the road. This system bases the idea, that the programmer would program the system, what has the capacity for image recognition. Then the car would take a little trip with driver and programmer, and the camera what is installed in the car is taking the picture all the time.

And the programmer would mark everything, what comes to the way by telling the car, should it drive slower or evade things like traffic lights or street lights and people. That thing would happen by using the photographs, what the system has collected. A person who would teach that machine would mark every point in the pictures and give instruction, what to do in each situation. If the car would face similar objects, it can use the procedures, what it has done earlier with similar objects. But in fact, there are many risks with this kind of things. And the driver must always find the things, what is going on.

There could happen things like that the programmer forgets to mark some vital targets like humans or pets to the system. And the thing is that the computers would not know anything, what is not programmed in their memory. The thing in machines is that they would never ask anything, and even if they would ask something like "did you forget something" the user can close that window by using the ESC button.

But if the computer would become self-learning it can also ask other computers the instructions, and link it's own database to the other databases, what are stored in the network of the servers. This would be a very nice and easy way in theory to create the program, which can drive a car on the road. Making more complicated things must artificial intelligence have the supporting infrastructure, what is more advanced, larger and complicated.

The problem is that this kind of thing needs more than some 150 billion transistors. The transistors are the thing, which makes microchip operating, but the thing is that the benefit about human brain if that it will start the handling of problems in multiple places. The ability to use many places or centers or nexuses for computing at the same time give the very small thing the very high power computing capacity. And this is the thing, what makes the human brains so fascinating.