In the richest countries live poorest people

In the richest countries live poorest people

The reason why I write this text is the rising temperature of the Earth. Even if we would decrease the level of production of carbon dioxide radically in the Western world, there is a possibility that African countries would make themselves the countries, what are tempting investors by promising softer regulations for creating carbon dioxide and other pollution. That thing will be a great article for the industry, what directors would not feel the responsibility of their way to earn money. And who cares about things, what happens after 100 years?

Many African countries are very rich with their natural resources, and when those countries are making contracts with Western companies, those contracts bring very much money to those countries. But that money ever benefits normal people. The ridicule of faith is that the nations, what have the richest natural resources have also poorest people in the world.

And that kind of things is remarkable when we are looking at the targets for investments. The reason for the bad economic situation in those countries is corruption, which means that most of the benefits of the selling natural resources like oil or minerals are staying to the hands of the political elite.

And most things, what those countries are buying from foreign countries, are military products. But there is another reason for the poorness of those countries, and that thing is that when those countries are selling something to foreign actors, the money what those countries are earning is returning to the bank accounts of western nations and companies. The reason for that is that those countries are buying everything from foreign countries. They would buy the maintenance for the water supply from the foreign operators.

And that kind of contracts, where the basic infrastructure of the country is maintained by the foreign company. That thing would make the country very vulnerable for the influence, what comes from the companies, what is connecting to that maintenance work. If everyday actions in the electric and water supply are giving to the foreign actors, that will guarantee the profits for those companies, and of course.

The leading class of the country would earn very good money, because of the bills of those contracts would give handling money to the top officials. But when we are looking at the economic and educational structure of those countries, the top men of those governments are trained in western universities, where the government and the families of the trainee pay the payments and costs.

But I don't know what kind of other educational structure is in those countries. When we are thinking about people like electricians and technicians, I don't know what kind of training those people have in that kind of third world nations. The bad situation of democracy, what those countries are also well-known is the reason for rich natural resources.

Those resources allow paying payments for the mercenary soldiers, who are protecting the government, or who would pay their salaries. And the mercenary soldiers are supporting the leaders of the areas, where the natural resources are easy to benefit. That means that in the places, like the Democratic Republic of Congo is many governments, who are getting support from warlords and mercenary soldiers.

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

"Keep them poor" is one very good motto for people, who want society, where people cannot advance by their own work. But why somebody wants to make the class-society, where the only couple of people would have real rights and the rest of people would be very poor?

 In that kind of societies, the thing is that this set would separate the high-class people from the ordinary people, and if so-called regular people would be poor, they would not have time to get education and rise in the hierarchy. If the people would be working all day in the heavy physical working, they would not know about better things, because they spend all day in the workplace, and then get home as tired, that they would not able to get an education.

Every people makes mistakes

In this model, the ruling class is hiding behind the mask of perfection, and that kind of things are seen in the way, how some people are sharing articles about persons like computer specialists. The computer workers or specialists like micro support people and programmers are people, who are working in the area, where is not many layers between the leaders and workers, and there might be not henchmen, who can be blamed if the work is not done well.


And that would make possible that the henchmen would see, that the boss is not a perfect man or woman. Those people would uncover only the regular members of Homo Sapiens species, who can make mistakes, and that removes the image of perfection. The reason why some people are fighting against things like artificial intelligence and social media is, the same in both cases.

All writings are not propaganda

The artificial intelligence would eliminate the method where some person can get the benefit because the handler of the information would not have time to read some things in the files. One of the things might be how many speeding tickets would some person get, and the second thing is that how many of the other drivers would get speeding ticket in the same size crossing of the speed limit in the same police district.

That would tell if somebody is a little bit "more equal" than others. Also, artificial intelligence would control equipment and that would give people more free time for hanging in the social media, and the social media can uncover that there is something wrong with the workplaces or attitudes of the bosses or other people, who would be hiding behind the image of perfection. But the major problem in social media is not that there are people, who are hanging in there all day.

Social media is a very effective tool for disinformation and propaganda. That thing is an effective tool for making contact with youngsters and giving them hardcore propaganda, but there is another point of view of that thing. There is also justified protests on the Internet, and that kind of things are really problematic for the police and military forces. If the protesters would just march across the city, would the situation handle by riot police and denying to publish the images of the protests.

Things always have two sides, and sometimes there is no right side

Of course, some provocation can break a couple of windows, what justifies the use of force to scatter the demonstration, what is defined as the riots, and breaking the property would give legislation and justification for using the violence against rioters. The social media would give another image of the demonstrators, and maybe we are wanted to see those things in some other point of view.

That means that there might be two very undemocratic parts against together, and this is the thing, what we have seen in Arab nations. There were dictators, who were replaced by new dictators after the Arab spring, who are continuing the same politics against their own people, and that thing means that the same way continues, but the faces in the official wall paintings are changed.

Things like social media would uncover things, like some very famous people would not have opinions at all. The thing, what makes social media very interesting thing, and that makes it problematic for the people, is that it is a very good environment to share information. Those solutions and environment are really easy to use, and they can be a very good tool for telling things, but there is a one really bad thing, In social media would be uncovering things that some very nice and cool person cannot talk about anything else than some clothes.