The direction of the gravitation.

The origin of the next theory is the elementary particle looks like a whisk. So the superstrings are forming rings that are causing the electromagnetic low-pressure in the middle of the particle. When that whisk-looking structure rotates. That motion causes the electromagnetic wave motion or gravitational waves are traveling inside the structure. 

And they are causing a situation where impacting wave motion is forming the electromagnetic emptiness or so-called warp bubble inside elementary particles. Or they can form standing-bubble-looking gravitational waves. 

Those gravitational waves can make the situation that the wave motion jumps out from the bubble and forms the warp bubble around that standing wave motion. Maybe that thing could also explain a thing called dark energy. 

That thing can happen straight. Or the impacting gravitational waves are causing the oscillation of that whisk-looking structure called an elementary particle. The superstrings that are forming this structure are acting like antennas. 

That there forms tiny warp bubbles or small black holes in the middle of that structure. Or there is the possibility that the warp bubble forms a small black hole inside it. The size of those structures is far smaller than quarks. 

The thing is that: Warp bubbles or quantum black holes can form similar-looking effects. And another fact is that those things are not confirmed. So everything that reads here is theoretical. 

So can gravitation be a pushing or pulling force? That thing is one of the biggest things that researchers must solve before the GUT-Theory (Grand (or the great) Unified Theory) can be done. There is a possibility that the artificial black holes that are made by using 2D atom structures can solve the gravitational problem. 

The thing that forms the hole in the 2D atom structure is the electron that jumps back to the 3D form. That electron leaves the hole in the structure behind it. Then the side-coming quantum fields are starting to fill that hole. And that thing can create the tower in the center of the hole that can be from the 3D material. 

The quantum ring that surrounds that hole can deny that the wave motion can travel over it. And it can form a standing wave motion in the 2D structure. That thing can cause a situation where the Schwinger-effect forms the 3D material. The reason for that is that the wave motion or superstrings can travel over that wave. And then that thing forms the situation where the wave motion can form the whisk-looking structure. 

Theoretically, an elementary particle's model is a whisk-looking structure. That is forming of a series of quantum rings. That is similar to the form of the holes in the 2D atoms. And that thing means that there are similar-looking holes in this whisk-looking structure. 

Because those quantum rings are rotating those structures are leaving electromagnetic waves inside them. When the electromagnetic or quantum wave motion hits to particle, a little bit of that wave motion or energy jumps out from the particle or its quantum fields. So that thing could be the reflection of the gravitational waves. 

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything