Do you know, what is the ideology of your candidate during the election?

Do you know, what is the ideology of your candidate during the election?

One word more about political commercials, we should know who we are voting, what is the ideology of that group, and what kind of things it supports? The thing is that what if some politician starts to act in parliament against things, what has been promised during the campaign?

The problem with political campaigns is that they are made by the people, who are professional salesmen. They might write speeches to the politician, who might not even think about some things and the thing what those people, who are working in those campaigns are offering is the change to get a place in the political system.

At first, those people must get a candidate, who they would sell to people, who will give votes. Sometimes some people are saying that selling a politician to the people is the same thing as selling soap to customers. But at the first sales team must get a candidate, wh would believe them. And then they must get money for commercials because they must make sure, that people listen to their man. They must confess that their politician has something to give for the regular people.

Regular people are making a decision, who they will vote in the election. So the policy and the promises must be adjusted for pleasing the regular people and financial leaders. The thing is that there are more cleaners that top directors of enterprise companies. And in real elections only the votes, what are given have mean. If some candidate would get more votes than others, that means that the candidate has been elected.

And here I don't write about American way to elect presidents. There the number of electors, who are elected from each state is crucial. That means that the campaign makers are making focus, what states are important to them. And wich states would get less attention. And in the USA the person, who gets fewer votes can be elected to the president if the number of election men would be greater.

And at the last, I must say, that if those people, who would work in the election campaigns get their own man or woman in the top place of the political pyramid, that means that they would get a job, where is a good salary. They would be hired to next campaigns, and that is the reason, why the entire team must and will do their best in those cases.

One writing about political commercials

One writing about political commercials

Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?

But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.

Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.

Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.

Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.

But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.

We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.

And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.

Why somebody resisted revolutions?

Why somebody resisted revolutions?

Here we should ask, why somebody would resist revolution in every society? The revolution is the violent method to change society and people who want to resist it are arguments their way to think, that society needs a calm advantage. The violence would support the power in the country, and that is a good argument for people, who want to reduce the freedom of speech.

And the otherwise the question is that, who makes decisions of the material, what can be published and what is banned? And who would select things, what are printed in the school books? Those persons have the power to decide, what kind of thoughts people would think and what models the children get. People who resist revolution argue against fast changes. They call this slow advancing the natural advantage, which means that society is like a flowing river, which would travel across time.

That thing, what we are calling as"flowing society" would make it's route peacefully and calm over the state, and the attempts to change that thing fast causes violence. Those people think that changes in society must happen by using their weight, and the changes are inevitable, but they must have time to happen in a peaceful process.

Those people are saying that fast movements in the track of society are causing more resistance than peaceful and sharply investigated change. But the change would always be in front of us. There is nothing stable in the world than change. And when we are thinking about the change, there is always something, which makes the first action.

And if the people would think that censorship is the cure for that thing, they must realize that if there are many things dammed behind the iron doors, that means that the pressure for change is also dammed. That thing means that when the dams are opened that would cause violent effects. That's why those changes must flow freely.

Democracy is the right to know things, and that makes that thing a more complicated thing than we ever thought. The thing is that democracy is one itself an ideology. But it is the thing that offers the base of many ideologies. And the worst case in the democracy is that, what if people don't know how they are voting. Or what kind of people they are elected to parliament?

If we want to misuse something democracy is the perfect tool for that kind of thing. The populism can give tools, which allows marketing own ideology on the internet by using things like alcohol taxes and VAT for selling own ideas to normal people. There is one little thing, that is ever mentioned when we are talking about democracy. In the publicity is not a sharp description of the populism, and that thing is the good word to crush political resistance of own ideology.

And philosopher Rousseau said once that people must be taught to think the right way. Or did he say that "people must learn to think the right way"? The first version means that the government tells people, how they should think and vote. The second version is that people would self learn, what is best for them. And the problem in both of those models is that who will say, what is the right way to think?

People would get their knowledge from the sources, what they are allowed to use. That means that the selectors of material would always affect the opinions of the people. This would cause question, who decides the books and homepages, what are published, and what are banned from the Internet, bookstores, and libraries. One of the worst cases that can happen to state is that it is lead by the popular dictator, who would crush minorities for taking popularity.

Why Russian military exercises are in Baltic sea, but its interests are in the arctic area?

Why Russian military exercises are in Baltic sea, but its interests are in the arctic area?

There is one answer to that question and that is the Baltic sea is more suitable for training area than Barents sea, because water is not so deep in the Baltic sea, and the area is smaller. If submarine would hit to the bottom of the sea, the crew is easier to rescue than in the deep sea areas.

Also, the ships and other vessels are finding each other easier in the Baltic sea, but there is one thing, what would raise the value of Baltic sea in the eyes of Kremlin. That is publicity. Every single movement, what those troops make can be confirmed from the neutral states, and leaders of Russia hopes that those orgulous military exercises with highly trained troops would help Russia in their political purposes in the internal politics of those countries.

And also the Russian headquarters hopes that the psychological effect would shut the mouths of the persons, who are supporting the foreign policy, what Russians think as hostile. The message what Russian military wants to give is that every hostile action against Russia would be responded with force. One thing, what is the goal of the Russian political control is that the freedom of speech against the leaders of Russia must be stopped. 

The actions, what Kremlin has made against political opposition are not things, what it wants to show to western- or any media. In those cases, the best thing, what those leaders would hope, is that people would be silent about arresting. And the answer, what Kremlin leaders would give to people is that they got food and circus pleasures. Normal people would not need to take part in politics, because the decisions are made by using information, what is not public. And that supports the power of Putin and his closest men.

When we are thinking about the military exercises in the Baltic sea, that place would be better to flight camera crews above the air cushion vehicles and highly trained special forces. Another thing, what is meant for supporting people, who are conforming the politics of Kremlin are high-yield thermonuclear weapons, what mission is to give an excuse to follow the rules of Kremlin.

And if those weapons would be used the destruction area would be thousands of kilometers. If Kremlin decides to use 60 megatons nuclear weapons would destroy entire Europe if they are dropped to Berlin. The 50 megatons "Tsar" bomb created the pressure wave, what traveled three times around the world when it was detonated in above Novaya-Zemlya in the 30 October  1963. This device is the highest power thermonuclear device, which has ever detonated in the atmosphere. And the same yield warheads have been installed in the Russian SS-18 "Satan" missiles. Those missiles are the biggest nuclear missiles, which is in service in any country.

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Brexit with or without an agreement, that is the message of the Boris Johnson the political Ed Sheeran

Do you notice the similarity between images of pop-star Ed Sheeran and the political star Boris Johnson, who is now the prime minister of Great Britain? Boris Johnson is now the prime minister in Great Britain, and he says that Britain would leave the EU with or without agreement. And Johnson has been said, that Great Britain would not pay the severance pay. But who cares about those things anyway, would the EU declare war to Great Britain, if that money would not be paid. What is the real choice in that situation?

The thing is that the Brexit is the storm in some glass of water, what locates in some cabinets, and if that thing has something to do with regular people is, that they will lose 12 000 workplaces. That thing does mean anything when people are hearing when Britain is great again. But do you know, what makes Boris Johnson a very effective politician?

The answer is simple Boris Johnson is different than others. The image with unkempt hair would be similar to Ed Sheeran, and because Johnson seems different the reporters would come to his and ask things. And the media writings where that man claimed to be some kind of "motormouth" makes him more interesting. Of course, tough speeches are also giving trust in the eyes of electors, and the terms what that man uses are very easy to understand.

But who cares about those things. Boris Johnson is a very popular person in Britain because that kind of people is normally very successful politicians. Boris Johnson is like the political version of Ed Sheeran, the man who would talk things, what regular people wants to hear. And that makes those persons very easy to understand. They will drive their political agenda very effectively, and that makes them easy to hear.

Social Darwinism and Western society

Social Darwinism and Western society

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

What social Darwinism actually mean?

Term social Darwinism means the theory, that only the strong persons are suitable for living in society, and the weak individuals would be removed, and this is the thing, what makes some people love this ideology. The Darwinism is visible in the business life because if the people would not buy merchandise from some company, that would cause the bankruptcy or as Darwin would say, the elimination from the environment.

But the thing is that this way to think is not suitable for humans. We cannot leave other people dying in the streets, is the western way to think. But that is not true in every place on Earth. There are still places, where people are dying in the streets. The idea of social Darwinism is in the most exacerbating the predestination ideology of some societies. The predestination means that if the person would be born in some social class, that means that the social position of that person have been preordered when that person has been born.

That kind of theories is very popular in the high-class Indians, whose position is very good compared to other people.  Hinduism justifies those people to rule the nation, what is the only thing that can be in the eyes of the high-class society. Leaders of the team would not see anything wrong that they would get better salaries than others, or they can say anything, what they want to others.

If we are thinking the leaders of the group, their children probably would like the situation, that only they are able to get the places in higher education and the leadership in the big corporations when they were born, and this is the thing that supported the absolute monarchy. Only the noblemen had the right to get an education because they had the right to rule the land, what came from the god.

Low-rank superiorities are also bosses

The modern military ranks are coming from the noblemen era. The lower rank personnel sometimes forget that they are in the superior position to their henchmen. That means they can order the henchmen to do anything, what they want. When we are thinking about the lower military ranks like lieutenants they might seem very low if we compare them to generals. But the fact is that those lower rank military men can order their henchmen to make every single job, what the superiorities would give them.

That means that for the henchmen those lower rank persons would not be so nice as you might think, and if you have seen the movies like  "Full metal jacket" you know what I mean.  And as you see, the people who have a good position in some society don't see anything wrong about the things that nobody would ever rise to the higher rank position from some environment. When we are thinking about the purity of society, we must realize, that the cases, where wealthy people are isolated from normal or poor people also isolate them from reality.

The isolation supports the prejudice

That means that some factory leader would not want to allow, that the family children would not talk with the people, who live in slums. This thing would cause that those children would get poison in their mind, that something can be changed. And the thing is that those people, who have the power on those societies are covered their position by the high-rank education, which means that they are wiser than others.

But if there is a problem with the cases, where those isolated leaders would discuss with other people. They always play something, what is above all other members of the society, and they are actually portrayed as the exhaustless leaders, and then happens the thing, where those persons would not find the simple solution. That can break the image of those people in the eyes of henchmen.

When despotism turns against the ruler

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

When despotism turns against the ruler 

When we are thinking about the Emperor of Russia, we must say that the final end for that way to rule made the emperor himself. The thing is that the despotism, what made the emperor so powerful caused that he was under the threat, what other people ever thought. That threat was that people afraid the emperor, and the despotic way to rule caused that the agitators claimed, that emperor killed people if that person didn't like food, what was served in the front of that man.

And that kind of things caused the situation, that the despotism turned against the user of power. The situation was similar to what Alexander the Great faced during his campaigns. The problem with that man was heavy drinking, and during those parties, Alexander took sometimes a sword and started an attack against other people, who were with him, and the worst thing is that he lost his memory during the parties.

Did somebody just murder Alexander the Great by using Krav-Maga?

The bodyguards didn't do anything to stop that man when he sways with swords and pikes. That caused the thing, that those people could claim everything to Alexander, who lost his memory. One of the things about this case is that Alexander was becoming a terrifying person, who was afraid by other people, who didn't dare to tell a thing to that man, who became monster while he was drunk.

And because he lost his memory, the assassins could just claim, that he made something to the person, who laid the sword in the chest. Maybe his bodyguards killed that man and just told the story about the poisoning. When we are thinking about the way, how Alexander behaves and how violent he was, the real reason for death might be some kind of strikes to head or stomach.

In that case, even the step on the stomach would cause the rip of the stomach or speel, and that might cause similar symptoms with the poison. And that might happen also by accident, when somebody, who was drunk just step over the stomach of Alexander the Great, who was maybe off. or those people might play the game, who has the strongest stomach muscles, and that will cause death if Alexander overestimated his strength, or did he just slip and hit his head? The symptoms would fit also to the concussion or internal blood leak in the brains.

But if Alexander the Great was murdered, the killer must be sure that there is no blood or signs of external violence. Maybe the killer used the Krav-Maga-style self-defense or combat skills, and in that case, the report, what was made because of the death of Alexander might be faked. I don't know about the way, how the death of the emperor was told to the people at that time and was the medical reports public. But the case of Alexander the great the news for death of that man would not enter his homeland immediately.

There could be taken years when the ordinary people would even know about the death of the leader, who took his army to India. And at last, we might think one question: "How good were the autopsies in that time"? Or if Alexander was dead because the bodyguard used deadly force, would that man just tell that to others, because it might cause death, because of the death penalty was given by murder of the King.

What's the problem with rap music?

What's the problem with rap music? 

The problem with the information is that it would not get only from one channel.  Modern youngsters use many channels to get things, what they want, and that would cause problems for moderators. When we are thinking about the elder people attitude for youngsters, especially in the patriarch systems, we are facing the paradox. The leaders of the government, who are playing the elder and wiser men, are saying that there is no mean, what youngsters are saying, but then there would be 2000 policemen in that place, and that tells that there is something, what has the meaning for that the leaders.

And there is one very big thing, what drives the nation in that situation. There is one thing in the trust of the Kremlin leaders and that is the relationship with Orthodox church. If the person would be deeply religious in one day and the atheist on the second day and that opinion would change simultaneously, depending on who is asking that would destroy the trust for that person.

The thing what makes that situation worse is, that the young people are following multiple channels and the censorship of the government would not have time to remove the awkward things even from their own channels because the mass material what would deliver will be huge because the media can transform to the studio or transmitter immediately after when it's filmed. And the censors have no time to see every minute from the broadcasting.

Every program even in the state-controlled media is not political or cultural. There are many other movies, like traveling programs where the censorship is not so sharp, and there might happen mistakes when some reporter introduces the culture of some village. During the making of the program are those people starting to drink bowls for the friendship between Kremlin and that village.

Why youngsters are following multiple channels to get information?

Young people don't have money to buy new television sets, which are very expensive, and that's why they are rather buying laptop computers, which allows them to see many things, and that thing is a problem. If some person goes to see wrong homepages, that would give them influence, what the government doesn't want them to get. And here we must ask, what is the problem with some music style?

 Why does it poison the mind of the youngsters? Is that music somehow aggressive, or is it agitating people to violence? Or is the problem that the skateboard people have the too high condition, that the army leaders or drill instructors would not manage to jog in the side of new rookies. The thing is that if something does not matter, that means that there would not need to bring some special forces to the place.

The thing is that if some music would disturb the leaders of the Kremlin, that means that it makes it more and more interesting. When we are thinking about the governments, we might ask one question: who speaks in the name of those organizations?

Is the problem that the poorly paid workplaces as the OMON-troopers would not interest the youngsters? The thing is that high prize jobs are reserved to the friends of Kremlin and the rest of people would not be allowed to think anything about that. The thing is that the thinking is prohibited if the thoughts are not similar, what the leaders would accept.

Artificial intelligence and visions of the end of the human race

Artificial intelligence and visions of the end of the human race

The artificial intelligence, what will take control of Earth, and the case, where this thing would turn against the human race is a common thing in the science fiction stories. The thing is that artificial intelligence would not need to use bullets and nuclear weapons for destroying the humans is not very often handled thing, and the thing what artificial intelligence can use are the silent methods, and one of the most effective ways to terminate entire nations is just denied them to get children. Denying the people to get children would be not noticed in the media, because this kind of operations would not need guns. And the epidemic would not be deadly. People would just get sterilize and that's it. Nobody notices a thing, before its too late.

Without children, the entire population would cease it's being. And the best or the most silent way to make that thing is the infect people with mumps, which destroys the egg cells or testis.  Sometimes we are thinking about our relationship with artificial intelligence by choosing the way of view, that could the artificial intelligence or algorithm have rights like humans and animals. And if artificial intelligence has the rights to be and feel, we must take an induction step in this philosophical thought.

We can ask the question, can we someday vote the artificial intelligence to the position of the president, and that is a very interesting way of thinking about that very complicated thing, what might be also very devastating. The artificial intelligence can collect all data, what we have imputed into the social media, and if the program is sophisticated enough, the system can create the campaign, what pleases the most of the people, and that's why the artificial intelligence could get the place of the president.

But in this case, the things, what people write in the social media would form the artificial intelligence, and the thing is that kind of algorithm can act as the dream president and keep the permissions. But we have not thought about the one exception, and that thing is the "shadow protocol", what might make the artificial intelligence one of the horrifying thing in the world. When we are thinking about the case that artificial intelligence would take control of the world and destroys the human race it would not probably operate like the terminator and begin the war against the humans.

That algorithm can make unable to live by using pollution or some organisms, what might destroy the egg cells or testis of mankind, and that would destroy the entire human race. And artificial intelligence has time to operate. And the way how this thing could take control of the society is that thing makes itself very important. One way is to destroy all scientists from the Earth, and then the creation of the serums and vaccines against that supermums is impossible.

And one way to make the operation is to use genome tests, what has been taken from the fetus, and then cause some infection to the women, who would have to get the intelligent children, and that would give chance to deny the creation of the new medicals. This is one version, where artificial intelligence would take the power on the Earth, and in this operation would not shoot any bullet.

The human race would just die because there would not be any new children, and then the power turns to artificial intelligence in a couple of generations. The thing is that this would be the thing called "silent holocaust". People would not even notice that they would not get any children anymore. And artificial intelligence can live through generations. And it can copy itself to other computers. This is one of the dystopian visions about this theme, which is very interesting but at the same time frightening.