Do you know, what is the ideology of your candidate during the election?

Do you know, what is the ideology of your candidate during the election?

One word more about political commercials, we should know who we are voting, what is the ideology of that group, and what kind of things it supports? The thing is that what if some politician starts to act in parliament against things, what has been promised during the campaign?

The problem with political campaigns is that they are made by the people, who are professional salesmen. They might write speeches to the politician, who might not even think about some things and the thing what those people, who are working in those campaigns are offering is the change to get a place in the political system.

At first, those people must get a candidate, who they would sell to people, who will give votes. Sometimes some people are saying that selling a politician to the people is the same thing as selling soap to customers. But at the first sales team must get a candidate, wh would believe them. And then they must get money for commercials because they must make sure, that people listen to their man. They must confess that their politician has something to give for the regular people.

Regular people are making a decision, who they will vote in the election. So the policy and the promises must be adjusted for pleasing the regular people and financial leaders. The thing is that there are more cleaners that top directors of enterprise companies. And in real elections only the votes, what are given have mean. If some candidate would get more votes than others, that means that the candidate has been elected.

And here I don't write about American way to elect presidents. There the number of electors, who are elected from each state is crucial. That means that the campaign makers are making focus, what states are important to them. And wich states would get less attention. And in the USA the person, who gets fewer votes can be elected to the president if the number of election men would be greater.

And at the last, I must say, that if those people, who would work in the election campaigns get their own man or woman in the top place of the political pyramid, that means that they would get a job, where is a good salary. They would be hired to next campaigns, and that is the reason, why the entire team must and will do their best in those cases.

The problems of problematic media

The problems of problematic media


The problematic media or media channel is causing more problems if its name would be mentioned in the news. The thing that somebody wants to close that thing makes people think, that there is something, what those people don't want to show other people, and that begins the search over the Internet because millions of people want to find out those secrets, and that's why the thing that some things like social media would be mentioned as the problem would operate like magnet. It would start to pull new users for that channel because people are curious, what might be the problem of that channel.

The thing is that people would like to see, when something, what is mentioned as the waste of time or what would have no meaning, will become the thing, what would create the interest for that channel, and in this case, the censorship or denying something would turn against its own purpose. In this time we must realize, that the attempts to mention that somebody has been as an example in the mental hospitals would cause the induction question, and that is, why this person was in that place? And where that kind of information has been getting?

But we all know that there is information, what might be embarrassing for each of us. And that thing makes the use of the Internet very complicated thing. If a person would start to campaign against the media, where the information have been delivered, that would make other people curious, what is the real bad thing in real life. And we have many depressing examples about the cases, where the censorship or attempt to deny some artist have caused the opposite effect, what the censors would want.

The career of the artist has turned to upwards and the number of sold records have been increasing. And that was very good for the music and entertainment industry. This kind of artists who have caused discussions or otherwise caused reactions in the public media are interesting artists. The same method is used in many political campaigns in history, and one of the most important and effective ways to bring publicity and popularity to the politician is "coming out of the locker".

And that means that politician would give a picture that "this person has guts". That kind of things would be a very good way to get votes, but that thing is a little bit worn and the audience wants something different than the series, where tens of politicians are coming out of the locker. One of the most effective examples from history, where the adult movie star have been got the place in parliament as the deputy of the Radical party is Cicciolina or Ilona Staller, who was elected to the Italian parliament in 1987. You might check that information by using Wikipedia.

That person campaign based the sexual material, where that adult film actress performed herself. And after that many other politicians and artists have been used the "nude film history" as the key to making themselves interesting, and giving the image as the liberal and nice persons. They have seen in many elections like governor candidates as the user as the source of the news, where those things have been mentioned. Also, many public persons have openly talked about their mental problems and problems with drugs, and many times those persons have told about those things in public TV broadcasts and social media.