Activism and problems with writings on social media.

Activism and problems with writings on social media.

In the past days, there was a very good way to handle activists, and that thing is that those persons have stamped as the sick. And then the divorcement or kicking off from the working place has been argued by things like depression or some other mental problems that are not tolerated in the working life. The idea has been taken from Nazi Germany, where the mental illness was the reason for arrest and kill people, who had opinions what were not tolerated by the Nazi government, and still in many dictatorial countries the mental illness is the cover for the political arrests and imprisoning. When we are thinking the climate activism, there are many times connected terms like climate angst.

That term has been created for ridiculing people, who have been worked for nature. And in that thing is always connected news, where the people who are been political activists are shown to a public audience as some kind of freaks, who are going to the cold shower. When we are thinking about angst, we might ask what would you think, if you are facing the mocking all day, and what if the windows of your car would be broken all the time, or on your door would be painted the image of the penis? Would you like that thing? Or what would you like that all the times, when you send the E-mail for somebody, people think that those things are good topics for comments like you will face "little accident", while you are fishing in some lake? If that thing feels good, that's it.

Strange detail in the comments, what has given by Greta Thunberg and her fight for the climate, is sometimes there have been the only words the age and Asperger. Those things are looking very interesting like somebody wants to ask that girls parents for taking notice about the actions what this girl has been done. There have also been Tweets that there could happen "accident" on the sea, and those things are a really bad thing.

What if something happens, and the police would see that kind of writings?  There are many people, who would remove the climate activism from media, and the thing what makes this kind of things very embarrassing. The thing is that if we would want to make something about this climate changing, we should abjure something, what is dear for us.

Over a century the car has been the mark of the social position, and it has been a symbol of freedom, but the problem is that most of the carbon dioxide releases come from the traffic. And if we must abjure our right to own car, that means that something more than just the movement equipment has been cut from our life. What kind of life the boss could live, if that person must sit on the next of the ordinary workers?

The car has offered a good shield against so-called working-class people. When the boss is sitting in his city jeep, nobody could ask about the things, like why that boss always roar to the certain henchmen. I know that this kind of things are not the business of henchmen, and they can be divorced. The superiorities don't need to hear the opinions of henchmen, and that's the law. But somebody might talk about that kind of things, and that doesn't feel nice.

But the car has also given many excuses when some person wants to show the position or just flee from working. The excuse for being or staying out from the office would be that somebody has scratched the painting and the car must be taken to a police station and repairment, and if a person doesn't own the car, that problem would not exist.

I have seen similar things somewhere else, and when somebody writes or talks about something, what does not please everybody, there is the text about autism or something else. That thing is quite remarkable because of those kinds of things are something, what is showing something, what is from very deep.

So when we are thinking about children and their opinions, they might look like a little bit naive, but that kind of things are normal, because they don't have life experience. But then we must say that the Earth belongs also for those people, and one thing in climate activism is that we are always thinking that people don't care about the Earth. But they must open their eyes. Sometimes I have seen comments, that some people have not liked my way to write, and they offer the ring around my eye or bury me in the very deep hole.

The thing in carbon dioxide is that it is not a thing like carbage. If I would throw the candy paper to the road, I would get even penalty for that thing. But when some factory releases 20 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide or dumps the waste to the ground, that would seem nothing on television. When we are thinking about carbon dioxide and dumping it to the water system, that thing would turn to carbonic acid. And that thing has the same effect in every water system.

The question about social media is who owns those services?

The question about social media is who owns those services? 

And what kind of data would be interesting the spies? The answer is the data, which can be used for blackmailing operations. If some politician or net activist, who claims to fight for the animal rights would be a catch for the hunting trip to Africa, those persons might lose their friends and the voters of those people might leave.

When the leaders of the social media companies are telling about their privacy policies, and that they don't share their information with the other service providers or marketing services, we always forget one thing. There might be long chains of the companies between the real owner and social media service, and that means that the real owner of the social media company can own many other services.

And the things, what would those companies get from the Internet are giving them to make a psychological profile of that person. If we are thinking about the ability to connect data, what is collected from some different social media applications, we would see, how the public opinion differs from the private discussions. 

But if we would connect data from the social media and as an example the bookstore, we can find many things about the targeted person opinions, attitudes, and orientations. One thing is that the data, what would be collected can uncover many things. There are some little mistakes, what uncover if the person might be different, what claims to be.

One is that if the person, who claims to be a woman, often buys underpants, what is meant for men. Of course, that person can buy them to husband, or the man buys often pantyhoses tampons and make-ups, would that tell something about the user of the account.

Or what would some animal right protester do with the ammunition of Safari-rifle? Those things are really interesting things when people are connecting the data between social media and other sources. And those things might be very awkward for some people. That thing can destroy those persons immediately.

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

The leader of OPEC (Organization of the Petrochemical Exporting Countries) has been nervous about this environmental activism, and that shows that activism has an influence on that kind of powerful actors. The thing is that the position of the leading actors of producers of the oil and natural gas exporters the leaders of those countries have guaranteed their position in the international field.

If some nation would make those actors angry, it will face the rise of the price of the petrochemical products. And the position of the ruler of those vital natural resources has been caused, that those leaders have been above the judgment of the public media.

The economic power of OPEC is really large, and that power has caused, that the Western world has got the problems to justify the bombardments, what has made the alliance, what is lead by Saudi-Arabia. And there is another very big thing in the natural resource trade. The rise of the military power of Russia has been financing by the Western World by buying the natural gas and oil from Russia.

So this makes very difficult to speak about the problems, what oil and natural gas would cause in the world. Every single kilowatt of energy, what is produced by using another method than buying the oil and natural gas from OPEC is taking money off the pocket of those countries.

But when we are talking another thing about activism, we might face the thing, that it would bring the mind of the people other things than OPEC. The thing is that there are many things, what we have kept something considered self-evident. And when we are thinking about things like cars and other things, they have been symbols for the independent people. If people would not have cars, there would be a big loss of the taxes, what the government collects from people.

But the activism itself has turned the world. In the past keeping silence about the difficult and communal things have been kept as the mark of being adult. And the activism itself has been the thing, what was somehow childish. There have been claiming, that the activism has no influence for the rulers, and people should keep their mouth shut when big boys are talking.

If somebody had a different kind of opinions should go to get some help. But as we see, if somebody would get nervous or attacks against activists, the thing what those people say has got influence. And the purpose of activism is to cause the influence on the people, that they would see the things, what activist wants them to see.

Activism and the directive of the copyrights

Activism and the directive of the copyrights

Sometimes social media uncovers things what people would not want to show to the public audience. One of the examples is that the vegan has eaten the flesh of the fish, and those people are very sharp that they would not eat a thing, what comes from the animals.  But social media is a very powerful tool, what might use to uncover many secrets, what people might want to hide from the other people. One of the things is that some politicians and political activists are caught by living against the things, what they are claiming to support.

Also, there are things, where the leading politician have uncovered little secrets, and one of them is those persons have not even administrated their social media accounts, and they have hired people, who have written the things in the social media, what other people are admiring. That kind of things is a little embarrassing. Or those activists would not even have any single opinions, what they are written by themselves.

There is a thing, what we must realize when we are talking about the freedom of speech and other things, and it is that there are people, who will like to shut down entire social media because it will tell people things, what those people would not want to show to the public audience. Those things are actually things like complicated political relationships between activists, politicians and the financial power, which means the supporters of the election campaigns.

The thing is that there are activists, who would have things, what they want to hide, and one of them is that there are rumors, that those people have taken money or some other profits from the producers of food, and that means that some strikes against the fur farms are some way suspicious. There are claiming that some persons, who are portrayed as the leaders of the ALF (Animal Liberation Front) are actually driving by using Mercedes Benz and they are using the activism only as the route to parliament.

That means that those people are agitating underage people to make the strikes in the fur farms, and then they would just use that thing for getting publicity for their political career, and also those people would sometimes have will to inform their entire gang to police because they want to clean their criminal registration. There is big money in food marketing, and it's not the same thing, where the sausage makers buy their flesh for their merchandise, and here I must say that there are rumors, that somebody wants to use the ideology for the animal rights for things like improve political career, and also targeting the food producers to buy their merchandises from another country.

And the ideology of those people is, "nothing that people sees does exist". That means that those people are trying to move the production of the flesh to other countries or remove embarrassing material from the internet, and allow to deny the things, what is not supporting their agenda.

That means that those persons have chosen the only targets, where lives cute animals, and nobody actually says things for supporting the animals like pigs, what are not so cute. The thing in the activism is that the people would want to give justice for animals, and I don't like furs because of the reasons for the animal rights, but why nobody defends the disgusting animals, what is also suffering because of pollution?

This is not a joke, there have not even seen the pictures of pigs or slugs in the demonstrations, and the last ones are taking the nutrient straight by using their skin. There is also claimed, that some animal protectors are avoiding their home villages and that some fur farmers have actually called those animal activists in their farms because that kind of things would include the things, what those activist leaders don't want to show their people. Those demonstrations, which includes texts "ALF" are a very good method to ask weapon carrying license for own safety.