Does the anti-version of dark matter exist?

Does the anti-version of dark matter exist?

Could there be a possibility for the existence of an anti version of the dark matter(1)? And would that thing offer the solution for the mystery of dark energy(2)? That means that the particles of the anti-dark material and dark matter would also annihilate, but the annihilation would be very slow. In some ideas, there could be three versions of the dark matter, the normal cold dark matter, the anti-dark matter and the bridge version of those hypothetical particles, what would be something between antimatter and material.

The idea of this thing is coming from the theory that the black hole (3) is connected to the particle, what is locating in the other dimension, and is called as "white hole"(4). So if the black hole is pulling in it mainly the dark matter, that means that the "white hole" would also pull particles from its dimension and send them to our universe.

And those particles would be anti-dark particles. Here I use words anti-dark material, for highlighting that those particles would be mirror particles for the particles of dark matter the same way as positrons are mirror particles for electrons.

When I'm writing this text, I will start to think that maybe the particles of dark matter is similar to other material. But the reactions between those particles would be extremely slow because the only interaction between those particles would happen by gravity. And this is the thing, that we must remember when we are thinking about the hypothetical slow annihilation between those particles. The reason for annihilation is that there is annihilation, which means both particles of anti- and normal material are transforming to energy, and that's why the anti-dark and dark matter must react similar way.

Could anti-dark matter be the key to dark energy?

If we are thinking about the possibility to find the anti version of the dark matter, we must remember that every other particle in the universe has a mirror particle, and that means that the dark matter particles must have that kind of pair. But what that thing means in the normal universe. The thing is that those anti-dark matter particles would also annihilate with the dark matter, and that thing would be the key element for the creation of dark energy.

So if the dark matter particles are annihilating with its mirror particle the annihilation reaction releases lower energy levels than the annihilation between normal particles or material and antimatter. That means that the "slow annihilation" would be the solution for dark energy. And if we would think that the slow annihilation would cause the forming of dark energy, we might think that the slow annihilation can benefit in the pinhead-sized nuclear reactors, which could theoretically offer the energy source somewhere at future.

The normal annihilation would release too much energy, and that means, that a portable antimatter reactor is hard to build. But could slow annihilation offer the energy source of tomorrow? That is a very good theoretical question.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

(4)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Why dark energy and dark material are interesting?

Are dark energy and dark material the same thing?

The dark energy is one of the mysterious things in the Universe. And sometimes the creation of dark energy is explained that the spin of quarks is causing the thing, what is known as dark energy. The free quarks would be the dark material in this very interesting theory, which could explain part of the dark energy and dark material.

Sometimes we are thinking that the dark energy and dark material are the same things, and this means that we should call those things "Dark stuff" or ether. But we don't know are those things the same thing, and that's why we must say that those things are dark matter and dark energy, and they are one of the most interesting and fascinating things, what are seen in the Universe.

Is dark material free quark, what spin forms dark energy?

There are two theories about the form of dark material and dark energy, another is that thing is forming by the particles, what is something like free quarks or some other thing, and second theory is that thing is free to wave kind of movement in the thing, what we are calling Universe. And that means that the dark energy is like some kind of radio waves, but that thing is too quiet to notice by using radiotelescopes.

So could the dark energy be only the very low energic radiowaves? And then if we are thinking that the dark energy is so-called free wave movement in the Universe, the next question is, what is causing that wave movement, or what moves in that wave movement. And the thing, why the form of the dark energy and dark material is interesting is that is it possible that there is a small particle in the Universe, what is in the border between energy and material?

Could there be some kind of particle that works as a "gate" between energy and material?

And if we could find that thing, we must realize, that this hypothetical particle could be the thing, which helps us to turn the energy to the material. That kind of thing is a fascinating thing, and we know that there is theoretically possible to turn the energy into the material because we can turn the material to energy. But how we can do that thing? That is the thing, what is the problem with the mirror-effect, what could revolutionize everything. The thing is that we haven't made any single of these kinds of successful tests.

If the dark energy would be some kind of very low energic radio waves, that thing means that the dark energy would not affect the small particles at all. That means that even the largest stars would not affect by the dark energy, because of their energy production would cover that effect. But the extremely large entireties like the intergalactic molecule clouds the dark energy would affect. Those molecule clouds are extremely thin, and those forms are extremely stable.

The mystery of dark energy and dark material

The mystery of dark energy and dark material

The energy must become cold and dark before it can condense to the material. This is the idea of the thing that material can turn to energy, and energy can turn to the material. The first one is an everyday phenomenon, but the last one needs special circumstances for happening. And this is why dark energy and dark material are interesting things. Maybe they are parts of the same effect or phenomenon, which might connect those things to gravity. And that is the reason, why I handle those things in the same text.

When Albert Abraham Michelson metered the speed of light, that man proved that the "ether" or mythic form of the material, what is forming space does not exist. The speed of light was the same every time, and that means that the existing of "ether" was not true. And the speed of light was a little bit lower than 300 000 000 meters per second.

The speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, which was lower than calculated speed, and that thing was not caused reactions, and physicists corrected their calculations by using the speed, what Michelson was reported. And that's it, the speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, and nobody even thought that could there maybe some kind of reason, why the real speed of light is lower than it should be.

If calculations are made right, there is something, that will slow the photons, and that thing has been caused the discussions, that there is something wrong in the universe. Then the astronomers found the case, that the universe is too heavy, and there is something, that we cannot see or feel, but the thing is that something has a very large effect on the universe itself.

That thing is called as the dark material or dark energy. The thing that makes that effect very interesting is that we could call those things as "ether". But when we are starting to think about this strange mystery, what we are calling as the dark energy and dark material, we are facing one very interesting paradox. Mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, in the opposite effect, what is one of the most fascinating things in the world of science.

We transform mass to energy in every day, but what if we could make the reaction backward? That means we could send things through the electric wires. And then we must ask one question, what might revolutionize entire science. Could the dark energy and dark material be the stages, when the energy would turn to the material?

So the thing is that some intelligent people think that energy would turn cold before it would start to take the material form, and is the dark energy forming the dark material? In this case, the dark material would be the gate between energy and material. When we are thinking about the form of the dark material, we can think that It is a so-called proto-material, what is forming the "real material".

In some Big Bang theories, the cold big bang continues even today, and the energy is turning to the material. And that thing could be the answer to dark energy. Energy must turn to dark and cold before it can condense to the material.

That thig could be called as the "slow big bang".  But that thing is only one version of the theory of the dark and dark material, what is connected to that thing. Another version of the dark energy and dark material is that they could be so-called "free gravitons", which makes people think, that there might be some kind of connection between dark energy, dark material, and gravity. Could gravity turn energy into the material? That is a really interesting question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?

What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?

Does the hypothetical particle Graviton push or pull the object? If we would find the answer to that question, we can find out what caused the Big Bang. If all material in the universe would be in the same place, there would not be any other energy objects, which will cause the transferring energy to that object. And then the gravity would crush the object like a giant supernova, or the gravity would push particles away from each other.

This thing would determine is gravity pushing or pulling force? If gravity would pull an object, that thing means that the object is normally surrounded by the harmonic gravity field, and that's why the object doesn't move in space.

That kind of case cannot happen in real life, because space is not empty, and the idea is that every particle at the universe has interaction between each other. The idea of dark energy is that thing has a similar form with other types of energy, and because the mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, that means that the dark energy can turn to dark matter.

But what is dark energy? Sometimes that is called a graviton or mysterious dark photon, which means that the dark photon would push the objects away, and the gravity itself would pull them together. And here I will say, that the dark energy and gravitons have the connection, but we cannot prove it, because we cannot make calculations or make observations about that thing.

But if we are thinking that dark photon is the graviton, we must re-establish the form of dark energy. The thing is that when we are thinking about the form of gravity, some philosophers have created an idea, that gravity is the pulling force.  That means that the source of gravestones would be the opposite side of objects, and they will push the particles together. So the idea is that the gravitons are coming from the back of the object if we are observing the thing from the surface of other particles.

And that means that there would be open the string or weak version of Einstein-Rosen bridge between two objects, and then gravitons would push those objects, and then the bridge between those particles is pulling them together. That means that there are no gravitons in that bridge, that means there is no dark energy, and then the gravitons would push the objects together. There is no evidence about this kind of direction between those mysterious particle's effects on the universe.

When we are observing a thing, that is called the interaction between particles, which means that every single particle in the universe has the bridge or string with every other particle. The particle would travel to the most dominant particle, which means that the bridge between those particles is strongest. So the shorter version of this verbal explanation is that in a normal situation the gravitons are bombing particles from every direction.

That means that those particles are not moving, and if there would be open the bridge, where is no or where are fewer gravitons the object would start to float in that channel and this case the most dominant channel would win. And that thing is given the idea of the theoretical antigravity. The idea is that gravitons would be removed from the other side and then the gravitons would push or pull the object above the mass center.

But for creating that kind of machine, we must realize, how we can first, prove the existing of gravitons, and the second thing that causes problems is finding out the direction where the graviton effect. Does the graviton push or does it pull the object? And for finding out that thing, we must first see the gravitons.

What means zero-point energy?

What means zero-point energy?

In some wildest scenarios, the researchers have created the idea, that the "dark energy" can benefit as the power source. The thing, what has caused this thing is that If the "dark energy exists, it can benefit".  In theory, the production of this system is really easy. The only thing what is needed is to create the antenna, which transforms the dark energy to the electric power, but there is nobody, who has made that kind of machine before.

But let's think some more conventional way. There are many versions of the "zero point energy". And normally it means the free electrons what are everywhere in the universe. The reason why this kind of technology has interested the leaders and creators of the space technology is that there is a possibility to use the free electrons from the universe for creating the electricity for the spacecraft.

Sometimes the term zero-point energy means the energy, what is stored in super-rings, or particles what are involving the quarks. Or sometimes it means the free electrons, what is found all around the universe. Sometimes that term means the cosmic background radiation, and the "zero-point propulsion" means the system what benefits those power-sources for the energy source. But the problem is that the "zero point propulsion" is the system, which is really difficult to build.

The solar generators can work with liquid helium. Those systems are closed circle of tubes, where is moving the liquid, and they are like heat exchanger, what operates the opposite way than normally. The liquid, what moves in the tubes rotates the generator, what is making the electricity, in this closed cycle system. 

The idea of the zero-point propulsion is similar to solar generators, what are the normal generators, which uses the closed liquid circuit for creating the electric power. The solar generator is actually the modified fridge, where the liquid rotates the generator, which means that the solar generator will work the opposite way. In the fridge, the pump would transfer the liquid in the tubes.

And in the solar generator, the liquid would rotate the generator. So the thing in the solar generator is that it would operate in the extremely low temperature. That system would be capable to create electricity from every liquid gas in the universe, and it can also use liquid helium in that process.

Could the short-term black hole cause the effect, what is called as dark matter?

Could the short-term black hole cause the effect, what is called as dark matter?

1. Is it possible that electromagnetic radiation forms the short-term black hole in the fullerene ball?

There is theory, that the nano-sized black holes are creating the dark matter. in this theory the electrons are hitting to the ball-shaped crystals or fullerene balls. And if there is gas inside those balls, the electrons would slow, causing the short term forming of a tiny black hole. That black hole would stay a stable only couple of nano-seconds. If that thing happens simultaneously the particle would act like stroboscope light.

There is an idea, that the fullerene-ball would be filled with gas, and when the high-power electricity would conduct to that structure, it would create a short-term black hole in the fullerene ball. And that would make possible to create an ultimate-stealth system, what is invisible in radar, infrared and even for the human eye.

2. Dark matter means material, which absorbs every kind of radiation.

Dark matter, or matter what absorbs all radiation would make things invisible in every kind of observation sensors. The dark matter is the term, which means invisible material and energy, which is the dominant thing in the Universe, and in fact, we cannot see that matter, what is mainly free electrons, what is not connected to the atoms.

But there is the thing, what people normally don't think when they are talking about the matter, what would not send radiation echo to the eye of the observer. There is a theoretical possibility to create material, what would absorb every radiation, and that thing is the crystal-shaped molecular structure, where is shot the electrons in the speed of light.

3. The idea is that the electron would across the speed of light in the short-term period because the object would not slow immediately when it hits to the thicker layer. 

When an electron hits to the atmosphere, it would turn to a black hole for the short period, because the speed of light is faster in the empty space than in the medium. The slowing of the electron would take a couple of nanoseconds, and in that time it would be a black hole, what is the size of the quark.

If the electron hits to that ball-shaped molecule in the speed of light, that electron would turn to small-size and short-term singularity, what will make the molecular structure able to absorb every type of radiation, what impacts to that layer. And in this case, the object would not able to see, by using radar or any other sensor. In theory, this kind of material is able to create in the laboratories just bombing the ball-shaped molecular structures by using electrons.

The thing could be the fullerene-layer, where is connected to the high-voltage electricity. and in the every carbon ball could be gas or some other matter, what makes those electrons slowing. That would cause the creation of the extreme small-size singularity, what would act like every other black hole, and deny the radiation echo from that layer.

The parallel universe theory and the collateral reality

The parallel universe theory and the collateral reality


1.Parallel universe theory

There are many times talked about the parallel universes, which means that universes are like pearls in the necklace. In that theory, there could be other universes in another dimension, but that theory consists of the idea, that there could be also another universe in our own dimension, what makes this theory very interesting.

Parallel universe theory handles the universe as the supergroup of supergroups of galaxies, and there is the empty space between those universes, what are like bubbles, or the concentration of the material. Because the space between those bubbles is empty, which means that there are very little energy and particles, which means it is empty if we want to compare it to the bubbles. And this means that there could be "anti-universes".

2. Antimatter and magnetic pushing force would explain the dark energy

Maybe anti-universes and antimatter explain also the thing, what is known as "dark energy". The dark energy means that the positions, what is the name of the anti-electron are pulling protons away from them, and that would mean, that the pushing force of particles, what have similar polarity is the thing, what is called "dark energy".

Also, antiprotons are pushing the electrons away, and here we can talk antiprotons as well as positrons. The energy level of the antiproton, or proton, what is the proton, what has a negative polarity is much higher than positrons, and that thing would push the electron layers of the atoms.

Most of the material in the universe is in the form of energy. Most of the particles are actually electrons and photons. That means that the universe is actually full of electrons, what is not connected to the atoms. If the position would impact the electron, that causes that the atom loses the electron layer, and the nucleus would be damaged. But the antiproton can just turn the atom to ions. And the dark energy would rip the entire universe in pieces in the distant future.

3. Universes are the series of megastructures

Those bubbles, what we are calling as the "universes" can also form by antimatter. That antimatter is the mirror version of the material, and if the antimatter would touch matter, that causes the annihilation, reaction where entire material would turn to energy. The idea of that theory is given the observation, that sometimes the antimaterial particle would impact the atmosphere, which means that there is antimatter somewhere.

When we are thinking about anti-universes and universes, we might realize that those things are very interesting, regardless are those antimatter-universes in our dimension or in some other dimension. And here we are facing the biggest "if" in the theories of the universes and matter. There is a possibility, that every each particle of our universes has an opposite or mirror-particle partner in some other universe.

4. Universes can be in our dimension, but they can also be in some other dimension

That means that we would have twin duplicate in that other universe. But we ever can meat or touch that duplicate, because that thing is antimatter version of us. This thing is pure theoretical thinking, and even if each particle in our universe has the duplicate, that doesn't mean that the particles have taken the same structural form, what they have taken in our universe.

So what the universes are in this theory. They are series of the enormous megastructures, which might be totally unique. That means that those bubbles might not have stars or planets at all, and they are forming only the atoms and molecules, what have the form of the nebulae. Or they can be full of black holes, but if they are in our dimension, the laws of nature are the same in each of them.