Skip to main content

What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?


What is the form of dark energy? And what is the direction of gravity?


Does the hypothetical particle Graviton push or pull the object? If we would find the answer to that question, we can find out what caused the Big Bang. If all material in the universe would be in the same place, there would not be any other energy objects, which will cause the transferring energy to that object. And then the gravity would crush the object like a giant supernova, or the gravity would push particles away from each other.

This thing would determine is gravity pushing or pulling force? If gravity would pull an object, that thing means that the object is normally surrounded by the harmonic gravity field, and that's why the object doesn't move in space.

That kind of case cannot happen in real life, because space is not empty, and the idea is that every particle at the universe has interaction between each other. The idea of dark energy is that thing has a similar form with other types of energy, and because the mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, that means that the dark energy can turn to dark matter.

But what is dark energy? Sometimes that is called a graviton or mysterious dark photon, which means that the dark photon would push the objects away, and the gravity itself would pull them together. And here I will say, that the dark energy and gravitons have the connection, but we cannot prove it, because we cannot make calculations or make observations about that thing.

But if we are thinking that dark photon is the graviton, we must re-establish the form of dark energy. The thing is that when we are thinking about the form of gravity, some philosophers have created an idea, that gravity is the pulling force.  That means that the source of gravestones would be the opposite side of objects, and they will push the particles together. So the idea is that the gravitons are coming from the back of the object if we are observing the thing from the surface of other particles.

And that means that there would be open the string or weak version of Einstein-Rosen bridge between two objects, and then gravitons would push those objects, and then the bridge between those particles is pulling them together. That means that there are no gravitons in that bridge, that means there is no dark energy, and then the gravitons would push the objects together. There is no evidence about this kind of direction between those mysterious particle's effects on the universe.

When we are observing a thing, that is called the interaction between particles, which means that every single particle in the universe has the bridge or string with every other particle. The particle would travel to the most dominant particle, which means that the bridge between those particles is strongest. So the shorter version of this verbal explanation is that in a normal situation the gravitons are bombing particles from every direction.

That means that those particles are not moving, and if there would be open the bridge, where is no or where are fewer gravitons the object would start to float in that channel and this case the most dominant channel would win. And that thing is given the idea of the theoretical antigravity. The idea is that gravitons would be removed from the other side and then the gravitons would push or pull the object above the mass center.

But for creating that kind of machine, we must realize, how we can first, prove the existing of gravitons, and the second thing that causes problems is finding out the direction where the graviton effect. Does the graviton push or does it pull the object? And for finding out that thing, we must first see the gravitons.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of