Skip to main content

The reason, why hydrogen bomb has so little fallout

The reason, why hydrogen bomb has so little fallout

The reason why this particular piece of nuclear technology causes so little radioactive fallout in the near of "ground zero" is that the rise of the fireball is so fast, that space, what is caused by the fast-rising piece of gas is pulling the dust and other material to the higher atmosphere with very high speed. The effect is similar to hover, the rise of the fireball just delivers the nuclear fallout to a very large area. And that means that the nuclear weapon itself is not so "clean". The "Tsar bomb" (1) was the "multi-stage" FFF (Fission Fusion Fission) weapon, where the fusion fuel was closed between the two layers of fissile material. 

This means that in the explosive capsule is at least two layers of Uranium 238 or natural uranium, and when the primary shot or normal fission weapon sends the radiation burst to those layers, the Uranium starts to turn to Plutonium, and the fission would press the fusion material to gather very hard. This will increase the power of the unit. That kind of weapon is creating pollution very much, but the high temperature causes that those radioactive particles will fly to the upper atmosphere. And nuclear waste is the main reason, why those tests ended in the atmosphere. 

The mystery of operation "Emery"

But after the ban of the atmospheric nuclear tests, the tests have made underground complexes. That means that pollution should not rise to the atmosphere. There have been made nuclear tests, where is happened accidents and mistakes. On December 18, 1970, something went wrong with "Operation Emery". Test "Baneberry"(2) caused huge radioactive fallout because that 10 kilotons nuclear warhead detonated too close of the surface. The depth of the shot was 950 feet (289.56 m)(3), and that was a little bit too close to the surface, and it was throwing the radioactive sand to the higher atmosphere. The cleaning that area took about 6 months, and there were questions, why the test team made that kind of mistake. 

The nuclear device was dug too close of surface, and the question was should that test be contain something, what is called a miniature nuclear weapon, or portable nuclear weapon. But the warhead was a switch, and the result was a disaster. If the size of the weapon could be only one kiloton, that depth could be enough. So were their errors in the nuclear test team papers? Or was "Baneberry" some kind of X-ray laser test?

In those tests, the nuclear weapon is used to create a high-power laser ray, and in some cases, there is a hole in the ground at the position of that device. This hole is made because the laser-ray must get a free route to the atmosphere, and if the structure is made wrong, that can cause the radioactive leak. So was this cause the "Baneberry " waste? That case caused claims about the deliberating break of the contract, which denies the atmospheric nuclear test. 

(1)
(2)
(3)

Google: one foot to the metric system: 1 foot=0.3048 meter

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies?

Could this be the thing, that some people don't want you to know about zombies? The simplest way to control zombies, which are made by using tetrodotoxin, which is called "zombie poison" is to use the automatic dispenser, which is normally used in diabetes treatment. In this case, the dispenser would be loaded by using tetrodotoxin. If the level of this poison is right, the person would be totally under the control of other people. And if the system cannot detect this poison there is a possibility to make the laboratory experiment when the staff will follow the decrease of the tetrodotoxin, and then the system can use a simple clock, which will inject poison to the body of a victim after a certain time. This would be an effective tool in the hands of military and counter-terror operators. Those zombies can be captured enemy operators, who will send back, and then they just kill their ex-partners. By using genetically engineered bacteria could be possible to create t...

Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.

 Terrifying visions of genetic engineering.  The modern Hounds of Baskerville ABW:s (Advanced biological weapons are the modern Hounds of Baskerville. The term ABV means the animal which is genetically engineered. And which is controlled by using some interactive electronic systems. There is a possibility to connect the action camera to dogs collars. And transmit commands to that animal by using electronic systems. Spoken words can use to the commands.  Or they can be a series of sounds that are stored in the sound files. When the operator activates a certain file that sound means a certain command to the animals. There is the possibility to automatize some commands by connecting the system to the image recognition tool. When the action camera sees something that is stored in the memory of the computer. That system sends the coded order to the animal.  Nanotechnology and genetic engineering are the most lethal combination in the world. The ABW:s (Advanced Biological ...

Facebook and dominance of the media.

The position of Facebook is dominating and that causes concern. Facebook is a well-known and commonly used service. And that thing causes that the information is starting to pile up in that service. That information contains data that we might want to hide. Facebook is a network-based service that can use for many purposes from marketing to intelligence.  Facebook was down and the thing cost about half a million dollars per hour to that service. That shutdown has shown how dominating that service has been growing. Facebook is a powerful tool. It can use to track the networks of people.  Artificial intelligence can show the network map of the people who are using that service. The data that travels between certain members of the network can show how often those people are contacting each other. There is a lot of criticism against Facebook but the fact is that everybody is using that thing.  The attitudes toward Facebook are conflicting. People are criticizing that service ...