The political system and the crises

The political system and the crises

The political system has created all leaders of the nations, and also Donald Trump is the creature of this system. When we are talking about things like patriotism and another kind of thing, we must realize, that nobody who is not known by the political system can be elected to the position of the President of the United States of America. Here I want to say that also Donald Trump was known by the electors or the persons, who accept candidates.

The role of the president is also to protect the government, and that's why that person must take the bad decisions to the shield of the President, which means that the decisions like things, what Trump has been made are made by the president, not by the government. This is an interesting point of view, because of the things, what Trump has made in Syria are not good for the reputation of the USA and they can shake the position of the USA. But there is another side in this conflict.

The international community has blamed the USA that it goes to war too often. So there should find some other states for taking that kind of military action, and in this kind of case, Russia is one change. And the other thing is that Turkey is allied, which can be called as "uncomfortable". The decision, that Trump has made with Kurds is not the first time when the USA has made this kind of decision. So for Kurds, there is nothing than mountains.

The thing is that Turkey has military power, which can crush the Kurds in open fight, and in the analysis of the reasons of the attack to northern Syria Turkey wants to face Kurds in open battle, where it can use its full firepower, and crush the positions of the Kurds, as it has done before. And this is how Americans thought they could do in Vietnam, the British thought that they can do in Northern Ireland and Germans thought that they can do in Europe during the Second World War.

The cases like the Iraqi occupation catastrophe and the Gulf Wars along with the Soviet and NATO Afghanistan operations have shown that guerillas can be very dangerous, even if they have no official trainers for their operations. But there is evidence that at least money from the Muslim businessmen was given money to Afghan fighters, and also those operators were forward the CIA money to the Afghans during the Soviet occupation. But are those actors supported underground organizations after the cold war is the question, there is no answer?

Of course, Osama Bin Laden has given money to the terror organizations but is there somebody else, that would be difficult to prove. The thing that makes the organizations, that operate in the Middle-East area is drug dealing.

Those organizations are covering the opium plants, where they are getting more profits, and those profits allow also hire mercenary soldiers to train those people, and if those operators are hired or their jobs are forward to some organized crime organization, that would mean that the trainers could be even Chinese. That money allows the undercover operations in the USA and other Western nations because it has not marked as owned by the Chinese.

In international politics is somehow shame to negotiate with guerilla organizations. The only possible solution for terrorism what is the common name for guerillas is to crush those fighters by using firepower. The military superiority has brought many new attempters rocky areas of the guerilla and counter-revolutionary warfare.

The massive police organizations and military force have given the thoughts in the mind of the people, that when the opposing main force has been destroyed in open battle, that thing would stop resistance. The resistance has continued after main battles as the guerilla warfare even hundreds of years, as we have seen in Northern Ireland.

The bad situation of Donald Trump and the problems with tactics, which are used in the counter-guerilla operations.

The bad situation of Donald Trump and the problems with tactics, which are used in the counter-guerilla operations.

So Turkey hits Syria and the problem is that it is part of NATO, which means it is one of the allies of the USA. And another problem is that there are Kurds, who are also the allies of the USA what makes this thing little nit more complicated than normal people might think.

The thing in that area is that there are two parties on the Kurd side, another is YDF, which is a so-called official organization, and the other is PKK, which is classified as a terrorist organization in Turkey. So what makes this case so problematic. The thing is that the relationship between armed groups and governments in that area is also very complicated.

When we are saying that Turkey is allied with the USA that doesn't mean that the generals of the USA army control straight the military forces of Turkey. And the thing that makes this situation "interesting" is that the USA denied selling the F-36 fighters to Turkey, which choose the S-300 missile system from Russia for air defense.

The reason for that is Russia could calibrate it's air defense missiles to shoot down those fighter-bombers. And of course, Turkey doesn't like that kind of advantage in the relationship between it and its other allies. The position of Donald Trump is not very nice anyway, because of his period as the President of the United States of America is the internal political crises, and his way to act is far away from the way how people have adjusted to seeing in the international politics.

So this is the reason, why commenting about this kind of situation is so complicated. When we are thinking about the situation in Syria there is no military answer. And the violence increases violence. When people are facing bombardment that thing causes hate and increases the support of the PKK and other radical groups, as we have seen in other places on Earth.

I know this might mean a really cold way to think, but a good example of this kind of advantage is the situation in Israel. The Israeli military force crushed the PLO in 1982 and after that, the policy in that country has been that because Israel is the stronger side, it must not negotiate with the opposite side.

And in that area, the conflict has continued as terrorism and guerilla warfare. The tactic of IDF is to use aircraft and helicopters with smart weapons against guerilla targets. Those tactics cause hate, and of course, those strikes are effective and they are keeping Israeli forces safe.

Some people believe that airstrikes are used because of the psychological aspect, what is two side thing. Airstrikes are coming like lightning from the skies, which makes fear in the mind of the enemy. But also that thing makes sure that the distance with own troops and enemy is long enough.

And the own troops are not facing "negative psychological effect", which means that the own troops are not spending time in the homes of the opposite side. That thing is supporting the terrorist agenda, which wants to show their enemy as a monster. And airstrikes guarantee that there is no trace of the terrorists, who are not in place at that moment.

We always forget those normal soldiers, who are operating in the field are they special forces or tank men are sometimes forced to make tough decisions. And those field operators are also under the psychological influence of the regular representers of the opposite side. That's why helicopters and airplanes are a better way to scout and fast strike operations.

They can track mobile telephones, and then shoot their missiles against those targets, but in those cases, the person who uses the mobile telephone might be different than a person, who has bought that device. That means that airstrikes are effective against targeted mobile telephones.

But they are causing that tracking the terrorists or the user of that telephone is difficult because there is no DNA or other samples in those targets. There are also no people for interrogations, what is, of course, a good thing for terrorists.  And there is a possibility that terrorists are waiting for the last second and then leave the house, what might confuse the intelligence of Israel, that they are dead.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11012691