The problematic photon

 

The problematic photon

When we are thinking photon as the transmitter of the light, we must ask, do the photons send the light? Or if there is a possibility that photo would stop, could we see it? This kind of thing makes us ask, what is the photon?

If we think that the photon itself is the light, we must say that if we are thinking about the situation, that every time gravity wins, and photon starts to drop to the black hole, there must be the point, where the photon will stop. Here I will give an example of stopping photon.

The theorem of the photon, which passes the black hole, or the two black holes, what is orbiting together. 

In the cases where two black holes are orbiting together, the singularity would turn to elliptic. This thing would be happening just before the black holes are starting to impact, and in this case, it could be possible that the photo could pass those black holes, and then start to fall to the singularity.

Or when those black holes will touch together with the photons, what is leaving from the impact area could start to drop to the new singularity. In those extreme cases would happen many extraordinary things, what would be impossible in other conditions. When the black holes would be in the line, the singularity would catch the photon and the orbiting speed of those black holes is near the speed of light before they start to collide when the singularities are touching together.

There is a possibility that the photon would pass the black hole in the direction, that it will go too close to the singularity. So the massive gravity of black holes can take the photon and that thing would cause the effect, where the photon will start to drop back to the black hole, even if it just has passed the singularity. During that process, the photon will stop. This thing can be possible in the cases, where two black holes are orbiting each other.

Could antiphoton be possible?

Every single particle in the universe has a mirror particle, which is called as antiparticle or simple antimatter. The thing that makes antimatter very interesting is when those particles are touching with their mirror particle that contact would release a very high level of energy. In this reaction, what is called "annihilation" both parts of this reaction would turn to energy. And this thing is to make it promising fuel for spacecraft, what will be used in the interstellar spaceflights.

There are positrons, or antielectrons, antiprotons and antineutrons. So is it possible that there is an anti-version of a photon that existed somewhere in the universe? This is one of the most interesting things in the world, and what kind of thing this "antiphoton" could be? Could it make the annihilation reaction, when it touches the photon if that kind of particle exists? The idea of antiphoton is conducted from the physical reality, that every other particle has its pair in antiuniverse, which means in this text the entirety of antimatter or antiparticles.

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

 

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

Could photon form the material?

Could there be material, what is not particle or energy? Or what could change the form between particle and radiation freely? And can photons form material? If we are thinking about the last question, we might say that we have ever faced the case, that there is a single structure, what is formed by the photons. Or should we rather say "the kinetic structure, what is formed by photons"? 

Light is forming by photons, so we might say, that there is an astral structure, which is forming by the light because photons are particles of light. Is the photon the key to one of the most fascinating material theories in the world, what is known as the "photon material" or "Schrodinger's material"?

The theory of "Shcrödinger's material" bases the example of what is known as "Schrödinger's cat"(1). When Erwin Schrödinger wrote his great example of the cat, what is not dead or alive, the philosophers started to create the idea of the material that is not material or energy. That material would be something, that we cannot even understand. The difference between Schrödinger material and "dark matter" is that the theoretical "Schrodinger material" can transform itself into material and energy. 

But here we must ask "does the material take the form of energy and backward anyway"?, So what this theoretical material would be, and what makes it so different than normal material. The idea about "Schrödinger's material" is that is created by pure light or photons, and the base of that thing is the theory that photon has mass. And if the photon has mass it is material. 

So if the photon has mass, that thing can create the atoms and then the atoms can form the structures. But as you might notice, there is one thing, that makes these kinds of theories hard to prove. There is not a single observation about the atom, what is forming only photons, and this means that the theory of the material, what is "pure light" is only theory, but as you might understand, theories are base for experiments and proving things. 

Is photon one version of dark matter?

The idea of this thing has been taken from the idea, that the dark matter is the "quantum fog", what interacts with other particles only by gravity because those particles have no "spin". So there is hot and cold dark matter, the hot dark matter, what interacts but very slowly. And the cold dark matter, what interacts only by the gravity. So if the material would react very fast, it would need the electromagnetic field for reacting. 

The subatomic particles would not have really big mass, which means that the gravity or gravitational interaction between those particles is extremely weak. That means that the interaction is also extremely slow, and it cannot happen until the universe is an extremely stable condition. 

And the 3-kelvin radiation would deny that interaction. So the question is, is the photon one version of dark matter. When photon leaves from a star or other light source, is it possible that it would someday stop. Or can the photon make the lattices metals can form? 

If it could make that thing someday, what does this material look like? This is a nice thing about theories, we can think things freely and make models, and when something has been proven, that thing would be to end of speculation, what is like the end of the road. The theory stops to be theory, which ties the researchers to the proven formula. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

The writing about the physical constants

The writing about the physical constants

The physical constant means the number, which is the same in the same condition every time. So is the speed of sound the natural constant? This is the thing, what causes problems when we are thinking about this thing. The sound has different speeds, while it travels in the medium. So the sound moves faster if it would travel in the thick material. In aluminum, the speed of the sound is about 5200m/s (1)but in air, the speed of the sound is only 343m/s. That means that the sound is not the physical constant. 

But what is the speed of light in aluminum? That cannot be solved, because aluminum would not conduct the light. If we would want to solve the speed of light in the medium, we must use medium, what can pass the light. And this is the thing, why this kind of things are important. So the speed of the light is natural constant, or is it that? 

We are learned in school, that the speed of light is naturally constant. The thing is that the universe is not empty, and the scattering from other particles is disturbing the movement of photons. But when we are thinking about the form of the photon, and that is the light has particle form and wave movement form. 

So could the wave movement mean that the photon is turning to superstrings or super springs? In theory, the superstring or spring is the smallest known particle in the universe. That thing is like the string, and the quarks are actually like a ball of yarn, which is formed by superstrings(2). 

When we are thinking about the interesting thing, what is called a gravity lens, we must realize that the speed of light is not stable, and the massive objects have an effect on the trajectory of photons, and also black holes would suck the photons (3)inside it. And this phenomenon is connected to one of the biggest mysteries in the universe. That thing is what happens in black holes? Or what happens if the escape velocity of some particle is tau zero, or the speed of the light? 

Do the photons leave to the surface of that particle? And how that affects that particle? So does the photon have the mass? This is one thing, what causes grey hair for cosmologists. The thing is that we must understand, that because everything is interaction in the universe, the photon must have mass. The mass is required if the gravity affects the trajectory of the photon. And the second thing is that because the laser would work, that means that photon must have mass. 

Now I'm starting to scream and say that everything, what is existed must have mass. The mass is necessary for existence, and this is one thing, that we must realize. But has photon the mass or not? Photon might have mass, which is too small, that we can measure it. This is one thing, that might have to think. The photon is too fast for the measure, and that is the thing, what we have to realize. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speeds_of_sound_of_the_elements

(2)

https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/questions/superstring.html

(3)

https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-a-photon-definition-and-properties-2699039

Image: 

https://www.thoughtco.com/thmb/JFkZtCdBTRThLsJkceqmXpo7G78=/768x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/GettyImages-180294159-57a0b3915f9b589aa9b765e2.jpg