Companies as part of business life

Companies as part of business life

We all want to be leaders of the big companies, and of course, that kind of thing is really important when we are thinking about a career, what we might do. And in the experience of the leading position of companies are important, when we are searching for very big positions in the big companies. That's why some people are establishing own companies because they want to show their management skills and make a network. But the thing is that before we are establishing any kind of firm, or we start to lead any kind of things in business life, we must know exactly what the company is.

The definition of the word "company" is that thing is a combination of service and product, what purpose is to make a financial benefit for the owners. Of course in SOAP (Service Oriented Application) service itself is the product, but service is also thing how the product is delivering to customer.

And if we want to make a successful business, we must have the necessary skills for that sector of business life, what we have chosen. This is the thing in the successful business. If we make a bad job, we must pay damages and that kind of things are spoiling our reputation if we sometimes want to seek a job as the leader of big companies.

In the working life is billions of people, who are chosen the wrong career, because of their first experience of some jobs is bad. The person can be a perfect chef or perfect person for customer service, but the bad experience in the first contact with working life would turn studies to law schools and another kind of things, and that thing is really sad.

But if we establish a firm, we must make a backup plan, because sometimes people who don't know right people are not getting customers. Good professional skills are not enough when we must get contracts. Selectors of subcontractors of big and well-known companies are getting thousands of offers in a month, and the thing is that those actors seem good in the CV:s of the people, who are working in some other company.

And that kind of contracts is a good opportunity to make social contracts and increase the social network with the leaders of a well-known company. So that's why some offers are getting buried in the Email boxes. This is the reason, why we should get somebody, who would recommend us for those people. But if we do bad work, that thing is maximizing damage, because that person might lose trust for our skills and ability to handle problems and projects.

Following the law is always important because as you might know criminal registration is not a very good recommendation in any position of business life. And also we must realize, that we must not increase corruption or somehow use unethical methods in business. They are bad for reputation, which is a more and more important thing in business life because people are sharper with things, like ecology, humanity, and another kind of things.

If the conditions of product things are unethical, that thing would uncover on the Internet very soon, and who wants to buy the product, what would cost lives in somewhere. Also, things like cartels and other illegal methods in competitions are very soon uncovered. This is the reason, why we should consider our training. If we would have some else training what is suitable for business life, we must realize, that somebody would start to make reports for cartels.

Things like sports clubs are nice hobbies, but they are causing so-called "conspiracy theories" about the cartels, which means contracting prices between the companies. And if that kind of things would uncover, the result would be extremely big penalties and long court processes. This is one point of view to business life.

Who can we trust?

Who can we trust?

Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.

When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.

The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.

When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?

So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.

But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?

When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.