How oligarchs can topple Putin without official authorities? (Earlier text continues)

The answer is that there is no official way how oligarchs can even topple Putin. The only thing that those people can make is hire contract killers. And that is the worst mistake that those people can do. If the FSB sees that kind of attempt. That thing causes very big troubles. Like ricin poisoning in the streets. 

The oligarchs cannot arrest Putin. They cannot give commands to FSB. Because those people are without official prerogatives they cannot do anything legally. There is no way to resist or even say something that Putin doesn't want to hear. The thing is that the three stages of oligarchs mean that there is no way to make connections with Putin without the middleman. 

The thing is that only the top oligarchs can speak straight with Putin. And the lower-level men must find somebody at a higher level to tell their business to Putin. That thing protects Putin very well against people who want to make something for him. Putin wanted to keep their distance from most oligarchs. But that thing doesn't mean that oligarchs are not under surveillance. 

And nobody allowed to speak against Putin. If some oligarch wants to operate against Putin that person must have access to talk straight with Putin. And what would you think to happen if some friend of Putin would uncover an attempt to topple him? That thing would be a big disappointment. And in that case, the threat to Putin would be personal and concreate. That thing makes Putin a frightening person. 

When we are thinking about the age of Vladimir Putin, nobody lives forever. That means that Putin might have 10-25 years of career before he turns too old being the leader of Russia. And if we think that Putin will rule Russia to the age of 95 all people will turn a little bit paranoid. So there is the possibility that when Putin turns old. That person might start to see conspiracies around him. And that thing can cause very bad problems with social relationships between Putin and his closest friends. 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Russian stock markets are diving.

Image: https://markets.ft.com/data/world/countries/russia

Russian stock markets are diving. And that thing is a good example of how military actions are affecting the economy. When we are thinking about things like strong leadership and authoritarianism we forget one thing. In an authoritarian nation, the leased has a different position than, in a non-authoritarian nation. 

In an authoritarian government, leadership has a bigger purpose than in a non-authoritarian government. And that thing means that the words of that kind of leader mean bigger things than in a non-authoritarian nation. 

When we are thinking about the crisis there is always the possibility that the investments would be confiscated. And the other thing that causes uncertainty in marketing is the thing that being fellow with the attacker is bad for business. If there will be some kind of sanctions. That means that those investments to the nation that will get sanctions can cause problems for that investor. 

The thing is that uncertainty in the marketing means that the investors will start to remove their investments from that nation. The thing is that people are afraid the authoritarian and violent governments. And that thing means that the investments to the authoritarian nation would be a hard thing for investors. 

Threatening to use force means that other governments must react to that kind of thing. And that means there is the possibility that investments that are made to that country would be withdrawn. The thing is that the marketing statuses tell about the trust for that country. 

Things like corruption and non-predictable actions would destroy the trust. And without trust nobody makes investments. The thing is that there is the possibility that nobody buys products like gas from Russia. The reason for that might be that the customers are afraid. That Russia would cut the energy shipments. If other nations would not follow its orders. 

When we are thinking the words that Nordstream-2 pipeline is a non-political project we must remember one thing. Nordstream-2 is the thing that brings billions of Euros in Russian cash. And those billions are free to use in all projects including nuclear weapon research. This means that all energy shipment contracts have a political dimension. The problem is that if Russia attacks Ukraine, the energy shipments would be a good political weapon in the hands of Russia. 

If Russia attacks there would be problematic things. One of them is the Russian as a business partner. If the Russian government turns very unpopular in the west. That causes problems with Russian investments in western Europe. 

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Information security and trojan horses

Information security and trojan horses

Normally we are thinking trojan horses as the malicious software, what is slipped to the system, and what is transforming from some shareware program to a computer virus or spying tool. But there is another way to think about the trojan horse, and that thing is connected with the idea of the virtual working environment.

That idea is that the entire virtual headquarters of the company can turn to trojan horse very easy way. When the system architects are building the internet or IP-base solution, where the team can work virtually, that thing causes one very interesting problem, when we are thinking it in the point of view of the cybersecurity.  What if the entire company would cheat to use the similar digital headquarters, what is maintained by criminals?

The idea is that if we would use the virtual headquarters, and we offer the service from some company, somebody can build a duplicate of that service or working environment. After that, the hostile operator just cheats the crew of the company for using that giant trojan horse, and the thing of how cheating can happen is quite easy. The people, who would install IP-addresses and Internet addresses to the system would simply get wrong net-addresses, or the link, what is sent to the customer can be faked.

That would cause that entire corporation would turn to use hostile virtual solution, and make every action under the surveillance of the hostile operator. This kind of things can cause the worst kind of data leak as possible. And when we are thinking about the informative trojan horses, what can be used to send the faked information about the advantage of the economic situation of some companies, the thing can be done by NAT: ing the homepages.

This means that the router would automatically turn the IP-address to another, and this technology is created for denying the loss of IP-addresses. But if the natting parameters are wrong, the system can turn dangerous. The thing is that the router can link faked homepages, like as an example the faked homepages of stock markets, and that thing could make possible that the investors would get false information of the advantages of the value of shares.

But that kind of techniques, what are called as phishing can use to get access codes and other things from the law enforcement and other operators, what should be trusted. And if some unauthorized user would see the wrong databases, that thing can cause very bad troubles for many people.

Who can we trust?

Who can we trust?

Trust is the thing, what must earn. The problem with trust is to find out, who we can trust? If we would think that we can speak freely everything, what we want, we can go straight to a nightmare. But if we would be too suspicious, we might harm our own business and other things. And this is the major problem in earning trust. We must find the actors, who we should not trust.

When we have located that kind of persons, we must find ourselves in front of the other kind of problem. Or a couple of problems, if we are sharp. The first one is, who will believe us, and the second one is that is there some person hiding behind some drug user, who would select and give that data to the operator, who works under our eyes. If we kick that cleaner or ICT-supporter away, that would cause, that this person will be replaced by somebody, who we cannot predict.

The induction problem would be, what we can do next when we have located that kind of actor? If we are facing people, who will break the rules garishly, that would mean that this person might have support in that kind of things. And the thing is that the person, who we think as the leaker of information would be somebody else, and the person who we see in front of us only channels, what real traitor is using.

When we are facing the case, that some person is leaking information, we must make an analyze, what kind of data that person has given. And then we must think, does that person have access to that kind of data? In some cases, when the medical information is leaked from hospitals, I would ask, what cleaner would do with the data what is containing the information of the patient's medical records?

So is there some actor behind that person? The type of data, what is delivered will uncover many things, and one of them if the data contains only information of the psychiatrical reports what are meant for highly-trained specialists, that tells that somebody who has education has chosen those files for that actor. People who have not trained would not deliver only the data, what affects courtrooms, and if the delivered data contains only things, what are effective, that tells that they are chosen by the person who is not cleaner.

But then we might think another thing, what is ever mentioned in this kind of cases. How that leaker would think to survive in that kind of situation? There is something, what that person thinks as an effective way to keep the victim's mouth shut. And something confesses people that there would not be consequences. So do they know somebody inside the family of the target?

When we are facing the leaker, we might kick that person away from the firm right away. But we might also follow that person because something caused, that the person has given those files to the unauthorized actors, and the question is, why that person allows doing that thing? Why didn't that person contacted police or lawyer, if somebody blackmails this inmate? And if we would kick that leaker away, there would be somebody else, who might be more dangerous than some cleaner.

The classical conditioning will be an effective tool in animal training

The classical conditioning will be an effective tool in animal training

In the religious paintings are the codes, or instruction how to make some things like grow the obey for some other person. When we are looking at the paintings, where Jesus or some other holy man is sitting with lamb, and this asset is of course really nice looking, but there is another way to look at that kind of painting.

That painting could be looking at the point of view of the behavioral sciences, and if we would want to teach the obey younger and smaller person is just give other members of the team punishment. If they would not obey and follow that leader, that would make punishment like hitting another individual or just the second individual.

In fact, the thing, what makes possible to take control of every individual in the lamb or any other animal pack that the controller or herdsman just finds the leader of the pack, and then takes the own lamb, what acts as equipment, what to use in the controlling process. The idea is that every social animal pack has a hierarchy. Every single individual has their own place, and if the animal is not below some other animal, that means that this animal is the boss.

The leader of the group can be replaced by using the very easy methodology, what was invented by Ivan Pavlov

When the herdsman replaces the original leader by own leader, that means that the original or natural leader just teach to obey the leader, what the herdsman uses as the leader. If that leader would grow with those herdsmen, it would not afraid of them. If the leader of the group would trust some people also the others would trust that person.

And when the leader of the group comes with the herdsmen, that is a mark of trust. Those lambs are following their leader in every place, and in one evening those animals would get in some city, and they will be butchered.

This thing bases the idea, that the leader of the group would be captured, and then teach to follow the substituent. The methodology would be the classical conditioning, which was invented by Ivan Pavlov. It bases the recompensing and punishing. If the animal pleases trainer, would that animal get the price, and if that will cause the disappointment would it get punishment.

That thing would happen by giving punishment to the leader if that would not follow the marks, what the first lamb would show. If the leader of those social animals would accept somebody above itself, it would make all individuals of the pack to follow that lamb. This is the way how to take a pack of lambs under the control, but it can be used with every social animal.

Trusting people is the thing, what is normally misunderstood in the working life

Trusting people is the thing, what is normally misunderstood in the working life


The trust is the thing, what is so nice thing, and it's very easy to use in the wrong purposes. In the modern working life, the key element is the teamwork, and that is the thing, where trusting other people are in a very important role. And then if we would be a little bit suspicious in that situation, we must understand that sometimes we are facing the situation, that somebody misuses trust in the teamwork.

The thing is sometimes feeling better for asking things about the behavior of the team member or henchman from the workmates. That would be more comfortable than speak with the other person face to face. And asking things from another person would feel also the way to get "real information" by asking things from other people. But that kind of thing would cause cheating in the working community.

One of the most important things in the trust is that thing would not form in one minute, and building the trust can take the lifetime, but as you might know, the trust can break in one minute. This is a big problem in working life because if the trust is once broken, there would be no change to win it back. If the close friend would treat somebody, that might cause the inmate has no ability to trust other people. And that means this person needs some kind of help.

But what the offered help could be? The thing that the person is unable to trust other people will cause that the therapies would be failed because the person believes, that therapist will tell the things to other people. If the person cannot trust other people, that would cause many problems in personal and professional life. But when we are talking about wealthy trust, we are talking about that we should not trust other people in some cases, because the thief and traitors would play the trusting games.

Those games are like "you don't trust me if you don't do something like drinking the liquid from the bottle, what another person would offer.  And in the worst cases, the thing is that the person would agitate the partner to point the loaded pistol to own head, and then pull the trigger, and in the worst cases, the other person has been loaded that gun.

If we would think the situation in the point of view of the intruder, that person would approach some team member, and play that their workmate has psychiatric problems, and then tell that the victim would not actually understand the own condition, and that would help that intruder to slip in the workplace. That means that the intruder might have the knowledge, what is needed when the place of the victim is released, and in that case, the opportunity and motive would cause, that couple of pills will slip in the coffee of the victim.

And then the workplace would separate the victim because the psychotic symptoms cause problems for the workplace, and that kind of problems would better handle somewhere else, because working life is not for mentally ill persons, and then the place in the corporation will be released. And in those cases, we always should ask the motive, why somebody wants to help the community? Does that person have own motives for that thing, and one of those motives could be that the released place would give the reason to send the application to that company? So think carefully, before you trust somebody, who you ever met before something bad would happen.

The political game with numbers

The political game with numbers

The popularity of Vladimir Putin has been decreased, and maybe the dropping from the 80 to 64 percent would be caused that Putin has hard to explain the demonstrations all around Russia, and it seems better in public media if the number of supporters of the official president is 64 than some 80 percent of the people. This is the thing, what we must understand in the popularity records of the people. The thing is that the lower numbers of the supporters would be lower than 60% is more trustable than some support ratio, what will be near 100%. The trusting and giving the information, what seems trustable and real are the key element in the information operations, and the thing is that 51% of given votes is enough to keep the man in the rule of the nation.

If I will make faked information of the politician or some other person, I would use lower numbers than some 99%. The thing is that if the winner would win by numbers 52-48% that would seem very good in the public network. And the thing is that the person, who has got the support would win the game. That kind of result would give an image of the fair campaign, and the things like 80% support would seem that the race has been fair and the thing is that the "better man wins". In this case, the number of abandoned votes would not be very big.

And in fact, I sometimes think how many politicians have bought their election to parliament by the way, what uses minimum numbers for victory. In the modern days, the attempt to buy the "miscalculation" is quite difficult, because of the Internet, but before global information network would be a possibility to manipulate the numbers of the supporting votes. But there is no evidence that this kind of things has done in western election campaigns.