Deep anesthesia and spaceflights

Deep anesthesia and spaceflights

The social problems of Mars-missions are one of the biggest problems, what the research teams have been faced when they have mapped things, what could go wrong during the space flight to Mars. The selection of the crew members would be very difficult because the commander must be a combination of some kind of Shackleton and commander of a nuclear submarine. The problem is that those people must have the same kind of natures with polar explorers, nuclear submarine crew and field archaeologists, and that means that those people are not easy to find.

When ESA (European Space Agency) is collecting the data for the Mars-flight, the thing is that one of the biggest problems in interplanetary spaceflights is sociological. If the relationship between crew members turn very bad, the entire mission would be a danger. That means sending the sleeping crew to that mission is a really good idea. The problem is that muscles are not used while that process, which means that the electric stimulation must be used to keep muscles strong.

The deep anesthesia eliminates social problems between crew members, and that would seem one of the best solutions for the spaceflight, which will take 180 days in one direction. In that plan, every crew member would have their capsule, where they would sleep, and the capsules would act as the rescue platforms in the cases, where the spacecraft would be destroyed.

The reason for the social problems in the spaceflight is in the human mind. Even we would have a commander, whose mission is to lead the crew, we must realize that in the total isolation the risk in the case, that something goes wrong is far bigger than in anywhere else. That means that there is no way to return if the commander of the spacecraft would be lost control. In real life, we always face the thing, that some persons are more popular than others.

And if somebody is left alone, or in the worst case face the situation, that the commander would transfer every job of the "best friend" to others, that thing causes problems. A human mind is a dark place when we are facing things like jealous. The thing is that we cannot predict everything, what human beings are thinking and how they acting in closed societies.

In the closed spacecraft, everything is different than on the Earth. There is no way to escape, and that means that somebody would start to hope that the mission fails or even the death of the other people. These kinds of things are unexpected, and they are really hard to predict because some social problems are visible only after a certain time.

For the Mars mission, we need a very extraordinary persons

When we are thinking about the crew, what we can send to that kind of trip, we are facing things, that we must make some kind of matrix, what we can use in that kind of process. That means that we can use psychological data, which is collected from people like nuclear submarine crews. We can compare the Mars craft with the nuclear submarines, and the crews of those vehicles are also living in isolation.

But the crew that we need in the Mars-mission would be a little bit different. The person, who we need to command that crew must be a combination of the Shackleton and the commander of the modern submarine. And the other persons must be a combination of the submarine crews and some polar explorers.

When the crew lands on the surface of Mars, we must say that surface operation is needed little bit different persons than during the journey, and there would be more difficult to look for people, who will land on the red planet. Those people must be the same type of persons, who are working as field archaeologists. How to combine the submarine man, polar explorer, and archaeologists? This is a very big problem.

The ancient Olympic games and their role in society

The ancient Olympic games and their role in society

As we might know, the Olympic games had a much deeper meaning in antic Greece than just games. They offered a place for the discussions about peace and alliances because they were a natural place, where also kings can visit. So there were many other things, which were done around those games, and the sports were not in primary reason, why some kings visited in that area. Hot weather kept people inside or seeing the games, and that caused that the kings could discuss like outsiders didn't hear, what they spoke in their tents.

The ancient Olympics of antic Greece was hosted by the city named Elis, and those games were done in the holy area of Olympia. Those Olympic games were five days of competitions, where athletics race against each other, and then the winner got glory and money. Except in the horse race, where the money was given straight to sponsor, and the driver of the horse got the payment from the sponsor.

Or officially that money was given to a horse, but of course, they were used by the sponsor. And, of course, officially the athletics were private persons when they participated in the games. But those athletics gave gold and glory for their hometowns, and that is one reason, why the loss in those games was a shame.

Even if those athletics were private persons, the city offered them to change to practice for the Olympics and that means that those persons had coaches. When we are looking at the historical texts, the sportsmen gave a small gift to the statue of Zeus, when they won those games. The thing is that those gifts were cheap, and they were symbolic gestures for the gods, that they allowed that man to win the games. And as you might know, that those athletics were trained by professionals. Those gifts were the marketing merchandise, what the coaches used to offer their services.

And training of those athletics was expensive. I don't know did those athletics themselves know that there was big money behind them. So if the sportsman was caught for deceit, that person must buy the small statue of Zeus for the god, and that statue was the mark that money and time, what those athletics were cost must give back. But there is one question in those Olympics, and that is, why they were hosted by Elis?

That is because those sportsmen must dare to try hard, and that means that the place of Elis or the Olympian holy land was chosen for the place of the games, which was kept in the hottest time in summer at every fourth year. The reason for that was that there was a break in agriculture, but the hot weather kept people in order. But there was one thing, why those ancient Olympic games arranged.

That thing might be ancient eugenics. In that time noble families of Greece lived in total isolation, and marriages were allowed only at the same level of people. That means that those families were sharply marked in the family trees and the bloodlines were very important because one handicapped person might risk everything. So the new blood or genetic material, as we would say in modern times should be best what can get. And the Olympics were the perfect place for selecting that new blood.

The thing was that those sportsmen were perfect fathers for the children of the princesses. They brought fresh blood for the royal families of Greece, and that's why they were used for ancient eugenics. The Greeks were known that wealthy people gave wealthy children. In ancient Greece, those people knew, that also things like personality traits are descending. So that was so-called ancient eugenics. And in that time the noble families were living in total isolation, which means that they must get the new genetic material, and that thing was given those athletics. So this kind of thing is a very good way to explain things like DNA manipulation.

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Society has turned to two class people because the economical middle class is lost. That makes very big differences to things like economical and tax planning. Also, the middle class people had a role to work as the shock absorber between wealthy and poor people, and that causes problems with society.

The middle class has been separated in the higher and lower middle class, what has delivered the information from the poor people to the wealthy persons by natural social contacts, but when the abyss between incoming layers has been growing, that would cause problems to get information that the prizes or taxes are too high to ears of the persons, who make decisions. The problem in parliaments is that the people, who come from wealthy families are over-represented in those institutions.

Wealthy people have more money, and they would pay the membership fees for political parties more often than poor people, who need money for many other targets. This would cause the phenomenon, where politicians are receding from the poor people. If I would be a person, who lives in a one-room flat, I would feel uncomfortable to meet people, who live in own houses, because I would not have a normal social relationship with people, who have a different level of incoming.

The large middle class has also offered good field, where politicians could promise things, and that allowed the popularity, and if politician betrays the permissions, this thing can cause the there are no votes. And that's why politician must think carefully about permissions because the betraying those things can cause the dropping from parliament.

The problem is that there are less wealthy people than poor people, and the paradox is that wealthy people are funding the campaigns of politicians. But the votes come from poor people, and if a politician would just please wealthy people, that would cause the end of funding the campaign, but if the campaign pleases only the wealthy people, the means the loss of votes.

Loss of a normal social relationship, with normal discussions, would cause that those people would not have information, what is going on in the poor people neighborhood. And that causes fear mutually because every people have prejudice, and this is the thing, what trolls would benefit effectively. But when we are thinking about the loss of middle class people that causes economical problems, because of the role of middle class people has been acting as the financial reserve.

If the government needs more money, it would collect more taxes from the middle class people, and in the years, when there is not so big need for money the tax level can be decreased. But when we are talking about the thing like the federal reserve, there are many things, where those words are pointing. Of course, that means the central bank of the USA, but also that means the bumper, what gives limits how the economy can move, or it can mean the money what can use right away for some urgent building sites or other urgent targets.

One version of the reserve is marginal, where the level of taxes can move. When the level of taxes are planned the planner would calculate the minimum and maximum levels for taxes, and when the decisions of the level are made, the level of collecting the money would keep low, because that level can rise in the next year.

If we would think this way, the person, who determines the level of taxes operates in two year periods. In the first year, the level of taxes is determined, and on the second year, the determiner would check how those calculations connected to reality, and then adjust the levels of collecting taxes. This is one way to think about the role of middle-class people in the socio-economical field.

When society is split

When society is split

In the 1990s the differences of incomings were growing, and that caused the advantages what has caused many problems in Western society. The social and economic advantage caused that rich person became richer and poor people stay poor. But this thing doesn't tell everything about the economics of the country, and the thing what is always forgot is that inflation causes the prices of the merchandise are raising, and even if the incoming level has been same, the person can get less merchandise with the same money, what they got in the early 1990s. This means that the purchasing power of money has been decreasing, and the thing is that money is not the same thing anymore.

But when we are thinking about this thing, what is called as "lowball glass effect" we have forgotten one very important detail. If we are thinking the economics as the pyramid of the glasses, and when we are putting the liquid on the top of the pyramid the most of it would fill the glasses, which are top of the structure. That means that the most highly paid jobs are also slipping in the hands of the wealthy people. When the highest bosses of the companies are adjusting their salaries and commissions.

Which causes the effect, where the people, who are leading companies are getting most of the profit if the year of the company has been victorious. That means the most of the incomes might go to the salaries of the directors and members of the board of directors. This means that regular work doesn't get anything about this kind of results. All profit of the company would go to the pockets of the highest rank directors, and in the worst cases, the social space of the company would get a coffee maker, when the directors would get new cars.

The problem of this advantage is that when the differences between incomings are growing that thing will misplace the middle class from society. The length of the accordion of salaries causes the effect, that when researchers are calculating average salaries, the real average salaries doesn't match with calculations. And that thing causes problems with politicians because the calculated middle-class people are not the majority anymore.

The reality is far away from theory, and this is notable in politics. This causes problems to adjust the taxes and this causes the loss of popularity. This is one thing, what is remarkable in business life. The thing what causes that effect is that the wealthy people are almost every time in the high-rank jobs, and that means they have a network of other high-rank people around them.

This means that the top positions in companies are going to people, who the electors are already known. And that's why the people who have parents, who have big salary are getting most highly paid jobs in the business. This is one part of business life. That kind of advantage would cause that wealthy people are moving away from downtown, and this thing isolates them more than ever before.

Is salary only thing, what is important in working life?

Is salary only thing, what is important in working life?

The work is good to give, but salaries are hard to pay is the rule in the working life. And this kind of things is problematic in the discussions about things, which are important in working life, and the thing is that there is one very good point in the discussions of salaries. That is, is the salary only thing, what is important in working life?

Of course, the worker needs money for living, and everybody should live by using their salaries, without need to ask money from the government and social authorities, and this is the paradox of salaries. If salaries are really low, people need social security for a living, and that would cost money for the government and taxpayers.

But if the salaries are too high, that thing can cause the price of food and other services would be getting high. And that thing is very problematic because too high salaries would cause the people, who get poor salary are driven crammer than ever before, and that kind of things can cause more costs for society than we even expected.

Rising numbers of criminal activities would cause that we should hire more law enforcement and prison guards. And there is a possibility that some of the stealings are not ever solved. The main number of the costs of criminal activities are forming from small crimes.

Those cases where a person steals merchandise, what value is less than 50 euros happens all the time and the thing what makes them very tedious is that they are done very often, and even if one thief would not steal lots of merchandises. In many cases the value of the stolen property is under 5 (Five) Euros, the financial loss of the shop will be very high. 

If a thousand people steal the candy or can of beer, what value is about 2 euros, that will cost 2000 euros for the shop. And if that happens every month, that would cost 24 000 euros for that shop. And that loss must take from somewhere. That kind of stealings cause that the shop must hire guards, and this means that these kinds of costs must transfer to somewhere, and that means that the prices will start to rise.

Sometimes any of the thieves would be caught. This kind of stealings happens, when people don't care about their fate in the court system, and anyway, the person who steals property would not need to replace things, what other people have done, and maybe that kind of losses would not ever be replaced. If the salary is poor, and people would not live with money, what they earn, that thing raises the number of the stealings of low-price products. Ans many of those thieves are ever caught.

The criminal investigation and details

The criminal investigation and details

When we are thinking about the criminal investigation in the case of violence, there is a couple of questions or details, what the investigator must realize. There is always the possibility that the attacker is acting as the hired actor, and that thing has sometimes forgotten the people, who are working with criminal activities.

One of the detail, what should make the investigator think that the hired person is behind the violence. That detail is that the actor or suspect has not ever seen in that area before. Or the clothes, what are used in those activities are not seen anywhere before that action.

The last thing would tell the investigator, that the person, who is working as an actor in this kind of cases would be dressed specially for that kind of attack. And if the suspect would not be angry, would the case be made by the hired operator.

Normally persons whose motive is hate would yell and roar to their victims. And in that kind of cases, where the target is the victim of hate crime, the actor and victim know together. Normally that kind of violence is happening in the groups of alcohol- or narcotic addicts.

If the person would not have those problems, and somebody would attack without the reason, that could mean that there is something behind that case, that other people would not even want to know. If we are thinking about psychopath those persons are often quite impulsive, and they are not looking for their victim a very long time.

And those people are serial criminals, which means that there must be another similar cases. Here we must realize, that some Mafia-killers are trying to play maniacs when they are caught by police for avoiding the prison. In mental hospital would the time move faster and maybe someday some psychiatrists would recommend that those criminals are allowed to go out from the "institute".

The classical conditioning will be an effective tool in animal training

The classical conditioning will be an effective tool in animal training

In the religious paintings are the codes, or instruction how to make some things like grow the obey for some other person. When we are looking at the paintings, where Jesus or some other holy man is sitting with lamb, and this asset is of course really nice looking, but there is another way to look at that kind of painting.

That painting could be looking at the point of view of the behavioral sciences, and if we would want to teach the obey younger and smaller person is just give other members of the team punishment. If they would not obey and follow that leader, that would make punishment like hitting another individual or just the second individual.

In fact, the thing, what makes possible to take control of every individual in the lamb or any other animal pack that the controller or herdsman just finds the leader of the pack, and then takes the own lamb, what acts as equipment, what to use in the controlling process. The idea is that every social animal pack has a hierarchy. Every single individual has their own place, and if the animal is not below some other animal, that means that this animal is the boss.

The leader of the group can be replaced by using the very easy methodology, what was invented by Ivan Pavlov

When the herdsman replaces the original leader by own leader, that means that the original or natural leader just teach to obey the leader, what the herdsman uses as the leader. If that leader would grow with those herdsmen, it would not afraid of them. If the leader of the group would trust some people also the others would trust that person.

And when the leader of the group comes with the herdsmen, that is a mark of trust. Those lambs are following their leader in every place, and in one evening those animals would get in some city, and they will be butchered.

This thing bases the idea, that the leader of the group would be captured, and then teach to follow the substituent. The methodology would be the classical conditioning, which was invented by Ivan Pavlov. It bases the recompensing and punishing. If the animal pleases trainer, would that animal get the price, and if that will cause the disappointment would it get punishment.

That thing would happen by giving punishment to the leader if that would not follow the marks, what the first lamb would show. If the leader of those social animals would accept somebody above itself, it would make all individuals of the pack to follow that lamb. This is the way how to take a pack of lambs under the control, but it can be used with every social animal.

Social Darwinism and Western society

Social Darwinism and Western society

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

What social Darwinism actually mean?

Term social Darwinism means the theory, that only the strong persons are suitable for living in society, and the weak individuals would be removed, and this is the thing, what makes some people love this ideology. The Darwinism is visible in the business life because if the people would not buy merchandise from some company, that would cause the bankruptcy or as Darwin would say, the elimination from the environment.

But the thing is that this way to think is not suitable for humans. We cannot leave other people dying in the streets, is the western way to think. But that is not true in every place on Earth. There are still places, where people are dying in the streets. The idea of social Darwinism is in the most exacerbating the predestination ideology of some societies. The predestination means that if the person would be born in some social class, that means that the social position of that person have been preordered when that person has been born.

That kind of theories is very popular in the high-class Indians, whose position is very good compared to other people.  Hinduism justifies those people to rule the nation, what is the only thing that can be in the eyes of the high-class society. Leaders of the team would not see anything wrong that they would get better salaries than others, or they can say anything, what they want to others.

If we are thinking the leaders of the group, their children probably would like the situation, that only they are able to get the places in higher education and the leadership in the big corporations when they were born, and this is the thing that supported the absolute monarchy. Only the noblemen had the right to get an education because they had the right to rule the land, what came from the god.

Low-rank superiorities are also bosses

The modern military ranks are coming from the noblemen era. The lower rank personnel sometimes forget that they are in the superior position to their henchmen. That means they can order the henchmen to do anything, what they want. When we are thinking about the lower military ranks like lieutenants they might seem very low if we compare them to generals. But the fact is that those lower rank military men can order their henchmen to make every single job, what the superiorities would give them.

That means that for the henchmen those lower rank persons would not be so nice as you might think, and if you have seen the movies like  "Full metal jacket" you know what I mean.  And as you see, the people who have a good position in some society don't see anything wrong about the things that nobody would ever rise to the higher rank position from some environment. When we are thinking about the purity of society, we must realize, that the cases, where wealthy people are isolated from normal or poor people also isolate them from reality.

The isolation supports the prejudice

That means that some factory leader would not want to allow, that the family children would not talk with the people, who live in slums. This thing would cause that those children would get poison in their mind, that something can be changed. And the thing is that those people, who have the power on those societies are covered their position by the high-rank education, which means that they are wiser than others.

But if there is a problem with the cases, where those isolated leaders would discuss with other people. They always play something, what is above all other members of the society, and they are actually portrayed as the exhaustless leaders, and then happens the thing, where those persons would not find the simple solution. That can break the image of those people in the eyes of henchmen.

The growing environment gives some skills

The growing environment gives some skills

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

If the individual has grown in the middle of enemies, it would have better abilities to defend itself. 

The researchers have noticed that the water striders, what growing environment would leak the smell of the beast fishes would grow the pikes against those fishes. This thing has brought the mind of the researchers the idea to let the drug addicts grow the sober children, and this would be the way to make the social immune defense against drugs. That means that those persons would have the better able to resist the addiction of the drug dealers and the chemicals, what those people would use.

I don't know has somebody really made that kind of growing test, but as you see, the people, who are working with the behavioral sciences are interested in this kind of education theories, because that kind of way would able to create the persons to the service of law enforcement, who would not change their side in the covert operations, where they are in contact with drug gangs. There is one case, what might be interesting in the way of the behavior tests and it has connections with the zebra mongoose.

Those animals live from two to twelve years, depending on what kind of mother those animals have. The thing in the mongoose-society is that the animals are making puppies at the same time and after that, the puppies would be feed collectively. That thing causes that the strong and the fat puppies, what are the puppies of the strong and big females are able to get better food. The beginning of life orders, how long those animals would live.

Could mongooses feel grudge?

So that population would be the good target for the tests, would the animal feel grudge or does it try to revenge the behavior, what it would face, when stronger puppies are taking its food. The way how those animals choose the puppy, what they want to feed is the size, and that brought in the mind of scientists the experiment, what would investigate the hypothetical ability to revenge. I don't know have scientists ever made that test on the action, but this kind of questions are nice to think.

So what would happen if the puppy-mongooses would choose the order? Would the lifetime of those animals change, or what would happen, if the weaker individual would become stronger? During those hypothetical experiments, weak puppies are taken from the group, and then they would feed with good food and hormones what caused that those puppies would grow big and strong. After that, they looked like the puppies of the Alpha-females, and the thing would be, that is it possible that those animals would revenge to the others. I don't know about the results of this kind of test, and there are many things, which makes people be silent about them.