When humans are falling, robots are rising.

 When humans are falling, robots are rising.

The robot makers are saying that robots will take jobs from some people. And of course, that thing causes worries. But otherwise, we should think about what kind of jobs robots are taking from us? Are they jobs that are wanted or respected? 

Or would you do those jobs? The thing is that robots are a complicated thing in the environment and business infrastructure. And the fact is that robots are effective operators that can grow productivity to the highest possible levels.

Robots can operate without breaks, and they don't need salaries. And if the company uses only robots for a working process. That means it can make products with the lowest possible price. 

Because robots are not needed salaries or practice they can operate near the delivery area. And the thing is that the robot can make so many stages in work. That is stored in its memory. And those modules can be changed when the company wants. 

So that kind of company can minimize the salary and transport costs. That means it can make products with lower prices and that is a good weapon in competition. And even if the products that robots made, are not sold. The company can turn to make a new product right away. Or if there is a cut in production those robots can take into use immediately when the order is taken. The robots would not make strikes. And the only thing that is against them is that they are taking jobs from people. 

 But the problem is, what the people whose jobs the robots are taking would do? 

The problem is that those people would just get their salary in the form of social aid. But the low salaries in the sectors. Where robots are planned to use are causing that the people who are working in those works are unhappy. In this text, I write about normal working robots, which mission is to replace human workers in boring and low-paid jobs. The advancing robotics needs infrastructure that supports them. 

The infrastructure is, of course, the recharge points and wheel-change service. But the environment is also the thing that is between our ears. Things like attitudes are the things that are also belonging to infrastructure. The attitudes are the things that are making people select the politicians. And politicians are making the laws that are controlling the development of the systems. 

When Elon Musk wants to make more robots and use them for work, that is reserved for migrant workers the idea behind that thought is that there is a couple of things that people should understand. The thing is that when we are building more and more apartment buildings we need more and more cleaners. So where we can take those people? Do the native citizens willing to apply for those jobs? 

Or what kind of people is willing to apply for those jobs anyway? If the natives would not want to do them, there is possible to bring foreign workers to make those works. And when the contract is gone the migrant workers are going home. Then we might ask one very big question: what kind of people come from a foreign country to clean some apartment buildings? 

Or would you tell your children that their place in society is to work as a cleaner because we don't want robots or migrant workers?

Maybe some people must take that kind of job. But what is the price of the force? Do we want employees who are a couple of months in work and then they are gone? When a new applicant is hired, there it takes time to introduce and learn the jobs. And then after four months, the next worker is coming in. Is the work well-done if it is made by some person who has social problems? Or would the people who live in the house feel safe if their cleaners are full of tattoos?

Is the person happy if that worker knows that after a couple of months will wait for the new work application? There is the possibility that in those places was not even promised nothing more than 2-3 months.  But is this the thing that we want? Do we want there a large group of outcast people? 

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The internet has been made many things safer. But it's a dangerous place.

Students are told not to use Wikipedia in research, but it's trustworthy. Says the article in "The Conversation". The link to the article is here. But you can see the URL below this text. 

The prohibition of using Wikipedia as a source for research is one of the most interesting questions in the studies. In normal cases the Wikipedia is trustworthy. And some people are saying that the purpose of that prohibition is to make work more difficult than it is. 

The thing is that Wikipedia is trustworthy in the cases like computing and natural sciences. But there are also problems with the things like selecting sources for the works in the modern world. Things like books are good sources if they are confirmed. But the fact is that during the time of the internet the printed information might be old. 

When books are coming to bookstores they might handle the old-fashion information. And that thing is visible in the most intensive areas like computing. The things that people are used to doing might turn old-fashion in a very short period. The fast advantages in the programming architecture and operating systems are making some well-known methods old-fashion. 

Let's take one example. In the past, data security was the area, where only a couple of operators worked. Their mission was to deny the hacking. And in old good times, hackers just called the phone calls. But today the fixed data connections are making the internet more secure. 

If we are taking the point of view from the coding and programs. The firewalls are blocking the normal malicious code like echoing the formatting command from operating systems. The artificial intelligence-based firewalls are searching the source code of the data packages. 

But the risks are turned to social media. People can share data that should not share. Things like images of firearms and memberships of the shooting clubs can cause burglaries because criminals want that kind of stuff. And also things like papers that are forgotten to table and where is passwords can cause problems for data security. If criminals are zooming those images. 

They can get the passwords for the targeted systems. Also, things like hidden surveillance cameras can uncover data from the screens. One of the examples of that kind of thing is uncovering the Russian "Status-6" "Kanyon" torpedo with 100 mt. warhead. The papers that were visible on the camera allowed western actors to isolate the diagrams of that system by using the zoom of the graphics program. 

When the organization faces data crime the first thing is to report that to authorities. And of course, that report can also give to the media. That allows that all people know that there was a security leak. And they know how to handle the situation. And when the data security has been broken or dangered. That thing should cause discussions about the topics: "what should we do otherwise that this would not happen again". 

That kind of thing is called physical hacking. The workers should dare to report the people who are asking strange questions. Or bar evenings where the "film is cut". That thing can tell that somebody is trying to steal data from the system by asking for passwords. And also family members should tell if they get strange phone calls or somebody asks about things like when parents are at work. 

The mainframe of the hacking is turning to social hacking. In the worst-case criminals are taking hostages for blackmailing key persons.  The hacker would send the probe like E-mail or text message for asking passwords. That means the mobile telephone or the captured Email of the boss would open the road to the system. 

Or otherwise, hackers might try to cheat or blackmail people give passwords and access to the system. One version is to stun a person by using chloroform. And then the Sodium Amytal would force the person to give passwords. 

In another version, the data criminals use the zombie poison (Tetrodotoxin) to order their victims to transfer money to their accounts.  The thing in data security is the "open attitude". If something is tried to affect the person that person should dare to tell that thing. If the hackers are stolen data the first action is to confess that thing. Hiding the information-stealing is the worst thing, that people can do. 

https://theconversation.com/students-are-told-not-to-use-wikipedia-for-research-but-its-a-trustworthy-source-168834

Facebook and dominance of the media.

The position of Facebook is dominating and that causes concern. Facebook is a well-known and commonly used service. And that thing causes that the information is starting to pile up in that service. That information contains data that we might want to hide. Facebook is a network-based service that can use for many purposes from marketing to intelligence. 

Facebook was down and the thing cost about half a million dollars per hour to that service. That shutdown has shown how dominating that service has been growing. Facebook is a powerful tool. It can use to track the networks of people. 

Artificial intelligence can show the network map of the people who are using that service. The data that travels between certain members of the network can show how often those people are contacting each other. There is a lot of criticism against Facebook but the fact is that everybody is using that thing. 

The attitudes toward Facebook are conflicting. People are criticizing that service because it dangers privacy. And otherways almost everybody is using it. The governmental and private corporations and actors are found that service. But the critics for it is caused because the users are making its content. So they are offering their work for Facebook. But otherwise, the paper magazines and especially the car and other hobby magazines are used the same method for making their content. 

The reporter came to take a couple of photographs of the hobby car made short writing and then return home. The builder of the vehicle didn't get anything. And the magazine was sold to people at a very good price. That is the thing that ever caused criticism. But the social media services are caused discussions of copyrights. There have been discussions of copyright, freedom of speech, and other things like that. 

The question is about the line of social media and its moderation. Who is making the limits for cheating and other things? Maybe we would not face those problems without social media. What is tolerated? And what is not tolerated? The thing is that in social media are many things that are causing discussions and what are a little bit uncomfortable for some people. But there is one thing that we must realize and that is would the world even know about things that Putin has made in his country without social media? 

When people are saying they must not read negative things. Because they want to keep fun they are allowed to do that thing. When people are writing to social media they are allowed to make those things by using the platform that they want to use. 

Maybe many of those writings are boring, but who cares. People have the right to celebrate. But otherwise thinking also boring people has right to write something. Nobody listens to boring people and maybe that is the reason why they must write something. If those things are boring people must not read them. 

Who forces us to spend time reading things like this? If you have read this text to this point that is your choice. You could spend your time by making something other things. So if you hate this text, I must say that choice was yours. I didn't force you to read. There are lots of people who are not social, they are not spending their time in a disco all day. 

They look boring so they can disturb somebody. That's why they are at home. But if you are in the disco and some other person would write something boring would you spend all the time while reading the texts what boring people are writing? Why you are not at dancing? Or maybe that thing is not my business. 

Image: Pinterest

https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

The dark matter and the forming of galaxies

The dark matter and the forming of galaxies

The dark matter can form also other nebulas than galaxies. 

The forming of the first protogalaxies started quite soon after the Big Bang. And the scientists have found the galaxy, what is forming purely the dark matter. That galaxy has proven that the dark matter interacts with other material by gravity and the dark galaxy has caused thoughts that can we see that galaxy if we would be very near that thing?

So is the dark matter glass, what will let the light go through it, or is it like some kind of carbon bite, what we see as a shadow against the normal galaxies. The thing is fascinating because of the form of dark matter is important, when we are thinking about the possibility to see that thing, and if there is a large number of dark material in some galaxy, we might think that could we see that material even in the short distances.

But we know that dark matter acts like normal material and forms the clouds like other material. The thing in gravity is that every single object in the universe has gravity field. When we are thinking about the gravity field and atoms, we must realize that every single star and planet is the combination of atoms as well as interplanetary nebulas are.

The idea of the next part of the text is taken from reality, that dark matter interacts only by gravity. So that means that the interaction between dark matter and other particles would be very slow except near black holes or neutron stars, which would behave dark matter like normal matter, and their gravity field is really strong. That means they would pull the dark matter to them and sling into space.

One of the impressive thoughts is how black hole or neutron star acts if they are getting in the nebula, what is formed by dark matter?

So if the dark matter is forming the similar nebulas what normal material forms in the visible versions of the interplanetary nebulas, the thing is that the dark nebulas might have a bigger effect on other particles in galaxies. And if we are thinking the case that the dark matter would interact with the gravity, that thing can cause the forming of the supermassive black holes in the points, where we cannot expect their forming.

When we are turning back to the dark galaxy, we might think the questions, is there be a possibility that there are galaxies, where is not a single planet? Or where is not a single solid planet? And what would look like a galaxy, where are only stars and the supermassive black hole, where the material would drop. The thing is that black holes are also pulling the dark matter inside them.

And because the dark matter would act like normal material, but the interaction happens only by gravity, that means there could be galaxies, what has formed by the dark matter, but what has the supermassive black hole inside them. But what the dark matter looks like, if it would drop in the black hole? Would that very powerful object turn the dark matter to the normal matter, or does the dark matter what is dropping in the black hole send some kind of radiation.

What would be the EIS and what makes this kind of things interesting?

What would be the EIS and what makes this kind of things interesting?

EIS(1) (Everywhere International SME:s) means one of the most interesting things in research and development or R&D. SME:s (Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises) (2) is one of the most effective methods to make the R&D effective. The small size enterprises are offering a good forum and environment for research projects. 

That kind of environment is helping to keep the project team motivated and the secrets inside the house, by using this model where the company is multiple cell companies nobody can slip in the group without somebody noticing that thing. Also, the team would not have unnecessary bureaucracy, but when we are thinking this kind of research in large-sized companies, we must remember that the company can create an auxiliary business name for new projects. Or it can establish the sub-company, which is fully owned by it. 

This type of cell model company is very safe if we are thinking about information security. And the cell-model helps cover the information, what is not wanted to give for the great audience. That means that the workers, who are working with confidential projects must not carry ID-cards or use computers, which can connect them with certain companies. 

So, in this case, the worker or even the big chief cannot connect themselves to companies like Lockheed-Martin, and that thing helps them keep things secure. And that thing also keeps them safe, if they must land to the hostile land, and in this case, the hostile actors cannot connect them anything secret. 

But what we need in that case, if the company works in a multinational environment? We need the thing, what teaches things to those people very fast. And that kind of technology, which allows a person to learn things like foreign languages in a very short period. The same method can be used to teach other things like engineering skills or military tactics. 

The most intensive way to learn things 

The most effective way to learn things is to involve as many neurons as possible in that process. And this thing is under research because in business life and intelligence world needs to create things like linguistic skills as fast as possible. So if the person has 24 hours to learn the new language, how people should work in that case? 

Would you think this kind of thing is impossible, and even that thing is possible, those kinds of methods are really dangerous. They affect straight to the nervous system and multiple areas at the same time. So if something goes wrong that thing could cause horrifying psychosis. And it can be used to create faked memories. 

The idea is to combinate all learning methods, what people have ever created and use them at the same time as a person. That thing would contain the subliminal voice, very fast flap images and electromagnetic stimulation to brain core. Also, the nerve tracks of hands can be used to give stimulation to the person. This thing would be the ultimate version of virtual reality. So this kind of thing would contain things, what some people would want to keep in secret.

(1)

https://www.interregeurope.eu/eis/

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_and_medium-sized_enterprises

The hoax information and the dangers of it

The hoax information and the dangers of it

The false-flag information attacks

The false-flag information operations are one of the most sophisticated tools in the hands of trollers. The false-flag attack in social media would be done by using faked social media accounts, or by stealing the well-known user's account, and then start to deliver the deep fake images and films. That means that the faked commercials can deliver on social media, and the customers would come to some shop, and ask for sales, which have not existed.

The most dangerous effect in cyber warfare is that using deep faked information, which is connected with false-flag operations in social media. During those operations, the hackers can use that thing as the platform's phishing operations. And even the nuclear weapons officials would try to get in the trap and give the access codes to the nuclear storages. This is one of the scariest visions that have been introduced in the media.

False-flag attacks can be made by using captured social media accounts, which belonged to some media houses. That thing would make those attacks more effective than they would otherwise be, and in the hands of the wrong people, those things are creepy. If we are believing that some actor is trusted, the captured account can make very big damages, because the trusted actor would not deliver faked information. And that would cause the thing that somebody would even start the nuclear war by using that kind of method.

So the worst of the fears is that the faked information can cause nuclear warfare. This theoretical scenario begins with the idea that some support systems of nuclear weapons would be hacked. In this case, somebody would get the codes for access to the nuclear weapon message and communication systems. 

When we are thinking that the military place like Cheyenne Mountain or Gora Yamantau would be hacked and in those screens, what is used to commanding the nuclear weapons would be caught by hackers, who would deliver the hoax information of the incoming nuclear strike, that thing can cause war in theory. The problem is that if the nuclear weapon operators would notice the attack, they have only a couple of minute time to react.

And there is no time for making double-checks by using What's App and asking about the situation on the ground. So what if somebody hacks the communication line of the nuclear command?

In this kind of visions the persons, who are serving the third country, what is in war, and then those people would hack some missile control computer. After that, they would deliver the hoax information that some missiles have been shot from their enemy territory, which could cause that the personnel of that base would estimate the situation that they should open fire with nuclear weapons.

Image:

https://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/wikipedia-is-fake-news.jpeg

Writing about graviton and theoretical quantum particles

Writing about graviton and theoretical quantum particles

Could there be the thing, what is called as "antigravity"?

Researchers know that every single particle in the universe has a mirror particle. Or maybe we should rather say, researchers, believe that every particle in the universe has its antiparticle because nobody has claimed to find antiphoton. So there is one very interesting thing, what scientists have thought, and that question is: has every four fundamental base forces (1) (gravity, electromagnetism, and weak and strong nuclear force (Color force) of nature also their anti force. 

So is there the antigravitons in the universe? (2) That means that there would be one of the most interesting effects, what could be possible, the antigravity. In that case, the graviton, what is theoretical particle would have the mirror particle, which would act the opposite way with gravity. The thing is that we don't know much about gravity. We don't know about the direction, where the gravity effects. 

Theories are very difficult to make if we cannot see, what we must model. And in the case, when we are making theories of gravity, in the key role is the hypothetical particle known graviton. Every single time, when we are making theories about gravity, we have begun from the theorem, that because of every other base forces in the universe has the transporter particle, also gravity must have that particle. 

Antigravitons are making antigravity possible?

So how gravity effects? Does it pull or push objects? But every theory begins that at the first the object shoots the graviton to another object, and then the superstrings would pull them together. That means that the objects interact with other objects, but then we have one little thing, what we ever thought? Does the gravity field of the object expand like some radiation? 

That means that gravity is like radiation, but making sure about that, we should find graviton. And graviton would be the super photon. Or is that field stable? In the last case, that thing would give a chance to create the hypothetical graviton rocket motor, which is so extremely powerful, that even the photon rocket would look like a moped. But the problem is that we don't have a single observation about gravitons. 

When scientists found that neutrons are scattering, that was the beginning of the endless lists of theories and calculations, what purpose was to find the reason, why quarks are scattering neutron, and that thing has created an idea what is called "dark energy". The thing is that the outcome energy would keep the quarks in the structure, and the internal energy would push those particles away from each other. 

The thing, that is destroying neutrons is fascinating because it would give the key to an endless energy source or even the ability to break the gravity and create a fully operating antigravity device. The idea of dark energy is basing one theory that in the Big Bang the gravity was turned to its mirror force, and started to push particles away from the center of the Big Bang. 

And that thing has caused the conduction to theories that the graviton, theoretical particle, what transmits gravity would also have mirror particle, so-called antigraviton. That thing would revolutionize technology and science if we would someday find those particles. The existence of antigravity is an interesting theorem because that thing would make some science fiction stuff possible. 

(1)

https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

(2)

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/137-physics/general-physics/particles-and-quantum-physics/813-what-is-a-graviton-intermediate

Image:

https://www.techexplorist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/gravity18.jpg

Could one single individual organism be civilization?

Could one single individual organism be civilization?

What kind of civilization would be the creature, what is hybridized with computers? The idea of this thing is taken from Xibalba(1) or Mayan underworld, and there was the god, who just sits in the place. The servants of that God made all the works, what that creature wanted. (Image II)

And this god was given an idea of the hybridization of the living creature and computers. in this case, the creatures, what are hybridizing with the computers, can make also this thing with the big-size data networks. So the idea is that when the creature would be born, the robots would put it in the tank, where the computer will connect the brain core stimulation and the EEG-control system to that thing.

So by using this kind of technology the single individual would control the very large combinations and entities, and maybe that would be the future of some kind of alien. If we are thinking about this kind of hybridization, the creature would put in the tank and the computerized networks would be acting as the sensors for that creature. And the thing is that the system would control robots by using WLAN-connections.

Image II

One of the most extreme things in futurology is the hybridization of the individual and the machine, we might think the model, where civilization is very different than our own. In one extreme version, there is only one individual on each planet and that individual would be connected to the very large network of computers. Then those individuals would keep in contact with each other by using radio telescopes.

And when they want to fix their bodies, they would change genomes, and connect them with the clones. In some very unique and extreme models, the entire civilization would be only one individual, what is connected with computers. When the body of that individual would die, it would renew itself by using the clone, which means it would act as some kind of Phoenix-bird.

Can one individual form civilization? This thing is one of the most interesting parts of the philosophies discussions about other civilizations. When we are thinking about the "phoenix-model", where only one creature of some species could exist, and when the creature would die, and the next, cloned individual would follow that thing, we might think that thing is possible, at least in theory.

Modeling the hybridization of computers and living creatures, we might face the thing where one single individual would connect its brains to the internet or some other kind of data network, we might think possible, that some creature would make that thing. In this kind of case, the alien would create very large automatized complexes to the planet, and then it would transform the living individual to that planet, which can be connected to the computers.

The thing is that the system would offer to the brains extreme large memory blocks, and the brains can offer creativity for the system, which cannot otherwise create new things or think abstraction. In this model, the individual would give cells to create a new body by using the cloning method. And that new body would take the place of the dead one.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xibalba

Second image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0d/Jarron_Maya_2_-_Ixquic_y_los_Se%C3%B1ores_de_Xibalb%C3%A1.jpg/375px-Jarron_Maya_2_-_Ixquic_y_los_Se%C3%B1ores_de_Xibalb%C3%A1.jpg

Sea monk the mysterious sea monster

Sea monk the mysterious sea monster

Is this creature the scuba diver from the 17th. century.

When we are looking at the image of the sea monk, we must realize, that the person, who has seen this kind of sea monster would see the ancient scuba diver. Maybe this man was the scuba diver, who used primitive equipment. And I don't know how much normal people knew about scuba diving during the 17th. century? At that time there were scuba diving suits, and if we are thinking carefully, in the middle of the man-shaped creatures can be the diving bell or the deep submerge capsule. Or that might be the auxiliary oxygen.

Sea monk or sea bishop is one of the most mysterious sea monsters in the world. The origin of that tale might be in the 30 years war, where protestants used this kind of tales as the propaganda against Catholics, but there is one detail in this tale, and the detail is that this story might have a different kind of backgrounds. One of the backgrounds might be that everybody knew that monks told many things to inquisitors, and they send the people to executors.

Maybe some person told something only in the boat, and then that thing brought problems to somebody. And if the judgment is augmented in some special way, that thing uncovered that there were monks or bishop in the same boat with the storyteller. So this means that the sea monk-stories are told for the warning, that the bad guys are not doing anything when they are alone, and that means that they are looking like innocent, but when they get assistance the things are turning, and they will make reports about things like smuggling for getting the benefit. And during 30 years of war, monks were so-called bad guys.

This is one background of the tale about the "Solar Warden".

The strange element of the sea monk stories is that the image, what is drawn of sea monk is that the sea monk seems to have some kind of protective suit. That means that the sea monk would be human, who has just come from the seas by using the boat. So that means that the creature would be just the monk, who was traveling by boat, and then the people would tell more and more details about this thing because everybody wanted to tell better version and because of the 30 years war, the Catholics were enemies, everybody wanted to confess, that they believed that monks were bad guys.

Does the "sea monk" have a gliding suit? That could mean, that this creature would be a saboteur, who jump from the balloon.

As you know that these kinds of tales are living and forming. The story of sea monk is the origin of the tales of the myth of "Solar Warden" the mythic station, which has the origin of the myth of Atlantis. The story is told about the giant space stations, which are created for genetic experiments. In some versions of those stories the "Solar Warden" would be the underwater base or series of underwater bases, where there are genetically selected people, whose mission is to support the scientific and other work for superpowers.

There is a possibility that the sea monk has been jumped from the balloon that was pulled by the sailship. And that means that the person would be some kind of spy. The thing in the middle of those drawn creatures would be the equipment box for their missions.

In the most interesting version, this creature was the astronaut from somewhere. I don't know how serious that claim is, and don't be so serious about this kind of thing. NASA has used this kind of thing to getting innovation for modern space systems. And they have created the one-man recovery vehicles.

In this case, the landing craft of the astronaut might be very small, and this is why the people have laughed at that theory. But in fact, this kind of capsule could bring astronauts from the orbiter. This means that the craft would get energy from an outer source, and it can lay down by using propellers or ion motors. In this case, the "sea monk" would use the glide suit, and the craft would get its energy by using maser ray, which is targeted to that thing.

Image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_monk#/media/File:Japetus_Steenstrup_sea_monks-1-.png

Writing about so-called abductions

Writing about so-called abductions

When we are thinking about the situation, that some person would be captured in the spacecraft and some kind of humanoids make tests to that person, what takes hours, and people would see just the flash of the light, and the person would not seem to go anywhere, that would be a very big mystery. There are three possibilities, which can make that thing possible.

One is that those people have been under the effect of some kind of electromagnetic field, and those fields can cause so-called electromagnetic dreams, which means that the brains would see things, which are not true because brains cannot separate dreams or real observations. Sometimes it has been claimed that people have been targeted with high power radio waves because the system would cause overvoltage in the brains, and those researchers have thought that increasing the level of electricity in the neural system, that allows people to remember dreams, what they have seen.

This could be possible because the electric level of the brains would allow connecting the axons, which are normally reserved for other purposes. And maybe those people have been so tired, that they couldn't even recognize when they slept and that causes hallucinations. But the fact is that people normally don't remember their dreams.

The second choice is that the abduction would be done, but it has been happening somewhere in the past, and the person would remember that case in the dreams as the nightmare. So could those strange cases happen in some rooms at hospitals, when the person is young? And somebody just "lends" the baby. In that scenario, those kidnappers would be human, who want to make some kind of tests or just impacts the electric shocks to brain core, and brainwash the victim for thinking that some mafia-men would be some holy men, who must have jobs at banks.

Then in the adult age, that thing would make the flashback. In those cases, the victim would be exposed to chemicals like LSD and laughing gas, and during that case, somebody might use virtual reality or brain core electric manipulation for creating faked images in the mind of the victim. When consciousness is lower than in a normal situation, the person might not see virtual reality systems. Or that person doesn't realize that the place, where the thing happens is the own bedroom, because of strong hallucinogens.

But there is one more explanation, what could explain, why the person seems ever go out from a house during the abduction, and that thing is that the time in the UFO would travel slower than in the normal universe. In this hypothesis, the saucer-shaped UFO would equip with the system, what would accelerate person or some sub capsule inside the craft to the speed, what is near the speed of the light, that thing would make possible to make operations, what takes hours without people from outside would not see anything special.

And if we could stop the time, and we would have enough sophisticated technology, we could kidnap a person from the elevator, make our tests, and after that release that victim. The thing is that people would see anything. But the thing is that the accelerator, which is combined with the high-power electric transmitter would need an extremely powerful energy source. And the speed of the test capsule must be extremely high, that the time inside it would stop.

Fascinating way to think

Fascinating way to think

Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".

They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.

And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.

Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.

We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.

Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.

The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.

Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.

The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.

Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.

The mystery of dark energy and dark material

The mystery of dark energy and dark material

The energy must become cold and dark before it can condense to the material. This is the idea of the thing that material can turn to energy, and energy can turn to the material. The first one is an everyday phenomenon, but the last one needs special circumstances for happening. And this is why dark energy and dark material are interesting things. Maybe they are parts of the same effect or phenomenon, which might connect those things to gravity. And that is the reason, why I handle those things in the same text.

When Albert Abraham Michelson metered the speed of light, that man proved that the "ether" or mythic form of the material, what is forming space does not exist. The speed of light was the same every time, and that means that the existing of "ether" was not true. And the speed of light was a little bit lower than 300 000 000 meters per second.

The speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, which was lower than calculated speed, and that thing was not caused reactions, and physicists corrected their calculations by using the speed, what Michelson was reported. And that's it, the speed of light was 299 792 458 m/s, and nobody even thought that could there maybe some kind of reason, why the real speed of light is lower than it should be.

If calculations are made right, there is something, that will slow the photons, and that thing has been caused the discussions, that there is something wrong in the universe. Then the astronomers found the case, that the universe is too heavy, and there is something, that we cannot see or feel, but the thing is that something has a very large effect on the universe itself.

That thing is called as the dark material or dark energy. The thing that makes that effect very interesting is that we could call those things as "ether". But when we are starting to think about this strange mystery, what we are calling as the dark energy and dark material, we are facing one very interesting paradox. Mass can turn to energy and energy can turn to mass, in the opposite effect, what is one of the most fascinating things in the world of science.

We transform mass to energy in every day, but what if we could make the reaction backward? That means we could send things through the electric wires. And then we must ask one question, what might revolutionize entire science. Could the dark energy and dark material be the stages, when the energy would turn to the material?

So the thing is that some intelligent people think that energy would turn cold before it would start to take the material form, and is the dark energy forming the dark material? In this case, the dark material would be the gate between energy and material. When we are thinking about the form of the dark material, we can think that It is a so-called proto-material, what is forming the "real material".

In some Big Bang theories, the cold big bang continues even today, and the energy is turning to the material. And that thing could be the answer to dark energy. Energy must turn to dark and cold before it can condense to the material.

That thig could be called as the "slow big bang".  But that thing is only one version of the theory of the dark and dark material, what is connected to that thing. Another version of the dark energy and dark material is that they could be so-called "free gravitons", which makes people think, that there might be some kind of connection between dark energy, dark material, and gravity. Could gravity turn energy into the material? That is a really interesting question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

The "Grand Unified Theory" or GUT and the idea of how GUT influences to theoretical material research?

This theory is one of the most interesting and mysterious parts of science. The thing that is making that thing so interesting is that it would connect all existing theories of the natural forces under one theory.

So it will combinate the Gravity, electric force, with weak and strong nuclear forces, but the thing is that nobody has ever created the formula, what would combinate those forces, and the mathematicians and physicians from Albert Einstein to Stephen Hawking have tried to create the formula, what would connect all theories under one theory.

The thing, that makes this theory remarkable, is that it would give answers to the things, what are connecting material and energy to the time and gravity. The thing is that the key to creating that theory is gravity. If we could explain the form and direction of gravity, we would be a step closer to "the Grand Unified Theory" (1) or "Theory of Everything" (TOE) (2) or simply GUT. I know that those theories are often mentioned being different, but in fact, some people think that TOE needs GUT for being created, and that's why they should be handled as one theory.

So I have written about gravity many times, and the thing is that things should not be. Gravity would cause movement, which turns to impact energy or heat when the particle hits to another. That energy is a form of the electric force. If we would shoot the particle to the nucleus of the atom, that would cause the nuclear fission, if the nucleus is heavy enough. That particle must just pass the electron layers, and this is why the only suitable particle for that job, and sometimes the theorists have created the idea, that this thing, what is called fission is the form of impact energy.

And when the nucleus or nucleoid would face its anti version, it would blow the quarks away from each other causing the annihilation. So is annihilation some kind of lightning? Does that thing cause, that the electric force, what keeps particles in the same form would somehow nullify? This kind of thing would cause theory, that all forces are the same force, and that would have the active and passive energy form.

But the thing is that gravity would turn the particle moving objects or it can move objects together. And then the impact would release energy, what is coming from the movement. But the thing, what makes "Grand Unified Theory" so interesting is that it would answer the thing, could we somehow connect antimatter to the material without turning both particles to energy.

What if we can create material, where are only electrons? This kind of research is pure theory, and maybe we cannot ever connect antiparticle to particle, but we can always think the possibilities, what that kind of possibility gives to mankind.

In this theoretical material would be only electrons or protons, ad the problem is in handling the annihilation. What if we are thinking about the case that we could connect anti-protons to protons? That would help us to create the proton or electron networks, what is the most incredible material, what people can imagine. But the problem is that the electrons and protons would fly away because of the magnetic pulling effect. If we could create layers, where is only an example of electrons, we could create the ultimate material.

So those particles need the glue particle between them, and the suitable version would be the anti-particle of the same particle. If we would put positrons between electrons, that would help to create the ultimate layer. But the problem is annihilation. If those particles would touch together they would turn energy. The thing is that if we could use electrons and protons in those theoretical materials handling those particles would be easier than handling neutrons.

In theory, we can connect neutrons by putting the southern pole to the northern pole of neutrons together. That would create an extremely strong layer, but neutrons are harder to produce than electrons and protons. And this makes those particles easier to handle, but first, we must handle antimatter and annihilation.

(1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

The ancient Olympic games and their role in society

The ancient Olympic games and their role in society

As we might know, the Olympic games had a much deeper meaning in antic Greece than just games. They offered a place for the discussions about peace and alliances because they were a natural place, where also kings can visit. So there were many other things, which were done around those games, and the sports were not in primary reason, why some kings visited in that area. Hot weather kept people inside or seeing the games, and that caused that the kings could discuss like outsiders didn't hear, what they spoke in their tents.

The ancient Olympics of antic Greece was hosted by the city named Elis, and those games were done in the holy area of Olympia. Those Olympic games were five days of competitions, where athletics race against each other, and then the winner got glory and money. Except in the horse race, where the money was given straight to sponsor, and the driver of the horse got the payment from the sponsor.

Or officially that money was given to a horse, but of course, they were used by the sponsor. And, of course, officially the athletics were private persons when they participated in the games. But those athletics gave gold and glory for their hometowns, and that is one reason, why the loss in those games was a shame.

Even if those athletics were private persons, the city offered them to change to practice for the Olympics and that means that those persons had coaches. When we are looking at the historical texts, the sportsmen gave a small gift to the statue of Zeus, when they won those games. The thing is that those gifts were cheap, and they were symbolic gestures for the gods, that they allowed that man to win the games. And as you might know, that those athletics were trained by professionals. Those gifts were the marketing merchandise, what the coaches used to offer their services.

And training of those athletics was expensive. I don't know did those athletics themselves know that there was big money behind them. So if the sportsman was caught for deceit, that person must buy the small statue of Zeus for the god, and that statue was the mark that money and time, what those athletics were cost must give back. But there is one question in those Olympics, and that is, why they were hosted by Elis?

That is because those sportsmen must dare to try hard, and that means that the place of Elis or the Olympian holy land was chosen for the place of the games, which was kept in the hottest time in summer at every fourth year. The reason for that was that there was a break in agriculture, but the hot weather kept people in order. But there was one thing, why those ancient Olympic games arranged.

That thing might be ancient eugenics. In that time noble families of Greece lived in total isolation, and marriages were allowed only at the same level of people. That means that those families were sharply marked in the family trees and the bloodlines were very important because one handicapped person might risk everything. So the new blood or genetic material, as we would say in modern times should be best what can get. And the Olympics were the perfect place for selecting that new blood.

The thing was that those sportsmen were perfect fathers for the children of the princesses. They brought fresh blood for the royal families of Greece, and that's why they were used for ancient eugenics. The Greeks were known that wealthy people gave wealthy children. In ancient Greece, those people knew, that also things like personality traits are descending. So that was so-called ancient eugenics. And in that time the noble families were living in total isolation, which means that they must get the new genetic material, and that thing was given those athletics. So this kind of thing is a very good way to explain things like DNA manipulation.

Why gravity waves are interesting?

Why gravity waves are interesting?

Cosmologists and physicians are always getting grey hair because of gravity. Gravity is the only force in the physical world, what effects in long distances. It is the most important and dominating force in the universe. And it cannot fit with any theories, and calculations, what is created to explain the universe. 

Sometimes some people have said that without gravity we would have the great Unity theory, but the problem is that we cannot combine gravity theories with other base forces of the universe. Electric force, weak nuclear force and strong nuclear force can put in the same theory, but gravity is so special. The electric force would keep the electron layers orbiting atom, weak nuclear forces keep the nucleus of the atom together, and the strong nuclear force keeps quarks together in the nucleus particles, which are neutrons and protons. 

So because the gravity is so special it has brought theory in the minds of scientists that there could be the fifth base force. There have been observations about the existence of this force, what we can call as "top force" (1). But those things are only references, what are basing the decomposition of the one beryllium atom. And there would need more research, that we could understand this force. 

Gravity waves are interesting because, in theory, a human being could use them in the interstellar spacecraft propellant. The idea of this kind of theoretical motor is that the system would create two nano-sized black holes, and then those black holes would be impacted together. 

That effect would cause the gravity waves, what is pushing or pulling spacecraft forward. But there is a problem with those systems, and one of them is this kind of system needs very much energy for creating those quantum black holes. But the thing is that we should create so enormous systems, that we cannot even imagine, what kind of supporting technologies that kind of things need

But gravity waves are a very good example of the thing, where theory has become true. With another gravity phenomenon, what is called the gravity lens, that thing is a very good example of the phenomenon, what has proven true. And the gravity lens is proven that gravity has an effect light, what is one thing, what makes that force interesting. The thing is that gravity is problematic because it cannot fit any physical theories or calculations. 

It is an only force, that effects the light. It can turn the trajectory of the photon. And that ability makes it special. Of course, things like glass lenses can turn the route of photons, and silicon can turn photons to electricity. The effect in the solar panel happens, when the photon hits the silicon atom, it would make the electron layer oscillate, and then the electron would jump to another atom, which is causing the photoelectric reaction, where the next atom would release extra electron to another. So the solar panel doesn't turn the photon to the electron.  

(1)

https://www.avaruus.fi/uutiset/kosmologia-ja-teoreettinen-fysiikka/luonnon-viidennesta-perusvoimasta-loytyi-viitteita.html

What thing made Cambridge Analytica so effective?

What thing made Cambridge Analytica so effective?

One very interesting detail in the next case is that Cambridge Analytica got the benefit, that the name of that company was connected to the University of Cambridge, and that was causing, that people let that company search the data, what they handle when they have used the internet. People didn't think that the data, what they delivered or handled affect the political system of elections any kind of ways.

The case of Cambridge Analytica the thing was that the first time artificial intelligence was used for investigating opinions of people, and then the politicians could fix their speeches to please the great audience. In the Cambridge Analytica case, the thing, what allowed to hack political system, the tool what was used, was the algorithm, what was created for commercial use.

The idea was that the software, what meters people interest to the commercial products were used to product used for creating a political program, and this kind of things are making this kind of products very interesting multi-use programs what can use in many purposes. The key element is that the politician is the product like some soap or another thing, what we are finding in the supermarket.

And also politicians want to boost their careers, so maybe in the one day tomorrow or the future, we will see more cases like this. This case opened people eyes, that data is ever harmless. The thing is about the algorithm, which detects the interest of the politician by simply metering the time, what the person would spend while looking at the texts and videos, where the politician introduces ideas. The algorithm is similar to what is used for selecting the music for festivals.

They detect clicks to videos, and then the part of the video, which is mostly rewatched, and that thing tells the analysis, what kind of music some kind of people want to hear. This method can combine to the automatic collecting the data. But when we are thinking about the written text, how we are looking for things, what might interest people. The idea is that the political program is like some kind of rock festivals and the political program is entirety.

That thing is that the things, what politicians are promising are things, what are collected from many details. So how we could find out, what kinds of things are giving the votes to the right person. The thing is that people could give the text of the speeches of politicians, and ask would that person give the vote to some politician? During that time the system meter the time, what a person spends with text, but at the same time system detects, what part of this text the person would the individual reads. Those things are telling about interest for that thing.

And when the person would answer, the algorithm or artificial intelligence would meter the length of the breaks between those words, and also it detects the octave, and that thing would tell if the person is getting excited and that also tells if a person lies. The question is simple, "would you give your vote to that politician, and tell me why"? The thing, what helped this company in its mission is that the name, what this company used, connected it with the University of Cambridge, and it made people allow the Cambridge Analytica to collect the data, and use it in their purposes as I wrote at the beginning of this text.

In the courtroom only facts are important.

In the courtroom only facts are important.

Social media has great power, as we have seen. In cases like a confession of AREA-51, social media had a vital role in the uncovering the secret, what might be bigger than we ever imagined. This case has been shown that the power of social media has a very large role to force the rulers to tell the truth for the people, and also Brexit has shown the force of this way to share opinions and thoughts.

But the thing is that social media has brought one problem in the mind of people. If we think that so-called traditional media would give one-side information of something, we must realize that the great mass of false information has more effect than the small mass of right information, if people are believing that kind of data. The confession is the key in this kind of way to act. If shared data confess people, it's the same, what people shares.

One way to make people silent is to claim that some people have taken to court because of their opinions. In the court is one rule what people must realize. Prosecuted are innocent until they are proven guilty. And proving the prosecuted guilty must happen by using facts, not appealing feelings. This is the thing, what is normally forgotten.

And that is a really interesting thing in social media. When we want to confess to people that our way to think is the only one and right, we must have only persons, who have authority to the system. Then we can use titles, what is not true, and get those "three persons" who can prove the thing, what has been discussed true. The thing is that those things seem very confessing, but then we can see something, what we don't want to see in this hypothetical case.

First thing is that the faculty or area, where professor works is not mentioned. Second, the source, what is used is somehow unique, it has been some lecture or something, and it has happened before digital recordings or recordings of the lecture have somehow destroyed. The third is that there are great feelings about this kind of cases. That thing is seen in the cases when some war criminal has been arrested.

In those cases, the media was full of brutal details what has been done to the victims, but a couple of things have been forgotten. One is the place where those things have been done, and second is the ranks and units, where those criminals served. Those things are really important for the justice system, which must give the judgment. And even if the cases where the crime is well known, the identities of the criminals must be proven, or those prosecuted persons are free to go. Sometimes I have thought that is the handling of war crimes by using brutal details mission to deny people to see those images?

 Well, that thing is a mystery, but the feelings are an extremely good weapon to keep people silent. "I was there myself" is a good argument in media, and "I want to forget". Those things are a good way to close the mouths of the people. We must forget to think about mafia and war criminals some kind of super demons. We must start to think about them as regular criminals, who had great support for their work. When we are handling cases like homicide detectives, we ever ask them to have they ever been battered? This is a really interesting thing to think when we are thinking about investigations and research.

The next there is a small example of about misunderstandings what are connected to Indians. What is the archeologist's relationship with the Mayan culture? Of course, European sociopaths destroyed that nice and famous Indian culture, which ruled the Andes of South America. By the way, Mayan Indians lived in Central America, and their culture was crumbling in when Europeans came. The Indians, who lived in the Andes were Incas and the reason why Pizarro could destroy those people was that Incas were conquered their area, and slaved the other Indians.

That allowed Pizarro to recruit those people in his army. The same thing happened in Central America, where Aztecs slaved other Indians, and then Cortez allowed to use force against Aztecs. But the thing is that the hate was a similar tool in the hands of Conquistadors what it was in the hands of Nazi-Germany and after that Allied forces benefit the hate in their actions. The thing is that crushing other opinions would happen by simply trolling them out from social media.

The second way is to appeal to feelings. If people see something happening that thing has a greater effect than if we would read some reports. If in the court would arrive, some 90 years old woman or man, would the counselor or prosecutors dare to interrogate them with full skills and force. But there is one thing, we can't believe that those old people were young sometimes. We always want to believe that somebody who we might know as the beloved man or woman was monster.

The thing is that the law says that every prosecuted must have the best possible defense. And the thing why defense must be used is that the also prosecuted person must be heard. But the motives have been changed in that kind of cases.

Murder is still murder and serious crime. If the merchandise of the person or the initial capital for business has been earned by using criminal methods, that capital would be returned to the families of victims, and the lawyers would get good profits for those cases. So the lawyer always wins. But the law says that murder can be prosecuted rest of a person's lifetime. This is the thing in law. In the courtroom, the moral has no mean, only facts are things what means something, and the rest of things are meanless. This is the rule in court.

Dogs and intelligence

Dogs and intelligence

Dogs are the best friends of human beings. Below this text is a video of the smartest dogs in the world. This dog can learn 1000 words and this kind of tests have been done by using the names of objects. And the dog could find all of those objects and actions, what the trainer has been taught to it.

This dog is mentioned being the smartest dog on Earth, and that Border Collie what looks a little bit "Laika dog" what was the first organism, what flew around the world in space capsule Sputnik II. The thing is that this kind of animals is used for tests, where is tested the animal's ability to learn things. This kind of method, where the dog is taught words by showing one object after another is used to create things, what allows people to learn things younger and younger.

Also, those methods are used with handicapped persons and advancing the research of machine learning. There are rumors about tests, where the pineal gland of the dogs are changed to organ, what is taken from higher species like monkeys. That thing has been made for testing the influence of pineal gland to the intelligence of animals and people.

When we are thinking about the methods of teaching dogs, the most important thing is to keep calm and relaxing during the teaching process. That means that the teaching will base the same thing what Ivan Pavlov created in the late 19th. century. That method is that the well-done job would be gifted by giving cookies or something other things. The method is motivating the dog to make things better, and in this process, the object is simply shown to the dog, and then it would be shown what to do with it. 

Do you know that memory marks of the dogs are researched? The idea is that the voices or images have been shown to a dog and its reactions have been followed by approximately, or there can be used the things like detectors, what are following the neural reactions of the dog. If the dog has been a stressful situation, and the voices or images, what have been connected to that case would be heard or seen again, that would cause the psychophysical reaction.

So if the dog hears the voice of the person, who has hurt its master it would react immediately. Also if some product causes the pain to it, it would react very strongly, if it sees that product or person, who has caused that pain again. So this kind of information is important for investigators when they are looking for criminals and other things.

One of the most interesting things is that if dogs have been in the space capsule, the researchers can make a copy of the cockpit of the capsule by using technology, where is used sharpening images. At first, the researcher would use sound what is recorded in a space capsule to find out, if the dog has been in that place. Then the researcher would use color, and then to the image would involve shape, then lines and after that, the image will be made sharper and sharper. This kind of tests has been used to create a base for tracking people like domestic violators and drug dealers.

The situation has been stressful, and the researcher would follow the neuropsychological reactions of the dog, and when the image would transform to look more and more looking like the place, where the stress has happened, the neurophysiological reactions will become stronger and stronger. So this is one of the most important things to know when violent persons or people who have grown fighting dogs have been tracked.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omaHv5sxiFI