Fascinating way to think
Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".
They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.
And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.
Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.
We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.
Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.
The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.
Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.
The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.
Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.
Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".
They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.
And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.
Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.
We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.
Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.
The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.
Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.
The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.
Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.
Comments
Post a Comment