The product is the tool for making business and without a product is no business.

All companies must have a product that they sell. Without product is no business. For businesses, the product is the tool that should bring money to the company. Without a product is no incoming money. The reason for that is that the product is the thing that brings customers. And customers are people who are giving money to the company to get products that the company will offer. 

When a person becomes an entrepreneur that person must realize that money that customers are bringing to the company is not a gift. Customers want those products. And if the product doesn't please them, they will choose some other deliverer for those things. 

Somebody says that products are unequal. Because companies want that people buy new products in the next year. That thing is an urban legend. But the fact is that the product is the base for business. And without product is no business. When everybody buys some product that thing brings it to every pocket. And finally, there is no sale anymore. And if the company is not selling products, that thing causes bankruptcy. 

So, if the company doesn't make new products, that thing causes problems. When some company offers computer games or mobile games, they must realize billions of users might load that game. But then everybody has that game, and why do they want to pay the same license again and again? Those users don't want to gift their money to the company. They want the product for their money. That's why the company must develop new products. 

So it's easier to make an unequal product that is easy to refine, and people are willing to buy the better product next year. If we think about cell phones it's easy to make a phone with a 60 Gb flash memory store. And then the next year company can make the same cell phone with a 120 Gb flash memory store. That thing saves the company from the costs of development. This thing is one of the most interesting things in products.

We must realize that technology turns more advanced. And advanced technology brings new abilities and advances in products. The new products are more tested and more secure than old fashion products. The fast-advancing ICT sector is a good example of an area where is no perfect product. And even the most-perfect products turn old-fashion very fast. 

But what if companies are making only perfect products? At this point, I must say that there is no perfect product. And sooner or later, even the best products turn old. When we think about the oldest mobile telephones the entire telephone turns old-fashion. 

The products are made a little bit worse than they could be. And that thing guarantees that people buy it next year. Maybe that thing is somehow right. But the product must give a response to the new type of threats, and it must follow standards. The information technology world is a race between hackers and defenders. 

When password protection became standard, the hackers turned to use social hacking like cheating the workers. They asked the passwords and misuse the data systems. So biometric recognition removed that problem. Maybe tomorrow we must use the password only once. That "once" is when we started to use internet accounts. 

And then, we will continue to use biometric recognition. The web camera can follow the user, and if the user changes during the use and continues to use the same account the system can tell supervisors that some wrong person uses someone else's account. 

Old-fashion mobile telephones are the risk. In old Android telephones, thieves must only remove SIM cards. If they want to get access to social media applications. If the phone itself is password protected, that gives better security. But there is the possibility that a misuser blackmails or cheats the password. So the next step is biometric recognition. The fingerprint makes it impossible to misuse the system. Or the misuser must be a registered user. 

This kind of system is telling if some other person will try to use the account without permission. The information of the attempt to log in to the system will be seen on the mobile telephone if the user uses a two-stage login. 

When people are not using old technology enough the network operators will remove the support from those phones. And the reason for that is the costs of the networks. When the operator maintains the network that thing causes costs. 

If there are no users, the costs will raise too high. Maintaining old-fashion systems costs money. And that money is away from some other projects. 

The reason why the networks developed all the time is that modern systems are bringing security. The new type of environment requires secured networks. And that thing must notice in the business and governments. When the Internet developed people trusted that governments are removing things like disinformation and other things from the net. 

But Putin's trolls, along with Chinese hackers, are shown that some governments are not trusted. When we are talking about "trust" trust is the thing that is always earned. Trust is not the thing that is just the world. 

When some of Putin's trolls are delivering disinformation or Chinese hackers will crack the systems people must realize that those actors are working for their governments. They ever are punished. This is why we must concern about the misuse of the internet. The new products must be safer, and we must prepare things like somebody misses a mobile telephone. 

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud 

Dr. Sigmund Freud has been written lots of things about libido and orgasm. In the case of Freud, those things have many more meanings that for some normal person. The terminology what Freud uses is very complicated, even it seems simple at first sight. The texts of that person are full of symbol, and sexuality symbolizes the secret world, what is in the human mind.

In this text, I will write the thing about the psychoanalysis. There are actually two types of versions of psychoanalysis. The original or so-called classic version, which was created by Dr. Sigmund Freud. In that version, the psychoanalyst doesn't give medicals to the patient. And in the "modern" version of psychoanalysis created Dr. Carl Jung, under the supervision of Freud. That version of the medical treatment would be accepted in this therapy.

Normal people would at the same time shame and protect that world, and the thing what that term means is the thing what people should handle in the psychoanalysis. Libido is the thing, what satisfies the person, and what person also wants to keep in mind.  When Freud created his methodology, what is called as the Freudian psychoanalysis, the first thing, what the person, who operate with client or patient must be done is to make the map about things, what patient wants to speak, and what that inmate wants to hide.

So the psychoanalysis is not the medical treatment. It is meant for the tool, what is used to analyze the mind of the patient, and that thing is the most important thing when the medical, and treatment would be planned and executed.

Of course, the psychoanalysis can help a person to handle feelings and willings, and those things are really important when the behavior of the patient wanted to change. The psychoanalysis is handling very personal things, and it can be used with or without medical treatment.

The role of the psychoanalyst is to follow the reactions of the patient when the discussion handles things, which is very sensitive and personal. Those reactions are things like yelling, violent behavior like punching the analyst or treating the analyst or some other members of the medical team.

If the patient is violent, the psychoanalyst would punish the patient and if the reaction is what is willing to get, the patient would be gifted. And that makes psychoanalysis very effective tool for qualified persons for supporting the other methods.

But still, in today the remarkable thing about the psychoanalysis is that sometimes this method is used as therapy, and in other cases that are purely the method, what to use as finding out the problems, what the patient has. The thing what makes this method the long and very hard for the patient is that Dr. Freud was not used medical treatment during this process. That has caused blaming, and Freud explained that thing in this case medicals would cover some dangerous things in the patient's mind.

Modern psychiatry is using different methods and more advancing tools than Sigmund Freud, but even in the most modern research rooms, the main role is the sofa. Of course, modern medical treatment is more advancing, than some cocaine injections. And in the version, what created Dr. Carl Jung the medical treatment is, how we should say, accepted.

In the most modern version, all electronic equipment would be covered, and the psychoanalyst can record things like speech, but also the functions of the parasympathetic nervous system. Those things would cause that in the modern world the classic psychoanalysis would be the most effective tool for finding out things, what person wants to cover. And for the effective medical treatment, the patient must be honest or therapy would fail.

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

What can we do, if a teenager delivers hate talk and racist propaganda on the net?

Here is one thing, when we must realize that we are adults, and probably some of those underage persons have even don't understand things, what they are saying or writing. But there is one thing, what might make some people suspicious, that there is something else than the teenager behind some social media accounts. And if the writings and talking would seem like some kind of press conference of Vladimir Putin, that would mean that somebody else uses that account.

Here we must remember that pedophiles are using the underage person identity in the net, and also hackers and propagandists are looking for the images of cute teenagers, and those images might be used in the account, what is used to benefit those peoples purposes. Sometimes I have imagined, did Zuckerberg even understand, what kind of rock that man put to roll when he started the Facebook. And today Facebook is the only solution and many other social media channels are driving past that solution, what was "the first".

Social media is a very big thing in the world, and also political campaigns can target by using the same method with normal marketing

There are many beautiful things in the case, and one of them is that Facebook grows a very powerful tool for many things, like mapping the political opinions of the users. And also it's powerful marketing equipment, which raises the value of his corporation. Today social media is big business, and there would be billions of dollars, what the marketing companies invest in those actors.

They are creating more effective algorithms, which can be used to make profiles of the people. The same algorithms can use to make the marketing profile of the user, but the same algorithms can be used to uncover the political opinions of the people, and the election campaigns can target to the certain audience same way with normal marketing campaigns.

In some scenario, the politician would just put the crosses in the squares of the form, and then the artificial intelligence would target the campaigns to the persons, who has similar opinions with this politician. This would increase the popularity of some politician. If a candidate would press the button, where reads that this person is strictly against foreign people, the artificial intelligence just selects people, who are against foreigners.

Those people are selected by using the words, what they are writing on Facebook, and that thing helps to find people, who have the same opinions with that politician. In fact, those algorithms can help that inmate to create speeches, what have the best influence on the audience. That means they can pick things from the information, which is share shared on social media, and find the things that are easy to solve by using political authority.

When we are thinking about the value and problems with Facebook is that if Zuckerberg would want to terminate that service, that man needs very much money, because it is used as the marketing tool, and those companies, what are using it as the communication and marketing tool might ask compensation about their work, what they have done in the world of algorithms.

Mobile devices are problematic because the person can push buttons accidentally

Those algorithms are used to collect the data about the things, what people are doing on Facebook, and those algorithms have problems with mobile devices. People are striking the "like" or "dislike" button accidentally when they are using Facebook by using mobile devices. But if the user listens to some song very often, what this person "dislikes" would that mean that the button is pushed accidentally. Those systems can collect data about the words, what people are using, while they are writing on Facebook, and if the words are positive that means that the thoughts about that thing are positive.

That kind of algorithms can also compile those words and clause structures with other accounts, and that thing would uncover persons political and another kind of opinions, and they uncover also if some texts are written by somebody else. Especially if this "somebody else" is writing on Facebook by using multiple accounts. That thing would rise those accounts in the close look of the moderators.

Psychological profiles can use to wrong purpose

One of the most horrifying problems of that profiling is that those profiles can uncover if the person is some kind of serial killer. This kind of data can misuse in many ways, and one is that data, what is collected from Facebook can use to track other that kind of persons, and if some criminal would know the "trigger", what makes that person make the horrifying things, that data can use to target the violence to certain person.

This means that using that data the person, who has necessary skills can use some psychopath as the "torpedo", who makes murders for that actor, and the thing, what makes those people extreme dangerous, is that they feel that they are making the right things when they are making murders for some mafia boss. The serial killer would not have a social conscience, and that means this person ever regret things what this person have done.

And if the profile of the user is made by using long term data collection, the artificial intelligence might notice, if there would be differences with the user, what began to use that social media account and the user, who uses that account in the present day. If the interests and words are suddenly changed, that might mean, the account is taken by some other user, who uses it without permission. Here I mean that using another person's identity in Facebook or any other social media channel is prohibited.

The thing of the legislation and money laundering

The thing of the legislation and money laundering

The thing in the organized crime is that the real big actors are staying away from the dirty business like drug selling, murders, and trafficking, what are really bad crimes, and the thing is that those actors don't ever meet their customers or henchmen face to face. Those people who are working in organizations like Mafia do not ever take the dirty money to their bank accounts, and they need to wash the money, what is collected from the streets.

In that process, the money, what is collected from the drug addicts is transferred by using many separate bank accounts and the corporations, would transfer to legal money, which can be used in the everyday life. And in that process, the money washers are writing many receipts, which must be shown to the tax collectors.

But the legislation is a very important tool against that kind of business, because the laws, what is denied the money laundering are an effective tool in the fight against organized crime. The legislation gives tools and legal standards for the authorities and justifies their actions against organized crime. And the thing is that kind of laws is the thing, what keeps state clean. But of course, there are inmates, who want to make money with the trafficking and drug business, and those people don't want that kind of laws, and the argument is normally that they are denying the normal competition in the market economy.

The thing is that if the country would not have the laws against organized crime and money laundering this kind of thing might have a negative influence on the markets because if the nation would not have that kind of laws. The bank system would put "the yellow mark" to the money transfers because in that case, every money transactions are suspicious because the origin of the money is not asked.

And this means that the organized crime would use that kind of hole in the legislation for getting the profits. If the legislation allows money laundering, that would give a bad reputation for the country, what makes a negative influence on business life. That kind of thing shows that the legislation must follow the time, and the authorities must have tools to fight against those things.