We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We are above others, and if someone disagrees, that would cause problems

We all want to see that our state is better than others, and when we are facing criticism, we will rise to our back feet like horses do, when they are afraid. This thing is visible in every state and nation in the world. And the thing is that the persons like Voltaire have faced that kind of things when they have said that the British Monarchy is better, advancing and respect human rights better than the French version.

And this kind of ideas has caused problems before and after the life of Voltaire. This kind of things are interesting to search and the fact is, that Voltaire was forced exile from France when he wrote that text. The reason for that was that Voltaire said, that Frech King was worse than British King, and that was not tolerated in that time.

Every person who was suspicious about the motives of the royal highness were traitors, and that caused anger in the mind of the people because if normal people would not be angry when the king was not the best in some poor writer's opinion was somehow "different". That means that when the king was angry normal people were angry too. 

The mind of the state is collective, and if the higher rank member of the society is angry every henchman is angry too. If that is not happening the disappointment of the leader would be great, and Santa Claus would not bring gifts. "This is the law of nature", is the normal argument in this kind of situation, when the leader turns all society against one person. This kind of leaders is always comparing their group to the wolfpack, where is the straight and holy hierarchy.

The person who is in the middle of the line of hierarchy probably likes that kind of things, but if the person is the last one, would that make that inmate unsatisfying. But the thing is that I represent the species, what is called human. Human has skills like discuss things without hierarch, and this thing makes us superior against wolves. But, when in wolfpacks the leaders would get angry, other members were angry too.

When the last member of the group would face trobles, nobody helps that inmate, because the hierarchy obligates only henchmen to follow leaders. If the leader face cheat, henchmen must defend the leader, but if henchman is facing the same things, nobody defends that inmate. This thing has caused that we have a democratic government. And the total or collective anger is often seen in the societies, what is controlling one person.

Collectively owned city cars can be one solution for lack of space in city areas

Collectively owned city cars can be one solution for lack of space in city areas

The collectively owned city cars can be the extended version of the public transportation system. There is one solution for the people, who need to use a car in the towns but they don't live in that area. One of the problems of the automobiles in city areas is lack of space, and one solution is to offer the electric car for borrowing like some city bikes, and the thing in this idea is that people, who are coming outside of that area can borrow the cars, what are meant for collective use. The system is actually similar, what is used in the bus companies, where the drivers would change their turn by using the electric car, and this solution, where the people can borrow the car is actually the expanded version of this solution.

One of the biggest problems is how to control the driver, or actually that the driver has the driver's license. The thing is that this kind of solution must have access to check that the person, who uses that vehicle has the license to use that vehicle.

The electric cars can loan like city bikes if the driver can be identified and the thing that the driver has the driving license can be noticed. The user of the vehicle must put the ID or driver's license to the hole and use the PIN code. The marketing idea would be that the service is only for registered users. And the vehicles can use face recognition for identifying the driver. When the vehicle would return to its loading point, the system would tell it's properly returned.

If the vehicle is returned to the wrong place, the user must pay an extra bill. The safety of the system would be guaranteed by artificial intelligence, what would have image recognition system and GPS, what will tell the computer what is the speed limit in some areas, and that denies the over speeding. The thing in this kind of systems is that they are leaving the steering to the driver, but it controls the driving speed, and that system can, of course, record the driving session. This would be guaranteed that the protection under the law is done, even if the people would drive by using the collective own electric cars.