The holographic reality

The holographic reality

Anyone who isn't shocked by quantum physics has not understood it.
-Niels Bohr-

And when we are looking at this quote, we must ask, does Niels Bohr himself understood quantum physics? Or is there anybody else, who understands this kind of thing? Or when Bohr created the idea of the Quantum theories, did he understand how fundamental his ideas were?

When we are talking about quantum physics, we are talking also about the very fundamental area of science, what is full of colorful people, who were and who are looking for thig, what is the final truth or definition about truth. Sometimes we are thinking that many things, what we see or what we are making is true, and we are forgetting that there are always exceptions about that kind of thing. And one thing, what we cannot ever understand is the reality.

What is the description of reality? For us, the reality is the thing, what we can taste, feel or see. And that's it. But then we must remember that we always see reality from a different point of view. That means that there is no absolute reality, and we can take one example of this thing. The thing is that when a person, who would not see colors looks at the traffic lights and says that they are red doesn't mean that this person sees colors. That person sees that the highest light is on, and that makes this person say, that the traffic light is red.

The possibility that we are meeting a person, who cannot see colors is very small, but in the world, it must be that kind of person. So should we think about this thing, when we are asking the color of the traffic light? I think that this thing doesn't affect the real life of most of the people. The probability that the absolute color-blind people come in front of us is very small. But when we are going to think the thing, that reality could be an illusion or some kind of hologram, we must remember that there are many people, who are writing many articles about this thing.

The Danish physician Niels Bohr explained that the universe is the hologram, what has sucked from some greater entirety. The thing that Niels Bohr precisely said was "subatomic particles only come into existence in the presence of an observer, then it is meaningless to speak of a particle's properties and characteristics as existing before they are observed"(1).

The thing, that Bohr pointed out was that the subatomic particles are forming the atomic particles, what are forming molecules, what are forming things, what we are calling as the reality. The thing was that this thing has been connected to the de Broglie's theory, that every single particle in the universe has the wave and particle mode, or the wave-particle duality (2).

So this thing has been created an idea, that the universe has been crushed through the wormhole to space, what we are calling as the universe. The thing is that when Bohr said that particles come into existence in the presence of an observer, he meant that the observer makes things real. Or he meant that the observer sees things, they have existed. If we are not seeing things they have not existed. And our consequence makes things real. And what this thing means? We know that quarks and Higg's boson are real, but at the same time, we cannot feel, see or taste them. So what makes this thing holographic?

In this case, we need the middleman to tell us that the thing is real. The thing is that we see the articles, which are written about those things, but we cannot see them ourselves. Or we see quarks when they are part of the bigger entirety. We see concrete walls, but we cannot see quarks inside it. So can the particle or object be real, before we see it? That is a really good question. The existence of an object is depending, that we realize that thing has existed. And is the wave movement or waveform of the material existed?

If you will touch powerful laser ray, that thing exists, because it burns our hand regardless of the form of light. And that means that the wave movement also exists. But what if we are looking at the radio waves, we are facing things that the machine or radio would need to transmit the radio waves to us. And are radio waves real? We know that they are real because in some books is written that the phenomenon that is called the radio waves is transmitting data, which can be analog or digital through the air. So in this kind of case, we need a tool to find out the reality.

(1)
https://www.khouse.org/articles/2002/398/print/

(2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Fascinating way to think

Fascinating way to think

Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".

They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.

And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.

Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.

We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.

Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.

The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.

Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.

The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.

Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.