Black holes in our solar system

 

Black holes in our solar system

Under this text is a link to an article that is published in the Business Insider magazine. There is writing about the possibility that we have a black hole in our solar system(1).  

There is one very interesting thing Could we have a black hole in our solar system? (2) Could this be possible? When we want to observe black holes, we must realize that we cannot get observations straight from the black hole. We see the disk of material around it, and here I must say, that we see only the radiation, what comes around the black hole. But inside the point, where escaping velocity would across the speed of light we cannot get the observation. 

And that means that we see black holes only when something drops inside them. So if the black hole is orbiting the star in the area, where is not material, that thing would cause that the radiation, what comes from the black hole would be very hard to notice. Or in other scenarios, the material that is dropped in the black hole is pure helium or hydrogen, because the black hole would act similar way with planets, and they will sweep other particles from their trajectory. 

That means that the light particles, that are dropped in the black hole would not send very strong radiation, which is hard to detect from the Earth, because it is sending in the form of X-ray frequency. That weak radiation would be lost in the background radiation. There have been speculations that near our solar system can be the very small black hole, what size would be about basketball. 

But what could form that kind of black hole? The answer would be that the antimatter explosion could form those really small black holes, which can exist about thousands or millions of years. Those periods are extremely short if we are thinking them at the point of view of the ages of stars like the sun. But even if those black holes would vaporize in a short period, that thing will take a very long time, if we compare that thing to the lifetime of a human. 

The vaporization time depends on the things, how much material the black hole can pull inside. And the stars would give the energy to those black holes, which means that the existing time of the small black holes is extremely hard to predict. The vaporization means that sometimes the black holes are losing photons, and what smaller the mass of this supermassive particle goes the loss of photons would increase. 

And sooner or later the black hole has finished its existence. When a black hole is in the space, the black holes cannot get anything to eat, and that means that they cannot get more energy. But if the black hole is near the star, that will feed it with energy, and that kind of thing can increase the lifetime of the black holes, which is extremely small. 

(1)

https://www.businessinsider.com/astrophysicists-found-black-hole-in-solar-system-planet-2019-11?utm_content=buffer194e2&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer&r=US&IR=T

(2)

https://www.livescience.com/tiny-ancient-black-hole-planet-nine.html

Image:

https://www.spaceanswers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Black-hole-in-Solar-System.jpg

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

The advanced measurement methods are causing grey hair to the scientists

In the world of science is forgotten one of the most interesting things, what we face always in real life. That thing is artificial intelligence, which can be used for handling multiple points in the calculations and observations. The thing is that artificial intelligence can handle billions of variables, and that thing causes conflicts with classical formulas in many areas.

Many of the classic formulas of classic mechanics like Kepler's point have been calculated by using two or three points, and modern computer technology can notice billions of points, and it can also mean that the smallest effective forces can be noticed. This thing means that we must confess, that even the farthest objects affect the particles, which are moving in some trajectories. We cannot meter that effect while the stress to the particle takes about two weeks or even months.

But when the effect continues even thousands of years they can cause the effect, what has mean. And when we are thinking about things like spaceflights, we must remember, that there are many other forces than just gravity, what effects to the trajectory. One thing is the solar wind, which will warm the spacecraft. That thing causes that the small particles are flying away from the craft, and the recoil force would turn it away from the course. That thing affects if the craft is flying tens of years.

Every particle affects other particles in the Universe

Also, the RTG generators, what is used in the space probes would cause that the radioactive particles will push the craft to the trajectory, which is not predicted. That thing can cause minimum errors in the trajectory, what can be measured. In the universe, every particle is in interaction with other particles and that thing causes errors in the calculations. Those errors have no mean in normal life.

But they can be measured. And when we are thinking about the minimum errors in the trajectory of particles like comets, that kind of thing can cause the false alarms of the new planets. The thing is that if the frozen nitrogen is in some part of the asteroid, and there would be the pocket of helium, the radiation can cause the jettison, which would turn the movement of the particle.

The thing is that the old-time scientists were not wrong. That means that the advanced measurement methods have caused the calculations to have turned sharper. The modern supercomputers can also use float decimal numbers, which contains even millions of numbers. That causes the systems to have more accuracy than any scientists in the world.

No human can handle numbers where are thousands of decimals. Or they cannot handle the gravity force of thousands of background stars, what is affecting the particles in every solar system. And that thing is causing the revolution in the world of science.  Computers can connect also the extreme weak variables to the calculations, and that makes them the ultimate tool for research and scientific work.

Radial particle accelerator

Radial particle accelerator

Do you know, what is the radial particle accelerator? It is the machine, what is created for material research, and the mission of that system, what looks a little bit like a radial piston engine, what would shoot the ionized material in the central point of that system. So in this multiple accelerator system, the accelerators would be in the form, what is looking like a radial engine. The mission of that system is to use small energy particle accelerators for impacting many ionized atoms together by creating new superheavy elements, what is existed only a couple of nanoseconds.

The idea is that the radial accelerator can shoot more ions at the same point than the normal particle accelerator. This kind of system is sometimes used in fusion experiments. In Sandia laboratories, this kind of system is used for creating so-called impulse fusion. The idea is that the system would shoot those ions together, and at the same time, it would need less energy than Tokamak or torus systems because the ions are pulling each other together.

But the radial accelerators might have history, what people would not usually know. Those systems were planned to use in the hypothetical spacecraft known as "Kosmokrator". The idea of this system is that the normal nuclear reactor would give power to the radial accelerators, which would create superheavy radioactive elements for the motor of that system. This kind of spacecraft would open the road to the entire solar system.

The idea is that by using ionized Uranium, Iron or some other element, the accelerators would shoot those atoms together, and then then the formed element, what would be existed in a couple of nanoseconds would be used as the fuel of the high power reactors. The fusion of iron might seem very impractical because it needs outer energy to sustain, but that would help to create the super heavy and very radioactive elements for high power reactors because the storage of those elements is very difficult, and there is easier to create them by using fusion. But this system is only one theoretical spaceship, which has been created during history.

There is one other remarkable system, where the radial particle accelerator would be useful. During the Cold War, the SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) defense program some scientists suggested the system, where magnetized plutonium or uranium powder would shoot in the chamber, where would be created the fission reaction. That system would create the most massive particle flow in the space, what people have ever seen. And the thing is that that kind of system could destroy incoming missiles and cause the very strong EMP-pulses to the atmosphere. That ion layer would deny the communication between satellites and clients and EMP pulse can destroy the electronics all over the Earth.

Image
https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/research_magazine/articles/2017/03/images/z_machine_600.jpg

Fascinating way to think

Fascinating way to think

Many people see different things in the same portrait or the same texts, what artists have meant. This is the thing in the symbol function. That means that the image can be translated in many ways, and if we are going back to the "Eye of Horus" many people sees the pineal gland in that figure. Somebody else sees even the "Kugelblitz" spacecraft and the last ones are seeing the image of a black hole in that "eye".

They are saying that the "eye of Horus" is similar to the image of a black hole. And here I must say, that people have the right to take freedoms with those translations and conclusions. I don't know any priest of Horus, who can tell me the "real purpose" of that figure. This kind of thought is free, but the reason, why some people are seeing things differently than others would happen because our brains are filling the images differentially, and the books, what we are reading and the other things, what we are doing are modeling things in our brains.

And sometimes the social environment, where people are living is causing a different kind of things. Sometimes some people are telling their ideas and imaginations other people easier than others. This kind of thing would cause other people to dare to be more peculiar than others. Those people are daring to introduce more sophisticated and radical opinions than others. And this is the idea of art and philosophy.

Make people dare to think originally, and introduce also extraordinary ideas. That thing makes research, development, and philosophy more interesting. If we want to make colorful science, we must realize, that we must not always expect, that there is possible to create some formula, what can explain everything, but we can try to create those formulas. If we don't even try, we cannot ever find out the truth. And this makes this kind of thing fascinating.

We can follow the road of philosophers and try to explain our opinions by using rhetorical argumentation, and that would make also extraordinary, and hard to prove things more acceptable. When we are talking about science, religion, and art, those things bring great feelings in the mind of people. And in science, we must realize, that this thing, what bases on the model of observations, theory, and philosophy is supporting the change. Transformation is the only thing, which is stable.

Our attitudes in society and opinions about many things are chancing during our lifetime. And the thing that would modify our point of view things is the new observations. Observation and confirmed observations have a little difference. Observations are things, that happen only once, and the thing, that makes them confirmed is the simultaneous things, where is collected the evidence of the observation. And there are many things, what we can observe, but we cannot explain.

The thing that black holes would be interesting objects because they can pull the light inside them is not making them the most usual objects in the universe. Those supermassive objects are the most extreme things, what we can ever think, and in fact, normal and supermassive black holes are fascinating, but not typical objects. If we think the thing, what remains after most of the stars would detonate or erupt, is far from black holes.

Only the biggest stars can form a black hole after they detonate. And when we are thinking the opposite extreme object red- or brown dwarfs, those stars are also interesting. They are sometimes erupting and the flares would burn the planets, but the reason for those eruptions might be that star would increase its size, and suddenly gravity wins, and then the nuclear reactions inside those stars would increase and the result would be a flare.

The difference between red dwarfs and brown dwarfs is that the last ones would not have nuclear reactions all the time. The size of the red dwarf is not big, and there are astronomers, who believe that brown dwarfs can be even smaller than Jupiter. And when we are thinking about what happens when this kind of star would burn all its hydrogen, there is maybe not a very big difference between the brown dwarf and the dwarf star, which has lost its fuel.

Those stars would live forever because the fusion inside the brown dwarfs would happen in the small area inside the star. And those stars would pull more hydrogen for them from the area, what locates near the star. So this replacement fuel would make active dwarf stars a very long life. The passive dwarf stars are white dwarfs, where is not a nuclear reaction inside them. This kind of thing makes science fascinating.

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

Could photon captured by quark? And the difference between theory and practical science

The grand idea of physicists is to create a theory, that contains every particle of the area of physics. And the problem of this thing is that other theories would not find harmony with new theories. The thing is that Einstein's and Newton's theories have conflict, and because of the theory of Special Relativity cannot fit the quantum theory, which means that the world of those people is collapsed. If they cannot create the formula, which contains everything in the Universe, that thing would mean that everything cannot be introducing with mathematics. So this is the problem with theoretical and practical science.

At this point, we must say that Einstein created his famous formula for about ten years. People think that creating some formulas is a very easy job, and they might be really interesting things, but then the mathematical formulas must fit the observations and don't worry, that thing is the most fascinating and at the same time difficult part of science. So what the scientists wait, when they are using some instrument.

Could photon captured inside the quark?

They might wait years the situation, that the photon would impact with another photon or quark in some laser ray, that thing could ever happen, but some people believe that kind of possibility, where photon goes inside the quark like in pocket. The thing would be extremely short projection, where photons would capture inside the quark.  There is a strange theory that photons can merge with other photons or quark. That theory is one of the most fascinating and at the same time unbelievable claim in history. There is not single prove that photons can capture by quark, but if that thing is possible that could revolutionize many things.

The thing what scientist could wait is a theoretical thing, what is called as the photon fusion, there is a little possibility, that the photons can merge, but that reaction cannot even prove. The reason for that theory is that because almost everything in the universe can be impact together, so why photons can merge or quarks, as well as quarks and atoms,  do together, do in the high-energy reactions.

But there is no way that we could prove that thing because for that thing would need the photon or quark, what has extremely high energy, or what comes in the right direction. That thing would prove that photon has mass or there could be some reactions between photons, what we will not know. And the people, who are making those investigations would just in that time cut the electricity off from laser when the suitable photon or quark comes to atmosphere.

That thing would cause this kind of reaction, which is impossible at this moment ever detected. This thing is the most incredible scenario. Just at the moment, when some theories can be proven that the system would turn off in a couple of seconds. But the extremely long laser rays have confirmed the thing, what is called as the gravity wave true.

Gravity waves

LIGO-system has detected those waves at the moment when two black holes have collided and in this kind of case the gravity wave would cause that the laser ray would be flattened like some kind of tube, and that thing would not seem like some kind of seismic action. But for hunting those gravity waves the laser ray must be extremely long, and the length of that laser ray in LIGO is over 3000 kilometers. That distance makes possible to see, how the laser ray would be flattened.

But if we would want to create a more sensitive sensor, we would need longer laser rays. In some scenarios to the edge of the solar system would send two or three probes, where is laser systems. Those lasers would form the sensor, what size is the same as the solar system, and those laser rays could measure weaker gravity waves than any system before it.

One of the greatest invention in history, wafting ball, what can use in many purposes

 One of the greatest invention in history, wafting ball, what can use in many purposes

Balls can use to create other planets habitable

Usually, the astronomers are talking about the habitable zone around the star. In that zone, the temperature is precise right for liquidation of water, which is necessary for the life form, what is like we are. In fact, the habitable zone is not stable, and actually, without oceans, the temperature on our planet would be much higher. That's why the scientists have created the idea of the transform the planets like Venus and Mars to habitable by using the carbon to increase the temperature of the planet Mars, but the thing is that by using the silver balls, what is delivered to the atmosphere of the planet Venus scientists claims that they could decrease the temperature of that planet. If those balls would be produced by using the right technology, they can offer cover for the microbes, what would deliver the oxygen in the Venus or some other planet atmosphere.

That system would cover the microbes against the ultraviolet radiation, and they can be used in the early stages in the process of the atmosphere of the planet changing to similar to Earth. Or the large area above the Isiah Terra mountains would be covered by using the large structure, what is made by using the wafting balls, what are connected together, and those balls would locate in the very high altitude by using Kevlar ropes. That very high riding balloons would create the shelter, what is protecting the microbes, what are delivered in some area from the UV-light.

The balls are denying the growth of the seaweeds

In the state of California, the water storage are covered by using balls what mission is to deny the sunlight from the water tank Also those balls increase the pressure of the water in system, what will save the water, because the layer of the balls is pressing the bottom of the water to the tube, what conducts it to the city, and if the tubes are clean the water would travel without resistance.

That thing would make water cleaner because it denies the grow of the seaweeds. This denies the water become slimy, and that system can be cover the water tanks also for some other reason. There are tales that in those water tanks is tested the underwater drones, what are made in Palmdale. And the wafting balls are also used to map the sea currents. Those balls have been made by using ecological material, and they were equipped with the GPS system, which allows scientists to follow them by using satellites.

When we think that the water area could be covered by using balls, we could create a thing, that can control the sunlight in the water. When the system needs more sunlight the balls would collect away, and that makes possible to get more light in the water. This technology is used to keep the water system clean from seaweeds. But if we would think that the human would someday travel to the other planets this kind of systems would allow to benefit the sea areas of the water planets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEmwJzQjwyw

An extremely large scale version of this product. 

When we are thinking the possibility to cover the oceans with the balls with a mirror can make the atmosphere colder, and the dark balls would heat the atmosphere. There is somewhere given an idea that the planet Mars would be covered by using black carbon, which increases the temperature.

Or in the atmosphere of Venus would send billions of shining balloons, what covers large areas of that planet, and they can decrease the temperature. Nanotechnology allows creating silicon composite balls, which can act as the solar panels. Those ball-shaped nano technical solar panels could deliver to the area, and they can produce the electricity. And that dust can easily be delivered to the surface of the moon, what transfers that thing to large power satellite, as in one film was introduced. In this time the used technology is the nano-dust, which is easy to deliver. So maybe someday this thing would become true.

Could the entire planet covered by using carbon balls, where could be computer inside. In this case, there could be two layers of balls, which isolates the depth from the surface. That would be made by connecting two balls together, and if the surface ball is bigger than the ball, what is sunken, will that make the system possible. If there is a tube between those balls each ball could have miniaturized power plant inside them.

Those balls can do everything

In fact, this two-layer construction can use as the base element for the layers, what can use to create the artificial surface for the large and deep sea-area. This system or structure would allow separating the surface water from the deep water, and that would make safer to create the agriculture on the planet, what is covered with water layer. In those scenarios, the plantation would be created with hybrid vegetables, where is connected to the genomes, what are taken from the algae, and some normal vegetable. This kind of thing feels like some kind of science fiction novel, but the balls can actually be used for the colonization of the water planets.

Also, each ball can be covered by solar panels, which allows creating a wafting power plant. In some scenarios, the ball-shaped probe, what is filled with some suitable gas could someday be dropped on the surface of Titan moon oceans or some gas planet, and maybe they will observe the strange environment. That thing would get electricity from clean energy. Those computer balls would be used to create an extremely large supercomputer. In fact, those two layer ball groups can act like neuron and mirror neuron. That kind of systems might allow creating in the distant future, and maybe they are operating in the atmosphere of some gas giants or wafting on the liquid zone of those giant planets.

The things what difference science and pseudoscience

The things what difference science and pseudoscience

The thing what makes difference in science is that scientist uses the existent material for making the conclusions about some things, and here I must say, that if the source is faked, the thing is is that the conclusions, what the scientist makes are wrong. The scientist uses the material, what is given to that person, or what has been found on the Internet. And if the material somehow manipulated, the scientist can also make mistakes. Or even the best of scientists can be tired or in fewer when they do their work, which means that even the best researchers are human beings.

If the scientist tries to give wrong conclusions, that would be very difficult, because that person must show, that the evidence or source material is used, and it's polite for ordinary people and other researchers to show, what is the used material. This means that if the researcher uses a photograph or painting, it's nice to show other people.  And the place, where the picture is taken or downloaded is polite to mark in the source list. The thing about the pseudoscience is that thing is always trustable, and it's hard to show faked.

One of the things about the pseudoscience is that it seems very nice, but something seems to be wrong in the research. The thing what is wrong is that the sources, what are used are not shown to the audience. And this is the weakness in the research. The thing is that the evidence must be something, what shows the claiming true or false. One of the remarkable thing in the pseudoscience is that used money for that research is very big, and this is the very big problem in scientific work.

If somebody gives money for the research, the members of the research team have a need to please those profiteers, and that means that there is a big risk, that somebody would write lies in that report. When we are talking about theories and another kind of conclusions, the thing is that the pictures and exotic merchandises are a very good thing, how to make people blind. Also telling some exciting stories about the sacrifices would be an effective way to make people be silent.

And stories about escaping the guerillas and erupting volcanoes are very impressive things. Those stories are a good way to make people impressed, what would be a good way to get publicity. If the reporters are confessed and impressed about the stories how this explorer escapes the hostile villains in the jungle and swims away from the great tsunamis, they might not ask anything, what might cause an embarrassing situation. And if the story is placed another side of the or in an exotic place like in the river Congo, would that confess many people.

The thing about the writing was it scientific or art

The thing about the writing was it scientific or art

The thing is that every person in the world should know that we are all supporting freedom of speech, but when somebody has different opinions, what we have, we would become very angry against those persons. This is an interesting thing when we are thinking about our relationship with media and democracy. Those things seem and feel nice when they are supporting our personal opinions. But when somebody has a different opinion, the thing would cause the anger movement against those persons, who dare to think against the normal people.

On the internet, you might hear about the blood types, like RH-, what is claimed not belonging on the Earth, and that kind of things would justify the persecution against those people, and this kind of things are dangerous. There are things, what we hear, but what we don't actually think about. Is there really people, who have the most exotic RH- blood type in the world? I think that some blood types are really extraordinary.  And when we are thinking about the thing, called "blue blood" in the case of the noblemen, we must ask, has some noblemen got blue blood? Were they so isolated, that they did not even have similar blood, what normal people have?

Then we must realize, that if we are thinking about the Genesis, and creation of the human, we must realize that those stories are actually made for supporting the power of the priests and other noblemen in the Sumerian civilization. When we are talking about the blue blood, we must say that the legend of the blue blood of the noblemen was created to make sure that the persons who are standing in the front of the people were not same, who gave orders. And as we know, some of the members of the ruling class would play the game, that the orders came from somebody else.

The test of the person would be easy. The real rulers would have blue blood, and that would protect the priests from the hate of people when they were walking at the market place. There is also a similar test in Romania. The test of the vampires will go that the person, who is suspected as the vampire would just need to eat the food, where is white onion. That kind of test was safe and trusted way to uncover the vampires, who are hiding in some taverna. But the white onion uncovers if a person has just eaten, before coming in the house, and in the case, that quest smells the white onion and claims to go to eat, would that uncover the lie.

And the blood of the Moluccan crayfish is blue. That animal is a very old species. If the test of the being priest was that this blood was injected to the body of the candidate, that thing would be very dangerous. Because if the blood has the Rhesus actor, the blood cells would be rough, which means that the blue blood of the crayfish would kill that RH+ person because the antigens of the blue blood would seize to the core of the blood cells. And this can cause the immune reaction in blood veins, what makes own immune cells to destroy the blood.

If a person is RH- the thing would be that the blood cells will be smooth, and the other antigens would not seize so easily. RH+ blood would seize the oxygen more effectively than RH- blood. And that's why this kind of blood type is a little bit more common than RH- blood. But in the first time, I have faced the people, who are claiming, that some persons are mentioned that they are not belonging on earth because they have certain blood types. This kind of things is very sad disinformation and dangerous pseudoscience.