Skip to main content

The things what difference science and pseudoscience

The things what difference science and pseudoscience

The thing what makes difference in science is that scientist uses the existent material for making the conclusions about some things, and here I must say, that if the source is faked, the thing is is that the conclusions, what the scientist makes are wrong. The scientist uses the material, what is given to that person, or what has been found on the Internet. And if the material somehow manipulated, the scientist can also make mistakes. Or even the best of scientists can be tired or in fewer when they do their work, which means that even the best researchers are human beings.

If the scientist tries to give wrong conclusions, that would be very difficult, because that person must show, that the evidence or source material is used, and it's polite for ordinary people and other researchers to show, what is the used material. This means that if the researcher uses a photograph or painting, it's nice to show other people.  And the place, where the picture is taken or downloaded is polite to mark in the source list. The thing about the pseudoscience is that thing is always trustable, and it's hard to show faked.

One of the things about the pseudoscience is that it seems very nice, but something seems to be wrong in the research. The thing what is wrong is that the sources, what are used are not shown to the audience. And this is the weakness in the research. The thing is that the evidence must be something, what shows the claiming true or false. One of the remarkable thing in the pseudoscience is that used money for that research is very big, and this is the very big problem in scientific work.

If somebody gives money for the research, the members of the research team have a need to please those profiteers, and that means that there is a big risk, that somebody would write lies in that report. When we are talking about theories and another kind of conclusions, the thing is that the pictures and exotic merchandises are a very good thing, how to make people blind. Also telling some exciting stories about the sacrifices would be an effective way to make people be silent.

And stories about escaping the guerillas and erupting volcanoes are very impressive things. Those stories are a good way to make people impressed, what would be a good way to get publicity. If the reporters are confessed and impressed about the stories how this explorer escapes the hostile villains in the jungle and swims away from the great tsunamis, they might not ask anything, what might cause an embarrassing situation. And if the story is placed another side of the or in an exotic place like in the river Congo, would that confess many people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Antimatter motor

Antimatter motor Antimatter would be an effective fuel for interstellar spacecraft Antimatter would be the most effective power source in the world. It will be the most suitable motor for interstellar spacecraft, but the problem is that thing is very reactive. And actually one of the biggest problems with this kind of motor is that the gram of antimatter would turn the entire planet to the molecular nebula. So this kind of motor can produce only outside of our solar system. Producing antimatter would need large particle accelerators, and that kind of systems might look like giant donuts, what is floating on the space. There are two ways to create the antimatter motor, one is to store the anti-ions in the magnetic bottle, where the pushing magnetic field will keep those ions away from the wall of the bottle, and then the antimatter would conduct to the water or some other particle. The huge explosion or annihilation reaction would send the rocket to a very high speed. The antimatt...

Thoughts about strong leadership

Thoughts about strong leadership Everybody knows, how the dictators would rise in the power of the nation, and the thing what makes people supporting those persons is that they offer strong leadership as the way to make nation proud. And also they have always the same parroting, the foreigners and other nations have a too strong influence in the country. But what makes those persons like some Robert Mugabe or Kim Jong Un to think that they are only possible leaders, and why people would need them? Why there is nobody else allowed to try to come to the head of the state, or even try to challenge those leaders? If they are so popular as they want people to think or believe, why they don't tolerate any kind of opposition if they are done so good and big actions for their people, that they are celebrated in every home in their country. The thing that would return the morale and spine for the nation is the strong leader, who would put the state back in order and row. The thing is ...

Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots.

 Next-generation nanotechnology can be independent-operating molecule-sized robots. "A DNAzyme (red) uses its binding arms to dock at a specific location on an RNA strand (yellow) and then cleaves it at its core. High-resolution, real-time NMR, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, and Fluorescence Spectroscopy." "As well as Molecular Dynamics Simulations are used to identify the structure. And catalytic mechanisms of the DNAzyme. Credit: HHU/Manuel Etzkorn" (https://scitechdaily.com/dnazymes-how-active-dna-biocatalysts-that-destroy-unwanted-rna-molecules-work/) The active DNA catalysts are the gate to DNA-controlled, independently-operating, molecular-size nanomachines.  The DNAzymes or active DNA biocatalysts are next-generation tools for destroying unwanted RNA. The DNA molecule is one of the tools. That can use for controlling molecular-size machines. DNA is like a chemical computer program. And if the researchers can make synthetic DNA that can make exactly what the...