Using genetic data in working life

Using genetic data in working life

This is a very big moral and ethic problem because genomes are telling many things about ourselves, what we even don't want to know. Genetic data tells if the person has mental illness or problems with concentration, which means disorders like ADHD, and this would face many ethical problems in front of our eyes.

The biggest problem is that who has the right to get that data in the hands and is it legal to deny the workplace if the person has concentration problems, what has nothing to do with the mental illnesses? Or should the responsibility of that thing keep in the hands of the Government, what would tell to company, that it must not hire some person, because the genomes would involve this and that mistakes. 

This writing is meant for the provocation, so don't take this seriously. But I sometimes don't understand, what is the privacy, if people don't care it anyway. And is it better than people are telling rumors than hear the fact-based data? Why our medical files are classified, but every person in the world can get very personal data of persons medical condition by watching the driver's license or ID-papers, and in fact, in the old communal bus tickets have been visible if a person is incompetent because the group of sale what was used in those tickets was reserved only for that group of users of those tickets. 

Or if the person would have some genetic disorder, what would influence that inmate to the drug or another kind of addiction tell that thing in the workplace, that everybody knows to avoid the drinking alcohol in the workplace. Here I'm writing about a thing, that people are telling, that people should speak freely about their illnesses, and in this point of view, people should not hide things, that they have some illness or other disorder in their genomes.

That thing is not their fault, and why they should hide those things. People are telling many times that they have cardiac problems, and that thing can risk their own lives because somebody can steal their nitro package. And that can cause death. Those people would not have a thing to hide in their problems and other people will always understand them.

So that brings one very interesting thing in my mind. Why people should not be open and allow to speak freely about other illnesses. That would make life better, and when people are talking about sickness, they should know the rest of that thing. Why the mental hospital patient should hide that thing even more than some cardiac patient. 

Modern medical science has explained that mental illnesses like psychosis and schizophrenia are caused by the wrong level of dopamine or some other neural transmitter or wrong networking of the neurons. So why they have not tolerated symptoms, but things like liver cirrhosis or peptic ulcer are. If we think that the symptoms those illnesses are harmless, the answer is that they are both very painful diseases.

And the origin of those diseases is often the lifestyle. Of course, some bacteria cause many times those diseases. But sometimes the wrong nutrient causes that thing. In fact, those accepted diseases cause problems in working life, as well as the non-accepted diseases. And this is one point of view about the thing, should people tell about their conditions to the employer and every other people in the world.

That's why because the working partners are often first persons, who see the symptoms of the diseases are they physical or psychiatric before team leaders and superiorities. So why we don't wear the skirt or carry pieces of jewelry, where is the list of our diseases, that every person knows, what is wrong with us?

In that case, the most effective way to share that data is to equip people with the RFID-implants, what people can scan every time when they are walking near other people. And if the person would not have smartphones, there could be desks where the person would read other people RFID if own mobile telephone is not in hand.

Those systems can put in the cash of the supermarket, and maybe that will end the stories, what are told in the cash line about the medical condition of some person. That denies the misuse or selling that data because everybody would get the information of another person medical situation by scanning the RFID-chip inside their bodies.

The silent media

The silent media

There have been rumors that the people, who have been family members of the social media activists have been offered cheap trips to Russia and China, and that thing has been used to force the activists to keep their mouth shut. The social media is the thing, what has been uncovered the problems in western society, as well as the problems in the authoritarian nations.

The authoritarian leaders are always offering support to each other, and this thing is one of the saddest notifications from history. When the people who were resisting the dictatorship got the power, the new rulers have used the same methods, what their predecessors have been used. The reality is that the name of the leader and the faces in the photographs on the wall have been changed, but the way to use power has stayed similar, what the ruler, what have been lost in history had.

The name of the secret police changes, but methods are the same. And the worst thing, what the nation can face is the popular dictator. Even if the first dictator is a civilized person, sooner or later would the power would go to the hands of despots, as we have seen many times in history. Sooner or later the ruler would change to the tyrant, who has started the persecutions against people, who are talking against them.

The defects in society might be kept silent by the press because it is controlled by some authoritarian leaders. The censorship of the media is a very good tool to claim people that resistance is useless, and the "reasonable" people are flexing in the prevalent situation. If a person is not reasonable, the results would be very bad. This is the agenda, how the authoritarian leaders are operating in the media. They are claiming, that they are so popular, that people should not even try to resist them.

And the weapon of those people is the "qualified journalism", as they are telling to people. If we are thinking about the agenda of qualified journalism in the point of view of religion, what is a good way to order people to keep their mouth shut, we must notice one really interesting thing in those writings, what bases on the Holy Bible. Those qualified journalists are taking only a couple of words of this book or only the parts, what are supporting their opinions, and leave the rest of it without notice.

One thing what is the most popular way to read that book is it offers authority to elder people. And in that book is mentioned that people have the right to punish their children, but the golden rule is always forgotten. That means that if a person really wants to get bitten because of the opinions or things, what are against other people opinions, means that the person must be real sadomasochist. But that kind of things is always forgotten from the so-called qualified journalist's way to write about the things.

When we are thinking about the newspapers, they have been the greatest supporters of democracy. But they have also been the greatest weapons in the hands of the bloodiest dictators in history. When we are thinking about violence and other kinds of things in history, there have always claimed that torture and another kind of things, what is made by the authoritarian police have been only the single cases, but would you feel nice, if you were one of those single cases?

The persons who own the newspaper or media-house are ruling the line of that thing. And if the trusted media house is turning to the hands of the authoritarian leaders, would the results be devastating. The problem is that buying the media houses can be done by using middlemen, and that means that the real owners would be really difficult to track. If the owner is operating behind the threads of many companies, what is registered in the multiple countries the real ruler can hide behind those threads.

Algorithms and fake news are a threat to democracy

Algorithms and fake news are a threat to democracy

As I have written before the same algorithms, what are used for marketing, can be used to target the propaganda on the Internet, and this makes them a very effective tool in the wrong hands. At the begin, we have faced cases, where politicians are suspected to send the trolls to their E-mails or social media accounts.

That would seem a very nice method to grow own popularity in the eyes of normal people. So politics is a dirty game, and that means that there are many people, who would use trolls to support their candidate. The messages that are full of hate and treats are a good way to bring publicity and also give a reason to be saying nothing. If that kind of candidate would not come to political discussions the reason could be afraid that something would happen.

When we are thinking about propagandists and their way to work, we are facing really uncertain methodology, where some Internet users are collecting a really big audience by sharing some kind of entertainment stuff on the net. And then they are turning their accounts to the tool of propaganda.

The big audience is a necessary thing for propagandists

The idea of this is that when the propagandist or PSY-OP-operator would start the mission, the information what is shared will get the largest audience, what those people can get. When we are thinking about psychological operations and fake news, there are many ways to accomplish the operation.

One of the things is to use manipulated images, where are connected details, like white powder on the table, by using photo manipulation programs, like Photoshop. Another way is to capture the accounts, which are used by respected journalists. In those cases, the propagandist would try to use the information is always very simple.

Propagandists believe in strong leadership

The data, what is shared is almost every time propped up by using the position as the manager. That means that the propagandists almost every time support the strong leadership, which would give them the chance to influence only one person, and strong leaders are good targets for flatterers. In those cases pleasing the leader is easier than please many people. The thing, what we ever thought or what we ever mentioned in the courses is that also journalists have political opinions. The world is full of people, who believe things like authoritarianism and totalitarianism. Some of those people are journalists. Have you ever visited in the non-democratic country?

There is a so-called official press, and there are people, who are writing stories in those official newspapers. Those people are really problematic because they are writing a very good language, and nobody actually realizes that the information, what those people share is shared without criticism and using one-side sources. The best weapon in the hands of propagandists is the subjective truth. Also in the propaganda weapons and violence are in the big role.

Those people are using many times the images, where the people, who they support are posing with guns, and they would many times tell people that if the comments are involving too much criticism those guns would be used against people, who are criticizing the data.  Violence is a very good way to order other people to keep their mouth shut, and one of the best argument is the neighbor what has 20 million nuclear weapons, and brainwashed military force. If you will irritate the leaders of that country they will attack immediately.

When they are telling about the rapes, they are telling only rapes, what are made by foreigners. And those people are really good to use pity as the weapon. If we would go to some dictatorial country, what goes on war, we would see the bodies of children. And of course, the government tells us that they would be killed by the enemy, but what is the truth? When people are telling something, or they are ordered to do something, we must ask one question, and that is "who is given orders to that thing, and what that person has actually ordered"?

Truth is a complicated thing

The truth is a very complicated thing, and maybe some airstrikes to villages have killed civilians but were there the radio-transmitter in that village. Or was the bombed shelter used the command center? This is a very good point to think about what we see, might be different, what we want to believe. And we always want to believe, that journalists are good people. Sometimes journalists have connections even to organized crime, and that kind of things are really embarrassing.

In the world is many dictators, whose secret police controls the press, and those people are playing reporters. They always have the explanations for everything and in that kind of cases, where the journalists are working as propagandists or troll-makers, they have always a very good way to keep people silent. The thing is that they have their own personal experience with that kind of crimes, and that would be a good way to make people silent.