About AUKUS cooperation: the defense union between Australia, the USA, and the UK.

Above: the B-1-bomber over pacific

The question is: why was the AUKUS contract made in secrecy? What kind of things may be a secretive contract involves? But the fact is that this contract will strengthen the independent defense of Australia. That kind of contract always involves communication outposts and the global surveillance network stations. 

The contract involved sharing technology with Australia. And that technology allows  Australia to build its new nuclear-powered submarines. But what else that contract involved? Military nuclear technology is one of the most secure and secretive things in the world. And that means Australia has offered something for counter gifts. Are those things involving the new radar technology? 

The AUKUS (Australia, The UK, and the USA) cooperation between the USA, Australia, and the UK is the thing that has caused discussions. Australia rejected the French-built diesel-electric submarines and started to create its nuclear submarines with the USA and UK. And that thing caused disappointment in the French and European governments. The nuclear submarines are making Australia more independent in the defense questions than ever before. 

Those submarines give the Australian navy similar global strike capacity with other navies that are using those systems. Modern nuclear submarines can also carry cruise missiles like BGM-109 "Tomahawk" that can launch from torpedo tubes. And that gives those systems the ability to attack factories and military bases that are a long way from the coastline. 

Nuclear submarines are the most capable systems in naval warfare and the AUKUS cooperation offers Australia a chance to get artificial intelligence-based computing. And other technical solutions that the UK and the USA are developed for their submarines. And Australia can offer their advanced radar technology as the counterplan for that cooperation.

But there is another thing that has caused discussions. That thing is the role of the USA in the conflicts between China and its neighboring areas. The thing is that the USA has many allies around the world. And the thing that frightens the USA is the new modern weapons of China. Even if the USA would win that war, there are millions or even billions of casualties if the warfare expands to a strategic thermonuclear war. 

And even if the conflict remains at the conventional level. There is the possibility that the USA loses one or more of its nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. And that thing causes nuclear pollution in that area. This is the reason, why the interest of the USA is to strengthen the independent defense of its allies. 

The number of equipment in the USA is limited. There is always a possibility there is a crisis at the same time in the South China Sea and Europe. That means the nuclear-powered aircraft carriers are needed in two places at the same time. And those units have a central role in the global operations. 

Whenever the USA must come to help its allies there is the risk of American casualties. Of course, the USA must help its allies when they need help. Because if it doesn't make that thing. The allies will be disappointed. Those contracts between the USA and its allies involving things like the allowance to use the airbases in that area for emergency landing sites for the strategic nuclear bombers. 

The support systems of the strategic bombers like escort fighters and tanker aircraft need those bases. And also the rescue crews are using those bases in the case that the strategic bombers will be dropped by technical error.

Also, those countries are established global electronic surveillance (ECHELON) and communication outposts supporting global intelligence and nuclear weapon operations of the USAF and U.S Navy. Also, the satellite data of the recon satellites is downloaded from those stations. This means that the center allies of the USA in that area need their power tools to defend themselves. Nuclear submarines are the thing that can put the challenge for China. 

()https://www.afr.com/policy/foreign-affairs/australia-crosses-a-strategic-rubicon-20210916-p58s2y

()https://www.jaoi.org/2021/09/h-k-sethi-aukus-pact-france-and-us-seek-to-mend-rift/

()https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a34483004/worlds-most-dangerous-submarines-ranked/

()https://theconversation.com/the-aukus-pact-born-in-secrecy-will-have-huge-implications-for-australia-and-the-region-168065

()https://www.theguardian.com/world/aukus

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AUKUS

()https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)

Image:()https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-b-1b-bomber-the-us-militarys-flying-missile-truck-22344

()https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Why we should not shoot humanoid?

Why we should not shoot humanoid?

This is the story of the fictional situation, that we might someday face the UFO and humanoids. In the beginning, we must understand that if the alien really comes from another planet, it will be something, what we ever can realize. At first, we should understand that those aliens might be the robots, what are controlled from the remote control systems.

And the real controllers of those robots might sit even in the other solar system  In the worst scenarios, this so-called humanoid would be the core, where the antimatter ions could hover in the magnet field. The size of those devices could be very small, and they might use to deny the situation, that the robot would somehow damage. Its technology will slip in the hands of unauthorized actors.

If there is a hollow robot, what is filled with antimatter ions would the result be devastating. This kind of things are really interesting thoughts, but there is a possibility. But when we are thinking about the most devastating device, what mankind has ever created, we are facing another kind of threat.

The antimatter bomb or so-called "Teller's bomb" is the most dangerous equipment, what mankind has ever designed. That device could be extremely small in size. The gram of antimatter can destroy entire Earth-sized planet. 

The only thing what the creators of this device must notice is that the antimatter must not touch the walls of the tank, where it is stored. So the pill size magnet tank can be installed inside the body of those Aliens.

That might be acting like some kind of extreme version of the suicide capsules. That means that those humanoids can be equipped with those devices. If somebody wounds them and the communication between alien and spacecraft would end, the magnets will turn off, and the antimatter will touch the wall of the tank, and that will cause very high power explosion.

Writing about the politics in the Crimean peninsula and in the world of nuclear forces

Writing about the politics in the Crimean peninsula and in the world of nuclear forces


The dream of control Crimean peninsula and the traffic in the Black Sea has turned against Russia. The influence of that kind of international acts is that other nations have started to keep Russia as the aggressive and provocative neighbor, and this kind of things are forcing the western nations to go together in military cooperation, and another thing is that the Russian way to talk about their weapons as the strike-equipment, and aggressive way to speak, we must realize that this kind of things are justifying the ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) bases in East Europe.

Those ABM missiles are meant for the protection the NATO, but actually, many writers forget the thing that the same weapons can use against ground targets, as well they can strike against ballistic missiles. When we are thinking about the missiles like THAAD, what has the kinetic energy warhead, those missiles can give the iron projectiles very high speed, and when the steel ball hits the ground with the speed of 15 000 kilometers per hour, the impact energy would terminate the target.

The metal melts as the drop, which consists the melted steel, and that thing could be very devastating against the point targets. The benefit of the THAAD system is that it would not consist the radioactive material, and that means that if those missiles would go in the hands of terrorists, they can use the fuel in the bombs, but the thing is that the destruction is more limited than the use of the nuclear bomb. So the thing is that THAAD cannot use against its creators.

The developing of those missiles started in the 1980s when the MGM-131 Pershing  II missiles wanted to equip with conventional strike capacity. The suitable system for that purpose seemed the iron nails, which would launch against the target. The idea of that weapon was to create the "shotgun-type" system, what can use against enemy airfields and missiles. The system was planned to launch to the opposite direction of the trajectory of the enemy missiles, and the iron projectiles would hit the target with very high speed. That system could be the tactical version of the ballistic missile, which cannot use against its owners. The problem with highly mobilized battlefield systems is that they are good targets for the terrorists, and that's why the military commanders have been searching the replacement options for the highly radioactive isotopes.

The system what was used before THAAD was SPRINT, the ABM system, what was equipped with high yield thermonuclear warhead, what had 5 mt destructive power. The mission of that warhead was to cause the large fireball and powerful EMP pulse, what would damage and vaporize the incoming missiles. But those warheads can be used also against ground troops. The thing was that the nuclear warhead could be dangerous in the wrong hands even if the detonation of the nuclear system would fail, because of the radioactive material would be used in the radioactive bombs. And that's why the military is looking for replacements for those weapons.

When we are talking about the contract, what denies the developing and producing the intermediate range ballistic- and cruise missiles, we must say that the contract does not have an effect if it would just break by every nation, what are involving it. In the real world, the thing is that IRBM missiles and the highly mobile nuclear missile systems need sharp location system if those missiles would be used against hardener silos and other targets.

For the operation, the missile needs two coordinates the beginning coordinate of the flight and the coordinate where to fly. And the GPS would give the first coordinate, where the launcher is, and the second coordinate or the end of the trajectory would come from the intelligence or reconnaissance systems, what are giving the coordinates to the warheads of the missile.

The beginning point of the trajectory is important because that point is used to calculate, how missile must fly to the second point. The GPS is a very effective tool for that purpose because it can give the location to the missile in seconds, and after that, the unit can continue the trip. The entire operation would take only a couple of seconds, and that's why the destroying those missiles would be very difficult, and after the nuclear missiles have flown away, the targets would be destroyed even if the launching vehicles would be destroyed.

And many people think that NATO has more advanced technology in that area than Russia and things like multi-channel communication with packed data packages makes the jamming of that kind of systems very difficult, because of the communication between location satellite and receiving system is happening in very short time periods. Those computerized and highly secured systems are hard to locate because entire communication would be done in a couple of nanoseconds, what is the time for the transmitting the coded data package, that contains the packed and coded location information. And the biometric safety systems makes them useless in the wrong hands. That means if the wrong person takes the device, would the information about that send to the command center.