Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser the most well-known orphan in history

Kaspar Hauser (1812-1833) was one of the most mysterious cases in the history of Europe. He came from nowhere to Nuremberg at the age of 16. When we are looking at the sources, the birthday has sometimes claimed to be 28 or maybe 30 April or 29 September 1812 and where those days have been found is not mentioned. I have written many times about this boy, who came from nowhere and faced his fate at the age of 21 by the hand of an assassin, whoever captured. The mysterious case began, when the young boy walked to the military barrack and gave the letter, what is claimed to write by his mother. There is a couple of source after this text, and you might check those persons names from those links. 

He could only say the words "I want to become an officer like my father" and then the word "horse", what he. repeated twice, or this is how that thing has been documented. There are many documents on the internet, and that's why I don't start to write about the story, what you can read from the net, but here I must ask one question, what is seen by the face of that boy.

The question is Kaspar Hauser one member of the family of Napoleon Bonaparte?

It is suspected that Kaspar Hauser lived in one single room in the early years of his life. That boy was mentally normal, which means that there was some kind of very important reason, why he was kept in the locked room. But there are a couple of remarkable things that people who have investigated this case have been noticed and the first one was that Kaspar had very soft feet. And the second one was that he walked like a drunk, which meant that he might have a problem with direction instinct, or he was drunk but the alcohol can be given him with injection straight to the blood. Was this injection mean lethal or was it given to confess the guards, that the boy was dead? And if that thing is true, some of the people, who were near him might be that person who took him near Nurenberg.

That thing is causing suspicious that somebody might have tried to kill that boy on that day when he arrived in the city of Nuremberg 26th April 1828. Maybe the murderer has given too little alcohol, and Kaspar survived in that attempt. Maybe the killer has given alcohol and then left the unconscious boy to die. The thing, that makes this case so interesting is that nobody seems to see, where that boy came. The soft feet gave a very weak hint about the conditions, where he was kept. The thing is that he was kept on the soft floor, and in the room, what was tall enough that Kaspar could stand.

 And because he could walk, somebody had given him a model that he could learn that skill. Or in some bad jokes is claimed that Kaspar Hauser has been in the space station, because of zero gravity conditions are making balance very bad. And that kind of thing will explain the teetering walk. And maybe that thing would offer a very good topic for some novel, where Kaspar Hauser has been trapped in Solar Warden. But let's continue more seriously. When we are thinking about the end of that boy, we must realize that after the first strike, where he got the scar on his forehead, that thing might be made also by the woman. 

The weapon was the meat knife, what looked like an ax, and that would mean that killer acted in panic. That means that this person might think that Kaspar could recognize the attacker. And when the attacks were made, that boy must be taken to another city and protected better. The second attack that was faithful lets many questions open. The injuries, what that boy got were not killed immediately. So is it possible that those attacks were made for setting up that person dead, and maybe somebody changed the identity of that young man?

Lord Stanhope had that kind of relationship that this kind of thing can be done. And did Stanhope knew something, what other people didn't know? He was a very high-rank member of the British government, and that means that this kind of person would not walk anywhere without a good reason. 

And that tells that the killer has not skills to make that thing. There is a theory that Kaspar was a member of some royal family. If that thing was fake, the people who were behind that kind of case were behind those attacks they might not want to kill that boy. The acted murder attempts would make the story more effective and convincing but then the attacker just made a mistake. The question is how much Kaspar knew about the stories, that he was a member of some royal family? But those violate actions make his story famous.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaspar_Hauser

https://www.edubloxtutor.com/kaspar-hauser/

Upper Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Hauser_Kreul.jpg

Downer Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Kaspar_hauser.jpg/250px-Kaspar_hauser.jpg

The technical version of "bad eye".

The technical version of "bad eye".

When we are thinking about the physic powers and the scientific- or technical solution for that thing, we might think that there is a theoretical possibility, that between human brains would be installed the magnetic system or radio transmitter, which could focus the neural electricity for the target.  We can imagine, what that kind of system or device would look like, and that kind of bizarre solution might be tested by some alchemists or some other people.

The system itself would be the U-shaped silver or golden channel, where would be the pike, which will point to ahead, and that small pike would send the neural electricity of the pineal gland through that structure. That thing would make that the neural electricity would be targeted to the target, and while it goes through the channel, it would get stronger. But as you see, the use or existing of this kind of system is not ever mentioned and there is not any proves about that kind of thing.

When we are thinking about the possibility to use that kind of system to take other people under the control, we must realize that the possibility, that the targeted radio signals would start to oscillate the nervous system. And if the power of that electricity is higher than the nerves own electricity, that thing allows controlling other people by using own thoughts on that purpose.

But that kind of system would need the surgery for installing that device. So could some ancient priest made cross-looking cuts to the head of those selected persons, and then made some kind of experiments with that thing. Or were those makers perhaps the humanoids. And remember that this text is only theory.

And if it is connected to the plutonium batteries it would use an active amplifier system. The thing is that that equipment would give the possibility to make telekinesis possible. In this case, the telekinesis would work only between humans or living organisms, but that kind of thing would be only the imaginational visions of the technology, which is extraordinary.

I took the idea of this thing from the old tales, where the head of the king was oiled in a long time ago. In my imagination, I created the idea that could it possible that this ritual of oiling the head would be made because of some surgical operation? And if that thing would be true, would there be implanted some kind of system, what will make some people think faster or were there some more sophisticated things in the brains.

So if there would put the golden plate between brains, that thing would allow that the electricity would travel faster between brain sides. But as we know what kind of thoughts are only the hypothesis, and even if those kinds of things would be made in the past, that doesn't mean that the patient stayed alive after the operation. If we think that some ancient priests put the gold plates between brains of their victims for making those people think "golden thoughts". That is one way to see things.

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.

And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.

When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.

Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that. 

Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?

When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants and termites, what also are ants are interesting characters. Those social, wingless bugs are defending their base with a very big attitude, and some of them even die, when they are defending their queen and home. One of the most interesting characters in that community, where everybody would put their stakes to the work of the day is military ants.

Military- or soldier ants are the very aggressive version of ants, and their mission is to defend others. But how those ants would control those soldiers? Their jaws are terrifying and attitude is deadly, but why they are not attacking the workers? That is because the worker would feed that terrifying member of the community.

If the soldier ant would be aggressive, there would be the situation, that another worker comes to the place, and then those ants would relax that horrifying defender of the community. They are telling that everything is fine, and nobody would not threaten the position of that specific ant. And then those worker ants would give a small bite of sugar to the warrior.

That keeps soldier ant satisfied, and there is one little thing about that soldier ant, what protects the entire community. They cannot eat themselves, and those ants are not using their jaws to anything else than just fighting. Military ants cannot even eat, because in their stomach is not bacteria, what is necessary for eating, or transformation of the food to nutrient.

Ants are given an idea to nanomachines, what his group of robots, what are operating like one giant robot. This kind of robot can lose one part of it, and it can still operate. That poly- or swarm robot would also be more flexible than any other device in human history.

But the ants have given ideas of the society, where everybody has their place, and one of those workers, who would work in that futuristic society is the data worker, who would sit in the space station and control the drones and other devices on the Earth. In this hypothetical scenario, those data workers cannot escape or rebel, because they are addicted to the nutrient, what will bring from Earth.

When we are thinking about evolution, the ants have learned the communal working. In their society, every single ant has own duty. And if the duty is defending the society, those bugs would not do anything else.

In the next part, the world "future" can be replaced by the world "other civilization". What we will do and what we are looking in the distant future is a mystery, and without time machine we cannot find that out, how our decadents would live thousands of years after us. The evolution of ants has given the idea that maybe the future would bring to the world the real-life information workers, who are operating in the giant orbiting space station.

Those space stations would need the food from Earth, and that thing would keep them under the control. And those workers would operate the drones and robots on Earth. The thing is that if those controllers connection with robots must be cut, the thing, what the people on Earth must do is just jam the communication lines. If those operators would spend all of their life in the space station, their bones and muscles would be so weak, that those inmates would be dead, if they land to the Earth.

And in one scenario those characters would not have even consoles, and their brains are connected to the computers by using surgically installed microchips. They would also offer their brain capacity to solve problems, and if there would be a problem, the operator, who sits on Eart can just cut the connection of the microchip. The idea is that in those space stations would live people, whose brains can be connected, and that will gove those systems extremely high level of intelligence and ability to solve problems.

Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?

Why Russian intelligence needs oligarchs?

One thing, what must be realized with social media, what you see in the western world might not the same, what they are in Russia. This is the thing, what have many times told in the western media, but the thing what has put less focus in media is that also Russian homepages can change by western actors. This means that the social media used by Russians in Russia might be different in the western world. That thing is very easy to make, and the system is very simple in theory.

That social media and the data, what users input in that system would search by algorithms, and then the artificial intelligence just removes things, what is not tolerated. The thing is that the server transforms the data to another homepage, which is similar to the real homepage.  the reason, why western military intelligence is concerning about the Russian social media, is that the intelligence services are using those platforms to keep in touch with contacts.

The new way to operate in Russian intelligence and security is that those organizations are operated by using oligarchs for buying the real estates and establishing the companies, what the intelligence can use in its operations. I just read the article in Helsingin Sanomat (21.7.2019) what told about the journalist, who has been uncovered corruption and other things about Russian security services, and I noticed about the name in that article.

That name was Yevgeny Prigodzhin. That man worked as the gang member for some Russian businessmen and was in jail for getting under-age girls for prostitutes, betrayals and robberies.

Those things were mentioned in the article, and when we are thinking about the past of Pridgodzhin, that would make that man the perfect tool for the hands of intelligence. Those kind of people are suitable for open the bank accounts and establish companies for covert operations, like buying real-estates for storing the equipment and housing the operatives, who cannot use regular hotels.

And the thing is, that if that actor would someday start to be the problem, that means that there would be found some overdose or something like that in the past, and then the police can arrest that man. Of course, the prosecutions would be something like tax avoidance, but if the person would not cooperate there would be find something worse in history.

When we are looking at the way, how intelligence service operates, there would be no person in service, who they cannot control. That means that the oligarch, who would operate with Intelligence is under the control of those agents, who would play the bodyguards of that person. And that means that the person is imprisoned in own office.

Some little details about black holes and the event horizon

Some little details about black holes and the event horizon

Because we cannot see black holes, we cannot say that we know things, what is happening in that particle. The end of our ability to make observations is the event horizon, and after that everything, what we see is theory. Black holes are the tightest objects in the Universe, and that is what we know about that strange particle.

The Event horizon

The last time, when we see the object before it falls in the black hole is when it touches the event horizon. In that point, the speed of the dropping object would be the speed of light, and this means that the time would stop in the particle. And what is behind that point, what is called "Event horizon", is only theory, and we cannot know if the black hole would touch the event horizon, or is there some space, where the fallen object can travel to the center of black hole, because we cannot get observations from another side.

The thing what we would see, when we are dropping in a black hole is a mystery. We might feel that everything would be stopped and after that, we cannot imagine, what the world inside the event horizon would look like. Because time stops at the point of the Event horizon, we would feel, that we would be in that point forever, and actually, we don't know are we elding during that moment, what takes forever. But that is the thing, what we can think about.

When we are talking about black holes, we are talking about points or objects, where information disappears. That means that the information, what goes in the black hole would not come out, or we cannot see that information anymore. There is sometimes claimed, that the black hole would destroy material, and that is not true in the physical meaning. 

If we would think that in the Earth atmosphere would forming the tennis-ball-sized stable black hole the thing would be, that this object would crush the form of the material. But the physical form of the material remains, but the entire planet would be crushed, when it would be pulled in the black hole. The molecules would be destroyed by the tidal forces, and that means that the molecular form of the material would be destroyed.

But atoms would remain. If the black hole would be supermassive, it can suck entire solar systems in it. There have been theories that the black holes might have solar systems, and the thing is that the transform disk around that object would give energy in a similar way as the regular star. And if the planet would orbit at enough big distance it would have lifeforms, but the X-ray radiation of the black hole would be very powerful, and that means the species must be more protected against that radiation than we are. But theories are an interesting thing.

Exotic engines and man-made UFOs

Exotic engines and man-made UFOs

The problems with exotic engine solutions are that they need very high-voltage electricity for operating and in the aircraft or another kind of systems the problem is to get device airborne. If the device could rise from the ground, that means the system can use quite little energy for the horizontal movements, but as I said before the problem is lifting the craft from the ground, and after that, the thing would be easy to maneuver.

Of course, we have made the large-size airborne vehicles a long time. Airships are lighter than air solutions, but the problem of those vehicles is that they have poor maneuverability. If the single ammunition from the aircraft cannon hits those vehicles, they can be destroyed.

If we would want to make the heavier than air vehicle, what is the size of the Typhoon-class submarine, the thing would be easy to do by replacing the missile tubes with turbines, what would rise that device above the Earth, but that kind of systems need extreme lots of fuel. And the easier solution would use normal fans, and nuclear reactors for rising that vehicle airborne, but that would be too risky to make in real life.

If we think things like UFO:s and their connection to paranormal activities, we might think, that if the vehicle, what would use magnetic engines would operate near some building, would the high-voltage electric field cause the phenomenon like move metal dishes. In many countries have been tested the man-made UFOs and the problem has always been the power source. Here I must mention, that when I'm writing about the saucer-shaped craft, I mean that the cross-section of the craft would actually look like the hat.

The hypothetical man-made UFO could look like shellfish. 

And the vertical form of the device could be everything.  But if we are thinking about the round, or saucer-shaped form, that would allow that the craft could move every direction in the same speed, and the horizontal movements can be created by using the radially installed rocket or ion-rocket engines. That hat-shaped space device would rotate the plasma through the hole, where is installed the high power magnets, what would pull the ions through that hole.


The rotating plasma would make overpressure under the device, and that will rise it to hover on the airborne. This system could also installed to every kind of aviation vehicles. That would give the change to create vehicles, what has outstanding maneuverability, and the idea of this kind of systems have claimed to get from the UFO encounters.

The horizontal magnetic ion-accelerators could cause shellfish-shaped form. The craft would use those systems to horizontal movements. This could explain the electric disturbances near the UFO incidents. 

The idea of this kind of devices is that they can rise to airborne and if the device can fly horizontally by using quite a small jet or rocket motors, and this thing would also work well if the craft is a cigar-shaped thing. If under the vehicle is the magnet track, it can use ions to move horizontally.

In this case, the device would have furrows on the outer layer, and it would look a little bit like a shellfish. The thing is that the magnets would make ionized gas layer around the craft, and the magnets, what are in its outer layer would use those ions for making the horizontal thrust.

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

When somebody gets nervous the thing has an effect

The leader of OPEC (Organization of the Petrochemical Exporting Countries) has been nervous about this environmental activism, and that shows that activism has an influence on that kind of powerful actors. The thing is that the position of the leading actors of producers of the oil and natural gas exporters the leaders of those countries have guaranteed their position in the international field.

If some nation would make those actors angry, it will face the rise of the price of the petrochemical products. And the position of the ruler of those vital natural resources has been caused, that those leaders have been above the judgment of the public media.

The economic power of OPEC is really large, and that power has caused, that the Western world has got the problems to justify the bombardments, what has made the alliance, what is lead by Saudi-Arabia. And there is another very big thing in the natural resource trade. The rise of the military power of Russia has been financing by the Western World by buying the natural gas and oil from Russia.

So this makes very difficult to speak about the problems, what oil and natural gas would cause in the world. Every single kilowatt of energy, what is produced by using another method than buying the oil and natural gas from OPEC is taking money off the pocket of those countries.

But when we are talking another thing about activism, we might face the thing, that it would bring the mind of the people other things than OPEC. The thing is that there are many things, what we have kept something considered self-evident. And when we are thinking about things like cars and other things, they have been symbols for the independent people. If people would not have cars, there would be a big loss of the taxes, what the government collects from people.

But the activism itself has turned the world. In the past keeping silence about the difficult and communal things have been kept as the mark of being adult. And the activism itself has been the thing, what was somehow childish. There have been claiming, that the activism has no influence for the rulers, and people should keep their mouth shut when big boys are talking.

If somebody had a different kind of opinions should go to get some help. But as we see, if somebody would get nervous or attacks against activists, the thing what those people say has got influence. And the purpose of activism is to cause the influence on the people, that they would see the things, what activist wants them to see.

About the Science Fiction novels and the way how people handle things in those books

About the Science Fiction novels and the way how people handle things in those books

When we are thinking about the SciFi books we are facing the attitude, that scientists always work imprudently. And military men are going to fix the errors, what scientists make. This is the normal attitude around the media when they are talking about weapon research and military contractors.

The men, who made nuclear bomb were criminals, and military personnel, who operate those bombs are innocent poor people, who are forced to use those weapons. But then we might take another point of view about those things, and ask "why we always must benefit everything, what somebody offers?".

When we are thinking about the scientists, who are working in the secret research plants in somewhere at other planets, we must say, that the persons who are making that kind of bases and make the things like contacting to another civilization possible are persons, who are making this kind of things possible. If we are thinking about the philosophical problem about crime, where somebody leaves the weapon in the hands of the people, who would use it against somebody else, we must realize that the person, who gives the opportunity and tool for crime is the same way guilty as the person, who uses that weapon.

Especially if the person who gives the weapon, and knows that the inmate uses it against other people are guilty of giving that weapon. But the person who uses and takes that weapon is making own decision about the use of lethal force, and that means that it would release the actor from responsibility. The user of the weapon is guilty about things, what the weapon makes when it is in the hand of the user.

Another way to think about scientists is that they are some kind of children, who don't understand, what they are doing. But when we are thinking otherwise, scientists are creating weapons, and weapons are toys in the hands of the military. And the point is that adults are making toys for children.

An adult person stands the criticism, what is targeting the adult person's personality. When scientists make their work, they must think, what they are going to do, and use self-criticism about their work.  So would we buy an assault rifle to the child? The thing is that we must not make or buy everything that we see and create everything that comes in our mind.

When we are observing this kind of things more careful, we might compare that kind of things in the point of view of a child who is left alone in the house with the tinderbox. In that case, the circumstances, what are making some actions possible are the house. So if we would leave the child without attention to that house and tinderbox in hand, there are very big problems ahead.

 If we don't give instructions, what that child must do, the case is that sooner or later the house would burn. The thing is that the person, who lives a child in the house should know, that something would happen, especially if that adult person would say, that "use that tinderbox as the light". So if the instructions are wrong,  the results would be extremely dangerous. And if we would leave somebody without attention on some other planet, could the results be something else, then we want.

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

When physics make something, that person is connected to the observations, what has been made. That means physics must make every decision by using the tools like particle accelerators and prove every single word, what that person says, and the thing, what makes the life of physics sometimes really boring is that they must reserve those physical tools for their tests. And every part of the life of physics is connected to the material and nothing else can exist than material. The thing, what makes the life of physics so stiff is the need to prove those things.

But here we must say that the philosopher must also prove the things, what that person claims. But the proof must be done by using the rhetoric method. In real life philosophy or pure philosophy, the philosopher must use language and rhetorics to make the opponent become convicted that the thing, what the philosopher says is the truth. So the philosopher should not make empiric tests in the work. In some claiming physics just conducts things what that person sees to the form of doctoral dissertation.

So what is the doctor of philosophy?

Philosopher has the freedom to take also other dimensions in the work than physics. That means that the philosopher would take the spiritual aspect along with material if that person can convict people that the thing, what philosopher claims is true by using rhetoric way to confuse people. So that's why the philosophy is a more flexible thing than some kind of physics.

 When we are thinking about the doctoral degree of philosophy, we must understand that the doctors of mathematics and many other abstract sciences are actually the doctors of philosophy. And here we can think that mathematics is so-called empiric science, but it is actually also the part of philosophy or abstract science. When we are thinking about the doctoral thesis about mathematics, we are facing thing, that the word of mathematics is an abstract word.

Every single part of that thesis must be made by using the methodology, what mathematics has been accepted. And every single part of mathematics bases the thing, that we have ten fingers. That thing has brought us the numeric system, where we are using the decimal system, what bases the number ten. And somebody has thought that what if the Sumerian high priest, what has accepted the numeric system would be lost one finger. Would that mean that we would have a decimal system, what bases the number 9?

Or what if some mathematicians would create an idea that the calculations would go linear way. That means that the brackets would not have mean, and the multiplication would not have a special place in the formula? So what kind of world would be in that kind of cases? Would it somehow different than it is today?

Of course, there are numbers, what has no opponent in the normal life. Those numbers are called as the complex numbers, and that thing is a little bit interesting. The complex numbers have two points in coordinates. And that means that we cannot use them in real life.

The real number is the thing, what we can calculate normally, but the complex part, what is above the coordinates of Y-axel is impossible to model in some shops. But that kind of numbers is the product of very clever mathematicians use of brains. Those things are a really interesting way to think.

Another old gravestone

Another old gravestone


In the next text is simultaneous repeated one word. And here I must say, that the thing is that I have thought many times, what is the story behind that signature? Was there something special, what that person made in those cases? Or was it made for remembering people for something?

When we are looking at this old gravestone, we might face interesting detail in that memorial. Of course, the grave is left without attention, but if there is some remarkable person, I thought that family would be interesting about that grave. But how important and the remarkable person the long-term juror has been?

There is a signature of the juror, and the thing, why I know that this man was the juror, is that there is mentioned, that he had honorific, what was admit by the head judge of the court to the person, who has made the long career in the court system as the juror. So this kind of details makes me interesting about this kind of things, because if the family members of that man must be protected, why they mentioned the position of that graved person as the juror.

The thing is why this signature is marked on the gravestone? This kind of things are remarkable details in the graves, and tell that there is something special about this kind of persons. And of course, why the position as the long- term juror has been mentioned? This kind of details makes the research of history so interesting.

Was there something special about this person, except that he was working as the juror in a long period? Nobody makes those things just for fun, and here we must say, that there must also be some reason to put the signature on the gravestone. This kind of things makes old cemeteries interesting. And as you might notice the grave has not been taking care. Why nobody visits there?

Could we someday get electricity straight from nature by using so electronegative material that it would suck the necessary electricity straight from nature?

Could we someday get electricity straight from nature by using so electronegative material that it would suck the necessary electricity straight from nature? 

The next writing is about the theoretical power source, what bases the system, which will transform the plasma into the electricity. if this system would be possible, it will make a revolution in the spacecraft design.

There is a possibility that in the distant future, we can create the craft, what would take the electric power for all its functions directly from the space. The principle of this kind of system is it benefits the ions of the space for creating the power of its operations.

In theory, there would be two ways to make that kind of system. The first one is to make a very long radio antenna, where the electricity or free electrons would transfer, and make the electricity to the systems. The second one version would base the electronegative material, what does not exist yet. The material would transfer the electrons through it, and then that material allows to fly without internal electric source.

In this form, the power system would actually transfer the electrons to the drive and support systems of the ionized gas or plasma, what most of the material of the space is. The ionized gas would make possible to create the electric field in the system, and that thing would make possible to fly in space without an internal power source.

The vital part of the system would be the generator, what works only in the zero-gravity conditions. The parts of that generator would not have physical contact together, and that allows it to rotate with extremely fast speed. So there is the electric motor, what parts are hovering in the non-gravitational conditions, and the other part would be the generator. 

The electricity of the induction motor would get from the system, which conducts the electricity from the plasma to that electric motor. If the temperature of that system would be low enough, the system will turn to superconducting, which makes it more effective.

The idea of this kind of thing would not be new, and at least Nikola Tesla got ideas of the flying machines, what would use the radio waves or wireless electric transfer system. And there have been ideas to create even the high voltage power by using the power of the ions. The idea based on the wheel, what is floating in the generator in the weightless conditions.

When the electricity of the ions would transfer in the stators, the rotor starts to rotate, and because there would be a vacuum in this tube or generator, the wheel or rotor would start to rotate extreme high speed, because there is no friction in this system. And this generator would rotate very long time because no part of it has no physical contact with other parts of that thing.

The fascinating idea of living forever

The fascinating idea of living forever

"Roswell incident" has given many topics for philosophers and scientists

In this writing, I would not tell stories about the Roswell case. The idea is to tell a story about the ideas, what that case has brought in the head of some philosophers or scientists. This kind of stories are fascinating many innovative people and bring many ideas in their mind, where could benefit the Internet and the most modern technology. But in the beginning, I will rehearse what means "Roswell incident". And more details about that case you might look from the Internet.

In some stories, the US Air Force has been captured dead humanoids from some spacecraft, and that story is involving tale that some of those bodies were stored in liquid nitrogen or liquid helium. If the electricity would conduct to the brains of those individuals, the researchers could communicate with that thing. There are many versions of this tale, and one is that the most brilliant scientists are stored in a very cold place, where they will recall to serve people when their services are needed.

The idea is that when the temperature would decrease near the Zero Kelvin, what is the absolute point of zero, the molecular functions in the body are ended. And if the computers are connected to the brains, what will stimulate with electricity, that person would communicate with people in this way, and technically those persons would live forever if the temperature remains very low.

This has been conducted the theory, that maybe in tomorrow we could live forever on the Internet as the EEG, which communicates with computers by using multi-level operating systems. In this case, the EEG would be the upper-level operating system, and the regular computer would be the lower level system. That thing allows storing human mind in the digital world forever, and in the wildest dreams that EEG would conduct the real person, and this allows that the people would technically live forever.

Can the algorithm operate as the assassin?

If the people would be stored on the Internet as the form of the algorithm, that would bring one very interesting point of view in the mind of philosophers and other people. That thing is that if somebody would destroy that algorithm would that person get prosecution about murder, and in fact, there is one thing that also made me think about the future. This thing is that if we would store our mind on the Internet, would we face the situation, wherein the net would be the assassination algorithms, what would destroy the stored EEG.

In fact, the assassination algorithms are possible, and they are the weapons of the next generation. They can slip in the mobile telephone, and then start the subliminal commands in that device. Or they can jump in the computer systems of aircraft, or support systems. So the algorithm can load too little fuel in the tank, and then the accident will be sure if this happens over the mountain area. Or it can program the autopilot act dangerously during the landing, which causes a really terrible situation.

When we are thinking about the assassination algorithm, that computer program can take some vehicle like robot taxi under the control, and when it locates the targeted person, it would increase the speed. Then the system would just slip away from the computer, and then there is no trace about them. And this makes them a very dangerous tool in the wrong hands.

In the future, the space travelers would make Dyson's spheres near the target stars

In the future, the space travelers would make Dyson's spheres near the target stars

When I'm talking about advanced civilizations, I'm talking also the human race. In the future, we might create Dyson's sphere near the target star and live in that space station. An advanced civilization could make their own artificial planet near some star, and benefit the ice asteroids what are orbiting the star and use that water in Dyson's sphere.

If we would think Dyson's sphere as the base near another star, that thing would be more suitable than some planet for the base, because that artificial planet would not contain any micro-organisms. The atmosphere would also be fully controlled, and that would make it more comfortable than some natural planet, and the life in that Dyson's sphere would be fully controlled. Sometimes some philosophers have introduced the idea, that the civilization, what lives on some planet would be controlled by using Death Stars, the giant Dyson's spheres, what are equipped with ion cannons, what is capable to shoot antimatter to that planet, what could destroy the entire planet.

That thing can be the ball-shaped space station, so-called Dyson's sphere, what will work like hollow Earth. That thing would create artificial gravity by using rotation, and the centrifugal force would create artificial gravity in the inner layer of this ball. And in the middle of that space station would be the artificial sun or fusion reactor, what will create electric power for that thing.

In some stories, people are flying to the stars, and this is the standard thing in the science fiction stories. And sometimes the scientists want to keep us restless, and they say, that there is not habitable planet orbiting some stars, and that's it, we cannot find humanoids from those stars as you might know.

Advanced aliens would not need planets

But otherwise, we are facing little paradox about this philosophical thought, because if we are thinking about the primitive civilizations, those aliens would not travel of life near to those stars, but if we are thinking about advanced civilizations, what can operate with advanced space technology. And that could build things like asteroid spacecraft. We must realize that those humanoids or astronauts can create their own planet by hollow the asteroid, and create the space station inside it. That thing can be a very interesting version of space travel.

 And maybe in the distant future, we would be the civilization, what would travel to another solar system and meet intelligent but primitive aliens, and who knows, what we would do in that situation. Here we must say, those very advanced civilizations might not be addicted by the starlight, and middle of those ball-shaped space stations could be created the artificial fusion.

In that system would be used the same kind of technology, what is used in NIF (National Ignition Facility), where the fusion particle would put in the center of the ball-shaped chamber, and then it would target by lasers or microwave systems, what will create the artificial sun in the middle of the ball. In fact, a similar system could be installed in the much larger ball, which could be massive Dyson's sphere. The ball-shaped space station would rotate and the rotating structure makes the artificial gravity possible.

The writing about our relationship about death

The writing about our relationship about death

One of the most difficult questions in philosophy is, how we will act opposite side if there is playing dying player?

Sometimes I have asked myself, that why the main character of the movies, what are told about dying is ever been the man, who looks like Santa Claus who is covered by tattoos. Those people need empathy same way as the cute nice girls.  Have you seen the movie "Cool kids don't cry"? It's a story about the girl, who is dying in cancer, and the things, what the classmates would do with her. And there is one thing, what I started to think when I looked at the trailer.

The thing is concerning the scene, where that character played the football as a goalkeeper, and that thing made me think about one thing, and sometimes I feel like a heartless bastard when I'm thinking about that thing, what is sometimes in those cases, where the dying patient comes to the team. The thing is that we all want to give joy and happiness to those people, whose life will be ending too soon, but have you ever thought, what might happen if the thing about cancer has not told to some players in the opposite side?

They could kick the ball with full force, and then that patient might break the bones, or here I must ask one question, what I ever dare: would you score to that goal? I sometimes thought that there would be the pupil or student, who would ever make goals before, and then that person would make the only score to the goal, what is guarded by a cancer patient. Would that person be happy about that goal?

I think that this thing is really embarrassing for everybody. Or how would those players act, if the player would die in Hepatitis B, what is caused by the use of drugs? Or what if that person would be an adult man, who is dying in liver cirrhosis, what has been caused because of heavy drinking? This is an interesting thing because also dossers would need empathy at that moment. Would we show empathy to the elder man, who looks like Santa Claus or the person, who is dying because of the use of doping? The liver can be destroyed also because of using the anabolic steroids, so would we support the person, who is full of tattoos, and looks like a little bit less cute than the young girl?

Moral problems are not easy to solve

This is the moral problem, what I have sometimes thought. Is morally justified to make scores to goals, what are guarded by a person, who might die very soon. Sometimes there is claiming that the game is game, and otherwise, there is an ethic problem, because that person should win in the last game, what that person would ever play, and this kind of things are really difficult.

How would you answer this kind of questions? Or what if this person plays very often in front of the goal? Is that acceptable in a moral and ethic point of view to think? Is it right to use that kind of player for making sure, that the opposite players would not dare to make goals? And how that thing would influence another player of that team?  Is this thing acceptable or not, this is the question, there are no simple answers.

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"

(Artuk.org)

Short writing about the painting "An Alchemist in His laboratory"


Alchemist worked in front of other people 

There are many paintings, which has this name, and some of those paintings are made by unknown artists, and the reason for that might be that those painters were afraid of revenge because some alchemists were wanted for witchcraft. If the painter hired the location of the witch that could cause that the painter would get the death penalty for hiring that information.

Also, alchemists didn't want that people would know that they were alchemists, and the painter wanted to hide the identity of the model and himself. Because if the alchemist has told about the experiments to the painter, that would be told to keep his own identity secret. One of the most interesting detail in this painting is, that alchemist reads the book.

Was real alchemist only written the instructions to "human robot", who made those experiments by following the texts?

In that book might be the instructions for the experiments what this man makes and in this case the person, who makes the tests or practical research might be the "human robot", who would make practical work, and the identity of the real mastermind was covered that way. If the instructions for tests would be clear enough, even the regular person would make the practical things and the real person, who made ideas and instructions for the test might stand as a hidden identity. And if the instructions would be written to that book even child can read them to the maker of the test.

I used this image as the illustration image in the writing about Alchemy, and now I will write something about this painting. There is one very interesting detail, or actually, there are many details, what we should think, and one of them is that alchemist is working in the front of the eyes of the normal people and he also allows children play in the next to him. And that means that this man seems to have nothing to hide, and then we can think, do those people even understand things, what alchemist makes?

Do they see the ultimate genius or some person, who might be some bookkeeper or something like that? The reason why alchemist allows those people to see him at work is that if there would be some police or soldiers, who are asking about the work of that man, would somebody tell it to him. And the way, how those people would say that thing is "hey sheriffs are looking for you, and what are you done"? So the alchemist would not tell his name to those people. But there are many things, which are really interesting details in that image.

Alchemists must hide their work from other people

There are many things, what made people really suspicious of alchemists, who were claimed to made contract with the devil. Those persons tested medical operations, which would be prohibited even in modern times, and that's why they must hide their notes in the codes.  Because if they were uncovered that Alchemist would send to jail or even hang because of the experiments.

One of those codes might be the globe, where is the line. That could be the instructions of the separation surgery of the cerebral hemispheres, what is made for a cure for epilepsy, and maybe some of those men made those surgeries. When we are talking about surgery, we must remember that the successful operation is different than operation, and maybe many people died in those tests.

They were claimed to made contract with devil himself 

The idea was that if the corpus callosum would cut in the early ages, there would grow the person who has two fully advanced humans in one body. The thing is that if the corpus callosum would cut the brains would have problems with synchronizing their operations, and that means that there would be problems with social skills and concentration because cerebral hemispheres cannot communicate together with the normal way.

I don't know has anyone made those surgical operations in the time, when this painting has been painted and they are strictly prohibited except for the cure of epilepsy.  The metal dome over the skull tells that the Alchemist has skills to control the mind of people, and that person might use the things like suggestion and hallucinate and stunning vegetables and mushrooms for controlling the person.

Troll factory and information warfare

Troll factory and information warfare

Social media is a very important tool for propagandists

The major targets for troll makers are the respected person, who would give effect to information if they would re-share some propaganda. If those people would share propaganda, that contact with many people on the Internet. Many times the troll or political propaganda is looking very much "real" information, but if we would look at that data more careful, there is shared only one side views of the things.

The major thing in troll makers is to target their strike to the audience, where it makes the greatest effect. One of the biggest points of information operations is that when people are sharing false information, they are extending rumors, and this is the purpose of the troll makers. The prime target for those people are the centers of the social network, who are respected persons in their social network.

One idea is to benefit the obey, what those people face in the world. Because some person has respect, that means that people are not want to show that different opinions than this person has. So the troll maker wants to benefit the social position of some member of the social network. The idea is that when the person with respect would believe something, that thing would scale over the rest of the group.

If a big group of the people starts to believe or share something, they would get more and more readers to trolls. The big group of people has big social mass in social media, and that would deliver the information to many people by benefiting those social networks.

The thing is that the prime troll itself might be very easy to notice as the false information, but the idea of it is that other people will tell about that thing by using their own words. That would cause the effect, that the rumor becomes the truth in the mind of the people. If an adult people see some trolls, that person might think that is naive or shares only one part thoughts about the things, what is claimed to happen.

Children cannot separate right or wrong information

But when this kind of things is told to children, that thing would seem true, and if the troll maker is an adult or if that adult claims to represent some kind of official authority, would children believe this kind of things. And one of the best things, what Russian troll maker would tell to the youngster is being the member of FSB, "what is one kind of police". In this case, the propagandist claims to be the same kind of policeman like in some person in a police car in western society. And in the information warfare is used the same method as in some school harassment cases. There are many people, who have read the troll, and somehow they have pressed "like" by accident. After that, the troll maker would start to tell people, that some person pushes "like".

The idea is the same as in the schoolyard, where a group of youngsters is coming to some person and say, that if you are not saying "yes" we will beat that person. Then those persons would go to the teacher and say, that "here is a couple of witnesses, who are seeing, that some inmate has this or that opinion". The best way to notice, if the thing is a troll, is that there is used the threat of violence or some other kind of force. That means if somebody has a different kind of opinions, this inmate would just yell to silent.

Should we Google our name or not?

Should we Google our name or not?

It's my own business, how I spend my time

It's my own business, how I spend my time, and I'm interested to know, what other people are talking about me on the Internet. There are many people, who say that I'm some kind of far-right conservative, and that kind of things are interesting to me because I don't think that I'm such kind of person. 

The thing is that people have the right to their opinions, and that thing is really interesting because many of us are accepting critics if that thing would not target us. People are easy to stamp or put in some form because they think and say things, what is not please us. But that's not justified to treat somebody. We want to tell people about our own opinions about, what they are thinking or doing, and maybe we say, that is the freedom for speech. But we must realize, that the way to tell our opinion by the civilized way, and we have not right to treat somebody, and in the same way, we have not tolerated treats, what is targeted to us. 

And we all think that we are some kind of modernists and advanced people because we want to be that kind of persons. But in fact, sometimes we are actually the most conservative people on Earth, but we cannot confess those things. We want to make reforms, but when is the time to act, we say "that there is a much better way to follow the tradition". 

We want to change things, but actually, we are supporting the old fashion models, and that is one of our greatest weaknesses. We cannot estimate ourselves pure objective, and that is very problematic because that thing, what we believe about ourselves would have a conflict with the thing what we are. 

Should we Google our name or not?

In the Web is instructions, that people ever should Google their own name, because the information, what they can get might be different, what they hope. And maybe sometimes is difficult to know, that be Googling our own name would give us the data, what might be very interesting. And one of them is that if somebody would share personal data about you, that might be really interesting to know.

In fact, we might sometimes have kept firm, and maybe in those cases would be good to know, that if somebody is sharing data, what might cause troubles to our business. In those cases, the name of our company might be found from the lists, that some companies would not cooperate with us, and that kind of things might interest us as an entrepreneur.

But what about our own name, would we want to know, what dirty tales are told about us. If there is found the false identity, that is used in social media that thing might be alarming. And if somebody shares things like medical records or some other confidential things, like details of your private life, that thing might be something, what you might want to know. And I'm interested, what people are telling about me, and this is the thing, why I sometimes google my own name. 

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Havis Amanda statue Helsinki
(Wikipedia)

Usual can be extraordinary

Thinking is the thing, what we should practice very hard, and in fact, we should confess that we don't know everything. What we think as the regular and common thing might be very extraordinary. And while we are practicing thinking we must try to find another side of the things. There is always something good in everything in the world, and there are many ways to see things. Let me explain a little bit about this thing. Normal people think that fishes are swimming in the water, but why don't we try to think something extraordinary, and try to think that fish is in some certain place and it would move water around it. That would mean that the fish is a stable object, what is laying in the water, what flows around it.

This situation is true in some places, like fast flowing rivers, where the fishes are at a certain place, and water goes around it. This case would be seen very often in nature, but there is one thing, what we don't actually think, and that is that only the little part of the water on the Earth is in the rapids. That means this is a very unusual situation if we would compare it with the conditions, where most of the water is on the Earth. The probability of this phenomenon can be calculated as an example by division the area of the rivers by area, what is covered by water.

We could take some other quantities of this calculation, and one is the number of water molecules, what is found in the flowing water systems and division them with the number of all water molecules on Earth. And then we can start to ask, should we take clouds in the number of water molecules. And is rain flowing or stable water, which is a very important question, if we would want to write a little bit longer text. But as you see, there are many people, who don't want to do that, so let the thing be. There are many things, which are fascinating and impress people, but what is away from everyday life.

The position of the observation can obfuscate people

Let's take another example. If we would go to walk in the evening of May Day, we would think that every people, who would walk in the city are some kind of students. That is visible especially in the Helsinki, and near the statue of Havis Amanda. Every year tradition is that the students would put the graduation cap on the head of that statue. In that situation, we are surrounded by the students, and we might think that every person in the Helsinki Metropolis area is a student, who studies in the university or some other higher education institutes.

But the Havis Amanda statue is only one position in the city. We might go somewhere else, and then we might understand that something obfuscates us. This thing is called the obfuscation of the probability. If we would go to some city, and wind up in the University campus, we might meet many doctors and professors but are those people actually the typical samples of the normal people, who are living in the city? This thing would interest the politicians, who would make decisions about taxes and other things, and the most important thing in the work of politicians is to please the biggest group of people because that this guarantees the votes.

And the pleasing of the majority would cause a collapse in next elections if the promises that were given during the campaign have been broken. The high position allows making many decisions, but that position would also make possible to make many mistakes. This is the problem in the position of the directors. If the person would make decisions, what causes problems there could be nobody, who will give advice, and that would cause collapse. And in those cases, the mistake is made by that certain director, who would kick off or if that person owns the company would that kind of the wrong decision cause the bankruptcy. So if the person would have too much power, there is a risk to make wrong decisions, what will cause the destruction of the company. This is the writing for the morning.

Trusting people is the thing, what is normally misunderstood in the working life

Trusting people is the thing, what is normally misunderstood in the working life


The trust is the thing, what is so nice thing, and it's very easy to use in the wrong purposes. In the modern working life, the key element is the teamwork, and that is the thing, where trusting other people are in a very important role. And then if we would be a little bit suspicious in that situation, we must understand that sometimes we are facing the situation, that somebody misuses trust in the teamwork.

The thing is sometimes feeling better for asking things about the behavior of the team member or henchman from the workmates. That would be more comfortable than speak with the other person face to face. And asking things from another person would feel also the way to get "real information" by asking things from other people. But that kind of thing would cause cheating in the working community.

One of the most important things in the trust is that thing would not form in one minute, and building the trust can take the lifetime, but as you might know, the trust can break in one minute. This is a big problem in working life because if the trust is once broken, there would be no change to win it back. If the close friend would treat somebody, that might cause the inmate has no ability to trust other people. And that means this person needs some kind of help.

But what the offered help could be? The thing that the person is unable to trust other people will cause that the therapies would be failed because the person believes, that therapist will tell the things to other people. If the person cannot trust other people, that would cause many problems in personal and professional life. But when we are talking about wealthy trust, we are talking about that we should not trust other people in some cases, because the thief and traitors would play the trusting games.

Those games are like "you don't trust me if you don't do something like drinking the liquid from the bottle, what another person would offer.  And in the worst cases, the thing is that the person would agitate the partner to point the loaded pistol to own head, and then pull the trigger, and in the worst cases, the other person has been loaded that gun.

If we would think the situation in the point of view of the intruder, that person would approach some team member, and play that their workmate has psychiatric problems, and then tell that the victim would not actually understand the own condition, and that would help that intruder to slip in the workplace. That means that the intruder might have the knowledge, what is needed when the place of the victim is released, and in that case, the opportunity and motive would cause, that couple of pills will slip in the coffee of the victim.

And then the workplace would separate the victim because the psychotic symptoms cause problems for the workplace, and that kind of problems would better handle somewhere else, because working life is not for mentally ill persons, and then the place in the corporation will be released. And in those cases, we always should ask the motive, why somebody wants to help the community? Does that person have own motives for that thing, and one of those motives could be that the released place would give the reason to send the application to that company? So think carefully, before you trust somebody, who you ever met before something bad would happen.