Do you know, what is the ideology of your candidate during the election?
One word more about political commercials, we should know who we are voting, what is the ideology of that group, and what kind of things it supports? The thing is that what if some politician starts to act in parliament against things, what has been promised during the campaign?
The problem with political campaigns is that they are made by the people, who are professional salesmen. They might write speeches to the politician, who might not even think about some things and the thing what those people, who are working in those campaigns are offering is the change to get a place in the political system.
At first, those people must get a candidate, who they would sell to people, who will give votes. Sometimes some people are saying that selling a politician to the people is the same thing as selling soap to customers. But at the first sales team must get a candidate, wh would believe them. And then they must get money for commercials because they must make sure, that people listen to their man. They must confess that their politician has something to give for the regular people.
Regular people are making a decision, who they will vote in the election. So the policy and the promises must be adjusted for pleasing the regular people and financial leaders. The thing is that there are more cleaners that top directors of enterprise companies. And in real elections only the votes, what are given have mean. If some candidate would get more votes than others, that means that the candidate has been elected.
And here I don't write about American way to elect presidents. There the number of electors, who are elected from each state is crucial. That means that the campaign makers are making focus, what states are important to them. And wich states would get less attention. And in the USA the person, who gets fewer votes can be elected to the president if the number of election men would be greater.
And at the last, I must say, that if those people, who would work in the election campaigns get their own man or woman in the top place of the political pyramid, that means that they would get a job, where is a good salary. They would be hired to next campaigns, and that is the reason, why the entire team must and will do their best in those cases.
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Thursday, October 31, 2019
Saturday, October 19, 2019
What if Russians get their agent to the head of the United States?
What if Russians get their agent to the head of the United States?
The thing is very interesting because this kind of scenario is sometimes introduced in the thrillers. We know that Russians could train their personnel and manipulate media, but can they handle social media in the same way with Brexit, that is the question, what we cannot answer. The second question is that would Russians want that thing?
Do they want that the FSB or some other intelligence service would get the leadership in the USA? And what would happen, if that person would get the highest public position in the political control of the USA? That kind of things are really interesting questions, and we know that there are many things, what the USA can do in that case.
One is that they would use mental manipulation for that candidate, and that would cause that the operation of the Russians would be doomed. And there are many other nasty things, that a person can face, and nobody sees a thing. And sometimes I have thought, how many times the CIA and another kind of intelligence services have switched the persons in the head of other governments.
So the best thing, what the intelligence can do, just switches the person, and use body doubles in that case. Or they can just brainwash the candidate by giving the high voltage electric shocks through the frontal lobe. In that case, the person must just put the jewel or some other device, which gives the electric shock to the frontal lobe on the head, and that thing would transform the way of thing of that person.
That kind of thing might be the cure for that kind of addiction. And the thing is that the claiming the candidate in the election campaign as the Russian spy is tough prosecution. So what would people do, if they would be cheating to vote Russian spy to the head of the state? In this kind of operation, Russian intelligence would use the methods, what has been used in the Brexit, but would that guarantee the election?
That kind of question is really good, and even if the Russian government would want to make that operation, what would that make to NATO? Would that person be worse than Trump? We know that this kind of person and body switches are addictive topics for writings and that kind of thing is really interesting to think. But would that person dare to make "real decisions", what is supporting Russian benefit? What if that thing would recognize?
https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11027787
The thing is very interesting because this kind of scenario is sometimes introduced in the thrillers. We know that Russians could train their personnel and manipulate media, but can they handle social media in the same way with Brexit, that is the question, what we cannot answer. The second question is that would Russians want that thing?
Do they want that the FSB or some other intelligence service would get the leadership in the USA? And what would happen, if that person would get the highest public position in the political control of the USA? That kind of things are really interesting questions, and we know that there are many things, what the USA can do in that case.
One is that they would use mental manipulation for that candidate, and that would cause that the operation of the Russians would be doomed. And there are many other nasty things, that a person can face, and nobody sees a thing. And sometimes I have thought, how many times the CIA and another kind of intelligence services have switched the persons in the head of other governments.
So the best thing, what the intelligence can do, just switches the person, and use body doubles in that case. Or they can just brainwash the candidate by giving the high voltage electric shocks through the frontal lobe. In that case, the person must just put the jewel or some other device, which gives the electric shock to the frontal lobe on the head, and that thing would transform the way of thing of that person.
That kind of thing might be the cure for that kind of addiction. And the thing is that the claiming the candidate in the election campaign as the Russian spy is tough prosecution. So what would people do, if they would be cheating to vote Russian spy to the head of the state? In this kind of operation, Russian intelligence would use the methods, what has been used in the Brexit, but would that guarantee the election?
That kind of question is really good, and even if the Russian government would want to make that operation, what would that make to NATO? Would that person be worse than Trump? We know that this kind of person and body switches are addictive topics for writings and that kind of thing is really interesting to think. But would that person dare to make "real decisions", what is supporting Russian benefit? What if that thing would recognize?
https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11027787
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Why populistic movements are turning against their supporters?
Why populistic movements are turning against their supporters?
The headline what I wrote should go like this: Why politicians don't keep their permissions, what they have given to electors? Here I mean that every politician is some kind of populist. The thing is that politicians must give permissions for the supporters and if the politician would not promise a single thing, nobody would give the vote to that person.
In the complicated world of politics, the politician must sometimes make permissions, what that person would not even self think as realistic. And in those cases, they must just expect that somebody else would fall their suggestion. But in the field of politics, there are cases, where the own benefit of the politician would go across the benefit of the party.
In those cases, we must realize that the place in the parliament is personally given to a politician. And here it the thing, why politics is so difficult field of the act. There are many suggestions, which are against some parliament members own way of view, and in those cases, they must sometimes vote against their own opinion, or they might lose the membership of the political movement. The thing is that acceptance to some list gives the political groups, what is called as "parties". In the cases that the political party works against the personal will of the politician is two ways to act.
Another is to stand in line with other members of the political movement or the other one is to find the new electors, and change the party. The last one would cause the situation where the person turns to a political weather vane, where the person would change party all the time when the political wind turned direction, and those persons can select their parties by looking at the most popular party. And the thing is that if the political movement uses social media would somebody start to make dirty politic in that media.
The thing is that those cheaters can hunt for people, who are registered to some political movement home pages, and start to pressure the people, who are the supporters of that party to leave those homepages, or the cheating continues. This is one version of the treating and making troubles for people, who are supporters of some movement. And that is the most usual dirty trick at the field of politics. The idea of that action is to isolate the politician from the electors, by denying to tell about their ideology to the people.
The headline what I wrote should go like this: Why politicians don't keep their permissions, what they have given to electors? Here I mean that every politician is some kind of populist. The thing is that politicians must give permissions for the supporters and if the politician would not promise a single thing, nobody would give the vote to that person.
In the complicated world of politics, the politician must sometimes make permissions, what that person would not even self think as realistic. And in those cases, they must just expect that somebody else would fall their suggestion. But in the field of politics, there are cases, where the own benefit of the politician would go across the benefit of the party.
In those cases, we must realize that the place in the parliament is personally given to a politician. And here it the thing, why politics is so difficult field of the act. There are many suggestions, which are against some parliament members own way of view, and in those cases, they must sometimes vote against their own opinion, or they might lose the membership of the political movement. The thing is that acceptance to some list gives the political groups, what is called as "parties". In the cases that the political party works against the personal will of the politician is two ways to act.
Another is to stand in line with other members of the political movement or the other one is to find the new electors, and change the party. The last one would cause the situation where the person turns to a political weather vane, where the person would change party all the time when the political wind turned direction, and those persons can select their parties by looking at the most popular party. And the thing is that if the political movement uses social media would somebody start to make dirty politic in that media.
The thing is that those cheaters can hunt for people, who are registered to some political movement home pages, and start to pressure the people, who are the supporters of that party to leave those homepages, or the cheating continues. This is one version of the treating and making troubles for people, who are supporters of some movement. And that is the most usual dirty trick at the field of politics. The idea of that action is to isolate the politician from the electors, by denying to tell about their ideology to the people.
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Artificial intelligence and visions of the end of the human race
Artificial intelligence and visions of the end of the human race
The artificial intelligence, what will take control of Earth, and the case, where this thing would turn against the human race is a common thing in the science fiction stories. The thing is that artificial intelligence would not need to use bullets and nuclear weapons for destroying the humans is not very often handled thing, and the thing what artificial intelligence can use are the silent methods, and one of the most effective ways to terminate entire nations is just denied them to get children. Denying the people to get children would be not noticed in the media, because this kind of operations would not need guns. And the epidemic would not be deadly. People would just get sterilize and that's it. Nobody notices a thing, before its too late.
Without children, the entire population would cease it's being. And the best or the most silent way to make that thing is the infect people with mumps, which destroys the egg cells or testis. Sometimes we are thinking about our relationship with artificial intelligence by choosing the way of view, that could the artificial intelligence or algorithm have rights like humans and animals. And if artificial intelligence has the rights to be and feel, we must take an induction step in this philosophical thought.
We can ask the question, can we someday vote the artificial intelligence to the position of the president, and that is a very interesting way of thinking about that very complicated thing, what might be also very devastating. The artificial intelligence can collect all data, what we have imputed into the social media, and if the program is sophisticated enough, the system can create the campaign, what pleases the most of the people, and that's why the artificial intelligence could get the place of the president.
But in this case, the things, what people write in the social media would form the artificial intelligence, and the thing is that kind of algorithm can act as the dream president and keep the permissions. But we have not thought about the one exception, and that thing is the "shadow protocol", what might make the artificial intelligence one of the horrifying thing in the world. When we are thinking about the case that artificial intelligence would take control of the world and destroys the human race it would not probably operate like the terminator and begin the war against the humans.
That algorithm can make unable to live by using pollution or some organisms, what might destroy the egg cells or testis of mankind, and that would destroy the entire human race. And artificial intelligence has time to operate. And the way how this thing could take control of the society is that thing makes itself very important. One way is to destroy all scientists from the Earth, and then the creation of the serums and vaccines against that supermums is impossible.
And one way to make the operation is to use genome tests, what has been taken from the fetus, and then cause some infection to the women, who would have to get the intelligent children, and that would give chance to deny the creation of the new medicals. This is one version, where artificial intelligence would take the power on the Earth, and in this operation would not shoot any bullet.
The human race would just die because there would not be any new children, and then the power turns to artificial intelligence in a couple of generations. The thing is that this would be the thing called "silent holocaust". People would not even notice that they would not get any children anymore. And artificial intelligence can live through generations. And it can copy itself to other computers. This is one of the dystopian visions about this theme, which is very interesting but at the same time frightening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Computer researchers published a new algorithm that revolutionizes web management.
The new database structures require new and powerful tools to manage databases in non-centralized solutions. The new data structures can be ...
-
Starlink and miniaturization of the communication satellites The dream of Elon Musk is to give every people free Internet across the world...
-
The time travel in mind or using imagination Sometimes we are forgetting one thing about data handling and memory. The thing what we are f...
-
Lightweight vehicles are flexible tools in the hands of the military Jeeps were effective tools in the hands of SAS Lightweight vehicle...