Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

The answer to the question of Bethlehem's star could be an eruption of the surface of Van Maanen's star or Sirius B. 

Could Van Maanen's (1) star (Van Maanen 2) or Sirius B (2)the Bethlehem's star? Van Maanen's star is too cold for being that star, but could that thing be the Sirius B. The age of Sirius B is about 228 million years, but there is the possibility that some kind of eruption on the surface of Sirius B has caused the effect, what we are known as Bethlehem's star. 

The star itself can be old, but sometimes the white dwarfs and neutron stars are impacting with bigger particles or a large mass of gas or dust will be dropped to the surface of the star, and that causes a very big explosion. So this kind of eruption that happens at close star would cause an effect that the new star has been born to skies. 

The most common explanation for that thing is the supernova or nova (3) eruption or explosion, which exploded somewhere in our Galaxy. And that thing is one of the most interesting theories in the world. Some scientists have believed, that the Bethlehem's star is the Van Maanen's star, what is at the distance of the 14,5 light-years from Earth, and that thing would explain the mystery of the Bethlehem's star. 

Van Maanen's star has ever been the supernova, but the nova-eruption, what has been happened so close would be very bright, and that thing would be seen in the darkest night. The key question in this theory is that the age of that white dwarf is too old being Bethlehem's star. But sometimes even the lonely white dwarfs are erupting, when the bigger particles are impacting them, and could the Bethlehem's star be the eruption on the surface of Van Maanen's star?

But the problem is that Van Maanen's star or Van Maanen 2 is too hot being the Bethlehem's star. And that means there could be another white dwarf near Earth, but nobody has been found. Sometimes also Sirius B is claimed to be that nova. 

The distance to that star is 8,611 light-years, which means that also smaller changes to the brightness of that star are easy to recognize. And the surface temperature of Sirius B is very hot, but the reason for that is the material from Sirius A is dropping to Sirius B, and that determines the age of that star difficult by using the surface temperature. But this is only theory. And the answer for the mythical Bethlehem's star could be the eruption on the surface of Sirius B. 

Could the Bethlehem's star be some kind of propaganda tale?

One explanation for the Bethlehem's star would be that it is only the propaganda tale. In that theory, some leaders of the Jewish community or Romans created this tale for making the chosen one brave. The story would be told that God was protecting that child, who will be the king of Jews. 

The purpose of those tales, what are told to noble children's purpose was to prove, that the God or higher spirits were protecting that person, that the royal mission was to complete. And if Jesus was the descendant of the King of Israel, that meant that the royal mission was to get Romans out from that place. 

When we are thinking about the hypothetical descendant of Jesus, we must remember, that the rule of the kings was, that they must protect their families for making the heir for themselves. That means that the holy bloodline would have existed. But this thing is only theory, and the book Da Vinci-code has been made it well-known. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Maanen_2

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11080216

Image:

https://cdn.eso.org/images/thumb700x/eso1605a.jpg

And what was the "Big Bang"?

And what was the "Big Bang"?

"Big Bang" is the creation of the material, time and Universe. Time existed before "Big Bang", but there was nothing where it can influence. When time faced material, the Universum started to form. And in the space, before "Big Bang" time was connected with the material. But because the form of the material was different time got influence on the material when it released in the "Big Bang". In the "Big Bang" the material and antimaterial electrons released at the same time, but somehow the form of material, what we are calling as "material" won the antimatter in the great annihilation, what happened in the begin of Universe.

When the "Big Bang" happened the first form of the material was released to the Universe. That first form of the material was actually the electrons and positrons, what was pulling together to the impact trajectories, and then happened the annihilation reaction, what is called as the "Great Inflation". Because there were a little bit more electrons than positrons, the form of material is, how we know it. In fact, we can think the "Big Bang" as the series of the phenomena were released very high energy levels. Maybe the "Dark Energy" is from that period, when giant annihilation has shaken the entire universe. 

So what caused this very high power explosion? One of the explanations for the "Big Bang" is that was some kind of erupting black hole. After the explosion formed a large number of electrons and positrons, and that caused the new explosions. When the material "won" antimatter, the universe was really hot, and electrons started to collide with another electron. If there would be the same number of positrons and electrons the annihilation continues forever until another type of particles would get a majority.

In this extremely hot universe, the protons and neutrons started to form in the collision of electrons. Another explanation for the "Big Bang" is that two clouds of electrons and positions collided, and this annihilation started the universe. The positron and electron are pulling each other in a colliding course because they have different polarity. But where those particles or black holes came?

Maybe they were remains of the elder universe, what has faced its end in the big crash, and then the black hole was in the totally empty space. And that caused the eruption because sometimes the photon would escape from the black hole, and if there is no replacement the black hole starts to vaporize faster and faster. Normally lose of the photon would mean anything, because the black hole would replace that in seconds. 

But in this case, there would not be any photon, electron or other material in the universe, and the black hole starts to vaporize forming the new universe. Or if the universe would lose its life in the great emptiness, the neutrons and protons start to break, and in the last in the universe would have only electrons existed. And suddenly some of those electrons start to rotate in the opposite direction than another, which means that it would transform to the anti-electron, and the electrons and positrons are starting to close together, and finally happens the great annihilation.