Freedom and things, what could happen if...

Freedom and things, what could happen if...

Freedom is the thing, which sometimes causes very interesting thoughts, and at the beginning, we must realize that there are always people who misuse freedom. Those people believe, that they have the right to do everything, what they want, and that means that we must suppress the freedoms in every nation because freedom doesn't mean that people have right to harm other people or their property. Laws are made for protecting people against brutality, and that's why people must realize, that we must follow the rules because they are meant to consider every single person in that country.

They are made for giving common rules, how people should live, and that means if somebody takes too many freedoms in the nation, that person would get the punishment, and in that case, punishment is not made to please that inmate. This is the thing in the nation and state. State and its force are established to protect its citizens against despotism. This is the reason, why we have government and it's police force. If we don't follow the speed limits, we must realize that we should get punishment, because everybody else gets the punishment. 

And that punishment is ordered by the state and justice system. The principle of the use of the law on punishments that they must be relevant to the crime. That means that the person is justified because that inmate did something, not what could happen. That means only what really happened is justifying because if we would think every possible thing, what could happen if the person drives too fast.

There is, of course possible, that the car hits to the limousine of The President Of The United States, who has opened the nuclear briefcase, what drops on the floor of the limousine. And then the coffee cup is dropping on the red button, and all missiles could fly to Russia. But this thing just didn't happen, or maybe the president hides that information from the public media. Or maybe his wife or child fell the Coca Cola  in the morning on that briefcase, what has malfunctioned, and the missiles didn't go for that reason. 

This kind of things are very good topics for the thoughts, and sometimes some person has told the story that the Russian spies can destroy entire nuclear submarine or command center simply by falling lemonade on the command consoles. But those things are not things, what are handled in the court. 

Freedom is sometimes misunderstood for the right to make what the inmate wants. And this is the dangerous way to think. Many times we are seeing people, who are telling, that they have the right to say and do what they want. But when they should listen to other people, they would not even want to hear opposing opinions. In those cases, people have the right to say everything, what supports the leader's personal opinion. In fact, when we are looking in the mirror, we might face the truth, that we are sometimes quelling other people freedom to say their opinions in many places.

We are not willing to even ask children or incompetent person, what that inmate wants to do because we don't have to follow that opinion. But the law says, that even those people have the right to speak in the meetings and other places. So why we are always so hurried, that we don't have time to hear the opinions of those people? If we are above those people and make decisions, we might still ask, what those people like to do, and maybe after that make the decision, what might be similar, or different what those people want. 

Freedom of speech is freedom of think, and that is the thing, what we always repeating. We have religion and other types of freedoms, but when we are thinking what that freedom means very careful, we must remember, that people who say, that they have the right to believe things and that's it. But when some other person has some other kinds of opinions, they would order to keep their mouth shut. The situation is similar to the Soviet Union. People had the right to be atheistic, but if they had another kind of opinions, they were arrested.

The distance between Egypt and Israel is about 613 kilometers, but Hebrews took 40 years for that trip

The distance between Egypt and Israel is about 613 kilometers, but Hebrews took 40 years for that trip

In this text, I will use the words "Holy Land" and "promised land" about the place, where Hebrew people went after they were gone from Egypt. Here I must say that Moses and other people who were born or worked in Egypt had no change to get in that new country. The risk that those people would be traitorous and believe, that the things were better in Egypt was so big, that they must die before those people went to that area.

Sometimes people ask why Hebrews walked 40 years or 43 meters per day for finding the holy or promised land after they escaped from Egypt. The reason, for that journey, is that Hebrews were moved around the Arabian peninsula after they went to the desert because they wanted to lose the men of Pharaoh, and that is the reason, why the persons, who were born in Egypt were not able to move in the promised land. That land was reserved only their children.

The reason, why those people who were lived and worked in Egypt must die before the settlement will take the place in the holy land, was that there were people, who were worked as the leaders for the other Hebrews. And some men of Pharaoh might be promised them something for traitorous actions, but there was another reason, why those leaders of the group must vanish before people could take their place in the promised land. The thing is that what happened in Egypt must leave in there.

The people must stand on one side when the plantations and irrigation for them would be done because if somebody would think, that they live in Egypt would be better than in the new place, the entire escape and the plan for establishing own land and state would be broken. And in this case, people must stand behind the dream as one man. When we are thinking about those people, who were standing behind that dream, we must understand that they were facing many traitorous actions before those decisions.

Pharaoh has been promised many things to those people but the thing is that only the leaders of the Hebrews got the good things in the society of Egypt. Ordinary people of Hebrew community would face the things, that they were the second or third class citizens. And the thing is that those people wanted freedom. They wanted to make their own decisions, and they wanted also respect from other people. When they walked in the desert, they faced many troubles and those troubles grow them.

And during the journey, those people didn't walk in a single group. They played the regular nomadic people, and then they had the knowledge, how to build the fortresses and other kinds of things. When the time was full those people grow together and then they attacked the promised land. Maybe the other team was attacked in the front and two others from the side and back against those defenders. So the people, who lived in Holy land had no change against Hebrews. That operation was giving those people respect in the eyes of other people. Is this true or false, the decision is yours, but this is how I would make those things.

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

Why physics don't think and philosopher think?

When physics make something, that person is connected to the observations, what has been made. That means physics must make every decision by using the tools like particle accelerators and prove every single word, what that person says, and the thing, what makes the life of physics sometimes really boring is that they must reserve those physical tools for their tests. And every part of the life of physics is connected to the material and nothing else can exist than material. The thing, what makes the life of physics so stiff is the need to prove those things.

But here we must say that the philosopher must also prove the things, what that person claims. But the proof must be done by using the rhetoric method. In real life philosophy or pure philosophy, the philosopher must use language and rhetorics to make the opponent become convicted that the thing, what the philosopher says is the truth. So the philosopher should not make empiric tests in the work. In some claiming physics just conducts things what that person sees to the form of doctoral dissertation.

So what is the doctor of philosophy?

Philosopher has the freedom to take also other dimensions in the work than physics. That means that the philosopher would take the spiritual aspect along with material if that person can convict people that the thing, what philosopher claims is true by using rhetoric way to confuse people. So that's why the philosophy is a more flexible thing than some kind of physics.

 When we are thinking about the doctoral degree of philosophy, we must understand that the doctors of mathematics and many other abstract sciences are actually the doctors of philosophy. And here we can think that mathematics is so-called empiric science, but it is actually also the part of philosophy or abstract science. When we are thinking about the doctoral thesis about mathematics, we are facing thing, that the word of mathematics is an abstract word.

Every single part of that thesis must be made by using the methodology, what mathematics has been accepted. And every single part of mathematics bases the thing, that we have ten fingers. That thing has brought us the numeric system, where we are using the decimal system, what bases the number ten. And somebody has thought that what if the Sumerian high priest, what has accepted the numeric system would be lost one finger. Would that mean that we would have a decimal system, what bases the number 9?

Or what if some mathematicians would create an idea that the calculations would go linear way. That means that the brackets would not have mean, and the multiplication would not have a special place in the formula? So what kind of world would be in that kind of cases? Would it somehow different than it is today?

Of course, there are numbers, what has no opponent in the normal life. Those numbers are called as the complex numbers, and that thing is a little bit interesting. The complex numbers have two points in coordinates. And that means that we cannot use them in real life.

The real number is the thing, what we can calculate normally, but the complex part, what is above the coordinates of Y-axel is impossible to model in some shops. But that kind of numbers is the product of very clever mathematicians use of brains. Those things are a really interesting way to think.