Russia shot down one of its Su-35S fighter-bombers.

  Russia shot down one of its Su-35S fighter-bombers. 

Human error, or somebody who might jam the jet fighter's IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) system, can cause this kind of episode. So if we talk about human errors, we should ask what caused those errors. Or maybe someone forgot to drive the IFF codes to the computers that control the AA systems. 

The jammer systems that deny the IFF system to transmit their codes to AA radars can cause situations where their air defense shoots aircraft down. Modern jet fighters and attack aircraft have only a couple of minutes or seconds to react when they see unknown, maybe hostile aircraft. If the aircraft comes closer to the headquarters would be an enemy attack aircraft, like the Ukrainian MiG-29 armed with "Storm Shadow" missiles, that aircraft could destroy the headquarters. 

One version of how to break the stealth technology is to use the IFF systems as the target.  AA crew can aim antiradiation missiles at the IFF system. Those radio transmitters are one vulnerability in stealth aircraft. 

The IFF system is a problematic part of the aircraft. The radio signal, that the IFF system sends makes aircraft vulnerable against the radar-homing missiles. Jammer systems that send radio signals to deny radar- or radio communication are vulnerable against antiradiation missiles. This means there are always new systems under development. 

Electronic warfare is becoming more important in modern battlefields. The drone systems require communication. And if the system can jam GPS and data communication. That makes it harder to use drones and communicate with troops. Also, jammers can deny the drone swarms internal communication. The jammer systems can be the target for HARM-type missiles created to destroy ECM systems and other radio transmitters. 

The stealth is the ultimate tool. But the next generation of radars and surveillance systems are hacking the stealth. The CCD cameras and lidar systems are making old-fashioned stealth useless. Same way next-generation AA radars might use pressure waves and other non-direct observation methods to uncover the stealth. The pressure waves around the aircraft are possible to detect by using AI-controlled systems that connect the data from multiple sources. 

And the weapon development is the race between the ultimate attacker and ultimate defender. The next-generation IFF systems might also use AI-based radar systems. The radar sends the identification request to the IFF system that answers that request. Then the AI starts to follow the aircraft that closes the IFF. And if it loses the target it can ask for identification again. That thing minimizes the need to send radio signals all the time. That helps stealth planes to complete their mission and makes them harder targets for enemy missiles. 

https://www.19fortyfive.com/2023/10/dont-tell-putin-russia-shot-down-one-of-its-own-su-35s-flanker-fighter-jets/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-shot-down-its-most-advanced-fighter-jet-over-tokmak-uk-mod-says/ar-AA1hFMaT

Zhelenskiy still says that the missile which hit Poland was not Ukrainian

S-300 missile system

We can understand that Zhelenskiy doesn't want to believe that missile that hit Poland was Ukrainian. When this kind of thing happens, there is always the possibility that it causes the end of weapon aid to Ukraine. The thing is that the Ukrainian military needs western equipment, like GPS-guided ammunition. And the thing that brings sympathy and support to Ukraine is that Ukraine fights with clean weapons. 

And if there are more similar errors where people are dying, that can cause a problem for weapon aid. The question is: did someone that sad on purpose, or was it some kind of error? The fact is that Russians want to stop the weapon aid. And maybe the purpose for that thing was a provocation. 

If that thing is made on purpose. The maker of that thing is certainly a Russian cooperative. Or could Ukrainians be so stupid, that they shoot their supporters? Of course, Russians will say, that Ukrainians tried to provocate NATO to attack Russian troops in the Crimean peninsula. 

I believe. Ukrainian high commanders didn't order that strike because that hurt the reputation of the Ukrainian government. And there is nobody who gets benefits from those strikes. But the Russian government gets to benefit from those strikes. The thing that makes the Ukrainian conflict interesting. 

Are that things like the destruction of the Crimean bridge that could be legal military action not confirmed by Ukraine? Ukraine never confessed to that thing. And the second thing is the destruction of the Nordstream-2 gas tube. What was the logic behind that action? The gas that traveled in Nordstream-2 was Russian. So why they didn't just close the ventilation or compressor? That is enough for cutting the gas flow. 

Maybe Russians tried to load Ukraine guilty for that action. The fact is that without that gas pipeline Russians cannot deliver gas to Europe, even if somebody wants to buy it. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/zelenskiy-has-no-doubt-ukrainian-missile-did-not-cause-blast-in-poland/ar-AA14bp8u

https://yle.fi/a/3-12314941

Image: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-300_missile_system

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/11/16/zhelenskiy-still-says-that-the-missile-which-hit-poland-was-not-ukrainian/

NATO:s executive secretary Stoltenberg said. "‘Missile hit to Poland likely caused by Ukraine. But it's not Ukraine’s fault" .

The fact is that even if the shooter of those missiles were Ukraine, that doesn't change the situation that Russia is the attacker. And without a Russian attack, nobody even launched those missiles. 

The fact is that Russian troops can launch those missiles even if they were not in Russian territory. And here I mean that the launchers of those missiles could be in Belarus. The thing is that the Russian attacks are serious things. And we must follow how the situation advances in Ukraine. 

But there is always the possibility that some agent or infiltrator will launch missiles from Ukraine. And the motive for those strikes could be simple: stop the weapon aid to Ukraine. Here I mean that even if those missiles were launched by Ukrainians the order for those actions could come from Russian high commanders. 

China rejected Russia in the G-20 meeting. But China said that "China says Russia cannot be expelled from G20". (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10643219/China-says-Russia-expelled-G20-suggested-excluded.html)

Frenship between Russia and China is breaking. The thing is that sooner or later the support for Russia would cause very big costs for China. If the economic sanctions on Russia will escalate to China. That causes very big problems for that state. Things like China's policy with Taiwan causes also political pressure on Chinese products.  China is not Western-style democracy and there are many internal problems. 

The Chinese government does not tolerate opposition or ethnic minorities. And that causes pressure on Western political leaders who always highlight how democratic countries we are. The problem is that even if we are democratic and very tolerant in our countries we are supporting governments that are not following the Western way to make things. And now we pay price because of that policy, 

But even if China might see Putin otherwise very comfortable the big losses in Ukraine show that the Russian war machine is something wrong. And the reason for that is that the position of V. Putin is uncertain. The fact is that even if Putin continues in his office there could be changes in his cabinet. 

And if the contact person in Putin's cabinet falls into disfavor it can cause problems for all actors in the value chain. So even if Putin continues in office there are very windy times in Russia during and after the Ukrainian conflict. 

If China would give pressure Putin. That thing can make peace or demarcation in Ukraine closer. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10643219/China-says-Russia-expelled-G20-suggested-excluded.html

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1697389/nato-Jens-Stoltenberg-poland-missile-attack-russia-ukraine-putin-war

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/ukraina-vaatii-kumppaneiltaan-selitysta-siita-miksi-ne-epailevat-puolassa-ukrainalaisohjusta-itse-valmis-todistamaan-ohjuksen-venalaisjaljista/8572780#gs.idzyzu

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/professori-g20-maiden-lausunto-paljastaa-etta-kiina-hylkasi-venajan-merkittava-lapimurto/8572680

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/mika-aaltola-puolan-ohjusrajahdyksen-kaltaisia-sodan-ylilaikkymisia-saatetaan-nahda-lisaa/8571708

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/suora-lahetys-klo-13-30-nain-nato-kommentoi-puolan-ohjusrajahdysta/8572574#gs.idy7dk

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2022/nov/16/polish-missile-strike-likely-caused-by-ukraine-but-not-ukraines-fault-says-stoltenberg-video

http://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/11/16/natos-executive-secretary-stoltenberg-said-missile-hit-to-poland-likely-caused-by-ukraine-but-its-not-ukraines-fault/

There is always the possibility that conflicts will escalate.

The image is 4 years old. And it's not connected to the case. 

Two Russian missiles hit to Polish ground and killed two people. That kind of thing requires a reaction against Russia. And that is a very concerning thing. When citizens of some nation are dead, that thing requires counter-reaction. 

And even if those missiles were not launched from Russian territory, there is one question about that action. Was it happen on purpose or was it an accident? There is the possibility that a technical error caused that missile to go to the wrong target. 

There are three possibilities for that thing. 

*Technical error caused the missiles to fly to the wrong target. 

*Missile launched to wrong target by mistake. 

*Missile launched at Poland on Purpose. 

The last case causes a question. Who made that thing? Was that thing the missile crew's or task-force commanders' idea? Did somebody in the command chain misunderstand the orders? 

Or did someone who represents Putin or claimed to be a representative of president Putin give that order? Or did it come from V. Putin? And what was its purpose? 

U.S President Biden says that the missile seems to be the Ukrainian Air-defense missile. So in that case, it's (at least should be) an accident. Turkish president Erdogan also says that he does believe that Russians didn't shoot that missile at least on purpose. But could those missile shooters be some Russian cooperative who works as the mole in the Ukrainian military? Or maybe some member of organized crime. 

There are people also in Ukraine who want long conflict so that they can destroy their police files. And some people want that NATO stops its support of Ukraine. Those people might offer their assistance to Russians because they believed that the Russians wins very quickly. 

Those people's motives could be drug smuggling or some other criminal activity. If they show their loyalty to the Russian government they hoped that Putin lets them go. 

So I think that maybe some war crimes in Ukraine are made by Ukrainian cooperatives. The reason for those mass murders and attempts to burn bodies could be that the people who made those actions believed that those victims knew their real identities. And maybe they knew the real reason for those people's loyalty to V. Putin. 

It's possible. That some users of those missile systems don't follow orders in the aiming sequence of the launching process. And that causes that missile will fly where it hurts. But it's also possible that users launched those missiles into NATO territory on purpose.

And then that can mean that Putin raises the stakes. There is the possibility that he plays a poker game. And test how united NATO is. The agenda of Russian leaders is that they are right. And Western nations are weak. So Russian leaders want to show people that they have the right to do anything that they want. 

The idea of NATO is that together small nations are stronger. And the problem with Russia is that they are reading international laws as they want. If we believe the same things we can say that the stronger nations have the legitimation to do everything that they want. 

The war crimes in Ukraine are one example of why NATO is necessary. Of course, we can always believe in the goodwill of the Russian government. But the problem is the wicked propaganda and information apparat whose only purpose is to support the power of Vladimir Putin. 

The purpose of Russian media is to support the power in that nation. And in Russia. Everything that serves the Russian agenda will be swell to incredible proportions. When some foreigner fights with a Russian after a wet bar evening. That thing turns to Fascist-governments large-scale anti-Russian action in Russian media. And when customs search Russian tourists' lockages that is always persecution. 

The fact is that Russians never get charged for things that they made in Syria. The reason for that is the Syrian government will not raise them. Because the Russian and Syrian governments see that those things in Syria are the internal business of Syria and part of police actions that means the Russian and Syrian troops are not subject to the law. 

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/seuraa-suorana-kello-8-30-ulkoministeri-haavisto-kommentoi-puolan-ohjuskuolemia-tama-tilanteesta-tiedetaan/8571546#gs.icpfgz

https://www.mtvuutiset.fi/artikkeli/nato-pitaa-tanaan-hatakokouksen-puolan-tapahtumista-tama-tilanteesta-tiedetaan-nyt/8571518#gs.icqiru

https://www.newser.com/story/328019/pentagon-investigating-reports-russian-missiles-hit-poland.html

https://www.usnews.com/news/world-report/articles/2022-11-15/russian-missiles-reportedly-hit-poland-amid-ukraine-war

Image: 

https://www.foxnews.com/world/nato-criticizes-new-russian-missiles-near-poland-lithuania

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/11/16/there-is-always-the-possibility-that-conflicts-will-escalate/

What causes the failure of the Russian air war in Ukraine?

One reason for the failure of Russian air combat in the Ukrainian conflict is found in the article below this text. At the beginning of the war, Russian Su-30 SM, Su-34, and Su-35S jet fighters made multiple air-to-air and -air-to-ground missions. 

And especially the attacks whose target was log-range radar-station and other high-priority targets. Russians made those attacks by using single aircraft. And then they didn't confirm was the target destroyed. Or was the radar just shut down for protecting it against anti-radar missiles? 

They might believe that the tank regiments take those targets in the hands of Russian troops very soon after the attack anyway. So the Russian pilots or some people in the command chain thought that the confirmation of the effect of the strike was somehow unnecessary. 

And then the radars were not destroyed and continued their operations. Another reason for the failure of air combat is probably between the chair and the dashboard. If those pilots didn't get enough practice for that kind of operation. 

AN-12 "Cub"

They cannot make their duty as they should. The fact is, at least these Su-34 and Su-35 planes are much better than MiG-29 and Su-27. But the problem is that there is the possibility that some of those Russian fighters were not what they should be. If the microchips or some other things were not properly working. That causes the accuracy of those missions decreases. 

Also, if Russians must end their ECM operations. That leaves aircraft without full protection. There is a possibility that Russian ECM systems caused problems for their own troop's communication. And that's why air vehicles are left without protection. When Russian troops didn't get information that the air defense was still operational they sent cargo helicopters and troop-transport aircraft to Ukraine's airfield. And those vehicles were easy targets even for older war machines. 

Did VDV troops that attacked Kyiv's airfield protected by combat helicopters?  

Or what those helicopters and landing heavy transport aircraft could do? They were easy targets for rapid-firing AA guns and shoulder-launched missiles. And if the heavy cargo aircraft is just touching the airfield when Javelin or Stinger hits it. That causes a situation where aircraft cannot make any maneuvers. 

Or what was their target? There are two airfields in Kyiv. Was predicted to target Antonov's airfield. Or was it Kyiv international? If the pilots attacked against wrong targets and then troop transporters started to land at that airfield whose defense was untouchable they were easy to destroy. 

https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/raportissa-uutta-tietoa-venajan-ilmahyokkayksesta-elektroninen-sodankaynti-hairitsi-omia-joukkoja/e06df833-f4f2-4457-af39-8cdf6c33917c

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su-30sm-multirole-fighter-aircraft/

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su34/

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su-35/

https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/raportissa-uutta-tietoa-venajan-ilmahyokkayksesta-elektroninen-sodankaynti-hairitsi-omia-joukkoja/e06df833-f4f2-4457-af39-8cdf6c33917c

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-27

Image: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://www.avionslegendaires.net/avion-militaire/antonov-an-12-cub/

https://www.avionslegendaires.net/avion-militaire/antonov-an-12-cub/

Why didn't the Russian army not do its mission in Ukraine as it should?

We all see that Ukraine didn't fall in 96 hours. And the question is why that thing is happening. During the exercises, the operations are done well. But the flop is happening in the real mission. All Russian units including the famous Spetsnaz are not what they should be. So what is the problem? There are many possibilities for that kind of surprise.

One of them is what the Russian army didn't expect. Is that the Javelin missiles will be so effective. And the Russian military experts expected that they could shoot down Ukrainian drones and fighters down easily by using their most modern jet fighters. 

The other version is that the troops are not prepared for their mission. There is the possibility that the commandos didn't get vial information like what their target looks like. If the team's target is a command center they should know what that thing looks like. And of course, they must know where is the point where they should put the explosives. 

That lack of information can contain the scenario where paratroopers don't even know, that they are going to battle. This means that the leaders of those units just forget to tell them that there is a war where they are going. Or maybe some of those troops believed that Ukraine was surrendering. So they didn't expect what they will face. 

There is always the possibility that there were only the best teams in the exercise and the skills of regular teams are far lower than in those "show teams".  There is also the possibility that the commanders are not telling truth about their strike capacity. There is the possibility that some "old guys" are not done their exercises as they should. And of course, if we think that failure is not acceptable in those exercises and demonstrations. 

There is also the possibility that some commanders are used fraud in those pieces of training. That means that if the commander put the detonators or explosives on the targets and then launches them at the right moment that thing makes the effect that looks like a successful artillery strike. There is always some reason for the flops in real situations. 

Of course, things like foodservice are one of the most fatal things in combat missions. When military men are in the combat zone they need ammo supply but also food and something to drink. If there is no food the sugar level in the blood will decrease. And that thing makes operations very hard. 

Why do Russians have problems destroying Turkish-built drones?

Image) Baykar Bayraktar TB2 (Wikipedia/Baykar Bayraktar TB2)

The Russian-Ukrainian war predicted that Russia will win Ukraine in 96 hours. The reality might be different. The war carries on, and many other predictions are not matched with reality. This war has been a pain and nightmare for Russians. 

The drones are invisible and very frightening killers. That can use alone or with manned aircraft. The manned aircraft can drop drones to the operational areas. And then those drones can mark targets. Or they can attack against the targets. Long-range drones like Loyal wingmen can be equipped with warheads and they can hit against missiles. And especially the long-range anti-aircraft and tactical battlefield missile launchers. 

Many things are problematic in the Ukrainian war. The predictions are not matched with reality. But one of the questions is simple. Why Ukrainian drones are not as easy to destroy as they predicted? Those Baykar Bayraktar TB2 drones are predicted to be easy targets. But there is something why Russians are not made that thing? The Bayraktar-drones are not the most advanced systems in the world. They are classified as the 2nd or 3rd. class drones. 

That is sold for some 2nd or 3rd. class countries. The Turkish build drones are introduced as "easy to jam" systems that are not so multi-use and effective as manned aircraft. But those drones seem still flying and destroy the attackers. The ECM systems along with air defense missiles and AA-artillery are predicted to be the most effective counteractors against the drones. 

There are three possibilities for the jammer system's ineffectiveness against those drones. 

1) Russians have those systems, but they don't use them. 

2) Russians have those systems, but those systems are somewhere else

3) Russians have those systems, but they are ineffective. 

But how that thing can be possible? The fact is that even cheap drones can turn extremely dangerous very easily. Operators can change components and the computer programs of those systems without telling the manufacturer that modification. The Ukrainian war, or rather saying, Russian invasion to Ukraine shown, that predictions are dangerous. Putin overestimated his force. And now he will pay the price. 

Drones might be very unsportsmanlike. But those systems are effective. The purpose of the military is to be frightening. It must scare enemies that they are not attacking to country. The military is meant to be a tool in the hands of the country and government. And the drones are allowing that government can control those things easier than some special forces man. 

And the only purpose that force has is to destroy enemies. If there is a shame to be some drone operator that is good for government. The shame helps those people to keep their mouths shut. The reason why drones are in use in many countries. Is the problem to recruit people in special forces. 

Or actually, the problem is that there are very long service times for those operators. And the skills that are trained to them are causing those people to be hard to control. The drone operator is easier to control than traditional special forces operators. The only needed thing is to cut their connection with drones. 

The fact is that the new drones are bringing new doctrine to battlefields. There are two types of killer drones. The Bayraktar is a Predator-type unmanned quite complicated unmanned aircraft. 

Another type of those horrifying system is smaller and simpler kamikaze drones. Those kamikaze drones are cruise missiles that are used in many conflicts. The target drone is equipped with a camera and the warhead can use as a kamikaze drone. 

In traditional systems, the weakness is that the system requires all-time communication. The RPV controller orders that small cruise missile dive against its target. The target can be the tank, building, or some other suitable target. But there is the possibility that the kamikaze drones are also equipped with the IIR (Image InfraRed) or image recognition-based systems. When the drone recognizes its target it will dive and impact against them. 

The "mother of those systems" is the BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile. That well-known and deadly weapon is the BQM-109 target and recon drone that is equipped with conventional or nuclear warheads. After the success of the Tomahawk systems, the smaller drones are equipped with similar target recognition and attack systems. And the fact is that all target drones can equip with warheads. 

The threat is that terrorists can modify the flying assembly kits by using warheads. And that thing causes problems with national security. Drones are frightening and scary systems. The army of Azerbaijan used drones effectively against Armenian troops in their conflict. 

But they are effective. And that's why they are part of the arsenal of many nations. The success of Bayraktar TB2 in Ukraine and Azerbaijan guarantees good markets for those drones. The thing that makes the drones effective is that they can use against better-trained soldiers. The drone operator doesn't need military training at all. And that makes those people easier to control. There is always a risk that highly trained special forces operator turns against the authorities or regular people.

Drone operators might seem very unsportsmanlike. But armies are not made for sports they are made to afraid enemies. And one thing is that the control of those systems and men are the key element in military planning. The skills that are learned in armies. Are meant for serving their country and government. Military skills are not meant to use in some restaurants. The problem with special forces has been the long service times. When the service ends the serviceman must go and find a new profession. And that thing causes problems in civil life. 

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/ukraines-bayraktar-tb2-drones-are-wreaking-havoc-russian-vehicles-200986

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baykar_Bayraktar_TB2

Image:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baykar_Bayraktar_TB2

Chernobyl, it explodes in every night.

Chernobyl, it explodes in every night.

The Chernobyl nuclear accident happened on August 25-26 1986 at 1.23 am, and this case feels in the destruction area even in today, because it has left the city of Pripyat one of the most horrifying museums in history, and the things in the city are just like people left it during the evacuation. In that area are mutated animals and the people who were involved that catastrophe is getting mutated children and they are afraid of cancer. and many of them have died in that symptom. There are still many open questions about, what happened in that night, and one of them is, why that test was done?

The official explanation of the accident was the test what was failed. The test what caused the accident was the test of the diesel generators self-starting in the case of a simulated accident. Or was the purpose of the test prove, that the diesel generators could replace the nuclear reactor in the short period use and if the reactor would be used to produce nuclear bullets that rime would be enough for taking bullets out from the reactor and if that thing would be successful, the taking out those plutonium or uranium bullets were not noticed in the other places like the observation room of the electric circuit  .

Or was it something more than just uranium or plutonium bullets? Was the test made for testing the use or uranium in the particle accelerator or the ion cannon? The idea of shooting the uranium ions by using the particle accelerator would make the most incredible weapon in the world. Those ions would shoot through the walls of nuclear reactors and nuclear weapon storages and they could destroy the warheads in the storages. Or those uranium or plutonium ions can be used in the most advanced version of the assassination weapon, what have ever created. The nuclear particles can shoot to any target, and if they hit the person, that causes very aggressive cancer, what can form by any form inside the victim's body.

There is a very well known thing that in the Soviet Union the scientists created the most utopist weapons in the world, and one of them was the nuclear tank, what has based the same idea with the turbine tank. The idea of the nuclear tank is that there would be a nuclear reactor on the top of the tank and that device would be used as the "nuclear flame thrower", what can open the lines of the NATO troops simply by targeting the radioactive particles from the nuclear reactor to the enemy. But the more advanced version based the idea that inside the tower of the tank.

The idea was that the tank would be equipped with a small size nuclear reactor, and in the place of the cannon would install the particle accelerator, what would target the beam of the nuclear particles in the same point. The idea was to use the internally shot electron- or beta rays with the positive loaded alpha particles, and that thing was able to keep the ray in the direct form. The opposite polarity of those particles sucks them together.

And the KGB had got the idea to create the portable version of that thing. The device would look like a hoover, but in the body would be the tank of helium, and that gas would shoot through the electrodes or electric arc, and that allows to create the portable ion weapon, and if those ionized helium nuclei would travel inside the radio wave, that would keep the alpha ions together. The particle accelerator would be in the handle along with the radio transmitter. That thing would be a very deadly weapon, and it can give a similar effect, what the nuclear reactor gives to target.

Maybe those things are actually rumors, and the reason for exploding the Chernobyl was, what is written in the public reports, there is a couple of things, what has no explanation. Why firemen were not equipped with radiation protective suits? So did they know that Chernobyl was a nuclear power plant? The level of temperature and radioactivity was extremely high, and that means that those men died in a couple of hours, and the thing in this action of the firemen is that when they came to that area, didn't they know about the radioactivity or that the burning thing was the graphite, what makes extremely high temperature.

When we are looking at the explosion of the Chernobyl, what happened on April 25-26th. at 1.23 am. we can say that this accident happens in every night in somebody's home. The genetic mutations in the area are really scary, and there are also mutations in the children's genomes, who are born as the children of the victims of that accident. There are many things, what are causing the rumors, that the Chernobyl was something else than just the electric power plant. One of those things is that the Soviet state hides the evidence and denied the accident at first.

The Soviet way to inform those cases is one of the things, what causes the rumors, and the things, what happened to the person, who got a very big dose of radioactivity was the stories that some of them were just melted because the DNA of the cells have been broken that way, that the cells could not produce the protein core. Some of the victims died in the infections, which were caused because the skin cells and bacteria what protects the body was lost.