What causes the failure of the Russian air war in Ukraine?

One reason for the failure of Russian air combat in the Ukrainian conflict is found in the article below this text. At the beginning of the war, Russian Su-30 SM, Su-34, and Su-35S jet fighters made multiple air-to-air and -air-to-ground missions.

And especially the attacks whose target was log-range radar-station and other high-priority targets. Russians made those attacks by using single aircraft. And then they didn't confirm was the target destroyed. Or was the radar just shut down for protecting it against anti-radar missiles?

They might believe that the tank regiments take those targets in the hands of Russian troops very soon after the attack anyway. So the Russian pilots or some people in the command chain thought that the confirmation of the effect of the strike was somehow unnecessary.

And then the radars were not destroyed and continued their operations. Another reason for the failure of air combat is probably between the chair and the dashboard. If those pilots didn't get enough practice for that kind of operation.

AN-12 "Cub"

They cannot make their duty as they should. The fact is, at least these Su-34 and Su-35 planes are much better than MiG-29 and Su-27. But the problem is that there is the possibility that some of those Russian fighters were not what they should be. If the microchips or some other things were not properly working. That causes the accuracy of those missions decreases.

Also, if Russians must end their ECM operations. That leaves aircraft without full protection. There is a possibility that Russian ECM systems caused problems for their own troop's communication. And that's why air vehicles are left without protection. When Russian troops didn't get information that the air defense was still operational they sent cargo helicopters and troop-transport aircraft to Ukraine's airfield. And those vehicles were easy targets even for older war machines.

Did VDV troops that attacked Kyiv's airfield protected by combat helicopters?

Or what those helicopters and landing heavy transport aircraft could do? They were easy targets for rapid-firing AA guns and shoulder-launched missiles. And if the heavy cargo aircraft is just touching the airfield when Javelin or Stinger hits it. That causes a situation where aircraft cannot make any maneuvers.

Or what was their target? There are two airfields in Kyiv. Was predicted to target Antonov's airfield. Or was it Kyiv international? If the pilots attacked against wrong targets and then troop transporters started to land at that airfield whose defense was untouchable they were easy to destroy.

https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/raportissa-uutta-tietoa-venajan-ilmahyokkayksesta-elektroninen-sodankaynti-hairitsi-omia-joukkoja/e06df833-f4f2-4457-af39-8cdf6c33917c

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su-30sm-multirole-fighter-aircraft/

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su34/

https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su-35/

https://www.uusisuomi.fi/uutiset/raportissa-uutta-tietoa-venajan-ilmahyokkayksesta-elektroninen-sodankaynti-hairitsi-omia-joukkoja/e06df833-f4f2-4457-af39-8cdf6c33917c

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-27

Image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://www.avionslegendaires.net/avion-militaire/antonov-an-12-cub/

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying. Does the AI have feelings? Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans. What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions. In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1). A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true. The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains. Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series. So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of

The networked Internet connects the world under one umbrella.

Search This Blog