Problem with populism.

Donald Trump made the thing that nobody predicted. He refused to accept the result of the presidential elections. And then his supporters marched to congress house. His example inspires many other leaders, and the last case was in Brazil, where supporters of a lost candidate demand a coup d'état. That thing is an example of a very dangerous path that can cost lives. When the candidate who seems more popular in eyes of some people loses, the next thing is violence. 

The reason for that violence is that the presidential candidate promised work or something like that to people. And when that person. Would not elect, people feel that they left without a job. Many people who are following populists believe in strong leadership. And they believe that the president can give jobs to them. Many times a populist candidate can say that a clear majority is behind that person. 

That will boost the message, and because nobody says that are those things even in the presidential jurisdiction, that means there are only things that support that candidate. And then if the election will not happen, that thing is easy to explain as that competitor stole those votes. And people who have no education believe those things.  

But then we must realize that populism is one of the things. That brings votes to people, who just want a large number of votes and a good job. Populism is the term that means leaders promising simple and kinetic things for people. 

In some practical examples term "populism" means that the candidate promises to work for people or simply asks what people want. And if those people are lost, the next step is hate and anger. People feel that they lost their jobs. The idea of populism is that the candidate just wants to please the great majority. In that kind of politics, the benefit of the majority is the thing, that leaders must follow. 

The message of populists is simple. Minorities are born to serve the majority. There is no problem with democracy. But when we think about ethical aspects. Those kinds of things are very embarrassing. In the world of populists, the only interesting person is the elector. 

Populists are many times very charismatic and colorful people. So they are giving good news to the media. And those people "dare to talk straight". So they are making very interesting headings. And that increases people's interest in their politics. 

That means only people who are part of the majority or who have some kind of permission have the right to get an education that gives the right to a higher degree education. And that reserves the higher ranks in offices only to people who please those populists. The thing is that populists are very good to benefit things like social media. They are talking about things that are visible everywhere. 

Street gangs and other things are things that populists mention as an illness of society. Street gangs are symptoms of social inequality. Some reason for those gans is jealousy. The gang members are jealous of other people. And that makes them sometimes violent. Street gangs are things that are symptoms. And they are good tools in the hands of populists. 

But they are promising medicine that is very easy. Increase the number of border guards, and other kinds of things are also offering workplaces. Kicking foreigners out of the country seems a good and simple solution. And the new border guards are offering new jobs in the minds of some supporters who are supporting populists. 

What the selection of career tells about people?

What the selection of career tells about people?

In the beginning, we must realize that we are imitating our parents because we are believing, that they are the most powerful creatures on the planet. That imitation is automatic, and the purpose of it is to please our parents. Our nervous system analyzes reactions, and when the person smiles and says something by using a nice voice, that thing might be analyzed and translated as acceptance.

So if a person selects a similar career with parents that would be caused by the need to please parents. And of course, the price of a well-done job is always to smile, what might mean the nice thing, like a meal with father or uncle, what has been the mark of becoming an adult. That kind of rituals are common in many families, and one of them is that when the person would get in law school, that thing is the meal with uncle.

When people see that kind of tradition, that thing would give the model in the mind, that only adults are willing to take a meal with uncle. So that kind of rituals is important for the life of people. Very often the tradition in the family are things like getting a driving license, and then the parents would borrow their car to person, who just became adult, which means that getting legal permission to buy alcohol and drive the car.

But then we must understand that there is one little thing about behavior, and if a person is joining the criminal gangs, there is something, what has accepted that kind of things in the home, and the question is "were the parents of that person criminals". So that kind of questions is not easy. We must understand that the child thinks that the adult, who is spending most of the time with that individual is the parent. And if the child is spending most of the time with some MC-people, that individual starts to think and talk like them.

Those kinds of things are uncovering many things of the personal history of the individual. When people are starting to make crimes, they are believing that those things are accepted, and that means that some very important person in the close social network of this people ave been accepted crimes. So what kind of person would bribe police or other officials?

That kind of person has thought, that paying bribes is justified as the right thing. And then the investigator must find out, where that kind of behavior has been learned? If we think that a person chooses a career as a criminal lawyer or mafia-boss, the reason for that might be found from the will to imitate parents. Maybe parents are taught that the suit and slips are making criminal activities accepted.

Are the parent taught that this kind of things is accepted, or where those things are learned, and who has through that every people are paying those payments? When people start their career as a criminal, there is something, what makes those people choose that career, and also there must be an opportunity to join the gang. Most of the criminals are members of some gangs. So if a person wants to become some mob, some very important person in life has shown the example of this kind of things.

Children and attitudes

Children and attitudes

There is one really interesting thing about the behavior of children. People who are interesting in those things, and are advising parents, how they should grow their children are many times full of tattoos. Those people are thinking that they are really good advisors, to tell other people, how they should keep their children in strength.

Children are a very good indicator, what kind of attitudes parents have. If some person, who is under ten years is starting to wear gang clothes and play some soldier, at the home the situation is that parents are accepting and supporting that kind on advantage. In that kind of cases, parents are responsible for the advantage, what has been taken to that situation. Children are telling at schools and other places, what kind of attitudes their parents have, by using a very nasty method.

If some pupil is telling at school, that this inmate wants to be a gangster or some other pupil is telling that the aim of that person is being the member of a motorcycle gang, that thing is very interesting because in those cases somebody has told, that this kind of aims is acceptable. But when we are looking at those things a little bit closer, we are facing the delusion that some MC-gangs are controlling the society. In some publications of writings, what those persons have given in many places is stories about "the army of motorcycle men". In fact in many of that so-called "vest gangs" is militaristic strength. There might be an absolute dress code, that the person who has a certain rank in the group has the right to keep certain clothes.

As an example, black leather clothes are reserved for the bosses, and actually, those clothes are the mark of the position in the group. The worst insult, what person can make in those societies is to skip own leader and ask straight from the person, who is above own boss. In some gangs, the person, who is two-level below other members would not even get an answer, if that inmate asks the toilet or something like that.

This kind of thoughts is very interesting. Some of those persons are looking the public persons, who have visited in the "clubhouse" or headquarters of the motorcycle gangs. They are introducing wild visions, that in someday the real controller of the state is some kind of MC-gang, and in some other stories, the MC-gangs have the position as the official law enforcement.

Some people are writing about this kind of things, and if we would see the entirety of those people social community, they would have only bikers in their social environment. In those cases, those people might not even know others than some gang-members. And in those cases, that kind of things are very well seen in writings, what the journalist makes.

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

Mirroring own position to other people is the mark of the king

When we are looking at some king of street gangs, we see how those people are driving with expensive cars and wearing expensive clothes. At the same time, the henchmen are wearing cheaper clothes, and other things are worse for the henchmen. And that thing makes easy to notice the rulers of the gangs.

The thing that the street gang bosses are wearing expensive clothes is happening because that person wants to prove to be better than others. The similar effect has been seen in the clothes of medieval kings and Roman emperors.

The golden wagons were rising the ego of those persons, and they believed that they selected by some power, what was above the people, and the same argument was used by medieval kings when they augmented their way to use power against normal people. The ruling was a holy mission of those people, and that justified them to do whatever they wanted to do.

Those people used the most expensive clothes to prove their position to regular people, and maybe they needed to think that they were somehow better or above other Romans. And in modern states, many dictators are driving with expensive cars, and the car, what that person uses is probably the unique piece in that country.  In the North-Korea the leader of the state drives by using expensive Mercedes, and others are using cheaper vehicles. That isolates and also rises the leader of the nation above other people.

Writing about hate and racial crimes

Writing about hate and racial crimes


Problem with racist and hate criminals is that they are thinking that their actions are justified, and that makes them very dangerous. When a person thinks, that thing, what is done is acceptable that thing might cause even the worse nightmare, what people ever can imagine. This is why we must really concern, what we are writing in on the newspapers. If we are giving the signal, that just owning the gun justifies the violence, we are going to the direction, what we don't want to face.

When we are facing the writings, where racism is tolerated and the attitude is that most of the people are hating foreigners, and the patriotic people own guns like assault rifles, we are creating the atmosphere, where the violence is tolerated, and then somebody would misunderstand that thing. The thing is that laws are written for protecting the weaker part of society, and that's why we have police force, what mission is to keep the law and order.

Sometimes we are facing the situation, that some private persons are thinking that when they are the gun owners, that would make them also the members of the street patrol of the city, and here we are going to the wrong way. In the eyes of the normal people, those street patrols are only the gangs. And in those gangs, the road would be straight in the street violence. In some cases, the serial killers have thought that if they target their crimes to the minorities, the police would not investigate them.

When we are thinking about hate in the cases, that somebody is done something to the criminal or serial killer, we are facing the thing, that person might think that taking the law in own hands, that thing would be justified, and they are doing the right thing. Normally the killer, who is acting because of personal hate, and whose motives are personal would stop the killing when the revenge has been reached, and this kind of crime is suspected when some serial killer just stops killing. This kind of crimes is done in cases that are involved in crack selling and drug dealing, and also humiliation in the marriage or something like that causes hate.

But if we are thinking about racial violence, we are facing the thing, where a person thinks that being different justifies killing and this kind of things are the worst nightmare. For those criminals, everybody, who has different opinions are justified to bang or even kill. And there is one thing, nobody is white or black enough for the persons. The hate is feed by the revenge what will happen again and again, and this thing causes the spiral, where violence is turning to everyday action. Those racial gangs are always the same, and the skin color doesn't mean a thing. They are normally getting their money by selling drugs and the profile is always the same, regardless are those gang members white or black.

The race is the only excuse for violence, and the drug dealers are wanted to keep the area clean from competitors. But in the beginning, the racial reason is a good way to incite person for the first act, like throwing the Molotow cocktail in some house. That kind of actions is important in the recruiting process because they deny that the person would go to the police station and tell the information about the business of the gang.  They will find again and again the people who are good targets for humiliating and persecution. When we talking about racism, we must realize that there is racism between the other nations.

White people are not only racists in the world, and the thing is that hate crimes are happening also in Africa between black people, and the saddest and the most well-known stories of those crimes have been massacres in the Rwanda and Burundi. Racism is often the term, what is used for crimes, which are made for hate. Many times those criminals or gang members are actually violent against everybody, who are so-called "outsider". If the membership in the gang would not interested, those people are against them. And the same people are thinking, that if some people are not willing to take the membership of their group, those people should pay for the protection, or their cars would be broke or in homes would cast the Molotow cocktails, and that kind of thing would cause death.

Operation "Magnet" and the thoughts about radicalism

Operation "Magnet"  and the thoughts about radicalism


Operation "Magnet" is actually the tracking project of the national security, and the prime mission of this project is to track the persons, who are a risk for public and national security. Those persons are profiled to be the members of the radical political movements or somehow mentally disturbed.  The way how the national security officials are operating in this kind of case is that they want to find the "seriously taken members" of the unwanted political movements, what are violent groups from the right wing to left wing radicalism, what is sometimes masked as the religious or ethnic violence.

The Idea of this kind of action is simple. To those persons are sold the merchandise, what can have meaning to the Nazis or some kind of organizations, and that merchandise consists of the Blood cross and another kind of things. And the prize of that merchandise is quite high, that that stuff would not be bought for fun. Also on the Internet is homepages, where you can buy illegal weapons and discussion groups, where those people are allowed to speak freely about their political opinions. When we are thinking about the way, how radical movements recruit the members, they normally offer freedom, as Lenin did in Russia 1917.

The Bolsheviks promised freedom of religion and other kinds of things, but the fact is, that the atheism took the place of religion, what was "opium to the people", but the fact is that the communists replaced the church by their own version of religion, and in fact, atheism is also one version of the religion.  When we are thinking about the radicalism, things like religion are a very good tool in the hands of provocateurs, and if the movement operates underground, it would be a good environment for the political provocateurs, who would give the simple explanations and solutions for everything.

And the simple solution, what that kind of people offer, is making the military forces powerful. That means the good work for the person, who wants to stand in the border station with an assault rifle. And this would give change to make the nation proud. The persons who are members of ethnic minority groups are very good targets for propaganda, and the thing is that this kind of propaganda and blaming makes people of those groups good target for radical recruiters, who promise them the place in heaven if they are dying as martyrs.

Those persons, who are supporting the radical movements are normally looking for the thing, what is called as "average person". They are offering something to the great number of people, and the worst thing, what they can face is the criticism. Nobody is allowed to criticize the decisions, what the leaders of the nation have made, and that means that everybody, who dares to say something against the leader's will is publically crucified. And the thing about the studies is to teach people a critical way to think about things.

The critical way to think is that people should be suspicious about the motivation and motives of political leaders and everybody else, who claims to have contact with UFO:s or the leaders of the nation. The criticism is an easy thing when somebody is telling stories about UFO:s and another kind of things. But when somebody is selling merchandise by using the children or handicap people like the cover, that thing would not be so easy. When some criminal organizations will send the gifts to the child caring institutes, they might look for the persons, who are good targets for recruiters.

And at first, those organizations would recognize those children by using those toys as the mark. Then they would offer the membership of some group, and at first, those organizations seem like the groups of freedom, but then the road will go to normal crimes like drug and gun dealing and street violence. When somebody would sell merchandise by using the children or some other poor person, would that be a good place to think, "have I seen those merchandise in somewhere else?".

And the other question would be that does there be some other members of that kind of organization, and do they get the same stuff, what this particular member would get? That kind of places is a good way to collect the account numbers by using that kind of merchandise in that purpose. This is one way to think, and the best way to support that kind of things is to leave the schools and go to the street gangs, and the threat is the thing that supports gun dealers and violent organizations.

Fear of violence makes people buy weapons, and then the spiral to ultimate violence is ready because the guns give wrong way self-esteem, and that thing causes sometimes that the people are starting to be more aggressive and also they dare to yell to their neighbors because the gun gives very good spine. And of course, the hobby gives very much friends, who are talking things, and in that group will rise the new kind of self-esteem because those people are finding the new enemy what are outsiders. Those people are everybody, who are not members of the group.

This very well seems in the gangs, what use marks. And this makes the rise of radicalism because in the first the members of the group are starting to tell others that some area belongs to them. This causes problems, because the city area is paid from the taxpayer's money, and everybody has the right to hang in public places.

Which means that there would be conflicts between the gangs, and then somebody starts to rage to outsiders with a gun. And the spiral of revenge is ready. Those gangs, what uses uniforms like vests with the texts in the back would support their members, and if there is a conflict between gang member and outsiders, the other members of the gang are supporting that person. The texts and other gang symbols have been used to map the gang members of the violent groups, and especially the leaders of that gang because the insignia must be ordered from somewhere, and if the gang members are ordering that insignia and ammunition or guns from the post selling, that would uncover them.

Or they are paying the bills for the membership of "club". And the thing is that high-rank member of the gangs have always great support, but the lower rank members have sometimes difficulties in that thing. This causes hate and revenge in the gangs. The things, what are self-evidence for the leaders of the gangs are not belonging to the low-rank members causes a schism between the members of the groups.