Climate changing and intelligent technology

Climate changing and intelligent technology

Intelligent technology can offer opportunities for slowing or even stopping climate chancing. If we are thinking cases, where factory halls would have an intelligent system, what follows temperature, it can adjust the level of use of the outcoming heat, because when machines are working the temperature in the hall will increase, what means that the need of outcoming temperature is decreasing, and also the temperature, what comes from welding can take to benefit the warking.

In this case, the system would use the curved tube, which takes the exhaust gas away, that it would release the heat to the air. And why not in the offices, where computers are making very high-level heat, and the room would turn hot, the intelligent system cannot turn the radiators lower, because the needed heat would come to another place.

When we are thinking about the normal dummy thermostat, it would observe only the temperature of the radiator, but the intelligent system would follow the temperature in the air, and adjust the radiators what should flex if the temperature would be too high. When we are thinking about the factory halls, where the machines would create very high temperature, that temperature can be used to warm also offices, and that would decrease the need for the specially created warm.

But if we want to be even more ecologic, we could use many systems, which are good for creating ecological energy, and one is that the farmers can collect the waste to the chamber, where the methane, what is forming in that reaction can be taken to fuel for the own fuel cell. And the exhaust gasses of fuel cells would be driven through the active carbon filter. That means that pollution can decrease by this method very radically.

When we are thinking about the energy sources of the future, we must realize that the creation of a successful fusion reactor would be late. And if entire Europe would be addicted by one power system and one reactor, we must understand that only the minimum problem in that system can turn lights off from entire Europe. And this is why we should rather look for the other types of solutions than the one very powerful electric platform.

If we would use multiple small-size solutions the problem in one electric power unit would not cause the cutting off from the entire network. So if we want to make an ecological and faithful electric network, we should use multiple and small size solutions, which guarantees the power supply in the cases, where the one power unit cannot do its mission.

If we want to use solar power or thermal ground energy, we can benefit from those stable energy sources for creating electricity, but both of those systems can be made for creating hydrogen. And if the solar panel is above the cloud layer, it gives stable energy, and the water molecules are really easy to break to hydrogen and oxygen by using electrolysis. The hydrogen can deliver to the marketing area by using the existing natural gas tubes. But if we are thinking that the creation of hydrogen must happen somewhere near the equator, we are wrong.

Hydrogen can also create by using geothermal energy, and the hydrogen would be a good export article for states like Iceland, where is cheap to make geothermal electricity production units. But it can also be created in the northern areas by using wind and solar power, and that hydrogen can be stored for waiting for winter, where it can be used in the cases, where energy must be produced for fixing the cases, where the need of energy supply is extremely high. Hydrogen is a very good fuel for turbines, it's clean and there is no soot when hydrogen is burning. And the only waste, what that hydrogen creates in the burning process is water. So what if we would create hydrogen ourselves in the northern areas?

In the summers we can use solar panels for creating electricity, and that power can use in the electric network, but it can also be stored in the form of the hydrogen, which is created from water by using the electrolysis. Liquid hydrogen can be stored in the tanks, where is thermos layer. That gas can be used in normal gas turbines, which means that it would minimize the pollution.

Aviation and ICT-sector

Aviation and ICT-sector

The carbon-dioxide releases of ICT-sector are bigger than aviation, and that is not a surprising thing. The NSA headquarters has been the largest energy user in the State of Maryland. The monstrous server rooms need always a very large-scale electric supply. And the number of those server rooms is increasing all the time. The reason is that mobile devices transfer the calculating capacity to the servers, which means that those systems need more and more power.

The high-power computers and servers need more and more electricity and the mobile systems, what is communicating with servers needs more electricity for communication processes. And if we would use light and non-powerful processors in the mobile systems, we would transfer the calculations to the servers, and that means that we would need more and more powerful server technology.

The reason why this thing has happened is that the remote use of computers and digital meetings will be a cheaper choice for companies, than some business trips. The manager of the big company might have even tens of meetings per day, and that means if those meetings would happen by using physical traveling, the price of those meetings would be very high.

But there has been one reason, why the big companies have turned to use virtual meetings. The reason is the security checks and if the laptop computer must be left to the airport would the result be devastating. Every contracts and paper would leave behind that person, and that is the reason, why there have been created the solutions like web-based documentation software and writing tools, that the person must not carry them across the border.

Also, the usage of Web-based solutions is easier to control than some local tools. That means that if some persons use very expensive software, and then leaves the company, the user rights of those applications can be denied immediately. In this case, the software would not able to use anymore, even if the laptop disappears in some airfield.

One comment for the Zuckerberg's ideas for the rules of the Internet.

One comment for the Zuckerberg's ideas for the rules of the Internet.

The idea of the controlling so-called "not wanted" content is very good, but when we are thinking about political commercials, there should clearly mention that the homepages and messages, what are involving the links to political campaigns and homepages are clearly marked, that the target of those links is the political homepage. There is a possibility that some political lobbyists are forgetting to tell people that the homepages are involving political material.

The people should understand that the lobbyists are choosing the only the material, which supports their own willings and the purposes and benefits of their own lobby. Scientist uses also the sources, what is not please themselves. Scientists also dare to say that they have made wrong decisions and they have made mistakes, and one mistake, what scientists have made, is that when they gave the recommendation to decrease the releasing of the nitrogen oxides, they forgot the carbon dioxide, what seemed to be harmless.

The thing in carbon dioxide is that it has been harmless until humans started to release billions of tonnes of that gas to the atmosphere by combusting fossil fuel. The natural born carbon dioxide is not dangerous, the thing what makes it dangerous is the huge amount of that gas, what is released in the atmosphere. The huge level of the amount would cause the rise of the temperature because vegetables have not enough time to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

And also when we are looking at the Internet and homepages there should be a warning that some material, what is published in the name of the science is actually very polarized. Even today in the world is people, who believe that things like climate changing are a hoax because they choose only sources, what supports that kind of attitude. Sometimes we are seeing that things like melting one glacier are stopped, and that makes possible to continue the lifestyle like past, and nothing should be done.

When we are looking at political homepages, we should have a chance to see, that the homepage belongs to the political movement, and the logo of the movement or party should be clearly seen. And there should clearly show that the information, what is shared by those homepages is political, also when we are talking about organizations like the United Nations, there should be seen that the homepages, what are kept under its name, are involving data, what is accepted by that organization.

Working in a remote position would decrease the level of carbon dioxide.

Working in a remote position would decrease the level of carbon dioxide.

Remote working is sometimes a very difficult thing for some people. That thing would decrease the usage of the public and private transportation, and that would leave the space in cities, but it can also decrease the level of carbon dioxide production. The motivation of denying something tells many things about the lobbers. Many lobbers have told that they selves or some other person, who they know is against public transportation or private automobiles because they have principles or they are believing that they are doing the right thing. But the thing is that there is something, what motivates those persons to support the private automobiles for some reasons

The thing is that we must decrease the use of private vehicles anyway because the room for the automobiles is ending, and that is the biggest problem in the urban environment. But why somebody is telling that mass transportation is against their will or principles? So they just want to show that they are above everything, and they can just leave the chances of the environment without notice.

Or is it so? Are they afraid something, because they don't care about pollution and the changing of climate?  If we want to make the city area flexible for transportation, we can just leave home and work by using remote connections, which makes possible to leave the car or every other transportation in history. And of course, that would give change to focus the traffic to the persons, who need the physical existence in their workplaces.

But the remote working would need strength and high morale, and in the real working life is the joke, that the "remote day" is the day, when the worker has a hangover. And this is the thing, what the remote day does not exist. The thing is that this day is reserved to work at home, and that requires trusting. That day is not a thing, what comes for free. And the remote working is the thing, what can decrease the traveling and traffic, but how to make it work properly?

The simple answer is to increase the moral sense of responsibility, and by making this kind of things is how to make those things, that the person works at home by using remote working environments and network-based solutions. That kind of things are used in the modern education system, and maybe they would work in real working life. But the thing is that those things need high moral attitude, that the work is done without the boss is breathing to the neck all day long. The thing in the remote work is that makes a revolution in the working life. And we must be ready for that kind of revolution, which makes the working life more effective and flexible than ever before.