Fractals and beautiful things

Fractals and beautiful things

The chaos theory and fractals

Fractals are forms, which are repeating after and after each other. That means that the fractal has always the same form but different sizes, and the thing is that fractals can be used to simulate the advantage of whirls. Fractals are created by using mathematical formulas, and those images are looking like the inkblot or galaxies.

The thing is that the fractals are effective tools for calculating the things, like whirls that are causing tropical hurricanes. The fractals are the origin of chaos theory and the idea that the flapping wing of the butterfly can cause the forming of the whirl, which just turns stronger and advances to hurricanes. But the fractals are in a key role in one of the most fascinating theories in the world.

The psychohistory or how to predict the behave of the entire human race.

The idea of creating the software, which could calculate the behavior of the entire human race would be very interesting. Some computer specialists have created an idea, that by using the meteorological programs, where the natural variables are replaced by using variables, what is taken from the social environment can be used for that purpose.

In that case, the Westwind would be replaced by the right-wing political advantage. And the Eastwind would be replaced the left-wing political advantage. The force of the wind would be replaced with the number of public media articles, and the article would get value positive if it supports some political movement. A negative value means that it harms the politician, who is representing some political movement. The political environment is one of the most important things in the decision making of the state.

Why target is political

We can think that politics, what are pursuing in the state or what are supporting by the press is like the wind. And if we can predict the behave of the political leadership and decisions, what are made in parliaments, we are very far in creating the formula, what can calculate the behavior of the state. The thing is that the political winds are rising the decision-makers to the power, and that thing can give an idea, what those people would do in parliament.

So we ever can predict the behave of the one individual, but we could predict the behavior of a great group of people. And what bigger the group is, the prediction would turn more accurate. So if we are comparing this situation with the atmosphere of our planet or behave of the gas mass of the galaxies, we can predict how the entirety of those giant gas masses is acting.

As I have written before the mathematical formulas, what have probably an ability to predict the behavior of the human race could be possible. The idea is that the formulas, what are created for calculating the movements of the gas masses would be used to create the prediction, how the human race would behave.

The idea is that even if we cannot calculate the behavior of the single human, we could calculate the behavior of the entire human race. The idea is that the things, what are happened in history would be used to create the matrix, what will be compared with the things, what is going on now.

And the movements of the political field would be calculated by using the formulas, which are used to calculate the movements of the gas masses. The variables of the natural environment would be replaced by using the variables, what is taken from the things, what are taken from the social environment. The idea of that thing was introduced to the Science Fiction writer Isaac Asimov in his book "The Foundation".

And how fractals are connected with this?

If we would make very sharp calculations of the behavior of the humans, we could create the effect, which would have affected the political environment. When we could make the "whirl" in the environment, that thing would act like a fractal, and continue turning the political environment in some direction.

The problem is that could we connect the psychology and the meteorological calculations? The thing is that we can think that parliament is the brains of the state and the policy that that thing would pursuit is the psyche of the state. This is one way to think about making decisions and adjusting the laws in the state.

Image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mandel_zoom_07_satellite.jpg

The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative information is forming alternative reality

The alternative reality is one of the most incredible and at the same time dangerous things, what researchers, who are working with information theories have ever invented. This thing is distorting information because human beings are looking for company, what have similar opinions, what themselves have.

That means that the information, that people get can be from many sources, but it strongly polarized. That means that a great number of people can use the same sources, what can be faked, and that thing would cause the mass-effect on the Internet.

When we are looking at the perfect assistants for the information warriors or "trolls", what is the modern version of the world "propagandist", we might think one person. The people who could transform the faked information true in the mind of people could be the person, who is working in a trusted newspaper or news agency.

If a journalist, who is working in the qualified would believe the faked information, that thing would get the effect, what makes it trusted. And this is the thing, what we must realize. "Because that information seems real" is the comment, what might be used in the case, where the story in some national broadcast network is proven fake.

This is a really dangerous thing in modern information. We have lots of information, but we cannot say is it true or fake. When we are thinking about social media, we are facing the thing that we can get more information than ever before, and there is, of course, many people, who are acting for some kind of ideological organization.

And more interesting thing is that we cannot say, what is the ideology? Does a person even self notice, when the opinions what that individual would write or tell are ideologically polarized? If we are taught from childhood, that some ideology is bad, we believe that this thing is self-evidence. That means that ideology turns to more than politics.

This is a dangerous thing. When we are thinking about ourselves as social animals or creatures, we must realize that the willing to find the group, what has the same opinions, what we have is created to protect the group. But there is the risk, that we would be members of the small but very noisy and radical group. And that means that we might be surrounded by people. who have the same opinions, what we have.

That effect would be like blowing oxygen to flames, and that thing would exacerbate our opinions, what happens to every member of those groups. When we are hearing only polarized opinions, where every criticism is filtered away, that means that we are getting only information, which is supporting our own opinions. And we will transmit those opinions to our descendants, who might start to think that our ideology is "more than normal politics".

Thoughts about the future and things, what are delicate for some people.

Thoughts about the future and things, what are delicate for some people. 

The thing about technical advancements of civilization is a very interesting object for thinking. When we are thinking about the technical solutions and biotechnology, we are facing one very interesting confrontation or paradox in those cases. The future of the human race would seem very nice, without our actions, what are risking the existence of the entire nature and our species.

Sometimes I have seen cases or arguments, where genetic and biological manipulation are prohibited because God has created us. Or that seems a very good argument for the new laws. This thing is interesting because some of those people are denying the existence of the god. There is some kind of contradiction, if the same person pleads for something, what does not exist.

Some people want to prohibit genetic engineering of human beings because that thing fights against the natural selection of some religious point of view. But there is one thing, what we must realize, and that is those people would probably not have things like cancer or AIDS, and that would make them real militant in the cases, where scientists are creating changes in our genomes.

When we are thinking about natural objects like small asteroids, which can cause very big destructions on the Earth, if they hit to the ground, there are people, who are denying the use of rockets or missiles against those targets. Those people have very good arguments for that solution, where the people just sit on the chair and let things happen because the asteroid is naturally created threat. That means  10 to 40 meters size stone can cause very big destruction if it hits on Earth.

That kind of stones can easily be destroyed or cut in smaller bites by using missiles. The thing is that those asteroids are one of the biggest threat for the human being and the possibility that those bites attack to Edinburgh is same class, what the hit to the same size area everywhere on the Earth is. The thing is that asteroids are natural objects, which are dead. 

This kind of things interesting, because at the same time people are risking their entire living environment. When we are thinking about the growing city-areas, we must face one very interesting thing, and that is that fast-growing cities are bringing natural animals near the human the way, what we have not seen ever before. This kind of things is called environmental angst.

But if we are thinking about the environment, we must realize, that we must not protect every stone, which can be found in the Universe.  When we are talking about the survivability of the human race, we should not set some bacteria ahead us, this is the thing, what we must realize.

Someday in the future, we would face the thing, that the genetic alteration of DNA is used, and that would cause very interesting visions of the humanity of tomorrow. The thing is that evolution is continuing in the human race as it has been happening before, and at last, a human would turn to another species if some kind of nuclear warfare or meteorite would destroy our entire planet.

How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

If mankind would someday create an artificial planet, what would replace the Earth, must there be some very good reason for that. And the reason can be that the Sun is starting to transforming to red giant star. That would be the end of our civilization and life on Earth if we would not move to another planet.

The problem of the suitable planets and particles is that the only planet in our solar system, what would look like Earth is Venus, what is nearer the Sun than Earth. So this planet would not give very much help when the Sun is starting to grow. Of course, there are moons, what has a rocky surface on the solar system, but the problem is that the gravity of those moons is very weak. And they cannot maintain the atmosphere.

For the answer to that problem is introduced that all the surface of the moon would be covered by a giant glass- or metal layer, and people would live in this structure. But if we would want to live in the normal gravity, where mankind has been living all of its existence, and where we have adjusted, we would need brand new Earth, and one thing, what we could do is create brand new Earth for our species.

If we would want to create an artificial planet, we must find interplanetary nebula, which involves the right elements. And then we must bring one heavier particle inside it, and then the gravity would pull the nebula on this particle and the process would take billions of years. 

But there would be another version, what would take a little bit shorter time, and in this version, we must have two interplanetary nebulas, what we would load with the opposite polarity of electricity. Of course, those interplanetary nebulas must be in the right distance, that the electromagnetic forces can pull them together.

Then inside another nebula would be stationed one heavier particle, what would help the creation of that artificial planet, and putting it in the right position. This idea has been taken from the YouTube channel, "what if", and the thing is that this kind of extraordinary ideas have been introduced sometimes before that, and the idea of the artificial planet is very fascinating.

This extremely large project has created the idea from the observation, that the water layer on the planet would make it colder. And then some astronomers calculated, that even planet Earth is not exactly in the living sphere near Sun. But the large water areas on the surface keep our home planet cooler. Also, the cloud layer and the gasses that are found in the atmosphere are important for the temperature of the planet.

And that have given ideas that if we would create the artificial planet, we could adjust its temperature by selecting the mixture of gasses and the area of the water layer on its core. The idea is very futuristic, but the thing is fascinating. Sometimes there has been introduced ideas that the new Earth would be created in the Asteroid belt when the sun is starting to transform into a red giant star and turns brighter. This transformation would cause the burn of life on our planet.

The new Earth would be made by using some big asteroid like Ceres. The asteroid would be covered with big and powerful magnets, and then the rest of the sand of the asteroid belt will be magnetized with the opposite polarity of electricity, what can deliver by using giant radio telescopes. 

In this idea, the asteroid would pull those particles on its surface. Then the water and other things would bring to that planet from Europe moon of Jupiter, and Oort cloud. The consumption of the atmosphere would be adjusting with carbon dioxide and other gasses like ozone that it can maintain life, what is brought from the Earth.

Maybe this thing would save our species and give it more time to move to other stars, but this thing would be far away in the future. But this technology would give the change to the human race to survive after the Sun is turned to the white dwarf and there is the only cold and dark area around it. This is the moment when mankind mus, at last, find a new home.

Did Anunnaki create human race or humans create Anunnaki?

Did Anunnaki create human race or humans create Anunnaki?

1. What if Anunnaki were humanoids, who created the human race?

This kind of texts is not meant for taken too seriously, and I hope that nobody gets hurt because I write this kind of things. But there is often mentioned the case, that Anunnaki was the ancient alien race, what created humans for operating as the biological robots for themselves. When we are thinking about Anunnaki, that kind of theories is always told to the people, and when we are thinking about the Anunnaki, that kind of things might explain something about our religion.

Why the purpose of human is to serve the god? This is a really big mystery for people, who are searching and research things like the Holy Bible? Sometimes some youngsters are mentioned that God is somehow the very schizophrenic creature because that character is a loving father, but in some cases, the actions of that character are really overscaled.

And when we are thinking about Sodom and Gomorrah, and the tale of the wife of Lot, the punishment, that the person was broken the orders of the god were really steep. So what was the reason, that the god gets angry, and turns two cities in the sand and the wife of Lot to the salt statue? Was it really the reason why God made those actions that somebody saw his faces or just lived some kind of vulgar life?

2. Was Anunnaki created by human?

If we are thinking the case of mystery Anunnaki in the opposite way, we must realize, that the Anunnaki might be the master race, what was created by humans by using the genetic method. In this kind of cases, the ultimate creature might be created by crossing two pure lines of the individuals. Sometimes this method is used for breeding animals like racehorses, and this method is causing always very much critics because the pure lines are made by pandering the genetically close inmates together, what would make the degenerated descendant, but if two of those descendants, what is not a member of the same family would make descendant, that would be genetically strong inmate.

The pure line crossing with humans is strictly prohibited because the system works that the line of the individuals are making the children as long as the entire population would be one, that means that the genetic material would be homogeneous. In the lighter case, the inmates make children with the family members, and then those lines would be connected. That pure line cross would make genetical strong inmates.

It is possible that the Anunnaki was the man-made creatures. That was superior to another human.  Maybe those individuals were created to the protecting mankind, but this kind of experiments are allowed, what means that they are not caused critics only happens with the vegetables and by using pure line cross has been possible to create the Rose, what is totally black. Testing that kind of things with animals is always causing protests.

Why the human race is so negative?

Why the human race is so negative?

1. Negative things teach to avoid something, what might be dangerous.

Evolution has created human brains by using a very interesting methodology. Our brains are handling negative things more effectively than positive things, and the reason for that is this process, where negative thing causes stronger memory mark is that those things mission is to protect the human race against beasts like snakes and another kind of treats. So this thing is very important to know when people are training to handle the difficult social situation.

And because of neuro-evolution has created the model, where people remember first the negative social situation, that means that the difficult customers are remaining in memories. The reason, why I write this thing now, is that there will be the midsummer parties very soon, and the sad thing is that people remember bad experiences better than good experiences, and that means people remember the unsuccessful parties but they would not remember any positive experiences.

2. Could some negative things transfer to the human before the person is even born?

The same thing is happening with every other social situation. And the reason, why handling the bad experiences comes first is, that the person is learning things, what might risk life. And if the first experience of the parties is very negative, that will cause that the person would not even want to visit in those happenings. The negative experience in the first time teaches people, that something is dangerous, and they would ever try the same thing again.

When we are thinking about the situation, that the bad experiences are transforming to the baby from the mother is controversial, but the fact is that the neurotransmitters are transferring messages between the mother and the fetus. So is it possible that some negative things, what the human learns is learned in the womb before the person is not even born? This kind of things is interesting to think when we are closing one of the greatest parties in the northern lands.

Homo Floresiensis and human evolution

Homo Floresiensis and human evolution

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Was the Homo Floresiensis the result of the extraordinary genetic disorder?

The strange skeleton, what was found from the Flores-island, Indonesia caused the reaction in the world of anthropologists because those skeletons have not similar dimensions with the normal midgets. And that thing told that there was something extraordinary in that skeleton. The thing is that sometimes is claimed that the strange skeletons have resulted in the extraordinary genetic disorder, but there is no actually proves about that thing.

The skull is claimed to be so small, that those hobbits were not intelligent, but in fact, the size of the brains doesn't mean everything. Also, the number of brain cells and the connections in those cells are important. So if the neurons of the brains of Homo Floresiensis would be very networked, or the neurons would be connected to themselves, that Hobbit could be intelligent, even if the number of the neurons would be lower than Homo Sapiens.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

Could the skeleton be Normal Homo Sapiens?

There are still arguments, that there was only the normal Homo Sapiens, and the proof for that is the skull, there were some anatomical signs for the genetic disorder, but other scientists say that the dimensions of the other bones are fighting back of that argument. Of course, there is a possibility that this thing what is named as Homo Floresiensis is the result of extraordinary genetic disorder or mutation.

After that, there were found seven more such kinds of skeletons, and the thing was told that there would be something extraordinary with those 20 000 to 50 000 years old skeletons, and one thing is quite sure. Those persons were not actually handicapped, and that thing caused the idea of finding the new human species, what would live on this planet.

The brains of the Homo Floresiensis were not quite big, and the weight of those people was only about the 25 kilograms, and if that species have met Neanderthals or modern humans, and there would be a fight between those species. And that might be caused the death of the Homo Floresiensis as the species. When we are thinking about the environment, where that species were lived, the hypothesis about this species is that maybe the population of those Hobbits was not big.

What kind of DNA those bones have?

And there is a possibility, that they were dead by the natural reasons. When we think the level of intelligence of those strange creatures, there is a possibility that they were intelligent. But for that, the thing is that the brains of the Homo Floresiensis must compose smaller neurons than the modern human has. The answer to the question is Homo Floresiensis only the Homo Sapiens, what has the genomes, what causes midgetism or independent species would remain unknown. The DNA test would tell something about those skeletons, but the results will not satisfy everybody.

There are very much tales about the "midget people" or "small people", who are often kind, but only a few have been seen them. And then somebody thought that does the Floresiensis has some kind of connection with the people, who are called "little folk", in the folk stories. That connection is very weak but sometimes is very fascinating to think, what kind of secrets nature hides from the people.