The mystery named Roanoke

The mystery named Roanoke

The ROANOKE is the opposite way CROATOAN (1), and the thing is that those people could mean that they returned to England, and hide their identity. That means that this thing about missing English colonialists would be ended that those men and women went back to England. And when we are thinking that there Virginia Dare (2) who claimed to born in Roanoke colony could survive the crossing Atlantic. And if those people would have a child, that could make their stories more believable, if they wanted to tell that they could be the fishermen. But this is only theory.

Another theory is that Indians were killed those colonialists, and that story claimed to told by the Jamestown people, who told that some local Indian chief would confess to killing those people. But the question is, who spoke with that chief?

Roanoke was the first colony, that Englishmen established in America and everybody in that colony disappeared. The thing that caused that tragedy was the one disappeared silver dish and after that colonialists burned the corn of the Indians, who they were ordered to treat with respect.

So could that case caused the loss of every colonialist, and who made that thing and stole the silver merchandise is the mystery. And one of a very interesting point in that series of happenings was that could somebody want to destroy the relationship between the colonialists and Englishmen, and made that project terminated?

That thing is that the violence would keep the people under work in the Jamestown was the real thing. And that meant that people had no time to look around them or speak about things, what they should not speak.

When we are thinking about this lost colony, the smoke that rises on the skies in 1590 when Sir Walter Raleigh returned being three years at England for looking for ships, who wanted to take him back to America and Roanoke there was the smoke rising to the skies. That tells that somebody would be alive in that town, but when those men came to Roanoke, there were no living people around it. And there was not either body of dead people and those colonialists were disappeared without any trace.

Or were there some Englishman in that place, and maybe that person returned to England with some other boat and then just walked away. If that thing is true, that would need the number of those men were not sharply calculated. And there is a possibility, that the lost men were not told to the leader of the group. Or the men were not even counted.

The story is really interesting because even if the investors withdraw from that case, the thing that Raleigh left those people after him seems interesting. Why he didn't guarantee that they would return home safe, even if they were been in that colony and the project was disbanded? What Raleigh didn't tell about this thing? And when he came back to England, he left two ships boats for those people that might give one very interesting evidence of what could be happened.

If we think that Raleigh was away about three years, those people might think that they were left behind. And nobody ever come to get them back to England. That means that the ships' boats might be a sign that Raleigh thought that those colonialists were planned to be killed, and they might feel the same. The thing in those colonies was that there were spoken many things, what is not wanted to tell to other people.

When we are looking at history, we must realize that also Sir Walter Raleigh killed by the hand of executor. And could the reason for judgment the journeys to America? When we are thinking about other persons, who took a part in the Roanoke project, the name usually seen in those papers is Captain John White. That name seems like the cover- or faked name for somebody, who should not be mentioned.

And then, at last, we are facing the message on the tree CROATOAN, what is ROANOKE in the opposite way. That would be a very simple code, which means that those people just returned to England. They might sail across the Atlantic ocean and then just walk to their homes. So this might mean the message, what is backward on the tree means simple that "we are going back". But this is only thoughts about that mystery.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roanoke_Colony

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Dare

The codes in medieval art.

(Wikipedia)

The codes in medieval art.

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

In the medieval art were many codes, and the only artist, who painted so-called cryptographical graphics was not Leonardo da Vinci. Many other artists made the hidden symbols in their paintings. And in that period the king was actually also the religious character. Actually, Leonardo da Vinci was the master of Renaissance art, and here I would write about Medieval art, what was made before Leonardo.

When we are talking about religious art, we are not asking a question, what that term actually means? The term "religious" art means that the painting was not allowed to change. In the medieval period, the only allowed type of art was religious art, and that meant that the character in the art was mentioned as the Jesus or some of the Saints. That would release the artist from the prosecution in the inquisition.

Sometimes we are facing the thing, that in the paintings were hidden some codes, and in some cases, there were instructions, how to recognize the member of the royal families, and also the marks of the other noblemen were hidden in the characters, what the artist was painted in the portrait. The pictures of royal people were also very important, that people would know, who was in charge.

And the second thing was that the portrait of the king was the warning, that somebody would tell that person things, what might cause troubles. sometimes the king or the character of the royal majesty is surrounded by the little birds, and that tells that the little birds would tell the king if somebody would speak about things, what the king should not know. The king was the ruler of the nation, and in the medieval period, that authority would come straight from God. That meant the king was actually one of the religious characters.

The character of the king was not ever very sharp, because some of them were made in the secrecy, and some were inaccurate for protecting some people. The idea was that the person, who uses the image for the recognition would look at the clothes of the man, who stood in front of the ambassador or some other person. Sometimes the king would walk around "incognito", and in those cases, the people should not know that person at all. So the marks in the clothes made the majesty.

The thing is that sometimes in the hand of the king is a small bird, and that bird was an extremely important thing because that tells that the king had the man, who covered his back. And that also meant that the king kept contact with supporters. Also, the image, what looks like steam, tells that the king is reporting to somebody, and that person would defend the king if something would happen.

Those steam-looking lines are seen in the painting of Valdemar IV Atterdag, what is above this text. That means that if somebody thought, that treating the king as a very good way to get benefit in the nation, that would cause a very big disappointment. The small hawk on the hand of the king meant, that this person would use contract killers and that thing was the warning, that everything that was spoken with the king should or bought to the place should leave in the palace.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valdemar_IV_of_Denmark

There were many symbols, what are hidden in those paintings, and one was the man, who ate under the roof. That meant that the noblemen should not tell to ordinary men and women anything about the parties, what was kept in the castle. Those things were kept outside the eye of the normal people, who would not like that kind of things. And that's why those things must be covered in the paintings, that the noblemen remember, what should not ask or talk in the wrong places.