Every individual in the society maximizes own benefit.

Every individual in the society maximizes own benefit.

The traditional politics is in crisis. The problem is that the candidates are coming more often from the highly trained wealthy families, what already have contacts to the politics. The thing is that those people are promising things, which are accepted by their social network. And the thing what makes this advantage very sad is that the "Game theory" says that every individual automatically maximizes own benefit means that in the worst case the politicians would voting only people, who are from the high-class societies.

When we are talking about the social classes of society, we should mention, what we are meaning when we are using words social and economic class of people? Are we mean people, who have high salaries, or are we mean people, who have high education? Those things are not always mean the same things. And the main problem of politics is that the people, who have high training and high education are voting more often than people, who have low education or low salary.

Why highly educated people are voting more often than uneducated? This is the question, what people are sometimes thinking. And at the same times, we might want to know, why people who are living in higher social position are giving their votes more usual than people, who would not have that position? This is a very interesting thing because giving votes is an only legal way to affect the people, who are sitting in the parliament.

And this thing is also alarming because people are giving votes to similar people, what they are. The thing is that people, who are children of highly educated people, or who have parents, who have a big role in politics are voting very often is that they might know people, who are working in politics.

That thing means that those people understand that there is a mean, who people are voting. This kind of advance, that only highly educated or wealthy people are giving their votes has a very sad influence on politics. If so-called normal people are losing touch with everyday politics that means that the politicians are losing also their touch with everyday life, and the politicians are getting old.

This kind of things is a really bad thing, because if every people, who are voting are giving their votes by following the socio-anthropologic model where people are voting individuals, what is similar with them, that means the politics would turn one-sided. And the dangerous aspect of this advantage is that the people, who would want to become candidates for elections are coming from wealthy and highly educated families.

When we are thinking about the price of the campaigns, there must realize, that the candidates need very strong support for their project. If there is no financial or mental support, the career of the person in politics would stay short. People must dare to make speeches and speak to people if they want to become a member of the parliament. During that process, a person can hear or read very strong criticism and that means that political candidate needs very strong support in the road to parliament.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10984870

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

Could the newest school of thoughts of philosophy named "Astrophilosophy"?

When somebody is talking about futurology, what is science that research people relationship with technological advantages and their influence on society, we must realize, that there are many similarities with the writing of novels. Nobody has seen future, or at least nobody ever has given any prove about, what is happening in the future, or what kind of advantages there will be in far after the hundreds or thousands of years. And that's why people would sometimes call the futurology as "Astrophilosophy". That thing would consist of the thought about hypothetical space colonies and travel to other solar systems.

Astrophilosophy would be similar than the philosophy of state or "Platonism". It would handle the human and our society's relationship with astronomy and the universe. What would be right, and what would be wrong, when we would start to colonize the universe. Things like protecting nature on some planet, which is dangerous for us, but what might be the level of bacteria is an interesting way to think about the conquering space.

Or if we would someday force to leave our home planet Earth, have we right to enter the young solar system, and sterilize some of it's planets to our new home? And if we would force to leave Earth, and it would happen because of pollution, would we let the same thing continue in the new home planet? This kind of things might be interesting to think before we would start to create new colonies in the Universe.

When we are creating new colonies, we must realize, that we should also give them something. If they are the only side, what gives things, that would mean that this colony would cut the relationship to Earth. When we would create colonies, the persons who would send to that mission would be most intelligent and perfectly trained. 

But if the journey would take hundreds or thousands of years, the colonialists would be born children, who have not even seen or hear Earth. And that would make social pressures to the relationship between Earth and it's hypothetical civilizations, but the problem is that those civilizations would turn aliens to Earth on together. And the thing is that maybe Earth would not in those visions be the number one, and it would turn to one of the colonies, or in the worst visions worse than average colonies.

The thing is that those highly intelligent persons could start to manipulate their abilities, and that means that they might turn to very highly intelligent, and also they can adapt themselves to new environments. And those environments could be different kind of places than Earth. Those colonies might start to send their colonialists to other planets, and they would not even tell that thing to Earth.

And why they should do that thing? Those hypothetical colonies might communicate with Earth from hundreds of light-years. That thing might take too long for communication. Then the colony would start to live it's own life away from the Earth.

When I wrote this text one thing brought to my head. And that thing is why when youngsters would write things like this, they are using their imaginations. But when elder people are thinking and writing this kind of things, they are making theories.

This is a thing, what makes me sometimes think, how many good writers could have lost because people attitude is that they are childish. When we are thinking about novels and writings, what are created by some writer, we can say, that many of them are still a theory. But why only elder people are making theories? This is a very interesting question. And sometimes people would think that the people who will write about their thoughts are some kind of autistic. That thing is a really interesting way to think.

The problem is in attitudes

The problem is in attitudes

When people are creating new innovation and services, we have problems to transform into those services because we are used something all of our life. When we are talking about city bikes and another kind of things like electric cars, we are always facing resistance, because that thing needs some changes in our lifestyle or the way, how we have done something before.

If we are thinking about combination services, where a person uses electric cars in short distance traveling, and for longer trips, those cars would be loaded on the trains, and then they can drive in the destiny. The reason why we don't use that kind of things is simple, even if we could sit in our cars, and the car would move to trains automatically, we would resist that thing for one reason: we cannot go to the toilet during that trip.

Even we ever visited in the toilet on the trips, what is taking the same time with this train-car service, we would start to afraid that maybe we must visit in that place. This is one example, how people resist the change. Another version of the service, what is not ever mentioned is connecting the electric bikes to the bus and train tickets. That means the person would travel to destiny and then drive there using 3 wheels electric bike, but we would not get that service, because we are afraid that somebody steals those bikes.

The electric bikes are really interesting tools, but sometimes I think, that why people would not equip them with the GPS system. Those equipment are not really expensive, and the person can follow the location of the electric bikes by using own mobile telephone. And why we are not using electric cars is, that we think that they are uncomfortable.

We cannot go to the workplace by using the electric car and put the plug on the socket when we are going in the house, and that behave would load the battery. We can compare this thing at the beginning of cell phones. People believe that the batteries of the cell phones would run empty, and that's why they faced resistance. And now I must ask, how many times there have been lost power in the battery of cell phones? The question of the use of electric cars is similar.

We could make those cars cheaper and cleaner way to travel if we just put the wall plug on the socket. The thing is that the remote working at home is the ecological choice if it is used correctly. But the problem is that if we would spend those remote working days in bars, and would not our jobs, those things might get bad meaning in the point of view of the employers. And if those days are misused, the employers have the right to be disappointed.

The thing in those cases is only between the ears of the people. We are afraid of the changes. If we are thinking about subways, we are facing one question: why we cannot use those trains also for carrying the merchandise to the shops?

The reason is that nobody ever thought about that thing. When the subway is closed from the public for cleaning, the trains could carry merchandise to markets. In that time those trains could stand a long time in the stations, and that will give a chance to load the stuff to the platform without disturbing passengers. In those cases, there is only a need to absorb the new way to think.

What if we can benefit the energy of a black hole?

What if we can benefit the energy of a black hole?

1. The problem is, how we can get energy from the back hole?

When we are thinking about technology, we could benefit the energy of the black hole even today. The problem is how we can get close enough to target the energy collector to the black hole, that the energy would have the effect of that thing.

The energy of the displacement disk would benefit by using the normal solar panels because in that area happens high-energy nuclear reactions, what will shine the light from that area. But the problem is, how to get close enough the black hole.

2.  One answer to that problem, let's make our own black hole

When we are thinking to make our own black hole, we would make a ball, and target the radio waves to that target. This would make it the singularity, and that energy would benefit the same way, as the normal black hole.

But those small size things would be very short term versions, and they must make outside of our solar system because that thing will cause the instability in our planetary system, and we would need a huge level of energy for that thing. And there is one version to transform the entire star to a black hole.

3. Transform some star to the black hole

That would happen by targeting extreme high electric-levels to the Oort cloud, and that will conduct the high power electric vortex in the center star, what will transform to a black hole.

But to this process, we would need so much power, that we cannot do it in the future.  In the most probable cases, nothing would happen, and even we would load our energy pump systems en centuries, that would be a very useless idea. And anyway we must go to another star for making that thing true, so this is only thoughts, what kind of systems that thing will be in some distant future.

4. We cannot make the practical solution before we can travel to distant stars in routine

There is a problem, that if the system would fail, the star would just blow as the Nova or supernova, and if we would have too little energy in use, we would make the "grey hole", what means a particle that has the same or little bit smaller escape velocity than the speed of the light. Then the "grey hole" would pull the atoms on its surface, and cause nuclear fusion, what is the size of Supernova.

Or maybe we would cover some star by using mirrors. That would cause an increase in the energy level to the level of forming the black hole, but there is one thing, what makes this very unpractical. We have ever been visited even to nearest planets, and the trip to the suitable star will be the different scale of a project than traveling to planet Mars.

5. What kind of technology we would use in the benefiting the energy of the black hole?

If we are thinking to benefit the radio waves, what the black holes would send, we might make radio antenna, and then send that radiation to Earth by using Laser or Maser systems, what can send a high-power energy impulse to the Earth. That radiation would travel in space over 6000 years if we would benefit the energy of Cygnus X-1, and this makes this thing very problematic.

But if we would make our own black hole, we must make it to the very far distance, because the gravity would make problems to our solar systems. If we are thinking about the ability to benefit the energy of black holes, we must make a stable black hole, what would not need external energy pumping. If we would make a too small black hole, it can explode, and that would be a very devastating thing, what might influence many solar systems in the universe.