How the page rank of the Internet affects our way to think about things?

The term "polarization of information" means that only one version of the data is shared on the Internet. In that model, we have the right to remove all information that is not supporting our conviction. We must only hear things that are supporting our opinions. The same thing happens when homepages or other information somehow feel uncomfortable. Or those things don't support our way to think about them. 

We don't have to look at things that we do not tolerate. And that means we can select our sources and information from the homepages that are making us feel comfortable. If somebody disagrees with that thing, we might yell "shut up". And we must not hear people who have counter-arguments. 

The problem with the Internet is that the information that people are getting is turning one-sided. We are searching and look at things that feel comfortable to us. And we don't even want to hear counter-arguments. Those are calling in the question or criticize our way to think about things. 

A thing called "page rank" determines the place of the homepages in the list of internet searches. When somebody is clicking the homepage, that thing rises its position in the PageRank list. And that causes problems because cool-looking websites and well-known actors are getting more clicks than some little-known actors. 

That causes that the information is getting from the point of view of the well-known actors. If some homepage is getting more clicks than others that thing puts it before that other homepage. 

The Internet revolutionized information technology and we are facing one thing. We get more information than ever before. But how to select useful information, and what is the correct information? We might forget that people who play an expert might be something else. And separating confirmed and true information from fake news is important. 

But the biggest threat is that the diversity of the information is losing. People are clicking only the homepages that are high in the page rank because those pages are first in the list that causes that the information that people get is turning one-sided. We are reading and looking at the information that pleases us. 

We are not seeing homepages that are against our conviction because we are not clicking homepages that are feeling uncomfortable. And the problem is that when we are clicking something we are looking for cool highlights. The cool name of the homepages is the guarantee for clicks. And clicks are rising the position of the homepage in the page ranks. 

The problem is that we can see decisions only by using the data that is in use at that moment. When we are making decisions. This is why we are making the wrong decision. We cannot officially see to the future. And that is the reason why the decisions are sometimes wrong.  We believe that we are safe, but the Internet is spying on us. And the Internet is the ultimate tool for people who want to affect others. 

Believing something is more dangerous than we believe. We believe that our computers are safe because we are protecting our computers by using the most effective firewalls that we can find from markets. 

But we don't remember that hackers can strike communication between computers. They can record that data or they can put their files in that data flow. 

The biggest threat for the Internet is that the diversity of information is gone. 

But the hackers are not the biggest threat on the Internet. The biggest threat for the Internet and its ability to share information is that the large-size and well-known actors are getting more audience than the little-known actors. 

Because well-known Internet actor gets more clicks than the little known web actor that thing causes that the page-rank that calculates the clicks are ranking the homepages of the well-known actors to the upper position on the screen. And when we are searching for some data, are we ever click the next page in search results? 

Because the page ranking favors the well-known actors. That means the information that got from the net is one-sided. The page-ranking system is originally made for commercial use. It should not use outside its purpose. 

Page-ranking systems have been created for searching products from web stores. That system is not shared political or some commute information. This is the weakness of the page ranking which is made for serving customers who want to buy sneakers. Page-ranking system uses the same method for sorting other web pages. And that thing makes the information unilateral. 

When the page-ranking systems are sorting the homepages of the political parties they are just calculating the clicks that those homepages are getting. This is the reason why the parties. That have so-called "cool names" are getting very much attention. The cool name will bring more clicks. And that is rising the position of the homepages in the page ranking. 

The page-ranking that sorts the homepages by calculating clicks is made for making people easier to find sneakers from the net. That thing was important when people were buying something from the net that paid in minutes. But if we are using page-rank (or any other tool). For a purpose that they are not made, that thing causes the unexpected effect. 

()https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Artificial intelligence and medical science

Artificial intelligence and medical science

One of the problems with artificial intelligence is that they don't have feelings. Of course, artificial would always be neutral, and nothing will make it get angry. It doesn't care about ethnic or another background and it's always fresh. And as you see the biggest problem of artificial intelligence is also it's the best strength, which makes that system very problematic and it faces many complicated ethical and moral questions all the time.

One of the greatest questions is, could the artificial intelligence someday replace surgeon or some other medical specialist. It finds every mutation in cells and tissues, which makes it a very effective tool. The robot would cut sharper than any human and it doesn't care about the time, what the operation takes, but transferring this kind of thing to robots would be extremely revolutionary vision, what needs time to think.

Medical science is a complicated thing from ethics, moral and technology. We are facing the thing that artificial intelligence is coming in the doctor's offices as well as many other places like laboratories. The computer can notice many things in seconds, which would take hours from the human researcher. Artificial intelligence can notice viruses by searching for their form, and that can also suggest the cure.

That thing would make possible to make diagnosis very fast, and that leaves the doctor time to be with the patient, and that would bring social and psychological aspect in the medical treatment. But when we are thinking about the case, that artificial intelligence would give the medical treatment, and robots would come to give injections would feel a very rare or too revolutionary thing in the mind of the people.

The thing is that artificial intelligence is a good servant but somehow bad master has been the usual reason, why people are against this kind of research and development. But when we are looking at the cases when some patients have been forgotten in the hospitals, artificial intelligence would be the good watchdog, and the system might be the form, where is marked the rooms where the medical staff has been visited, and then the things what should be done would be marked in the same form.

One of the simplest ways to make those things is just creating the system, what observes the time, what the door has been open, and how many times it would be opened during the round. And of course, the steps, and movements in the room would be recorded. That would tell, how many seconds would the nurse spend in the room, and if the change of beddings takes about five seconds, that person might be very fast, or something would be missed.

This is one version of the usage of artificial intelligence. Also, artificial intelligence can search, how many times every particular patient would press the call button during the time in hospital. This thing tells something, what the people have told to those individuals in the hospitals about things like when that button is allowed to push. But the thing is that artificial intelligence can keep the book about many other things, like how many cancer cases have been renewed in some hospitals, and are those cases focused on some ethnic or another kind of group?

And are the times of cure the same in every patient, who have similar tumors or cell mutations. This kind of records can contain information, what kind of and how strong some symptoms are justified the sick leave. And are the other treatments similar to all patients? If the person would ever push call-buttons, that would mean that person self takes things, or there is no need to care. But that thing could cause that some person would say, that the pushing of a button is prohibited. In those cases, the human would make decisions.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11004657

Children and attitudes

Children and attitudes

There is one really interesting thing about the behavior of children. People who are interesting in those things, and are advising parents, how they should grow their children are many times full of tattoos. Those people are thinking that they are really good advisors, to tell other people, how they should keep their children in strength.

Children are a very good indicator, what kind of attitudes parents have. If some person, who is under ten years is starting to wear gang clothes and play some soldier, at the home the situation is that parents are accepting and supporting that kind on advantage. In that kind of cases, parents are responsible for the advantage, what has been taken to that situation. Children are telling at schools and other places, what kind of attitudes their parents have, by using a very nasty method.

If some pupil is telling at school, that this inmate wants to be a gangster or some other pupil is telling that the aim of that person is being the member of a motorcycle gang, that thing is very interesting because in those cases somebody has told, that this kind of aims is acceptable. But when we are looking at those things a little bit closer, we are facing the delusion that some MC-gangs are controlling the society. In some publications of writings, what those persons have given in many places is stories about "the army of motorcycle men". In fact in many of that so-called "vest gangs" is militaristic strength. There might be an absolute dress code, that the person who has a certain rank in the group has the right to keep certain clothes.

As an example, black leather clothes are reserved for the bosses, and actually, those clothes are the mark of the position in the group. The worst insult, what person can make in those societies is to skip own leader and ask straight from the person, who is above own boss. In some gangs, the person, who is two-level below other members would not even get an answer, if that inmate asks the toilet or something like that.

This kind of thoughts is very interesting. Some of those persons are looking the public persons, who have visited in the "clubhouse" or headquarters of the motorcycle gangs. They are introducing wild visions, that in someday the real controller of the state is some kind of MC-gang, and in some other stories, the MC-gangs have the position as the official law enforcement.

Some people are writing about this kind of things, and if we would see the entirety of those people social community, they would have only bikers in their social environment. In those cases, those people might not even know others than some gang-members. And in those cases, that kind of things are very well seen in writings, what the journalist makes.

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

How the position of the observation obfuscates people?

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

Havis Amanda statue Helsinki
(Wikipedia)

Usual can be extraordinary

Thinking is the thing, what we should practice very hard, and in fact, we should confess that we don't know everything. What we think as the regular and common thing might be very extraordinary. And while we are practicing thinking we must try to find another side of the things. There is always something good in everything in the world, and there are many ways to see things. Let me explain a little bit about this thing. Normal people think that fishes are swimming in the water, but why don't we try to think something extraordinary, and try to think that fish is in some certain place and it would move water around it. That would mean that the fish is a stable object, what is laying in the water, what flows around it.

This situation is true in some places, like fast flowing rivers, where the fishes are at a certain place, and water goes around it. This case would be seen very often in nature, but there is one thing, what we don't actually think, and that is that only the little part of the water on the Earth is in the rapids. That means this is a very unusual situation if we would compare it with the conditions, where most of the water is on the Earth. The probability of this phenomenon can be calculated as an example by division the area of the rivers by area, what is covered by water.

We could take some other quantities of this calculation, and one is the number of water molecules, what is found in the flowing water systems and division them with the number of all water molecules on Earth. And then we can start to ask, should we take clouds in the number of water molecules. And is rain flowing or stable water, which is a very important question, if we would want to write a little bit longer text. But as you see, there are many people, who don't want to do that, so let the thing be. There are many things, which are fascinating and impress people, but what is away from everyday life.

The position of the observation can obfuscate people

Let's take another example. If we would go to walk in the evening of May Day, we would think that every people, who would walk in the city are some kind of students. That is visible especially in the Helsinki, and near the statue of Havis Amanda. Every year tradition is that the students would put the graduation cap on the head of that statue. In that situation, we are surrounded by the students, and we might think that every person in the Helsinki Metropolis area is a student, who studies in the university or some other higher education institutes.

But the Havis Amanda statue is only one position in the city. We might go somewhere else, and then we might understand that something obfuscates us. This thing is called the obfuscation of the probability. If we would go to some city, and wind up in the University campus, we might meet many doctors and professors but are those people actually the typical samples of the normal people, who are living in the city? This thing would interest the politicians, who would make decisions about taxes and other things, and the most important thing in the work of politicians is to please the biggest group of people because that this guarantees the votes.

And the pleasing of the majority would cause a collapse in next elections if the promises that were given during the campaign have been broken. The high position allows making many decisions, but that position would also make possible to make many mistakes. This is the problem in the position of the directors. If the person would make decisions, what causes problems there could be nobody, who will give advice, and that would cause collapse. And in those cases, the mistake is made by that certain director, who would kick off or if that person owns the company would that kind of the wrong decision cause the bankruptcy. So if the person would have too much power, there is a risk to make wrong decisions, what will cause the destruction of the company. This is the writing for the morning.

About difference and society

About difference and society


We have all heard the stories about hate between the families. And sometimes I have thought that is the hate between two groups of people coming from the era of cavemen. And in this case, we must think the situation, that some caveman has slept during the guarding, and that was caused the hate between that individual and another group. And of course, the friends of that person would be non-tolerated in the group of the cavemen, which lived about 10 000 years ago. And is it possible that the hate between the families is coming from that group?

Of course, the individual, who slept in the guard has also prosecuted the other guards, that they were not waking him up, and that caused the fight between the families because those individuals forced their wives and children in their side.  The human eye is an interesting organ because it turns to the target, what is different than others. The real and perfect way to write this thing is that the brains are separating the different things from the information, what our eyes bring to brains and those different things come to our knowledge easier than the things that are similar with others.

A reason for that ability is that that is a good way to separate leaders of the groups, and maybe that ability was forming when the caveman fought with Australopithecus apes and won them. Or at least, we are the species, what remains in life and Australopithecus send to history. The different looking persons were easier to mark at the other side, and then the group could attack them easier than the entire group, and the leaders were good targets for the bribes because they were leaders and easy to separate from the other group.

That is is one of the reasons, why everybody must look at the similar than others in the army or uniformed organization. Another is that the persons who look like similar would be easier to replace. The individual would stay in memory and cause problems because the other person cannot look like exactly that person. This would cause the leader can adhere to that person, this is why every low-rank military men must look exactly similar to the person next to him. That makes easier to sacrifice those men because they were part of the mass. And the team leaders have marked for their position. The ability to find the leader of the group is a very important thing when the own team prepares to fight. If the leader of the opponent is neutralized, they might go to panic or disorder, and that makes easier to cause fear on the other side.

The thing, what made somebody the leader of the group of cavemen is that individual knew the places, where that group could make the camp, and where to find the water. In that time the cavemen really lived in caves, and in the cold and long winters, they closed the entrance of the cave by using sand and stones. If there were allowed to find water in the cave, that villain could stay in that cave all long winter and wait for the spring. The leader of the team knew those caves, and that's why all group wanted to please that person.

And maybe the tradition of the headmen of the state is coming from that period. There is an interesting thought, what came in my mind, and if the tradition of the leadership is coming from the era of the cavemen, is it possible that the hate between the groups of people is coming also from that era. The thing is that would the reason for making murder coming from that far away from history.

The thing is that if the fear is in the heart of the leaders of the group, the opponent would not attack so easily. Maybe the way to make somebody the leader of the group has been so attractive, that even today we must have leaders of the nation to make decides how we must act. And of course, those leaders attract other leaders, what would follow the rulers. Sometimes is asked, why we must have rulers? But the way to act in the international or national environment is that somebody must become the leader of the nation, or there would be anarchy in the state.

When we are thinking about a democratic way to make orders, we must face one thing. Defending the scientific text is not a democratic thing. The thing what makes some things science is the cause of the simultaneous repeating happenings, what can be used for making theories, and theories must be proven true or false. The idea is not voting or organizing election campaigns are suitable for selection of the parliamentarians, but they are not a suitable way to defend the scientific text.

The thing in the scientific text must be proven, and in fact, we cannot be sure were the cavemen fought against Australopithecus. Or did those opponents have real leaders of the group, but the Cro-Magnon-cavemen had leaders. Or actually, we are those Cro-Magnon-people, who are learned to write and make other things, what are giving us the advantage and superior for the Australopithecus. But we can be sure that we somehow avoid contacting with different looking people than we are.

And maybe this kind of behavior is coming from the cavemen era. In that time different looking people meant that they were members of the competition team, and that means that they could be dangerous for the team, that knows the position of the source. Those palaces were wanted in the prehistoric period, and if the inner circle has leaked the location of that place would another group conquer that place. And if own team is weaker or the water is ended, the source would be gone forever.