When does the state turn to serve the individual?

When does the state turn to serve the individual?

For some philosophers, the state is thing what is above all, and the reason for that is that the state has established to serve people. So the people of the state must serve the state. In this philosophical hypothesis, both sides of the relationship between the state and individual persons would both get the benefit of this relationship, where the state protects the individual and for that process, each individual must give their stakes.

This is one way to say, that the state is above all. The reason for that might be some people thought that the apple of power was actually the hand grenade, what could kill everybody, who was against the king. If the king was angry, that person could use the hand grenade.  

The words of the philosophers have been searched and researched for hundreds of years. And still, nobody doesn't know, what exactly those people thought or what they meant when they wrote their thoughts. There are always thoughts that some philosopher has meant, what that inmate wrote.

That means that the thing is seen in their texts, there might be many meanings in their writings, and sometimes I have thought, how much those great persons could be written, if they have not written their ideas to paper? When we are thinking about things like the relationship between an individual and the state, those texts causes strong feelings even today.

And if they would be found in 18th. century, that might cause a very dangerous situation. So what would Voltaire do with network-based publication tools? When we are thinking about the role of the individual in the state, we might find the level, where the state starts to be one man. 

The idea of that has been copied from the famous phrase, what Luis XIV said once. "I'm the state" would be a very interesting way to rule the country. That makes the ruler unlimited user of power. But there is one little thing, and that is that what if the state loses the war? Would the king have anything, why other people leave that man alive?

The king is in the middle of the state, and that person cannot escape if the war goes bad way, and henchmen tell always, that the king has given every order int the state. And they afraid that the king would punish them if they would not follow the orders, and one of the best explanations is that some of those henchmen believed, that the apple of power was the hand grenade, what the ruler would use against the henchmen. Was that true or false, that thing is unknown.

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

Why people should be poor?

"Keep them poor" is one very good motto for people, who want society, where people cannot advance by their own work. But why somebody wants to make the class-society, where the only couple of people would have real rights and the rest of people would be very poor?

 In that kind of societies, the thing is that this set would separate the high-class people from the ordinary people, and if so-called regular people would be poor, they would not have time to get education and rise in the hierarchy. If the people would be working all day in the heavy physical working, they would not know about better things, because they spend all day in the workplace, and then get home as tired, that they would not able to get an education.

Every people makes mistakes

In this model, the ruling class is hiding behind the mask of perfection, and that kind of things are seen in the way, how some people are sharing articles about persons like computer specialists. The computer workers or specialists like micro support people and programmers are people, who are working in the area, where is not many layers between the leaders and workers, and there might be not henchmen, who can be blamed if the work is not done well.


And that would make possible that the henchmen would see, that the boss is not a perfect man or woman. Those people would uncover only the regular members of Homo Sapiens species, who can make mistakes, and that removes the image of perfection. The reason why some people are fighting against things like artificial intelligence and social media is, the same in both cases.

All writings are not propaganda

The artificial intelligence would eliminate the method where some person can get the benefit because the handler of the information would not have time to read some things in the files. One of the things might be how many speeding tickets would some person get, and the second thing is that how many of the other drivers would get speeding ticket in the same size crossing of the speed limit in the same police district.

That would tell if somebody is a little bit "more equal" than others. Also, artificial intelligence would control equipment and that would give people more free time for hanging in the social media, and the social media can uncover that there is something wrong with the workplaces or attitudes of the bosses or other people, who would be hiding behind the image of perfection. But the major problem in social media is not that there are people, who are hanging in there all day.

Social media is a very effective tool for disinformation and propaganda. That thing is an effective tool for making contact with youngsters and giving them hardcore propaganda, but there is another point of view of that thing. There is also justified protests on the Internet, and that kind of things are really problematic for the police and military forces. If the protesters would just march across the city, would the situation handle by riot police and denying to publish the images of the protests.

Things always have two sides, and sometimes there is no right side

Of course, some provocation can break a couple of windows, what justifies the use of force to scatter the demonstration, what is defined as the riots, and breaking the property would give legislation and justification for using the violence against rioters. The social media would give another image of the demonstrators, and maybe we are wanted to see those things in some other point of view.

That means that there might be two very undemocratic parts against together, and this is the thing, what we have seen in Arab nations. There were dictators, who were replaced by new dictators after the Arab spring, who are continuing the same politics against their own people, and that thing means that the same way continues, but the faces in the official wall paintings are changed.

Things like social media would uncover things, like some very famous people would not have opinions at all. The thing, what makes social media very interesting thing, and that makes it problematic for the people, is that it is a very good environment to share information. Those solutions and environment are really easy to use, and they can be a very good tool for telling things, but there is a one really bad thing, In social media would be uncovering things that some very nice and cool person cannot talk about anything else than some clothes.

Risks of biometric data and camera are things, which are not very well known.

Connecting the camera to biometric data would the specialist make a very sharp profile about the nature of some person, and uncover things, what the figure would not even know about own nature. When we are thinking about the case that we would want to uncover something about the nature of the person, we might show movie clips for the individual who uses activity meter sensor, and if that individual enjoys some movie clip would that thing uncover the type of nature.

If we would see that the figure will enjoy some special film types by following the blood pressure and frequency of the heartbeat. If the individual has violent thought, would that uncover by the sensor, and if the thought about violent act would be targeted to some individual, who is in near of the target of surveillance, would that information allow that the individual would be forced incite to the violence. Normal ways to handle situations are not suitable if the person has a sociopathic personality or that figure will harm or kill somebody.

That would tell the observer if the individual enjoys something, and then that targeted figure would cheat to carry the camera in the streets, which means that the system would meter the chancings of the effects or indicators, what I just mentioned. In fact, the programs what meter activity would make possible to hack the reactions of the body by using the shock sensor and the location of the targeted figure. If some place would feel uncomfortable for that individual, that would mean that this man or woman starts to move faster. That would uncover the bad things, what have been happening in the past. And the activity sensor, what joggers use would tell if the frequency of heartbeat is rising before the figure starts to walk faster. That would tell about the traumatic experience of the individual.