Inflation is not the only thing that affects prices.

Customers are wondering why prices in the EUR area are so high. One of the reasons is inflation. But that thing is not the only thing that causes rises in the prices. Another thing that affects the prices of products is the price of the cargo. And of course, how much product is offered for markets is affecting the prices. 

Things like wars in the production areas are causing the rise in the prices. Things like uncertainty are also giving negative signals and that causes the loss of money. If investors are not sure about the future they can take their investments off. And start to sell certain economical area's currency. And that thing increases inflation. 

Also if a certain economic area has a negative reputation because of corruption, bad human rights, or some other reasons. That thing causes inflation. The reason for that is the companies have a hard to market the products. That produced in that area. The thing is that when companies left Russia they left their merchandise behind them. And that decreases the profits. 

But otherwise making business in Russia can cause boycotts for the products. So it's wise to get out of that area. Governments ordered those sanctions. That means the profit that those companies took from Russia can cause problems. And authorities can even confiscate that money. And those people who continue that business can even be prosecuted for insubordination and actions against national interest. 

The thing that causes uncertainty is the Russian counter-reaction. Russia is not happy with the weapon supply to its enemy. And maybe it waits for winter. Maybe Putin thinks that closing the gas supply to Europe forces the west to its knees. The difference between Europe and Russia is that the Russian government must not care where people are living. 

And do they even have warm houses? That's why the Russian government can resist sanctions longer than western governments. But the thing is that closing borders and denying money transportation are the things that are making FSB operations in Western Europe more difficult. 

Things like the Ukrainian war cause there to be fewer grains for markets than usual. There is a possibility that Russians will disturb grain transportation. And that thing has already happened. That thing will increase the prices of the grain products. 

Things like the price of energy, and especially the prices of fuels like gas and oil are the things. That is causing the rises in the prices of the merchandise. When electric cars are turning more common that decreases the sale of fossil fuels. And this increases the prices of the things like diesel oil. 

Most oil tankers and cargo ships are using petroleum like diesel and other oil products. Also, heavy cargo vehicles are using diesel, and because sell of diesel decreases the oil company must fix their losses by increasing the price of oil products. 

Because the use oil products for traffic is decreasing. That raises the price of those products also in ships and aircraft. The negative attitudes to the fossil fuels like petroleum products are decreasing the use of those products. And that thing increases the price of the cargo. Also, expensive energy causes the storage prices will increase especially if the product requires cold storage. 

The new technological infrastructure requires investments in the electric network. Also finding replacing energy sources that can replace Russian gas and oil are the things that are causing the rise of the prices. Making new power sources like wind and wave energy plants. Geothermal energy plants require also investments. 

Uncertainty of the continuum of the electric and fuel supply from Russia are also things. That are increasing prices. There is the possibility that Russia cuts those supplies of energy and fuel. The fact is that the rise of the temperature on Earth is alarming. And melting of the ice of the mountains is increasing the rise of the temperature. So Earth needs fast action or we are in even deeper trouble than we are today. 

What is the economical science?

What is the economical science?

Economics offers a good tool for controlling society

Economics is a good way to give stick and carrot for large numbers of people. If people would not please, the price of energy can rise, or some taxes like fuel or value-added taxes of some products can be raised. And if people are nice, those taxes can be decreased, which leaves more money for living. So this is can be used in large scale the method, what was created by Ivan Pavlov (1) for brainwashing. 

Economics or economical sciences are an area of science, that is researching the economic and environmental interaction. This is the normal definition of this science, which is one of the most complicated things in the field of science. The thing, that makes economics so difficult is that the role of psychology is so big in this field is so big, and if we are thinking about the big actors in the field of markets, that thing is culminating to them. 

If the director of a big company says something, that thing has a very big influence on every actor in the economic universe, what is called the areas, where companies and finances are operating. The economics is also researching the invisible hand, what is the media affect economics. If the media highlights the negative data of some companies, that would cause even bankruptcy, and if that thing happens to the biggest actor in markets, that thing causes huge turbulence, because the main actors are cooperating with many companies, which must find new partners. and that causes disorder in the marketing environment. 

One reason, why western nations or the opponents of Russia have not justified the actions, what Putin has made, is that this man keeps the society calm and peaceful. Economics needs and wants a stable environment, and Putin is giving that thing to them. Russia is in a very important place when the far east actors are sending their products to the European markets, and Russia has also very big natural resources. The Trans-Siberian railway is giving a very effective transport route fro cars and other products. 

And the natural gas would guarantee the willing to be friends with Russians. This means that if Europe pleases Russia, it would give very cheap fuel for the European actors, but if the leaders of Russia would not be pleased, that means that the gas would get more expensive. 

Applying Pavlov's training method by using gifts and punishments to entire nations is possible. If people are nice, they would get a gift, and if they are nasty their homes would turn very expensive. And if in some areas is riots, the temperature of flats and houses can turn down. 

This is the method, what Pavlov created for brainwashing. If other leaders please Russia, that would give a gift. If the other nation would disappointed Russia, there would be punishment, which can be a higher price for energy. And this is applying the brainwashing for a large environment and masses. If people are nice, they would get cheap electricity, but if they are dirty, they would get punishment. 

Many people think that economics is some kind of artificial science, and the fact is that many sciences are somehow artificial. But when we are thinking about natural animals, they also have resources, what they cannot spend limitlessly. If some animals eat their food, they would die in hunger. And the economics is researching things like division of the incomings. 

The thing is that the good name and relationship would help people get more and easily property than a person, who has not those relationships. If I would be the son of some famous family of industrial leaders, I would know the right persons and get a good job and good contracts more easily than a person, who has not those relationships, what makes decisions to hire high-level directors or make contracts with subcontractors. The economics are researching how the economical wall, between the people, is forming.

The thing is that this kind of thing is one of the many definitions of the reason, why we have something so boring, and at the same time so fascinating things like economical sciences. There has been said that people would not trust economics, and there is a reason for that thing. The predictions of how markets are acting are normally going wrong. And that thing makes economics something, what people think as the "non-sharp" science. 

Another thing, why people do not trust economics is that this seems boring. Following the curves on the screen are not seem fantastic, and then people are forgetting that the economics is cooperating with everything in the field of international politics. And this is the reason, why we are looking for mates like the USA for allies or cooperatives in the international field. 

Nuclear weapons are giving more value to the business. And this makes the nuclear states very wanted cooperatives in the field of international business. When we are thinking about the Western world, we are facing the thing, that normally means the nations, what are democracies and what are members of NATO or allies with the NATO. And we are always want to support democracy, which is one of the most aggressive things in the field of politics. And the term democracy is good for business. It should guarantee that the products are produced in humanitarian conditions. And that means that democracy is giving also extra value for the merchandise. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

Rudolf Meidner and his relationship with Palme

Rudolf Meidner and his relationship with Palme

Why Meidner said that the ownership of 52% was suitable for employees? Why not 68-70%?

Rudolf Meidner introduced an idea, that the workers, who would work in the certain-size companies would be allowed to buy the stocks of the company, by using the funds, what is put for the workers, who would buy the parts of the company by using the focused stock selling (1). And after 20 years the workers would own 52% of the company. So where Meidner took that number? Why he didn't use numbers 60-70%? Why 52% was suitable ownership? This is one of the most interesting things in the Meidner-Rehn model, which is called market-economical socialism. 

The idea of this model was that the workers would feel more responsible for their work, but many people said, that those funds would be a dangerous step to socialism. And as I have written before in Finnish, there is a one really interesting thing, and that is that China is following this model or has adapted a part of the Meidner model to its economy. I have written this thing in here: https://yhteisojahistoria.blogspot.com/2019/11/rudolf-meidner-ja-markkinatalous.html

The role of Olof Palme (1927-1986) in those funds

Were the powerful demonstrations of the entrepreneurs in the early 1980s caused that some unstable person shot Palme? This thing is hard to prove because there are not convictions about this case. And that means the murder of Palme is still unsolved. 

But let's go tho think about the relationship with Meidner and Olof Palme. The prime minister of Sweden, who was supporting Meidner and his model. The thing, why the employers were resisted the model, what Meidner created was that it would turn the Economical model of Sweden to socialist. But there was one really interesting thing, and that thing is that this kind of ownership would be brought workers to the same table with employers, and that thing could uncover something, what those people didn't want other people to say. 

So the thing that makes this thing very interesting is that the funds for employees were supported also the man named Casimir Ernroth in Finland. That man was one of the most influential men in the Finnish industry. And the support for those funds was a surprise for everybody. But then we have forgotten that Enroth might be thought that other people would fall those funds, even if they were operating in his own company. 

And when Palme was taken the seat as the prime minister in the early 1980s the social democratic party began that program, but the party was not united. There was resistance in the government, and some people thought that the support, that Palme gave to those funds was not unlimited. Sometimes I have thought, that in many of those cases the supporters would expect that some other person would fall that kind of thing. Olof Palme was murdered in 1986, and the case is still open. 

There are many speculations about the murderer, and there have been many speculations about this case, and one is that those funds have caused the death of Palme because the demonstrations were so powerful, and some people, who had some kind of emotional touch with those things shot Palme. But had Palme something to do with those funds, except he permitted to establish them? But there are many other theories about this case. And the powerful demonstrations are feeding the fantasies and hallucinations of the people, who have an unstable mind. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employee_funds

(2)

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palkansaajarahastot

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle and democracy (What means the term "free men"?)

Aristotle said, that the right to give votes must reserve to "free men" because they have the best knowledge about the things, and then about a thousand years after that the voting right expanded to belong also for free women. And that caused a revolution for democracy, but then we have forgotten something, and that is here in the modern time is still many people, who have not right to give votes in any elections.

Those people are handicapped, ward, underage or foreigners, who would not have citizenship, and that's why those people have not right to vote in elections. And that means that the model of Aristotle is still in power. That kind of action, what is limiting the democracy is meant for protecting the state. And this means that they are so-called "necessary evilness", which means that the state must deny the situation, that two million foreigners would come to its territory and votes to the involved in some other country.

But the question is, why youngsters' opinions about the laws are not ever asked? Maybe there is no time for that. But when we are thinking about democracy, and the principle that vote cannot be bought, the answer is a little bit complicated than we ever thought, and the answer would be that there are people, who would buy votes.

Those people would offer more salary, lower taxes and another kind of thing, but there is one problem, the government would need that money, and even the taxes of salaries would be low, the taxes of the food, fuel and another kind of stuff would rise. And this is one thing, what we cannot even think about. If we would want to crush our political opposition, we might call our leaders as the "expert", and that thing would make those people more trusted in the eyes of the great public than world "leader". "

An "Expert" is one of the worlds, which shows real professionalism, and that would be a really good argument in the political discussions. But when we are thinking about "free men", we must realize that in modern times Aristotle would say "free persons" are only capable individuals for making decisions, because they have "right knowledge". But then we should ask, what exactly means "free person"?

Does that mean some businessman or maybe the specialist of administration? Or is it a person, who is a member of the ring, what makes decisions? And who would get the place in this hypothetical ring? Is that the person, who has the right training, and that training could be free to get. But then we must realize, that the high price of those, maybe administrative training would be a good way to eliminate not wanted persons from that training. This is one point of view of those things.

And censorship is a very bad thing in a democracy. If we are thinking election campaigns is not tolerated to deny to print the campaign material of some candidate by using political arguments, rejecting the offer by using argument, that we don't want to print that material we would be childish. If the price of that material would be so high, that person cannot pay it, that will be a very good alternative for political censorship. In this model, political marketing and campaign commercials would be under the heavy tax. And that would make them very expensive.

But if we would give the announcement, that thing would be tax-free, and then the parties, what are under the power would pay a lower price for their commercials because their commercials are interpreted as the announcements. Because opposition cannot pay the prices, their candidates would not get their commercials to the media. And this is the good and non-violent way to make sure, that the same persons would be in the control of the state.

Solving problems in the Third World with those people is the new way to think about problems

Solving problems in the Third World with those people is the new way to think about problems

In the beginning, the new eay to think about helping people is to help them to help themselves. That means that the western nations would tech local operators to make new solutions for their problems. And then the local actors can share their knowledge with other locals. That would be the road to sustaining and positive advantages in those areas, where the cooperation projects would be done. The target of those projects is to increase the knowledge with the social and economic conditions in those areas.

I know that talking about financial benefits from research projects might feel a strange thing in the eyes of people. But those arguments must also be noticed, when we are agumenting the need for some research for people, who makes desicions. They are many times think that there is always some domestic target in the same line with international research projects. And the funding is easier to get if that research would also bring the finanzial benefit for the industry or somehow else increases the national benefit of those projects.

One of the main problems in environmental research and things like protection of nature is how to integrate ordinary people in those projects. When we are thinking about the social and economic problems of places like Africa, we must confess to normal people, that it's also their benefit that some places are protected as environment, what needs the biodiversity.

The research would be a good way to the front of the eyes of the people, how good and beautiful some area could be, and maybe locals would also understand the values of natural animals and the environment to things like tourism. Tourism would bring extra-value for those areas, and bring money to the local people and also local government.

That kind of areas would give also the opportunity to research the African culture like their stories, and one of the things that this kind of thing can make possible is to make people and also western companies to interest the co-operation with African nations. In the area of high-tech agriculture, we might rather talk about data-oriented agricultural solutions, which are using less electric power, and that thing could be done by using intelligent technology. In this vision, the system would be equipped with artificial intelligence, which uses electric power, only when it is needed to use.

That would make things like solar panels and other sources of "green energy" even more effective, what they have been. And that kind of thing is making things interesting, and show the value of education also for the African people. Raising the educational level would make society more stable, and that thing helps to solve the internal problems of the nations of the third world. The problem for the projects has been that they are seen as one-sided.

But as you see northern Europe is the same way exotic to those people, and they might want also to see and research arctic environments during that kind of research cooperation. The thing in the data-oriented system is to handle the changing water supply. During the raining seasons, the system can collect rainwater to tanks, and during the dry seasons, the water can be released to some areas.

If we are thinking about the use of water supply, it can also be used for making electric power for intelligent systems. the system can observe the growth of corn by using a special metering system that might base to laser, which observes the growth of the corn by using extreme sharpness. That allows collecting data from the daily advantage of those corns. If we are thinking about the opportunity for industry, those areas are offering a suitable platform to introduce the knowhow about the Finnish industry.

This is why we should be involved more openly in those projects, where is collected data and analyze them in many places on Earth. That can allow us to create automated laboratories for field use. And also those systems, that will transmit data by using satellites might use to integrate local people and educational systems to those projects. They can help to protect nature and also gives Europeans the knowledge of the African environment.

But here we must say, that Europe and especially northern Europe is the same way exotic as Africa is for Europeans. That cooperation allows African scientists to research polar animals and other things like northern lights. The major thing is how to make people interesting in the possibility to make something big for making the Earth a better place to live.

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Transformation of society and the loss of middle class

Society has turned to two class people because the economical middle class is lost. That makes very big differences to things like economical and tax planning. Also, the middle class people had a role to work as the shock absorber between wealthy and poor people, and that causes problems with society.

The middle class has been separated in the higher and lower middle class, what has delivered the information from the poor people to the wealthy persons by natural social contacts, but when the abyss between incoming layers has been growing, that would cause problems to get information that the prizes or taxes are too high to ears of the persons, who make decisions. The problem in parliaments is that the people, who come from wealthy families are over-represented in those institutions.

Wealthy people have more money, and they would pay the membership fees for political parties more often than poor people, who need money for many other targets. This would cause the phenomenon, where politicians are receding from the poor people. If I would be a person, who lives in a one-room flat, I would feel uncomfortable to meet people, who live in own houses, because I would not have a normal social relationship with people, who have a different level of incoming.

The large middle class has also offered good field, where politicians could promise things, and that allowed the popularity, and if politician betrays the permissions, this thing can cause the there are no votes. And that's why politician must think carefully about permissions because the betraying those things can cause the dropping from parliament.

The problem is that there are less wealthy people than poor people, and the paradox is that wealthy people are funding the campaigns of politicians. But the votes come from poor people, and if a politician would just please wealthy people, that would cause the end of funding the campaign, but if the campaign pleases only the wealthy people, the means the loss of votes.

Loss of a normal social relationship, with normal discussions, would cause that those people would not have information, what is going on in the poor people neighborhood. And that causes fear mutually because every people have prejudice, and this is the thing, what trolls would benefit effectively. But when we are thinking about the loss of middle class people that causes economical problems, because of the role of middle class people has been acting as the financial reserve.

If the government needs more money, it would collect more taxes from the middle class people, and in the years, when there is not so big need for money the tax level can be decreased. But when we are talking about the thing like the federal reserve, there are many things, where those words are pointing. Of course, that means the central bank of the USA, but also that means the bumper, what gives limits how the economy can move, or it can mean the money what can use right away for some urgent building sites or other urgent targets.

One version of the reserve is marginal, where the level of taxes can move. When the level of taxes are planned the planner would calculate the minimum and maximum levels for taxes, and when the decisions of the level are made, the level of collecting the money would keep low, because that level can rise in the next year.

If we would think this way, the person, who determines the level of taxes operates in two year periods. In the first year, the level of taxes is determined, and on the second year, the determiner would check how those calculations connected to reality, and then adjust the levels of collecting taxes. This is one way to think about the role of middle-class people in the socio-economical field.

The political culture and use of power

The political culture and use of power

The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things. This is the thing, what we must remember when we are talking about the way to rule the nation. If every people in the country supports the leaders, in every state, would have democracy. But why western democracies are supporting dictators?

This is a good question, and the thing is that dictatorial government are a good way to turn attention away from internal politics. If somebody goes worse than in our country, why people should complain? And if people would get too much salary, that thing means, that the production must transfer to some far-east countries, which are also suitable enemies for the western world, because they are far away from us.

Who cares about the conditions, where those people live, because of their national firewall denies the information, what comes from that country. And there are tales that western companies have delivered the firewall technology to those governments for denying the delivering the unpleasing information of the human rights in those countries. What people can't see does not exist is the idea of censorship. And that's why the benefit of some companies might be that people cannot see where those products or their materials are made.

Sooner or later every person in the world must tell the opinions about things like democracy and ruling the nation. This is the thing in every sector of life. Economic leaders must say, do they want to support the political systems, what are against the benefit of the nation and ordinary people.

When we are thinking about the reason, what many rulers have used when they are "forgotten" the next elections is that they are making their nation great. But then somebody would ask, what is the definition for the nation? If normal people are living below the limit of the poor, we must realize that there is something wrong with that state. When we are talking about the regular or average salaries of the state, we must realize that there are two ways to calculate those things.

One is that every salary type in the state would list in the line and that brings the average salary, what is a little bit different than the real economic situation in that nation. This way to make statistics is very impressive, but it is forgotten one thing, and that is how many people would get each class of salary. The thing is that the ruling class, which represents only a couple of percent of citizens can get billions of dollars, and the rest of the people are eating their shoes.

This is a provocative example of the thing, what is called as the growing difference between the incomes. But many times the GNP is mentioned the good method to tell the world, how wealthy the nation or its economy is. That thing tells about how much each nation would earn, and that thing is a really interesting number. When we are thinking about GNP that tells only how much the nation earns per citizen. But it would not tell who will get most of the money, and it would not tell, how much each nation pays to other countries.

This means that most of the national income might come from foreign companies and investors, which seems a very good thing. But then that nation can buy foreign military material and most of the income might go back to foreign hands.

Or otherwise, those states could sell their waterworks to foreign investors and then return all their money to foreign countries. Otherwise, GNP is not telling, who exactly is earning the money of some nations, and that means that the distribution of the incomings is not seen in the statistics, what is always telling about GNP. Another way to tell people is that the economic situation in the state is good is telling, how much or rather a way to say, what is the percent of unemployed people.

That thing is a very good meter about the competitiveness of the companies, which operates in some nation. But the thing, what is missing from those statistics is how many people are in pension, and the thing what would be nice to see is, has that country the way to handle unemployment just to put them in the pension or to works, where they don't get salaries? That thing is a really good way to make statistics looking good. If a person would not get a job, would that inmate send to some"institute" for retraining, and that's a good answer for many problems.

Bad economic situations somehow justify that companies are telling that they must decrease salaries, but the high percentage of unemployed people means that companies have the freedom to select workers freely because there are more offenders for jobs. And that will be a good way to keep people silent, because if somebody talks against the employer, would that mean, that the job of that person would be seen more careful than before.

If we are thinking about the one-party governments, the best thing, what those governments can hope is that people are making 12 hours working days. Too much free time makes possible to agitate against the government and it's a way to rule the nation, and also the long working day will keep people out from social media. That allows companies to deny the delivering information, which is not meant to tell for great public. The thing is that democracy is a good way to rule the country if the decisions, what government makes are pleasing me, is a good way to think about things, as I wrote at the beginning of this text.

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

The dirty trick in the military is, how to control those people?

If you have read my texts before, you might read one of the texts, what probably look like this, but don't worry, these texts are meant for the reading. When people are creating new things, they should also see those things with critics, and tell people, how it can be used for wrong purposes. The things like tractors have transformed to combat vehicles, and the history is full of those cases, where the thing, what is made for good, has turned to the ultimate weapon. And do you know why military forces turn to use petroleum and oil in the vehicles?

The reason was easy, it made easier to control the most lethal force of the state. The warship couldn't take fuel from everywhere, they must take their oil from exactly the right harbor. And the oil was more effective fuel that some wood or coal. But when we are thinking the tanks and other vehicles the mechanized warfare was more effective than use horses, and the gasoline was an easy way to deny the rebellions.

The reason why military forces took aircraft in the use was simple. The pilot didn't need ground combat training at all, and the vehicle was a very effective, and cheap way to make an impression for generals, who wanted results. And that's why fighters became popular weapons. The reason why those persons would not be unpopular was that they were all officers. and that showed the men, that also officers took part in the war b giving personal investment in the action.

And the aircraft became more and more powerful. When we are thinking about the advantage of the military devices, the missiles were the next step. They could be sent to the target, and then the crew was free to fight like the regular soldiers. There was no defense against ballistic missiles until the first anti-ballistic missiles were created. And those systems based the nuclear warhead, what could damage the own electronics as well as destroy enemy missiles.

Robots are the most dangerous tools, what mankind has ever created. If they are used for bad purposes, they would not excuse the orders. So if the operator will order them to torture, they would not say a thing against that order. 

Modern versions are basing the combination of microwave and kinetic energy and they should destroy the incoming warheads. Also, the target can be covered by using plasma-layer, which should deny the radar-echoes from the area, or the systems, what are making the more powerful echoes, and the idea is to make the warheads to detonate too early, or jam the detonation system by using the EMP-pulse.

The advantage of military systems is causing the thing, where drones and killer robots are coming to the battlefield. Those systems are facing the resistance, but same way nuclear weapons and bombers, as well chemical weapons have faced resistance when they were taken in use.

The drones are remote-controlled systems, and the operators would not need military training at all, and the military police can take the operator in the custody if something bad is happening. If the operator would start to make things, what that person should not do, the commander can just remove that operator from the command console.

This is why the superpowers are creating more and more effective robots, and another argument is that the commander of the robot army doesn't need to care losses. But the things against those systems is that they could be the ultimate tool in the hands of dictators. The robot doesn't ever excuse its orders, and this is the danger of those systems.

I always have said that robots don't torture, but if the commander orders them to do those things, they don't excuse. And robots are allowing to go to war, what nobody even knows. They can make even mass murders, and then they can be destroyed. That makes those devices the most dangerous thing, what mankind has ever created.

30 years from Tiananmen

30 years from Tiananmen


1. What we have learned about this case?

When China transformed its economic system to the "socialistic marketing system", that means that the Chinese government has raised the economic level of the people in China, and that helps to keep society peaceful. And the large population of China would make it a good marketing area, would that cause a very embarrassing situation also in the western nations. If western nations would irritate the Chinese government, that would not allow making products in China.

The silence would tell that somebody shames that thing, what is embarrassing in the eyes of other nations because if the people don't stop to talk about Tiananmen, must western leaders follow the people, and transfer the production to some other countries.  The big economic value of China makes human rights and political system with Tienanmen case somehow difficult topic to talk. Because if the western governments would not respect China, they will not market their products to that area.

2. Violence was unnecessary

And otherwise, if the western nations would make trade contracts with China, that is interpreted as the acceptance of the political and human rights situation in China. But as we know, the good and clean facade helps people to forget things, what happened 30 years ago. There is a one really interesting thing about this case and its the violation against protesters were not necessary.

The weather in the summer in Beijing is really hot, and the protesters would not able to stay in their position in the extreme heat. The thing is that the reputation of the military in China gone, and also in other countries has been talking, that the military forces can be used against own people, and that was removed the shield of those organizations, that they could be used only against foreign enemies. Tiananmen was the case, what made Eastern block nations afraid their governments and caused the situation, where people forced to begin the uprising against the communist nations.

3. China would want the same position, what the Soviet Union had in the cold war era. 

Without hygienic abilities, those people would leave from the place, and after that, the police could arrest them without any attention of the foreign countries. The thing, what makes this case a little bit embarrassing is that it would disturb the trade between China and western nations. China needs co-operation with western companies, that it can get new technology for its military systems.

But there are more problems also in the internal politics of that country. When China released markets it dropped the bottom off from the ideological excuse for the one-party policy, what was argued with communism and Marxism-Leninism. But when the markets opened, the thing what remained was the dictatorship.

4. International law is not controlling the internal affairs of nations. 

The thing is that growing economic situation in China guarantees that the society in that country is peaceful and that releases resources for foreign affairs, like strengthen and modernization of the military forces, what are the really good equipment for strengthening own position in the international field of politics.

The problems with the relationship with western nations are that the rulers of China use those relationships as an argument that the western nations support the one party policy of China. And this kind of things is mentioned as the internal affairs of China. In international law is not mentioned about, what kind of political system is allowed in nations.

5. The foreign technology benefits the military forces of China

That means China has juridical right to be a one-party nation, and there is nothing, what would deny that thing. Tiananmen case is a purely internal affair of China, and that's why there is nothing wrong in that case. So the police acts are internal affairs, and if China would not justify those happenings, that is the own business of that nation.

One of the things is that China has grown the export and also opened new military bases including overseas bases tells that it really want to reach the position, what the Soviet Union had in the past world. And this would make it a stronger actor in the international arena, what people have ever thought. This is a very problematic thing in international politics because every nation has the legal right to defend itself and forward own benefit.

Should we separate from the Euro and get own money or not?

Should we separate from the Euro and get own money or not?

There are no simple answers for that kind of questions, like should we stay in Euro or not. This kind of questions is really good, because there is no way, how to predict the advantage of economics. The economics is science, what has one of the most difficult ways to operate because even we know the mechanisms, how this thing works, we cannot predict when the cycle turns upwards or downwards. In this text, I will handle the economics as the science, which has a very big and large scale connection to the information sciences, and that means that the way, how media reports about some things, what is happening has influence with economic advantage.

The news is modeling our way to think, and in the world of the stock marketing, the fast-changing situations in the marketing and economics  cause that even the faked news can have a really big influence, because the decision of buying and selling shares must make in the very short period after the information has been got. In the hectic world of modern information technology sharing the information is very fast. There is no time to check, how real or how even the source where the news has been got the involvement or even where it has been written.

The way to write things like human rights has a very big influence on tourism and willing to buy merchandise from some state, and that kind of things have the big influence to the economics of that nation. Before Adam Smith and his theory of "invisible hand," people thought that there is no way to control the cycle of economics, but then this Scottish economical researcher realized, that the things, how the people write in the newspapers has an influence on the cycle of the economics.

The thing about economics is to try to predict the behavior of the cycle of the economy and in the era of Adam Smith, the economics was the simple thing. But then the field of that science has been separated to the different areas, like the steel industry, electronics, computers, or ICT-sector, where the hardware is separated from the software, and there are sub-sectors like programs for business and entertainment sectors, and the last one is basically games.

And of course, there are programs for Mac, PC, and mobile platforms. The network-based solutions work in every operating system, but using them with the mobile telephone is sometimes a little bit difficult, because of the small screen. But writing the A4 document by using the mobile version of some text handling program is possible, but it takes a little bit longer time than writing it by using a tablet or computer.

So this makes the world of economics little bit more complicated than in the era of Adam Smith. The thing in economics is that this science is not independent, or economics itself is independent, but the behavior of the line on the screen depends on the things, like how much products have been bought, or how many times some computer program has been loaded. But it also depends on the situation in the global political environment.

If some state would start to behave aggressively, and if that state has nuclear weapons, it would have a great influence on the global political and economic environment. When we are looking at the currency and especially the value of the currency, we are facing the truth, that if the small state would face the threat from other countries, the things what next happen would have great influence to the economics.

If the international community would support that small nation, it would get power to its own economy. But when we are talking about the situation, that the state, what operates with nuclear weapons is going to defend the small state, would that cause a very complicated situation. Even if that state says, that it would not use nuclear weapons in that conflict, the question is "what if the opponent uses the nuclear weapons".

In the complicated relationship between the nations, what own nuclear weapons is one principle when one actor in the nuclear club goes to support some government, another one would support the opposite force of the government, what the first nuclear state has been supported. And then we must realize, that economics is really sensitive for that kind of things. In the past, the conflicts what happened in the middle-east had very large-scale influence in the economics of the world.

The thing in the way of view things might change radically if we would stop to use fossil fuel. The clean energy, what would produce locally can decrease the oil states influence the economics of the world, and the thing is, that if the oil states would lose their main export article, would that kind of change turn the economics down in those countries.

And this is only the part of the way to use the so-called "invisible hand". The other way is to use hoax information and other kinds of things, and that thing is really problematic because the influence of that faked news might be local, but if some financial operator would write faked news that some company has given the resulting warning, that person can make very big money in one moment. This makes the economics even more complicated than we have thought.