Nobody knows how people react to new products.

 

One thing that causes uncertainty in new products is uncertainty. Nobody knows how people react to that product. And another thing is how many people will buy that product? 

Sometimes even the known company and very big campaigns are not bringing customers who are willing to pay for the product. And without sale, all money and time. 

That is put into the R&D process is just a waste of time. Even if some free applications like Twitter are a very big success as freeware doesn't mean that people are willing to pay for them. 

That means that free software can be very popular. But nobody wants to buy about the use that kind of tool. In this case, that company will bring some products to markets. There are two big problems. 

*How to predict sales? And make sure that people are interested in the product. The main question is how to make people buy the product. Interest is not enough. The thing that is enough is the sales. 

*And the second main question is how to price the product. If the product is too cheap. People suspect its quality. If the price is too high, people think that product is too expensive. 

The main thing in business is how to make people look at a product. If people are not even looking at the product they cannot buy it. There must be something that makes interest for the product. And then something must cause the need to buy it. 

When companies are making products, they want to sell them. Without sales is no company. The company wants compensation for the time and money. That is put into the product's R&D process when it brings the product to shelves. If the product doesn't please customers the entire R&D process is only a waste of time and money. 

This is the fact in all products. The physical products or SOAP (Service Oriented Application) have similar problems. The customers are accumulating to well-known actors. 

The big size, large marketing capacity, with large networks of customers and recommenders are accumulating people to those actors. The "Accumulation theory" by Karl Marx still lives. The accumulation theory goes like this. 

The capital accumulates in the hands of wealthy actors. But the reason for that was unknown in the lifetime of Karl Marx. The reason for that is that people. Who have lots of money or capital are hanging with other wealthy people. Many times those wealthy people are in the leading position in their companies. 

And that allows a good social environment to offer also new products. The person who knows some other leader can make offers more freely than some outsider who must ask the audience. And if those people are meeting at dinners or free time. They can discuss the product unofficially before the buyer introduces those products to people with the same rank as that director.

And the internet version of the accumulation theory goes like this: when some company has a large number of customers. That accumulates customers to that company. 

The thing is that a large number of customers is bringing more customers. 

The customers must buy those products. And they pay money for that. That means customers don't want to try multiple products before they decide do they want to buy the product.  So most of the customers choose the well-known product and producer. 

So the well-known offerers of the products are more popular than some start-ups. They have an existing network of customers and recommenders. That means the customers and capital are accumulating in well-known actors' hands. This sad thing makes the internet and its products accumulate in the hands of smaller groups of actors. 

https://brandproductandmarketing.blogspot.com/

Can any particle travel between universes?

Can any particle travel between universes?

If the multiverse theory would be true, and there are other universes, we might ask a one really interesting question, and that is: could object travel between universes. So when we are thinking about the edge of the universe, we might use the term "solid", if any object than a photon can cross that line. 

The thing is that if some object wants to travel across the border of the universe, that thing would need so much energy, that we cannot ever imagine that thing. The object must win the gravity of the entire universe, which means that it would pull the particles back with the power of all galaxies and dark matter particles, and that means that the gravity level, what it must win is so huge, that we ever cannot imagine that thing. 

The form of the universe is a very interesting thing to think, and when we are thinking about multiverse theory, that theory has brought many things in the mind of the theorists. One of the most interesting questions is can the light or some object across the line, what is called "the edge of the universe"? 

In this case, we might ask, is the layer of the universe solid or is it something else? And then we might start to define, what the world "solid" means at this time. If we are thinking that the edge of the universe is the point, where our universes domination ends, and after that point, the gravity of our universe would not pull objects back, we might think the possibility, that could some object travel to another universe, if the supernova blows in that border? 

In this case, the word "solid" means that nothing can go across that line, which is the shockwave of the Big Bang. And why we are interested in the edge of the universe? The thing is that the first formed stars would find at that layer. And this thing makes the location of the Big Bang very interesting. If we find the location of that object, we might define the distance of our solar system to that location. 

So if we would find the galaxies or black holes that are farther from that location, that means that that object is forming before our solar system. And how simple this kind of thing seems in the paper. But we know that there is a big difference between practical solutions and theories. In this example, I started to write that the speed of galaxies is stable, and all galaxies are traveling at the same speed. 

But we have forgotten that there is a possibility that there are galaxies, which are formed of dark mater or gas and dust. Those giant disks would have gravity but there would be no stars at all. And that means those objects would pull the other galaxies faster than others, which means that the galaxies would not travel with the same speed, and this means that in the practical world only the very big distances means that some galaxy is older than some other galaxy. 

So can the object travel between universes?

If wormholes or "Einstein-Rosen bridges" (1) are real, the meteorite or asteroid could travel between universes. Can the energy of the supermassive black holes, what are oscillating with the same frequency be so powerful that the Einstein-Rosen bridge or wormhole would be forming between those objects, what are in different universes? And that means that there is a possibility that the object, what is formed of antimatter can travel to our universe or even in our solar system. There is a hypothesis that some supernova explosions are caused by antimaterial, what impacts with stars or planets. 

But can object make that journey without wormholes? This thing is a really interesting question. The journey between universes would take so long time, that the neutrons of the atoms would start to break, which means that the material stops its existence. And that means that if some particle would slip to another universe, that would be meanless to the things in another universe.  

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Image:

https://miro.medium.com/max/2700/1*QS59aHuIEgJoIogixOJ32w.jpeg

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

 

Schrödinger's cat and the material version about that example

Could photon form the material?

Could there be material, what is not particle or energy? Or what could change the form between particle and radiation freely? And can photons form material? If we are thinking about the last question, we might say that we have ever faced the case, that there is a single structure, what is formed by the photons. Or should we rather say "the kinetic structure, what is formed by photons"? 

Light is forming by photons, so we might say, that there is an astral structure, which is forming by the light because photons are particles of light. Is the photon the key to one of the most fascinating material theories in the world, what is known as the "photon material" or "Schrodinger's material"?

The theory of "Shcrödinger's material" bases the example of what is known as "Schrödinger's cat"(1). When Erwin Schrödinger wrote his great example of the cat, what is not dead or alive, the philosophers started to create the idea of the material that is not material or energy. That material would be something, that we cannot even understand. The difference between Schrödinger material and "dark matter" is that the theoretical "Schrodinger material" can transform itself into material and energy. 

But here we must ask "does the material take the form of energy and backward anyway"?, So what this theoretical material would be, and what makes it so different than normal material. The idea about "Schrödinger's material" is that is created by pure light or photons, and the base of that thing is the theory that photon has mass. And if the photon has mass it is material. 

So if the photon has mass, that thing can create the atoms and then the atoms can form the structures. But as you might notice, there is one thing, that makes these kinds of theories hard to prove. There is not a single observation about the atom, what is forming only photons, and this means that the theory of the material, what is "pure light" is only theory, but as you might understand, theories are base for experiments and proving things. 

Is photon one version of dark matter?

The idea of this thing has been taken from the idea, that the dark matter is the "quantum fog", what interacts with other particles only by gravity because those particles have no "spin". So there is hot and cold dark matter, the hot dark matter, what interacts but very slowly. And the cold dark matter, what interacts only by the gravity. So if the material would react very fast, it would need the electromagnetic field for reacting. 

The subatomic particles would not have really big mass, which means that the gravity or gravitational interaction between those particles is extremely weak. That means that the interaction is also extremely slow, and it cannot happen until the universe is an extremely stable condition. 

And the 3-kelvin radiation would deny that interaction. So the question is, is the photon one version of dark matter. When photon leaves from a star or other light source, is it possible that it would someday stop. Or can the photon make the lattices metals can form? 

If it could make that thing someday, what does this material look like? This is a nice thing about theories, we can think things freely and make models, and when something has been proven, that thing would be to end of speculation, what is like the end of the road. The theory stops to be theory, which ties the researchers to the proven formula. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

The Bird Is Gone

The Bird Is Gone

Could there be an encrypted message where is letters T.B.I.G (The Big) (Terminating Big) and could that mean some kind of demolition device?

What does this message mean? When we are thinking about this message it has been found on the tree, what is in one of the farthest and most isolated islands in the world. Sometimes I have thought is some carrier pigeon left to home for sending a message, and then something happened to that bird. At first, we might think, that somebody was mistakenly released some carrier pigeon, but there is another explanation. 

Is that the very well encrypted message? But is the message some kind of encrypted thing, where are the hidden word "The BIG", if we would take only the first letters of the words. So is there some special bag or something else? Those letters are T.B.I.G, what might mean that there has been happened something big. or T.B.I.G might mean (T) BIG, what might mean "Terminating Big". And is that "terminating big" some kind of demolition equipment. 

Or was there some dead bird laying on the rock. And then someday the persons, who have left that message suddenly have seen that "The Bird is Gone", so there is one little bit more interesting explanation for that message, and could that some ship, what name was "The Bird" was gone. Or did somebody accidentally released some kind of bird as an example carrier pigeon?

Is this "Bird Is Gone" message the key to the mystery of treasury, what is claimed to hide on that island? And how the maker of that message hoped, that somebody will find it?

Above this text is a message, that somebody has sent to a tree on the Cocos island, and that message could be the key to the treasury mystery, what has been told about that island. In that island is claimed to be the treasury, but nobody has been officially found it. When we want to solve some problems, we must think about what is the simplest possible reasons for that thing. When we are looking at things, what we might think as clear, we might find another meaning for the things, what seems regular. So when we are looking like the stories of the lost treasure, we must ask, why somebody wants to hide that thing? If some pirate would hire treasury to the beach a long way from home, how that person would think to return and get the treasury? 

Does that pirate rent a ship, and then go to get that thing from the sunny island? But if the treasury is gold and diamonds, why that pirate would not melt gold, and claim to find jewelry, and sell them to some store? So what that treasury could be? Are they some kind of documents, what is proving about some kind of cooperation with some investors and pirates, and this kind of thing might cause that the pirate could buy himself free from the prison if that person would someday catch because somebody has become suspicious of the origin of the money of the old sea captain. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocos_Island

Image:

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/08/strange-clouds-and-writing-about-cocos.html

We cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

We cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

The idea of the virtual crossing the speed of the light is similar to the impact of the cars. (Speed of car 1 +  Speed of car 2)

The idea of the virtual crossing the speed of light is the key to the WARP-drive (1). The thing is that if the impact speed of the gas or ions, what is coming against the particle is the combined speed of the particles and gas (Speed of particle + Speed of gas). And that makes this kind of thing possible. Does that thing have some kind of meaning in spaceflights is a secondary thing? The thing is that we cannot break the laws of nature, but we can go around them.

The virtual crossing the speed of light is possible if the spacecraft would travel to the gas, which is coming to the spacecraft at high speed. The idea of the virtual crossing the cosmic speed limit the speed of the light is similar to the impact of two cars. If the impact speed of both sides of the clump is 80 kilometers per hour, the impact speed of both sides of the accident is 160 kilometers per hour (80km/h+80km/h).

So if the gas is traveling through the spacecraft with the speed the impact speed of the spacecraft and this gas is the speed of the spacecraft and speed of the gas. There is one thing, that might interest people, who are interested in the interstellar spaceflight, and that thing is that the black holes or other whirls in the universe can benefit in the extremely long-term spaceflights by using them as the assistance of the virtual crossing the speed of light.

What if we would fly against the rotation direction of the galaxy by the speed of 99% of the speed of the light? What is the impact of speed between the spacecraft and gas?

So could we travel to stars by using the existing rocket technology? The thing is that we could create the giant particle accelerator to space, which accelerates the hydrogen ions to the speed of light, and then the rocket will launch against that flow of particles. The impact would cause the situation, that the impact speed between particles and the rocket is crossing the speed of light.

And if we would transfer this thing to the normal space, we could create the photon rocket what will get the speed of 99% of the speed of light. If the spacecraft would travel against the rotation direction of the galaxy, that thing could make the dream of crossing the cosmic speed limit possible. The thing is that the same effect would make WARP drive possible.

(1)

https://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/technology/warp/warp.html

A couple of words of time travel

A couple of words of time travel

Hypothesis about the briefcase men from the future.

Have you seen time-machine movies? Do you know what those fictional heroes make with those crystal sticks? Those crystals are oscillating with the same frequency with crystal, which is in the leaving point and helps to adjust the time machine. In theory, the time machine is possible, and we would want to go to the past. But if we would want to get back, there would be problems.

And sometimes the theorists or science fiction writers have created the model, where the person leaves the message to the descendants for sending the ideas and innovations from the future. This kind of time loop, where the astronaut from tomorrow would pump the data of the solutions of the future would help some hypothetical society to get ultimate power, even if those time travelers could travel only in one direction. That hypothetical future technology would give great benefit for people, who have it in their hands.

The theory behind the hypothesis of time travel

We know that we can stop time if we are moving fast enough, and there is introduced an idea that in someday, we would create the giant particle accelerator, where the small craft will accelerate to the speed of light, and that thing would cause that we will start to travel in time, and this makes possible to travel to future. But how we would travel to the past? This is a really interesting question?

When we would slow time in capsule, let's say about 50 %, which means that one year in the capsule would be two years outside. The thing, that we must do for creating that effect is to travel the speed, which is 50% of the speed of light. But how we would make the time travel faster in the craft? This is the problem in the theories of time travel. In theories, what is far from real life there could be organisms, what has so advanced nanotechnology, that they could be nanomachines in their body, what rotates the extreme small plates near the speed of light, and that thing would stop the time in their bodies.

But we don't have a chance to create that system in real life, because we cannot create structures, what would stand this kind of speed. And in real life, this kind of disk would be broken because of the centrifugal force, and that's why this kind of thing is pure theoretical level.

One version is that we would send the spacecraft in the black hole, and hope that there would be the space, where time would travel backward. And if we cannot go back to the point, where we have left, the time-traveling has no sense. The idea of time machine would be simple, and there is needed the plate, what rotates near the speed of light, and that's why the principle of the H.G Wells time machine is right, as we might so often say in theory. But how we could travel back in time? The idea of time slowing is that the energy level of the particle would increase.

And if we would create the opposite effect, and pump the energy out of the particle, we could make time moving backward, because, in the capsule, the time travels faster. In this case, we would need to create something, what we ever imagine is possible. We must create a particle where the movement is absolute zero. And we cannot create absolute stability, because the universe is moving, and this will put limits to create a time machine.

But let's think, that we could pull the entire energy off the craft, and we could create the space, where time moves faster, that thing would make the craft where is one cabin inside other. That means that when we are creating this hypothetical time machine we must make the structure, where are two hypothetical time machines one inside other. But as you see those systems are only theoretical research.

There is one little problem that we haven't even think about while we are thinking about this kind of technology. And that is, what if the "spin" of the nuclear particles of the time machine would turn, and the entire craft would turn to antimatter. This kind of technology would be dangerous because that allows some states to travel to the past, and start the battles by using modern military technology. And those things are, of course, very big moral and ethic questions. But who knows, what we would do in a distant future? Maybe there this kind of technology would be possible, but there would be many technical problems with materials and other kinds of things before this technology is coming to true.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipMwrcvukpU&feature=youtu.be

The mystery named Roanoke

The mystery named Roanoke

The ROANOKE is the opposite way CROATOAN (1), and the thing is that those people could mean that they returned to England, and hide their identity. That means that this thing about missing English colonialists would be ended that those men and women went back to England. And when we are thinking that there Virginia Dare (2) who claimed to born in Roanoke colony could survive the crossing Atlantic. And if those people would have a child, that could make their stories more believable, if they wanted to tell that they could be the fishermen. But this is only theory.

Another theory is that Indians were killed those colonialists, and that story claimed to told by the Jamestown people, who told that some local Indian chief would confess to killing those people. But the question is, who spoke with that chief?

Roanoke was the first colony, that Englishmen established in America and everybody in that colony disappeared. The thing that caused that tragedy was the one disappeared silver dish and after that colonialists burned the corn of the Indians, who they were ordered to treat with respect.

So could that case caused the loss of every colonialist, and who made that thing and stole the silver merchandise is the mystery. And one of a very interesting point in that series of happenings was that could somebody want to destroy the relationship between the colonialists and Englishmen, and made that project terminated?

That thing is that the violence would keep the people under work in the Jamestown was the real thing. And that meant that people had no time to look around them or speak about things, what they should not speak.

When we are thinking about this lost colony, the smoke that rises on the skies in 1590 when Sir Walter Raleigh returned being three years at England for looking for ships, who wanted to take him back to America and Roanoke there was the smoke rising to the skies. That tells that somebody would be alive in that town, but when those men came to Roanoke, there were no living people around it. And there was not either body of dead people and those colonialists were disappeared without any trace.

Or were there some Englishman in that place, and maybe that person returned to England with some other boat and then just walked away. If that thing is true, that would need the number of those men were not sharply calculated. And there is a possibility, that the lost men were not told to the leader of the group. Or the men were not even counted.

The story is really interesting because even if the investors withdraw from that case, the thing that Raleigh left those people after him seems interesting. Why he didn't guarantee that they would return home safe, even if they were been in that colony and the project was disbanded? What Raleigh didn't tell about this thing? And when he came back to England, he left two ships boats for those people that might give one very interesting evidence of what could be happened.

If we think that Raleigh was away about three years, those people might think that they were left behind. And nobody ever come to get them back to England. That means that the ships' boats might be a sign that Raleigh thought that those colonialists were planned to be killed, and they might feel the same. The thing in those colonies was that there were spoken many things, what is not wanted to tell to other people.

When we are looking at history, we must realize that also Sir Walter Raleigh killed by the hand of executor. And could the reason for judgment the journeys to America? When we are thinking about other persons, who took a part in the Roanoke project, the name usually seen in those papers is Captain John White. That name seems like the cover- or faked name for somebody, who should not be mentioned.

And then, at last, we are facing the message on the tree CROATOAN, what is ROANOKE in the opposite way. That would be a very simple code, which means that those people just returned to England. They might sail across the Atlantic ocean and then just walk to their homes. So this might mean the message, what is backward on the tree means simple that "we are going back". But this is only thoughts about that mystery.

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roanoke_Colony

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Dare

When society is split

When society is split

In the 1990s the differences of incomings were growing, and that caused the advantages what has caused many problems in Western society. The social and economic advantage caused that rich person became richer and poor people stay poor. But this thing doesn't tell everything about the economics of the country, and the thing what is always forgot is that inflation causes the prices of the merchandise are raising, and even if the incoming level has been same, the person can get less merchandise with the same money, what they got in the early 1990s. This means that the purchasing power of money has been decreasing, and the thing is that money is not the same thing anymore.

But when we are thinking about this thing, what is called as "lowball glass effect" we have forgotten one very important detail. If we are thinking the economics as the pyramid of the glasses, and when we are putting the liquid on the top of the pyramid the most of it would fill the glasses, which are top of the structure. That means that the most highly paid jobs are also slipping in the hands of the wealthy people. When the highest bosses of the companies are adjusting their salaries and commissions.

Which causes the effect, where the people, who are leading companies are getting most of the profit if the year of the company has been victorious. That means the most of the incomes might go to the salaries of the directors and members of the board of directors. This means that regular work doesn't get anything about this kind of results. All profit of the company would go to the pockets of the highest rank directors, and in the worst cases, the social space of the company would get a coffee maker, when the directors would get new cars.

The problem of this advantage is that when the differences between incomings are growing that thing will misplace the middle class from society. The length of the accordion of salaries causes the effect, that when researchers are calculating average salaries, the real average salaries doesn't match with calculations. And that thing causes problems with politicians because the calculated middle-class people are not the majority anymore.

The reality is far away from theory, and this is notable in politics. This causes problems to adjust the taxes and this causes the loss of popularity. This is one thing, what is remarkable in business life. The thing what causes that effect is that the wealthy people are almost every time in the high-rank jobs, and that means they have a network of other high-rank people around them.

This means that the top positions in companies are going to people, who the electors are already known. And that's why the people who have parents, who have big salary are getting most highly paid jobs in the business. This is one part of business life. That kind of advantage would cause that wealthy people are moving away from downtown, and this thing isolates them more than ever before.

In the courtroom only facts are important.

In the courtroom only facts are important.

Social media has great power, as we have seen. In cases like a confession of AREA-51, social media had a vital role in the uncovering the secret, what might be bigger than we ever imagined. This case has been shown that the power of social media has a very large role to force the rulers to tell the truth for the people, and also Brexit has shown the force of this way to share opinions and thoughts.

But the thing is that social media has brought one problem in the mind of people. If we think that so-called traditional media would give one-side information of something, we must realize that the great mass of false information has more effect than the small mass of right information, if people are believing that kind of data. The confession is the key in this kind of way to act. If shared data confess people, it's the same, what people shares.

One way to make people silent is to claim that some people have taken to court because of their opinions. In the court is one rule what people must realize. Prosecuted are innocent until they are proven guilty. And proving the prosecuted guilty must happen by using facts, not appealing feelings. This is the thing, what is normally forgotten.

And that is a really interesting thing in social media. When we want to confess to people that our way to think is the only one and right, we must have only persons, who have authority to the system. Then we can use titles, what is not true, and get those "three persons" who can prove the thing, what has been discussed true. The thing is that those things seem very confessing, but then we can see something, what we don't want to see in this hypothetical case.

First thing is that the faculty or area, where professor works is not mentioned. Second, the source, what is used is somehow unique, it has been some lecture or something, and it has happened before digital recordings or recordings of the lecture have somehow destroyed. The third is that there are great feelings about this kind of cases. That thing is seen in the cases when some war criminal has been arrested.

In those cases, the media was full of brutal details what has been done to the victims, but a couple of things have been forgotten. One is the place where those things have been done, and second is the ranks and units, where those criminals served. Those things are really important for the justice system, which must give the judgment. And even if the cases where the crime is well known, the identities of the criminals must be proven, or those prosecuted persons are free to go. Sometimes I have thought that is the handling of war crimes by using brutal details mission to deny people to see those images?

 Well, that thing is a mystery, but the feelings are an extremely good weapon to keep people silent. "I was there myself" is a good argument in media, and "I want to forget". Those things are a good way to close the mouths of the people. We must forget to think about mafia and war criminals some kind of super demons. We must start to think about them as regular criminals, who had great support for their work. When we are handling cases like homicide detectives, we ever ask them to have they ever been battered? This is a really interesting thing to think when we are thinking about investigations and research.

The next there is a small example of about misunderstandings what are connected to Indians. What is the archeologist's relationship with the Mayan culture? Of course, European sociopaths destroyed that nice and famous Indian culture, which ruled the Andes of South America. By the way, Mayan Indians lived in Central America, and their culture was crumbling in when Europeans came. The Indians, who lived in the Andes were Incas and the reason why Pizarro could destroy those people was that Incas were conquered their area, and slaved the other Indians.

That allowed Pizarro to recruit those people in his army. The same thing happened in Central America, where Aztecs slaved other Indians, and then Cortez allowed to use force against Aztecs. But the thing is that the hate was a similar tool in the hands of Conquistadors what it was in the hands of Nazi-Germany and after that Allied forces benefit the hate in their actions. The thing is that crushing other opinions would happen by simply trolling them out from social media.

The second way is to appeal to feelings. If people see something happening that thing has a greater effect than if we would read some reports. If in the court would arrive, some 90 years old woman or man, would the counselor or prosecutors dare to interrogate them with full skills and force. But there is one thing, we can't believe that those old people were young sometimes. We always want to believe that somebody who we might know as the beloved man or woman was monster.

The thing is that the law says that every prosecuted must have the best possible defense. And the thing why defense must be used is that the also prosecuted person must be heard. But the motives have been changed in that kind of cases.

Murder is still murder and serious crime. If the merchandise of the person or the initial capital for business has been earned by using criminal methods, that capital would be returned to the families of victims, and the lawyers would get good profits for those cases. So the lawyer always wins. But the law says that murder can be prosecuted rest of a person's lifetime. This is the thing in law. In the courtroom, the moral has no mean, only facts are things what means something, and the rest of things are meanless. This is the rule in court.

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

About the philosophical schools of thoughts

Philosophical schools of thoughts are many times mentioned in the biographies of philosophers. There are found many interesting schools of thoughts, like Neoplatonists, Leipzigeans, Modern German and many more ways to think about things. There is seen many very good ideas, how to put those persons in the boxes, where people can choose, what school of thoughts of philosophy would the philosopher advocate.

And this kind of things are good looking, but if the philosopher self should put self to some of those boxes, that thing would be really difficult. If there would be the allowance to become a philosopher, what depends on the knowledge, what shool advocator the philosopher would be, there would be no philosopher on Earth, who would not have peptic ulcer or who even wrote a single word.

When we are thinking about things like putting people to boxes, that thing would be a nice way to destroy the interest of philosophy in the beginning. Those things like classes of philosophers make studies very hard, and very complicated. And one thing, what people might not understand is that the thing in philosophy is to teach a person to think own thoughts.

Not copy other people thoughts. Even a child can make copies of texts, and in that case, the person must not even understand a thing. I don't speak languages like Japan, but I could copy texts if I can copy marks from one place to another, and I must not understand a thing about that. 

Sometimes some people asked me when I started to write, whose thoughts I will write. In those cases, I don't care a thing, what other people thought. But when some person, who knows everything better than I come to ask things like that, they should tell, what that kind of things are meaning to them? Who cares, who have written those words?

When we are thinking about those words, what is the matter, is the writer of the words some Plato from Ancient Greece, or some modern philosopher? When we are thinking the modern philosophy, we can ask, how modern that thing could be Advocators of the modern philosophy shool is mentioned persons like John Locke, who lived in the last 17th century. That thing means that there are only a few changes in the way of thinking in the knowledge theory. Locke lived about 300 years ago, and that man is still very qualified philosopher.

How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

How to make artificial planet? (In theory, of course)

If mankind would someday create an artificial planet, what would replace the Earth, must there be some very good reason for that. And the reason can be that the Sun is starting to transforming to red giant star. That would be the end of our civilization and life on Earth if we would not move to another planet.

The problem of the suitable planets and particles is that the only planet in our solar system, what would look like Earth is Venus, what is nearer the Sun than Earth. So this planet would not give very much help when the Sun is starting to grow. Of course, there are moons, what has a rocky surface on the solar system, but the problem is that the gravity of those moons is very weak. And they cannot maintain the atmosphere.

For the answer to that problem is introduced that all the surface of the moon would be covered by a giant glass- or metal layer, and people would live in this structure. But if we would want to live in the normal gravity, where mankind has been living all of its existence, and where we have adjusted, we would need brand new Earth, and one thing, what we could do is create brand new Earth for our species.

If we would want to create an artificial planet, we must find interplanetary nebula, which involves the right elements. And then we must bring one heavier particle inside it, and then the gravity would pull the nebula on this particle and the process would take billions of years. 

But there would be another version, what would take a little bit shorter time, and in this version, we must have two interplanetary nebulas, what we would load with the opposite polarity of electricity. Of course, those interplanetary nebulas must be in the right distance, that the electromagnetic forces can pull them together.

Then inside another nebula would be stationed one heavier particle, what would help the creation of that artificial planet, and putting it in the right position. This idea has been taken from the YouTube channel, "what if", and the thing is that this kind of extraordinary ideas have been introduced sometimes before that, and the idea of the artificial planet is very fascinating.

This extremely large project has created the idea from the observation, that the water layer on the planet would make it colder. And then some astronomers calculated, that even planet Earth is not exactly in the living sphere near Sun. But the large water areas on the surface keep our home planet cooler. Also, the cloud layer and the gasses that are found in the atmosphere are important for the temperature of the planet.

And that have given ideas that if we would create the artificial planet, we could adjust its temperature by selecting the mixture of gasses and the area of the water layer on its core. The idea is very futuristic, but the thing is fascinating. Sometimes there has been introduced ideas that the new Earth would be created in the Asteroid belt when the sun is starting to transform into a red giant star and turns brighter. This transformation would cause the burn of life on our planet.

The new Earth would be made by using some big asteroid like Ceres. The asteroid would be covered with big and powerful magnets, and then the rest of the sand of the asteroid belt will be magnetized with the opposite polarity of electricity, what can deliver by using giant radio telescopes. 

In this idea, the asteroid would pull those particles on its surface. Then the water and other things would bring to that planet from Europe moon of Jupiter, and Oort cloud. The consumption of the atmosphere would be adjusting with carbon dioxide and other gasses like ozone that it can maintain life, what is brought from the Earth.

Maybe this thing would save our species and give it more time to move to other stars, but this thing would be far away in the future. But this technology would give the change to the human race to survive after the Sun is turned to the white dwarf and there is the only cold and dark area around it. This is the moment when mankind mus, at last, find a new home.

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants are really interesting characters if we are thinking of evolution

Ants and termites, what also are ants are interesting characters. Those social, wingless bugs are defending their base with a very big attitude, and some of them even die, when they are defending their queen and home. One of the most interesting characters in that community, where everybody would put their stakes to the work of the day is military ants.

Military- or soldier ants are the very aggressive version of ants, and their mission is to defend others. But how those ants would control those soldiers? Their jaws are terrifying and attitude is deadly, but why they are not attacking the workers? That is because the worker would feed that terrifying member of the community.

If the soldier ant would be aggressive, there would be the situation, that another worker comes to the place, and then those ants would relax that horrifying defender of the community. They are telling that everything is fine, and nobody would not threaten the position of that specific ant. And then those worker ants would give a small bite of sugar to the warrior.

That keeps soldier ant satisfied, and there is one little thing about that soldier ant, what protects the entire community. They cannot eat themselves, and those ants are not using their jaws to anything else than just fighting. Military ants cannot even eat, because in their stomach is not bacteria, what is necessary for eating, or transformation of the food to nutrient.

Ants are given an idea to nanomachines, what his group of robots, what are operating like one giant robot. This kind of robot can lose one part of it, and it can still operate. That poly- or swarm robot would also be more flexible than any other device in human history.

But the ants have given ideas of the society, where everybody has their place, and one of those workers, who would work in that futuristic society is the data worker, who would sit in the space station and control the drones and other devices on the Earth. In this hypothetical scenario, those data workers cannot escape or rebel, because they are addicted to the nutrient, what will bring from Earth.

When we are thinking about evolution, the ants have learned the communal working. In their society, every single ant has own duty. And if the duty is defending the society, those bugs would not do anything else.

In the next part, the world "future" can be replaced by the world "other civilization". What we will do and what we are looking in the distant future is a mystery, and without time machine we cannot find that out, how our decadents would live thousands of years after us. The evolution of ants has given the idea that maybe the future would bring to the world the real-life information workers, who are operating in the giant orbiting space station.

Those space stations would need the food from Earth, and that thing would keep them under the control. And those workers would operate the drones and robots on Earth. The thing is that if those controllers connection with robots must be cut, the thing, what the people on Earth must do is just jam the communication lines. If those operators would spend all of their life in the space station, their bones and muscles would be so weak, that those inmates would be dead, if they land to the Earth.

And in one scenario those characters would not have even consoles, and their brains are connected to the computers by using surgically installed microchips. They would also offer their brain capacity to solve problems, and if there would be a problem, the operator, who sits on Eart can just cut the connection of the microchip. The idea is that in those space stations would live people, whose brains can be connected, and that will gove those systems extremely high level of intelligence and ability to solve problems.

What if Nietzsche meant the word "abyss" not, "emptiness"?

What if Nietzsche meant the word "abyss" not, "emptiness"? 

Which world Nietzche used? Was it "emptiness" or "abyss"? This thing is really interesting question, because Friedrich Nietzsche wrote all his texts by using German, because German was his home language,  and he studied his studies in the University, where the official language was German. Reality is that the entire personality of Nietzche is some kind of suspicious because he died so young. And before that about ten years before his death, he got brain infarct and that ended his career as a philosopher.

The thing, what makes this person so disputed, is his work with super- or over human theories, where persons, who have moral, ethically and intellectual superiority to other people would take the power in the society. This theory might be brought really scary visions in the mind of Nietzche. If people would breed the super intellectual individuals that would create humans, which are aliens to other humans.

The thing is that the writings of Nietzche have created the idea of using genetic engineering for the fasten evolution. The base of those techniques is that the persons who are making this kind of things are using knowledge of genetic material for tracking highly intelligent people, and then create children by using natural or in vitro fertilization.

So was Nietzche upset about his idea? Did he understand what he created?  If the University is used as the source of genetic material those places are often very intelligent persons. They can be used to cross new people, and if this chain would continue long enough the new race of humans would rise. 

But when we are thinking about staring the abyss, we might find new and new details about this thing. An abyss is a scary place, which seems to be empty, like the Universe itself. But when we are thinking about the Universe it is full of mass and material, what people can ever see. And the abyss of the universe hides the brightest objects, what mankind has ever noticed.

Those objects are invisible to human, but if we are seeing those objects by using X- or gamma-ray telescopes. That means that regular observer would not even notice those objects, but if that astronomer or some other observer has X- or gamma-ray telescopes that person sees the bright and high-energy reactions what are creating that radiation. But if the Earth will travel through those radiation rays, that would cause the energy impulse just detonates our planet. And those things are interesting to think before going to sleep.

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

The normal terminology in far-wing radicalism is that they are not radicals

We should stop talking about nationalism and left-wing movements at the different kind of movements. There is no difference between right- or left-wing radicalism, and the result is always devastating. The thing what might give little brakes for Stalin and Tito was that they were members of the ethnical minority of their homeland.

They couldn't get support from the majority same way as Adolph Hitler could. And the thing why the nationalism was not so highly respected in the Soviet Union was that there were so many nationalities. Of course, Russians wanted people of the world think that they are the heir of the Soviet Union, and that's why there is so great nationalistic wave.

There is very long living opinion, that Russians created the Soviet Union and the entire state was created around Russia, who has rights for the heritage of the Soviet Union. And this thing makes possible to say, that Russia is the Soviet Union, what have lost some land areas.

When we are thinking about the far-wing radicalism, the normal version of their speeches is that they are not far-wing members and the things like fascism have been lost after the Second World War. The argument is similar, with the argument that Mafia does not exist anymore.

That thing is an argument, that the fascist and nazis were lost after WWII. There are some versions, that the Fascists and Nazis were some kinds of the right-wing movement, but the reality is that those movements were market themselves as the labor movement, and the nazism has got the name from their agenda of national socialism.

The difference between those movements is that national socialism is highlighting the greatness of the nation, and that thing also is supporting by the militaristic strength. When we are thinking about the power and the Marxism, the idea about the peace between labors is very good marketing speech. 

But the real socialism is looking like a little bit different than ideal socialism. There are many similarities with nazis and communists, and the reason why there were not so great nationalistic movement in the Soviet Union was that there were many nationalities in that country. Maybe Stalin had problems to create a real "team spirit" in his country because he couldn't just ask support from Russians.

He was Georgian himself, and that put him to a difficult position because he couldn't just agitate the people against minorities. That means that Stalin was one member of the very small minority in the Soviet Union. Hitler was a much better position. He could yell against Gypsies and Jews because he was a member of the majority of people. And that gave him the very good weapon against minorities. The argument of that kind of leaders in that the majority is the thing, who is ruling, and other people must follow the majority.

Monopoly is the game with tactics and business

Monopoly is the game with tactics and business

There has been many theories and research made for the games and their relationship with the real world. Those researches have been made by request of authorities and some institutes for uncovering the ability of an inmate to control things like business or some other tactical things. The idea is to turn their interest in the young age in the right direction because those people are suitable for the train to the high position of the important role to society of business and government. 

Many times there have been claimes that Monopoly is a boring game, but it uncovers the people able to think like businessmen, and the main thing, what people should while playing this game is to buy cartels and break other people able to create own cartels. That thing happens by buying the squares around the game, and that thing would show, how good tactical eye somebody would have.

 The thing in that game is that the gamer can win the game by driving other players to bankruptcy, and that shows the real faces of capitalism. The Monopoly game allows the gamer to control the prizes and other players would just lose their money. Even if the player has the most expensive lots, that person can not make anything, if the competitor owns the rest of the gameboard.

The volume of that another player is so large if that person operates with houses and hotels, that the owner of the most expensive lots would be loose all the money. And the competitor can just pump all the money from that player. In this case, the most expensive hotels cannot fix the loss of money. Those things show if the person has skills to make business, in the new hectic multicultural environment.

The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

The strange and silly theory about the timeless civilization

When Albert Einstein created the Theory of Relativity, he invented that the speed of the time would be connected to the mass or speed. And if the speed and gravity would slow time, the induction thought would be that the energy would slow the time, and that will cause the slowing of the clock.

This means that the energy could also cause the slowing time, which has proven because of the difference between atoms clocks in the GPS satellites and ground station would run at different time. That thing proved that Einstein was right. And at the next in this text, there comes a couple of fictional writings about that thing.

Or the first one is the thing that tells about the fictional theory about civilization, what would be timeless. And the second one would tell about the fictional character, what would have a mouth in the hands.  I found those topics from some old papers, what I have been written, and I decided to share them for you.

1. I sometimes have thought that there is a possibility, that the super civilization would have the ability to turn themselves timeless by landing on the event horizon of the black hole. In that case, the fictional or hypothetical civilization would orbit the black hole in the level of the event horizon, that their space station would travel by the speed of the light. 

And the speed would slow or even stop the time, what would make that hypothetical civilization timeless, which means that they can live forever. Or at least their civilization would not be connected to the time. In this case, civilization would benefit the black hole as some kind of time machine.

2. The character, or alien what would have a mouth in hand would not seem to be dangerous. There would not be mouth with teeth in the hand. The mouth could be like some kind of disk, what the bugs have. 

Or the sweat from the hands would contain the enzymes, what would liquidize the nutrient. And the duct would take that nutrient in the body of that character. This thing would not be intelligent, but there are theories that some aliens would have that kind of ability.

But in fact, in officially we would not have a single alien in custody, and that's why the thing, what is called as the cosmos biology would be more writing of the science fiction novels than using the observations of the humanoids. Before we would meet the first alien or the extraterrestrial living habitant, we can write and think almost everything about those characts.

Because the extraterrestrial habitat might look like totally different than we are. And before we see the first one that thing,  everything that we are writing and talking about those things is purely hypothetical fiction.

More about the wormhole theory

Andromeda Galaxy Image by NASA

More about the wormhole theory

The thing where the wormhole theory bases, is that the black holes like a supermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy are not growing, and that means that the material would go somewhere from that particle. There is a couple of theories, why the material of the center of the galaxy is not increasing, and the supermassive black holes are not growing.

1.  The black hole would be more massive than we ever thought, and the massive size would cause so small change in the size of that thing, that we cannot measure those changes.

This means that the size of the enormous black hole would grow, but we cannot see that phenomenon. The reason for that is that the supermassive black hole would be so massive, that we simply cannot measure the change of the size of the event horizon.

2. The black hole would actually not absorb the material inside it, because it accelerates the material as the gravity sling. That means the material would be catapulted back to space. And that means that the black hole itself would not absorb material inside it. 

The idea of this theory is that the material would reach the speed of light before the event horizon. That means that most of the gas and other particles would return to space. This theory actually explains the giant material jettisons from the black hole of the centers of the galaxies.

3. The wormholes are in theory tunnels through time and space. The idea is that if two black holes are oscillating in the same frequency, there would forming the tube or channel between those black holes. 

The thing that supports that theory is the jettisons of the supermassive black holes in the centers of galaxies and quasars.  Also, the thing, that the size of black holes seems not to be growing is telling that material will go somewhere, but there is of course theory, that the gravity catapult would be catapulted that material way from the black hole, as I wrote earlier.

4. The supermassive black hole in the centers of galaxies is actually the "white hole". That theory is actually one version of the wormhole theory. In this theory, the material can travel in the wormhole to only one direction, that would open many things in the theoretical use of that phenomenon. 

Because if the material can travel only one direction, the thing is that would make that phenomenon safer. If the black holes would be absorbed that material with similar force, that means that if the other black hole would be more massive than another side of the pair, the risk is that it would absorb the material by using greater force than other. That would make the black hole the effect, where the stronger black hole would make the wormhole the cannon, where the material would come out the side of the weaker part with very high speed, that means that if the material would impact some particle it would cause the great explosion.

If material would travel only in one direction, what is the heavier black hole, that means that material would be easy to send to the center of the galaxy. The material would come out from the supermassive black hole with a very high speed, but the route of that gas is more predictable and there would be no bigger particles like asteroids or planets in the route of the jettisons of the supermassive black holes. But it ever can return by using the same black hole, because in the return case, the sending black hole must be lighter than the receiving black hole.

And here we must realize, that the material can turn to X-rays or heartened plasma when it travels in the black hole, and that means that we cannot use that phenomenon for the same trips, but it's possible that if we would create a black hole, what is big enough, that the spacecraft would travel through it to the other side of black hole. 

And we could benefit that phenomenon also for communication with probes, what is extremely long range from the Earth. But the thing is that if the journey is a one-way trip, the system can still communicate with the probe by sending the message robot to the probe, and that robot would be like a high-tech USB stick, what would take new computer programs and orders to that probe.

We could use laser communication for receiving messages and sending data to Earth. But in this wild scenario, the system would send the important data to that hypothetical probe by using connection vehicle. Or we still can use the radio waves, but the thing is that the return message would be sent by using other pair of small black holes.