One Halloween story about transformers

One Halloween story about transformers

There is a possibility that someday when the person will be born, the genomes of that baby would be stored in some storage, where it can take for making the RNA-virus, which would replace the damaged genomes. And that thing would make possible to live forever. But the retroviruses can allow that living creature would transform into another one.

The picture in this text is portraying the Roman God, Janus, who had two faces. Maybe the model of that thing has been some Siamese twin, but there are some other theories of that strange creature. That God had brought in the mind of the people the possibility, that somewhere could be creature, what can transform its form.

In many horror-movies is the creature, what seems innocent, and then suddenly it would transform into some kind of monster. Theoretically, this kind of creature could be possible, if there would be some kind of creature, what has the immune defense, what could transform things to another. The thing that immune defense must do in that case is to create the retrovirus, which would transform the cells to another.

And in some hypothesis is mentioned thein, what theorists call as the "Juliett-virus". The idea is that the hypothetical immune defense would create the virus, which has a simple structure. The immune defense would destroy those viruses right away, and then the creature would be stable. The stress or some other physiological reaction would cause the number of viruses in the blood system will rise, and that causes the transformation of some cells.

When the stress level will decreases the creation of the viruses will decrease, and the mutated cells will be destroyed. That kind of thing could transform the creature possible. When we are thinking about the creature that could fix its cells after the very large injury that hypothetical "Juliett-virus" would infect bacteria, and transform them into cells, what can fix that injury. This thing makes possible that the creature can even wake itself up from death.

But if we think that that kind of hypothetical creature from the ability to live forever those creatures could not live forever. The eldering process would not stop in that way. The thing, what we must do, if we want to live forever is the destruction or damaging of the DNA. When the radioactive and chemical stress would damage the DNA, sooner or later missing parts of that molecule causes cancer or simply the malfunction in the cells.

The idea is similar to computer programs. If the code would not load from the Internet perfectly, that causes malfunctions in the programs. The DNA molecule is the chemical version of the computer program. The nucleoids of that molecule are making the things that every single living organism, which has the DNA-based genomes.

The form of the DNA molecule is like a spiral staircase, and the nucleoids of that molecule can touch that the certain base pair would be cut in the middle, and then another side of the DNA can touch to that molecule in the same way. The DNA-molecule that has only one side is called the RNA-molecule, which would be copying the genomes from the cell to another.

And there is one thing, what we can do with this thing. We could transform the entire human DNA into one giant RNA molecule, and that thing allows the transfer of the different genomes to another cell. This might make possible to clone people or replace the damaged DNA with the new one. That would happen that in the birth the DNA of the person would be stored, and then that genome would be used for creating the retrovirus, which would transform the wealthy genomes to the body of the person, as I have written before.

Image:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janus#/media/File:Janus1.JPG

Two interesting pictures and the Battle of New Orleans

Image I

Two interesting pictures and the Battle of New Orleans

Yesterday was Halloween and the spirits were walking in the middle of people. So this kind of thing might cause the effect, that everything seems weird, and if people are believing supernatural, they might see things, what they are not seen before, and one thing is that coincidences get new involving. The painting in this text is the painting, which was painted by Jean-Hyacinthe de Lacrotte, and the photograph what is taken in Southern Finland in the dark time shows that street lights have taken the same form, what the stars have taken in the painting, what Jean-Hyacinthe de Lacrotte has been painted, and that kind of thing is really interesting coincidence. 

The name of the painter is interesting, and the second name of that man means Hyacinth, the flower, what people are taking to the graves at Christmas. So are those forms only coincidence, or are they made in purpose? That kind of thing is interesting things to think while being out in the dark. But I believe that those lights are in that certain form only because of an accident. But coincidences are interesting, and they make life easier and more interesting to live. 

And if those lights have put on that form in purpose, that means that there must be some reason for that. So what is the legend of the Battle of New Orleans? History tells that the general Andrew "Old Hickory" Jackson was the commander of the US troops in that battle in 1815. But was he the real commander? The thing is that in those days the truth was very hard to find out, and there is a possibility, that somebody has miswritten history in purpose. But that kind of thing is meanless in modern times. 

There are also stories that Andrew Jackson got the British plans from some very high-ranking officers, who wanted to lose those men, who came to New Orleans in 1815 with the Major-General Pakenham. That battle was the begin of the U.S militarism, and the big British losses have put people to think that the reason for those losses was some kind of paper, which was in the hands of Jackson. The wildest theory is that Jackson was a time traveler, who used history books in his work but don't take those things so seriously.  

The myth is that somebody saw that Jackson had strange papers with him, and there was the entire battle in that paper, but there is no proof for that thing. But this kind of thing is fascinating. And the thing that we might see on the Wikipedia page, what is linked below this text is that Packenham could continue his attack if he were not dead. Pakenham died in that battle, and that caused the British must change their plans. But somehow he has withdrawn after 350 dead and 1521 wounded and 552 missing or captured soldiers. Casualties of Jackson were 55 dead, 185 wounded and 93 missing soldiers (1). 

Here I must say, that we must trust someway the historical writings, which means that the mystery remains. The thing is that the official history-writing must sometimes be enough, and that means that Andrew Jackson is the winner of the battle, but otherwise, we must say, that without that battle there would be very different USA, than what we see in the modern days. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_New_Orleans

Image I

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Battle_of_New_Orleans,_Jean_Hyacinthe_de_Laclotte.jpg