Writing about "Haunebu II" and "Vril" hoax

Writing about "Haunebu II" and "Vril" hoax

"Haunebu" plan might be more conventional jet-powered craft than somebody thinks

I believe that "Haunebu" was the reality in the form of the images on the paper. But was the USAF made it real in some form after the war is a mystery? The USAF has been tested multiple extraordinary-looking vehicles after the Second World War, and maybe some of them were this mythic "Haunebu" but was it made by USAF independently or did they copy the drawings of some captured papers?

Was "Haunebu" real flying craft or was it only a couple of pieces of paper? The drawings that had the purpose in the hands of some Nazi leaders might be the source of the rumors of some extreme imaginational rumors about some kind of "extraordinary" power sources, and maybe that thing must guarantee the safety of some high-ranking Nazi officials. 

At first, I want to say, that "Haunebu II" is a good example, how the rumors of extraordinary flying vehicle plan get the wings. I believe that "Haunebu" was only an aerial vehicle, which was planned to use seven turbines or jet engines for flying. So there is possible that "Haunebu" was the partially real thing, but the "Vril" power was probably the thing, what was not real, and if this is true, the "Haunebu" was quite a conventional platform, what had more capacity than some ME-262, but the craft was extraordinary. 

That means that one jet engine was pointed straight down, and that thing controls the vertical movement, and the six other jet engines were in the radial position, and they would control the horizontal flying. This thing would be possible to create in the 1940s, and there is a possibility that all "Haunebu" plans were just hoax, what was made under the control of SS-E-IV and the mission was to sell the Nazi scientists to the USA.  

So was "Haunebu" real or not?

The thing is that there might be plans to create the flying cannon platform, which might have the extraordinary ability to move. The jet- or rocket engined model was probably under the construction in the papers but was there the real flying model or not is the real question in this case. When we are thinking about the "Haunebu" from history, we must realize that at the end of the Second World War German scientists created many revolutionary aircraft concepts. 

There were people, who wanted to deny the Soviets to get those people in their hands. So the thing is that the Research and development of the very extraordinary aerial vehicles continued after the Second World War, and that thing means that there might be many things, that were hidden from the public audience because of political reasons. 

Was "Vril" some early version of the wireless electric loading system? 

Maybe "Vril" was some kind of codeword for some very interesting power sources. There is one really interesting idea, what "Vril" might mean. That thing is the wireless maser or high-power radio wave system, which will load the electricity to the "Haunebu". In this case, the idea of the system was to use water-powered jet- or rocket engines for flying. That system is called an electric rocket engine. In that model, the electric arc would be used for creating the pressure in the combustion chamber. 

There is an interesting idea that the saucer-shaped aerial vehicle would be equipped with the rotating platform, where is two combustion chambers. When the saucer would turn, the combustion chambers would be in the same direction, and in that dish would be burned the electric arc. That thing allows the saucer-shaped craft also sloping to the different positions and the direction of the exhaust tube would be always in the right direction. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_UFOs

Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

Could The Bethlehem's star be an eruption of Sirius B or Van Maanen's star?

The answer to the question of Bethlehem's star could be an eruption of the surface of Van Maanen's star or Sirius B. 

Could Van Maanen's (1) star (Van Maanen 2) or Sirius B (2)the Bethlehem's star? Van Maanen's star is too cold for being that star, but could that thing be the Sirius B. The age of Sirius B is about 228 million years, but there is the possibility that some kind of eruption on the surface of Sirius B has caused the effect, what we are known as Bethlehem's star. 

The star itself can be old, but sometimes the white dwarfs and neutron stars are impacting with bigger particles or a large mass of gas or dust will be dropped to the surface of the star, and that causes a very big explosion. So this kind of eruption that happens at close star would cause an effect that the new star has been born to skies. 

The most common explanation for that thing is the supernova or nova (3) eruption or explosion, which exploded somewhere in our Galaxy. And that thing is one of the most interesting theories in the world. Some scientists have believed, that the Bethlehem's star is the Van Maanen's star, what is at the distance of the 14,5 light-years from Earth, and that thing would explain the mystery of the Bethlehem's star. 

Van Maanen's star has ever been the supernova, but the nova-eruption, what has been happened so close would be very bright, and that thing would be seen in the darkest night. The key question in this theory is that the age of that white dwarf is too old being Bethlehem's star. But sometimes even the lonely white dwarfs are erupting, when the bigger particles are impacting them, and could the Bethlehem's star be the eruption on the surface of Van Maanen's star?

But the problem is that Van Maanen's star or Van Maanen 2 is too hot being the Bethlehem's star. And that means there could be another white dwarf near Earth, but nobody has been found. Sometimes also Sirius B is claimed to be that nova. 

The distance to that star is 8,611 light-years, which means that also smaller changes to the brightness of that star are easy to recognize. And the surface temperature of Sirius B is very hot, but the reason for that is the material from Sirius A is dropping to Sirius B, and that determines the age of that star difficult by using the surface temperature. But this is only theory. And the answer for the mythical Bethlehem's star could be the eruption on the surface of Sirius B. 

Could the Bethlehem's star be some kind of propaganda tale?

One explanation for the Bethlehem's star would be that it is only the propaganda tale. In that theory, some leaders of the Jewish community or Romans created this tale for making the chosen one brave. The story would be told that God was protecting that child, who will be the king of Jews. 

The purpose of those tales, what are told to noble children's purpose was to prove, that the God or higher spirits were protecting that person, that the royal mission was to complete. And if Jesus was the descendant of the King of Israel, that meant that the royal mission was to get Romans out from that place. 

When we are thinking about the hypothetical descendant of Jesus, we must remember, that the rule of the kings was, that they must protect their families for making the heir for themselves. That means that the holy bloodline would have existed. But this thing is only theory, and the book Da Vinci-code has been made it well-known. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Maanen_2

(2)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius

(3)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11080216

Image:

https://cdn.eso.org/images/thumb700x/eso1605a.jpg

One writing about political commercials

One writing about political commercials

Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?

But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.

Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.

Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.

Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.

But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.

We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.

And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.

More about memes and peripheral information

More about memes and peripheral information

In the world of politics and far-right movements is very important being quiet and listen to things. The thing is that everybody has the right to say their opinions if the opinions are same, what the leaders of the gang want. This is one way to think about political freedoms. The thing is that silence is the best supporter of the far wing movements.

And those movements are very good targets for populistic politicians for giving promises. The thing in those movements is that they are using fear to handle people. When we are looking like things like skinheads, they sometimes play that they have really good connections and organizations behind them. Also, they are using pressure, that the two persons, who are recognized as skinheads are sitting in a car in front of the home of the reporters and the tactics are that they would want that reporter calls police. Then they are saying that the car is in public place and they have the right to be in there.

There is another way to think about memes, the thing is those memes are also used to show TV series, what should not watch, or things, what should not do on the Internet. And of course, the strength in the far-right movements is very strong.  The memes are also connected with things like the humor of the far-wing movements, where is also stories about shooting the pictures of the political leaders.

When we are looking at this kind of news, we must realize that somehow that kind of news is sharing information that authorities are accepting that kind of actions. And of course, those people are highlighting the relationships with military forces. The reason why military forces are so popular in the media is that the equipment of those authorities is showing very stunning images.

The assault rifles and camouflage suits are very stunning and in some cases, the far-wing nationalists have used image manipulation for involving their members in the images of the military forces. The idea of those clothes, what those people are wearing is to make them look like some kind of soldiers, and the pilot jackets and other things are giving the tough images for those gangs.

Also, some skinheads are wearing two jackets one on the other, that they would seem to be bigger. Sometimes bandits or bank robberies are using the same method for hiding their identities. The idea is taken from some military forces, where the trainers use bulletproof vests for looking like bigger and scarier.

Those kinds of stories are full of so-called peripheral information, what is accidental or put there on purpose. There is always seen that the people, who are members of that kind of movements are owning guns and that's why they should afraid. And when we are looking at the stickers, what has introduced the work of far-wing movements, they are full of musclemen, who are in some kind of kickboxing team. Those things are common in the world of radicalism.

Problems with memes are that they are passing the defense of the neurons

Problems with memes are that they are passing the defense of the neurons

Memes or faked joke images are manipulating our brains, and the problem is that the image is not just an image. Every image or picture is involving peripheral information, which has a very big effect on human brains. In the link below the text is news about memes, where are a couple of images, what is meant for mocking something. Or actually, two upper photos are meant for that, but those images have also peripheral information, what might not seem very well. In that photo is the image manipulation of the Finnish political leaders.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10941826

Massage of this photo could be that "you could also be Amish".  The thing is that in the upper photo is the Amish- or some old-fashion and religious persons, who are looking at very happy. There is a message that if people are members of that kind of community, that would make them wealthy, glad and of course very happy. And that kind of things is dangerous. Many people believe that there is no mean, do people believe in evolution or are they living in some religious community. But then we must realize that those people, who are not believing in evolution are nice targets for far wing politicians.

As we have seen non-educated people are very good targets for agitators, and that thing is the consequence of the ending schools before graduation. If a person has no education, that means that those people are very good targets for agitators, and if somebody says that there is no evolution, that would cause cheat. Or religious people would take their children off the school, because they are learning things, what they are not accepted. That thing causes isolation, and using those societies for getting votes is a good way to get a place in parliament.

The peripheral message of the second image is that Trump is like above everything. And the facial exposure is telling that this man is a skeptic and analyzes information very carefully. The third photo is the photo of long term president of Finland, Urho Kekkonen, who is portrayed as the symbol of the strong leader, and because that man was bald, that image is suitable for some skinhead propaganda. This thing brings connection in the mind that the real man shows for supporting the wise and strong political leadership by cutting hair off.

And then the quote, what you can find from a dictionary if you are not speaking Finnish is meant that the strong leaders have a strong and simple way to act, and if the government doesn't please that means kicking off. In the last image is the image of the painting, where is the fallen soldier, and there might be seen the hidden message, that Finnish soldiers are left alone, and that could be a message for independent defense. This is the thing in memes. They are meant to be fun, but those things are always containing the information, what might be propagandist.

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10941826

Social media and the changing role of journalists

Social media and the changing role of journalists

In the point of view of journalists, social media has made their work easier, but otherwise, it has been removed the glory from the reporter's work. In old good times, reporters must move themselves to the place, where something has happened, and wait for the press conference. And after that, they spent their night at the hotel.

This is the thing, what made the work of the reporter so interesting. Today the reporter must just open Twitter, and then that person sees, what some leaders have to tell people, and this is the thing, what makes journalism of today different. Also, normal people can see themselves, what some president has to say, and this is bad for newspapers.

The thing is that in the past the journalists were filtered the information, what was sent to people, and the thing is that the news agencies like Reuters and Tass were in the key role of the business of information sharing. If some journalist made people in the news agencies angry, that could mean that there were no call to press conferences. And this was an excuse for the censorship.

The thing was that both sides must be heard in every case, and if something made somebody angry, that meant that the neutrality of the information was disturbing. Modern social media has brought in front of the people another reality, and that is that many people read things, what they want to read. This is a selective way to use sources. We all make this thing and leave the things, what are supporting our own interest or opinion without notice. But when we are looking at people like journalists, we must remember that they are humans too.

Some propagandists are not governmental 

There is no way to be the absolute neutral while we are writing something or handling data. If we would have political or some other attitudes for some case, we would automatically see things, as we want to see them. And this is the thing, what we must realize. If we are thinking about the political attitudes of the reporters, we must realize, that they also have political and cultural emotions. This means that also so-called professional journalists would have written stories, what is more, or less against the things, what really happened.

Here I must say that the press is a good tool for lobbying things. When we are thinking about the cases, where some reporter has faced the attempts to influence the things, what that inmate has been written, we can remember the cases, where the MC-clubs like Hell's Angels have offered the meal for the reporters, that they would give nicely image to those persons, who are driving with motorbikes with the logo of the club on the back of the vests. That kind of things was really good advertisements for those clubs, and the reporters have faced many times another kind of attempts to influence the information, what they are sharing.

One version is the expensive car, what some "firms" are offered the reporter for the working tool. The car has always been marked that it has been used some director, and the kilometers would be marked after the use. Another version is the free parking permission in the expensive parking houses. Or sometimes some actors of the cases has been offered a good five-star hotel for free, which means that the hotel room has been paid by some company, what is asking some permissions, and sometimes the texts, what the journalists have published have come straight from the public affairs section of the company. In those cases, the reporters have been highlighted the benefits of some action.

And of course, in the war, the propaganda is the very usual tool. When we are thinking about propaganda, one mark of it is that the things, what are published are supporting another side, and another side has only bad things. This is one very good point of view of the information.

Let's think one thing. We are the journalists who are operating in the middle of the crisis. And then the government official brings us to the place, where have been happened the war crime. Then that person would give the governmental and official information about that thing, what might be something like killing children. Would we dare to write anything else to our boss, if we are surrounded by the local militia, what is telling the stories about the war crimes?

And what if that information would be given in the press conference, and the information officer would say, that he has taken us to the place, what is not true. But the men with assault rifles in that room would be real. Then we would write something, and the government official wants to check that information, what we are sending. Then we would go to our motherland, and tell that story to our boss or editor, who tells that the sell of the newspaper has risen.

Disinformation is not a new thing. 

Would that person write to the newspaper, that the situation, where the information was given, was somehow different than the reporter claims? Or would the reporter dare to tell the editor that thing? This is a very good point when we are analyzing the disinformation, and another name of the disinformation is propaganda. When we are looking at the information, what is shared in the press conferences, we must remember that the information, what is shared must be accepted by the keepers of the conference.

And especially in the case of the crisis, the press conferences share only the information, what is serving another side. And that's why we should take the purpose of all of the so-called press conferences more or less propagandist. We should know that all shared data of those press conferences are "cleaned". That means that they share only information, which supports their own benefit.

When we are thinking about social media, we are facing the situation, that the shared data is very one-sided. And the thing what makes this data more one-sided than before is that we are choosing people, who have similar opinions with us to our social media network. This makes social media really good tool for propaganda and other ways there is a massive number of non-relevant information, what means information, what has nothing to do with the thing, what we are looking for. And this is the reason, why we must have to use critics when we are looking for information from the Internet.

The movies and their influence on society

The movies and their influence on society

Sometimes people have claimed, that movies would not have an influence on society, but in fact, there is one problem of those things. If somebody wants to make pure propaganda, would that person use the film as the document, and that makes the film a very dangerous tool. In this text, I will write about movies, where is not used the flash photographs or subliminal messages, what would make the propaganda more effective and influential than the normal movie, what can use as the tool of propaganda.

The thing is that this kind of propaganda is hard to resist if it would introduce as the documentary and authentic information. In history is a very good example, when the media or radio broadcast have almost caused the nuclear war. The radio drama "The war of the worlds" what was piloted by the Orson Welles caused almost the national emergency when people thought that the USA was under the attack, and called to the police and Pentagon because they were listening to that broadcast.

The influence of the movies, what is pure fiction to the collective societies has not actually any researches, but the thing is that if in the movies some part of people is always demonized, and they are introducing as the "bad people", will that cause hate. The movies have great influence on the way of think of individuals if the people are watching violent movies at a very young age and if the adults will say, that the violence, what those people see in movies is tolerated.

And as the Joseph Goebbels, the minister of propaganda of the Nazi-Germany said, when the lie is simultaneously repeating people are starting to believe it. This is the problem with the movies. Even if we know that they are pure fiction, they have an influence on the way of think of the people. If we think about the influence of the films to the individual people, we must realize that those things like violent movies teach the way of think to the people, who are watching those movies.

The problem with movies is that they can use to demonize the other people, and if the adults allow looking at the violence, and teach the children that the violence, what those youngsters see is right, would that cause very bad situations and in the worst case the result would be some kind of mass shooting. And if the movies are using in the wrong purpose, like teaching that violence is the solution for young people would the results be horrifying. So that's why the movie makers must feel their responsibility when they are making their product for entertainment purposes.