What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

What was the real reason for the Iraqi war?

One of the reasons for the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein didn't predict that some people would make suicide attack against the World Trade Center. But that thing was only the last thing of the series of actions, what caused the allied invasion to Iraq, or at least gave the reason for the attack.

Many times I have written that there were many, so-called real reasons for that war. One of those reasons was that Saddam Hussein openly opposed the resolution of the United Nations Security Council, what was under the scrip by all members of the Security Council, what has the veto right. And that was a very bad thing for the authority of the United Nations and so-called superpowers. Also, the acts of formed Yugoslavia military forces in the Yugoslavian war forced the United Nations to authorize the military actions against Iraqi.

But there were also many other reasons, and one was that the United States wanted to demonstrate the effects of its weapons and that means that the international weapons trade was the major reason why allied forces attacked Iraq. The thing is that if we are thinking about what was the so-called real reasons for that operations, we must say that the war was the quantum of solace. When Saddam Hussein simultaneously broke the orders, what came from the United Nations, and then the political atmosphere in the United States turned to support the military actions because of the 9/11 attacks.

The thing that Saddam Hussein gave support for Osama Bin Laden along with the actions, what that man ordered before those suicide attacks against the World Trade Center and Pentagon justified the USA offensive military action against Iraqi. The thing was that Saddam Hussein miscalculated the U.S government and the nations will of attack against Iraq caused the attack. The thing is that maybe Saddam didn't know what were the plans of the Al Qaida, and he believed that the Al Qaida was followed the orders of the Taliban and mullah Muammar Omar.

And if Saddam Hussein discussed only with Omar, that attack to the USA would come as surprise. The demonstrations, where people show support for those terrorists caused hate and then the political atmosphere turned for supporting the attack against Saddam Hussein, and because the money for the war would get back from Iraq by the contracts of rebuilding and benefiting the oil of that country, the political support for the offensive military action for Iraq were guaranteed.

Because of the anti-militaristic movement of the USA Saddam Hussein thought, that he could deny the United Nations inspections to the chemical plants and nuclear laboratories. And then the world would forget that Iraq attacked against Kuwait about ten years before the second Iraqi war. Saddam Hussein thought that being silent, and playing some games, the flight prohibition zones in the Iraqi airspace have not stayed longer, and then that man wanted to take his revenge.

Or this is how normal people believe that the road went to the second conflict. But the thing is that the problem in that area is that it has been a very good zone for introducing military equipment, and also the money feels good in the pockets of Russia, what also wants to sell weapons to that area. And also if the Russian missiles and aircraft would be effective, the success against Western aircraft and other equipment would be good marketing for those products.

And also otherwise Western military manufacturers want to sell their products for the nations, who are attacked by the Russian equipment. The problem is that even the weapon selling to the countries, what are at war, the thing is that those orders are simultaneously broken, and if the orders are not followed by some military exporters, they have not to effect at all. The thing is that the Middle East is the area, where military manufacturers can test their newest and deadliest technology against real targets. That thing is causing the civilian casualties, but the truth is that in countries like Jemen, the actors are Arabs, and that makes difficult to justify somebody.

The weapons that are used are American made, but the users were Arabs and that thing causes many problems in the justification. The Russian military has used very strong firepower in Syria, and that thing is a little bit embarrassing for many people, who normally blame the USA because of the actors in the conflicts are other countries. And that makes impossible to justify the USA alone, even if the weapons that are used were made in the USA, the thing is that the enemies are justified as terrorists.

This thing is really bad, and embarrassing also for the coalition and weapon sellers, what are looking at the civilian victims from the TV. And the thing is that many Arab nations like Saudi-Arabia use mercenary soldiers for flying their aircraft, which is effective, but the thing who gives orders to those pilots is hidden from the public audience.

Empathy is an ultimate tool in working life.

Empathy is an ultimate tool in working life.

When we are talking about empathy, we are thinking that kind of things doesn't belong in the working life. Sometimes people say, that empathic leader is weak, but when we are thinking that case in another way, the mission of the empathy is to make harder to resist the boss. When the henchmen think that boss is a nice guy, they are talking things freely, and that kind of things would uncover many things, what can be solved by the team leader very effectively.

And that is the thing, what makes the work of the team leader very difficult. That person must get real information about the works in the team, and if there is somebody, who doesn't do the jobs as they should that kind of information must go to the ears of the boss. The thing is that being kind and polite, would that kind of behavior would make harder to say something against the boss.

Even in the situations, where the henchman is kicked off, there would be nice to ask, does that person know the reason, why the career in that company is ended? Or does that person even understand, how terrible was something was? And also the reason why somebody always speaking bad things about some workmates should be asked, and even if the other person would do a bad job, the reason should be asked, why that worker didn't come straight to the bosses office, that the separation process can be done immediately. 

Empathy or ability to see, what other persons feel is an effective and powerful social tool in life. When we are thinking about the ability to listen, what other people are talking or listen to the words, what they use while arguing that thing would uncover the things, why somebody acts like that. Empathy is not a thing, where every kind of behavior is tolerated. This is one of the greatest misunderstandings about that thing.

When we are in a superior position, and somebody is starting to blame us something, what everybody else has been done before, and that thing seems like a revolt, we can act two ways. One is to order that person to go home immediately. And this is what that kind of person is sometimes wanted to do. When that person goes home, the story what this inmate tells is that the thing is a small case and the boss overreacts.

Or the other thing what the boss can do is listen, what that person says, and then say that every person or new persons in the company has done those things before, and then ask the reason, why the job is not suitable for the henchman. If the person is some kind of popular actor in the team, every person of the team would be asked, what are they done that thing, when they started. 

And the third thing, what we can ask if the person is always late is the reason, why the thing is not suitable for this worker? In this case, the person would always be late in those meetings, and then the boss would start meeting without that person, and then ask the reason, why that meeting was not part of that worker's working day?

That is the thing, what that person would want to tell in the bosses workroom privately, that there is not so much audience around the boss and the henchman.  Maybe that worker has always something to say about the way to act in the firm, and maybe the boss would ask a couple of pages long report, what n the firm should people do better or by another way.

And the thing is that the order can be given that everybody would hear that. Maybe other members of the team might get that report, and maybe there would be many suggestions because that person seems to have so many critics about the actions, what the firm has made wrong.

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

What might be the reason for the silly claiming?

When somebody pretends that some other person is something, what that inmate is not, the motive can be innocent, like just making other people laugh. But there might be other motives like remove some other inmate from the route to some legacy. There is much psychological research about what kind of scenarios, where the role model would cause harm in the mind of a human being.

And some of those research are pointed truth the thing, that if the child would be grown in the environment, where the fantasies are created by using violent films. If the fantasies are supported that the adults claim that the way of the act in the violent movies is justified and accepted, that thing can cause violent behavior in adult ages.

If violent movies are watched when the child would not have experiences from real life, those things will make the base of the experiences. And that kind of things might support the developing of the violent behavior model in the personality of the children. If adults claim that the child is some kind of prince or something that would thing cause problems in the elder ages.

Some of those things are very harmful to children, who cannot use critics against the authority of the adults, and if adults are claiming something to  That kind of things might be very effective tools in the hands of criminals, who might want the legacy of some billionaire family, and one of the most effective ways to make that thing, is simply make the real heir maniac in the eyes of the law. But the motive can be simple embarrass some person just for fun or getting the spouse of that person, who could get a bad reputation or sending to a mental hospital because of those jokes.

Could the roleplay be the tool for those jokes?

The reason why somebody claims being a time traveler would be very natural, and the simplest thing is just the role-play, where some character is a time traveler. I don't know, how many people actually play role-games, but there might be some versions, where those people are playing some game on the street, and then they are telling a thing, what belongs in their roles to the wrong person. And maybe that might make those people look a little bit different than others.

There could be a reason for that thing, and maybe somebody advised the wrong person to those competitors or players. And that kind of things might cause a laugh, but they are a little bit embarrassing thing if you self would face that kind of joke. Have you ever imagine how many of those role players are facing things, what are meant for a joke, but the result is that the person, who faces that kind of jokes, might be disturbing for that kind of things.

There might be some other kind of joke or misunderstanding in the childhood

When we are thinking about the situation, that some adults or elder persons of the family are claiming that the youngest member of the family is some kind of time traveler, that thing would cause that person believes in that thing. That kind of things might look unbelievable in the eyes of the other people, but if there are some individuals, who are telling that kind of things to the little children, and if those people seem like adults.

That thing might cause the children to really believe in that thing. Also, here might be used some kind of virtual reality glasses for supporting that kind of actions,  what is meant for some sick joke. Or the purpose of that thing might be that the victim of the joke would really be wanted to send to some mental hospital. For the motive of that kind of things might also be an attempt to get the legacy what would otherwise testament to the victim, but because of those mad talking that person would send to mental hospitals.