What do you think, should the researchers read texts, what are supporting their own opinions or texts, what is introducing the opponent opinion?

What do you think, should the researchers read texts, what are supporting their own opinions or texts, what is introducing the opponent opinion?

To be or not to be that's the question, what we might ask again and again. And the result is that we can think this question about comfortable texts, that researcher is working, while this inmate reads some texts and looks the videos for finding sources for their own texts. That means that if we are using that point of view in our work, we might face another thing, and that is the texts, what the researcher makes are not always please those professionals.

But the purpose of that kind of action is that the researcher would find out the reason, why somebody is against their opinion. That little bit uncomfortable way to act is also uncovering the agenda of the opposite side. If the agenda is that they simply don't like the researcher's personality, that thing might be not a very scientific way to knock out the results, what researchers have found out.

There are many actors in the field of justice and in the rule of government, who are telling people, that they are willing to make compromises and discuss things. But at the same time, those actors would put the conditions, what other people are not willing or they cannot accept. Sometimes in those cases, those actors are willing to discuss things only if they are above the opposite side.

There are two versions to put the scientific results in the garbage, and the first one is to make a very popular blog or something like that and then simply level those results by claiming that the researcher is a joker when everybody laughs. And the other way is to get the better results of the investigations by using more effective and more modern tools for getting that data.

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview, is a very important question. This question has one answer, and that is not "there is nothing, how to recognize psychopaths because they are so clever, and handsome people". In the first sight, the psychopath might seem like the normal person, and that person might feel really nice. But then the image would change when the interview continues. The thing, how the psychopath would answer the questions is the thing, what will uncover that nature. The answers, what psychopaths are giving are actually very clever, and they can give impressing  CV:s and examples of the work, what those people have been done.

But then the focus in those works is actually, that the person would "only" lead the teams, and they would ever make anything self. And the attitude in the speech of the psychopaths is making the profit in the company is enough, and there is no matter about the way how the money is made. When we are thinking the nature of the psychopaths they have not social conscience and the thing in the social situations is that the psychopath would always be in the side of the power.

That person opinion is that teasing in the workplace is tolerated if the boss allows mental violence against the weaker person. And the very good signal about psychopathy is that the opinion of that person changes every time when the boss or majority of the team would allow cheating and teasing. The main character of the personal behavior and social skills of a psychopath is that they are always want to be in the side of the power.

The way, how psychopath manipulates people is a very nice and impressive combination of the flattering and pointing the weaker people from the team. And one of the most influential way to manipulate people is to inform the bosses about the things, what is happening in the team. In those cases, the person would tell many things, what might be true at first sight, but while telling that thing the person would tell things by making that inmates own role in the successes larger than it really is.

That makes the situation more complicated than we can ever imagine. The thing in this kind of case is, that the person can really be a good worker, and that person can also be made mainly the project. The thing is that the psychopath would also play the victim in the cases of teasing, and try to involve the support groups of those people, who have been victims of that thing.

And the psychopaths can also be good actors, but in the cases, where people are talked about the bothering and another kind of things in the workplace or private life, that person, who has no social conscience would sometimes say, that the boss or workplace should punish the victim. The thing is not like that. The teasers must get the punishment, not the person, who is targeted to that action, what can break the mind of that person.

How to track people by using the knowledge of the operating system?

How to track people by using the knowledge of the operating system?

Tracking people is always not need hacking skills. Only the knowledge of the computer, what is used could the tracker get the knowledge, is the person at home. If that targeted person uses many computers, what is in the public offices or owned by some companies, the system can compile the serial numbers of computers and operating systems, and if there is one serial number, what belongs to other computers than the PC:s what are belonging to companies or public offices that serial number might be the home computer of the targeted person.

The thing, what uncovers that thing is the license, what is used when the operating system is installed to the computer. I don't know how easy id to get that data but in theory, the type of license of the operating system is quite easy to get. If there is one machine, what would not have an enterprise license in some group of computers that are used for the blog as an example, that computer might be private property.

One methodology of tracking people is often forgetting, and the thing is to use the information of used operating system or device to track person and find out is the targeted person at home. The idea is to compile the data, what operating system collect from the hardware to find out the place, where the targeted person is. The system compiles the data like the type of computer to the data, what the system would collect when the person logs in the blog etc.

If the system is fixed, like a tablet computer, the system can compile the information like IP address and serial number to the database, what is stored from the information of the customers. If the computer uses licenses, what is sold to the public organization, there could be found the place, where the computer is. And then the surveillance or security camera can take pictures of that place.  The thing what makes blogs or some Facebook accounts suspicious is that they are used only from public computers. That will tell that there is something to hide in those accounts.

The thing is that kind of accounts are normally closed, but then the thing is that the reason for using that kind of accounts must find out. And when we are thinking about the type of computer and how it changes during the day will tell that if the targeted person sits in the café or is that person at home. And the changing between mobile devices and table computer would seem in the length and number of errors in the text, and those changes would tell the position or condition of that person. If thing is that writing blog is sometimes prohibited in the workplace, and the thing is that sometimes the security team would follow the times when there would be written in the blog.

That's why is very good idea to use a timer, and if the text is written at home could the use of timer hide the identity of that writer. And of course, if we want to keep our identities safe, and hide the blog from own employer, the blogs and other things should keep only by using their own laptops, because they cannot track by micro support or some other authority would not allow noticing that some writer is precisely some certain person, because that would not tell straight to the surveillance team if the person is somewhere out of office. And in this text surveillance team could be official or private.

What innocent looking data can uncover?

Every type of data has meaning. Collection of data costs money, and that means all data, what is in the database has the purpose. Databases are not collecting for anything. The data what is imputed in those data storages have always a purpose.  If it is connected to other databases that data can help to track everything in the life of people. In fact, the changing in routines are meaning, that there will be a big change in the life of a targeted person.

And if that person would buy the one-way ticket to the far away from home, that might mean that the career in office would be ended, if that person would not transfer to the office of some embassy. Or if we are talking about the persons, who are making a career in businessman, we might replace the word embassy the word remote office.

And that means there is no data, what has no mean. When we are thinking about the innocent information, that will give the professionals a very good tip about the purpose of some things and the things like why the admirals and generals moved far away from their service places when they retired but priests stay in the place, where they worked seems very innocent. That thing was mentioned in some lection, and that date is not actually so innocent than the persons probably thought it was.

The reason for the thing, why admirals and generals of the Russian empire moved to the south was that they were sometimes very hated men. And the moving far away from the service place would protect that officer from the hate of the ex-henchmen and the victims of the political arresting if that admiral or general worked also for the secret police. That thing was the duty of those persons, and if the work as the member of the Okhrana was offered, those officers must take it.

It was the door to higher rank officer post. And if the officer refused the punishment was execution. The reason for that command was that the higher rank officers had many secrets and the role as the police or in this case, the Gendarmarie officer made the wall between that officer and other persons. That command made this officer very unpopular, and that means that the emperor has the grip for the person, whose role in the society was to serve as the henchman of the emperor, and the life of officer was in the hand of the emperor.

The reason for the arresting of the officer must be clear if the emperor wants to promote that officer in the rank of general or admiral. If the officer wanted to rebel, there must be the thing, what was told to the secret police, and that thing was sometimes murder. Of course, the emperor has ordered that thing himself, but the role of the scapegoat was suitable for the henchman, and that thing guaranteed the popularity of the ruler of the country. It was easy to claim that some admiral or general have been worked alone without permission of the Emperor or higher commanders.

The emperor had always the thing, how to control those officers. And that thing was sometimes the arresting and torture of the member of the family. But when we are thinking about this thing in the point of view of the modern way to handle data, we are facing the thing, that if the general or admiral would ever come back, there was something, what kept that person away from home.

In modern life, we must realize that the directors, who are making uncomfortable decisions are coming from far away. In business life, this model has been taken from the Russian empire. In that country, the police or gendarmerie officers came far away, that their identities have been stay in secrecy. Modern computer technology makes possible to find out, where those persons come from by making analyzes, what they are writing in the social media.

The thing that some person would move in the old age to another side of Russia or even to a foreign land would tell that the person was actually working as the Gendarmerie official. Or in business life that can tell that person was some renovator, who kicked off a couple of thousands of people when the production transferred to the far east. Maybe some of those workers wanted to keep their jobs, and separation papers would cause hate in the mind of the person.

The ability to connect databases together makes possible to track the mistakes in the text by using the knowledge of the ethnic background of the users of social media.  Every ethnic group has their language, and that means we are all making some typical errors while we are writing something, because of the cultural and linguistic background. And those errors can uncover the ethnic background of the person.