Skip to main content

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview?

How to recognize the psychopath in the interview, is a very important question. This question has one answer, and that is not "there is nothing, how to recognize psychopaths because they are so clever, and handsome people". In the first sight, the psychopath might seem like the normal person, and that person might feel really nice. But then the image would change when the interview continues. The thing, how the psychopath would answer the questions is the thing, what will uncover that nature. The answers, what psychopaths are giving are actually very clever, and they can give impressing  CV:s and examples of the work, what those people have been done.

But then the focus in those works is actually, that the person would "only" lead the teams, and they would ever make anything self. And the attitude in the speech of the psychopaths is making the profit in the company is enough, and there is no matter about the way how the money is made. When we are thinking the nature of the psychopaths they have not social conscience and the thing in the social situations is that the psychopath would always be in the side of the power.

That person opinion is that teasing in the workplace is tolerated if the boss allows mental violence against the weaker person. And the very good signal about psychopathy is that the opinion of that person changes every time when the boss or majority of the team would allow cheating and teasing. The main character of the personal behavior and social skills of a psychopath is that they are always want to be in the side of the power.

The way, how psychopath manipulates people is a very nice and impressive combination of the flattering and pointing the weaker people from the team. And one of the most influential way to manipulate people is to inform the bosses about the things, what is happening in the team. In those cases, the person would tell many things, what might be true at first sight, but while telling that thing the person would tell things by making that inmates own role in the successes larger than it really is.

That makes the situation more complicated than we can ever imagine. The thing in this kind of case is, that the person can really be a good worker, and that person can also be made mainly the project. The thing is that the psychopath would also play the victim in the cases of teasing, and try to involve the support groups of those people, who have been victims of that thing.

And the psychopaths can also be good actors, but in the cases, where people are talked about the bothering and another kind of things in the workplace or private life, that person, who has no social conscience would sometimes say, that the boss or workplace should punish the victim. The thing is not like that. The teasers must get the punishment, not the person, who is targeted to that action, what can break the mind of that person.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When robots are laughing and crying.

When robots are laughing and crying.  Does the AI have feelings?  Does the AI have feelings? Or can it be emphatic? The fact is this program code that controls the AI determines if it can give empathic reactions. The problem with the human nervous system is that we don't make a difference in the writing of empathic letters or telling empathic stories human or AI. Our nervous system is not adapted to AI yet. And that's why we cannot separate text written by AI from text that made by humans.  What does somebody make with AI that can emulate feelings? The fact is that the cyborgs are useful tools for infiltration operations. The human-size robots can have WLAN/6G connections with the central computers. Or they can form a neural network that shares information between all group members. The robots can also act as walking neural network-based supercomputers. That can make complicated solutions.  In those networks, each member shares information and their data-handling capacity all o

Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization

    Earth 2.0 has been caused discussion about the possibility to find another civilization The Earth 2.0 or officially Kepler-452b is locating extreme log distance from Earth(1).    A new Earth-type planet has been found near the star, which is similar to our own Sun. The journey to that planet would take 1400 years, even if the spacecraft will reach the speed of the light. The planet has been found in the year 2008, but the confirmation of the existence of that planet has been taken time, but in 2015 the confirmation has been got, and Earth 2.0 has turned true.  The mass of that planet is 1,9 times Earth and the temperature is excellent if we are thinking about liquid water, but the journey to that planet will take so long, that we cannot ever go in there by using regular rockets and technology. The thing is that this kind of planets are the most interesting if we are looking for the lifeforms, which are similar to us, and the problem with that kind of things is that the communicatio

Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission

  Image I Tunguska meteorite and the natural nuclear fission 1) Tunguska UFO-theory  Tunguska meteorite is the mystery, that has been solved once, but then the case has been open again because Lake Cheko was not suitable for an impact crater. That lake has been introducing as an impact crater of the Tunguska meteorite. But the problem is that the shape of that lake is like a swimming pool. And that means it cannot form by a meteorite. So the mystery remains.  Meteorites can launch the natural nuclear fission if they hit the uranium ore, and transfer the impact energy to that ore. And is the thing that the famous "Tunguska" meteorite caused that kind of effect? There is also a theory that some "UFO" explode in that area, but the thing is that it is only theory, but interesting topics for some TV-series.  So I will begin this text by handling that theory, which is one of the incredible and outstanding theories in the world. Officially there is no physical evidence of