Crisis in the European Union (The influence of the climate changing)
The problem in the head of the state is that thing is made for giving a response to crises, and the thing in the crises is that they are giving the utility to the nations because under the threat of foreign enemy the nation must keep together. And the long term peace was the thing, what gave the people reason to start doubting and criticizing their own government.
And that's why somebody has been said sarcastically, that the war and crisis are the best things, what the dictator can hope. The enemy what is out of the border is a good reason to destroy democracy, and give the justification for the persecution of the opposition. The long-term peace causes always the situation, that the demands of the changes in the government, and also the things, what are made during the crisis are sometimes demanded to investigate.
In the European Union is one problem, there is no enemy out its borders, what would cause need to resist it by calling millions of people to arms. The traditional way to silence the opposition is all the men to the arms, and in the military forces is not tolerated to make politics. And that thing was a very effective way to make the reporters keep their mouth shut about the social faults. But when we are seeing things, which is very embarrassing and one is the warming of the atmosphere.
That kind of things has not a solution in guns and military forces. The strong leadership about the cases like growing sea level, polluting groundwater and releasing the basils from the sewer system in the lakes and areas, where people are getting their drinking water are really bad things. The groundwater would also be polluting because the sea water would rise to the groundwater areas. The climate changing is the problem what we must realize, and what touches every person on this planet.
If we think that Scandinavia is somewhere, where is not problems with climate warming, we might remember that the 1,5 meters rise in the sea level would have also influenced the Baltic sea, and also the low-level land areas in the Baltic States, Finland, Sweden, Danmark, and St. Petersburg region in Russia would face the really bad problem. And when we are thinking one of the most devastating targets for the terrorist attack, that target could be the polder-dam in the Netherlands. That kind of dams are planned also in some other places, and that means that those dams could be very interesting targets for terrorists.
But in real life, climate-changing would cause the refugee problem in Europe, and that thing is that if the simultaneous repeating storm would cause the living near the rivers like the Thames, Seine, Rhine, and Elbe is turning dangerous because of the tidal waves, the people, who live near those rivers might need to change their home to the another place. And the most populated cities are at the borders of those rivers. The tidal waves can be deadly, and in 1962 the great flood what had an effect everywhere in the North Sea region caused the death of 315 people in Hamburg, and the homes of 60 000 people were destroyed, when 5,7 meters wave rose in the Elbe river. And in Great Britain, 170 000 houses were damaged. That thing was probably one of the first warnings about the climate changing.
When we are thinking the situation, that the tidal waves are a very often repeating phenomenon, the people who live in Rotterdam, Hamburg, London, and Paris must move somewhere, there are no tidal waves. And this is the problem in the climate changing. It will cause a very big catastrophe also somewhere else than in the Maldives. And one of the most problematic things what would happen is connected the storms in the arctic areas. If the tidal wave what is about 6 meters tall would hit to Murmansk region, the radioactive material like radioactive sand and metal bites on the borders of that bay would be released to the Arctic Ocean, where it would come to our fish menu in the restaurants. And this is one of the worst nightmares, what we can imagine.
The problem in the head of the state is that thing is made for giving a response to crises, and the thing in the crises is that they are giving the utility to the nations because under the threat of foreign enemy the nation must keep together. And the long term peace was the thing, what gave the people reason to start doubting and criticizing their own government.
And that's why somebody has been said sarcastically, that the war and crisis are the best things, what the dictator can hope. The enemy what is out of the border is a good reason to destroy democracy, and give the justification for the persecution of the opposition. The long-term peace causes always the situation, that the demands of the changes in the government, and also the things, what are made during the crisis are sometimes demanded to investigate.
In the European Union is one problem, there is no enemy out its borders, what would cause need to resist it by calling millions of people to arms. The traditional way to silence the opposition is all the men to the arms, and in the military forces is not tolerated to make politics. And that thing was a very effective way to make the reporters keep their mouth shut about the social faults. But when we are seeing things, which is very embarrassing and one is the warming of the atmosphere.
That kind of things has not a solution in guns and military forces. The strong leadership about the cases like growing sea level, polluting groundwater and releasing the basils from the sewer system in the lakes and areas, where people are getting their drinking water are really bad things. The groundwater would also be polluting because the sea water would rise to the groundwater areas. The climate changing is the problem what we must realize, and what touches every person on this planet.
If we think that Scandinavia is somewhere, where is not problems with climate warming, we might remember that the 1,5 meters rise in the sea level would have also influenced the Baltic sea, and also the low-level land areas in the Baltic States, Finland, Sweden, Danmark, and St. Petersburg region in Russia would face the really bad problem. And when we are thinking one of the most devastating targets for the terrorist attack, that target could be the polder-dam in the Netherlands. That kind of dams are planned also in some other places, and that means that those dams could be very interesting targets for terrorists.
But in real life, climate-changing would cause the refugee problem in Europe, and that thing is that if the simultaneous repeating storm would cause the living near the rivers like the Thames, Seine, Rhine, and Elbe is turning dangerous because of the tidal waves, the people, who live near those rivers might need to change their home to the another place. And the most populated cities are at the borders of those rivers. The tidal waves can be deadly, and in 1962 the great flood what had an effect everywhere in the North Sea region caused the death of 315 people in Hamburg, and the homes of 60 000 people were destroyed, when 5,7 meters wave rose in the Elbe river. And in Great Britain, 170 000 houses were damaged. That thing was probably one of the first warnings about the climate changing.
When we are thinking the situation, that the tidal waves are a very often repeating phenomenon, the people who live in Rotterdam, Hamburg, London, and Paris must move somewhere, there are no tidal waves. And this is the problem in the climate changing. It will cause a very big catastrophe also somewhere else than in the Maldives. And one of the most problematic things what would happen is connected the storms in the arctic areas. If the tidal wave what is about 6 meters tall would hit to Murmansk region, the radioactive material like radioactive sand and metal bites on the borders of that bay would be released to the Arctic Ocean, where it would come to our fish menu in the restaurants. And this is one of the worst nightmares, what we can imagine.
Comments
Post a Comment