White House confirmed that the missiles dropped on Poland were Ukrainian air-defense missiles.

Ukrainian air defense shot missiles at Poland and that was an accident. Or that thing was not at least Ukrainians benefit. 

The White House confirms that Ukrainian air defense shot those missiles that hit the Polish ground killing two people. And the thing is that action must be an accident because that is against Ukrainian benefit. Or maybe Russians claim that the purpose of those actions was to cause the escalation of the conflict. That could cause a NATO strike against Russian troops in Ukraine. 

And that thing is of course a sad and tragic accident. Same way if Russia would shot those missiles that could also be an accident. But without the Russian invasion, Ukrainian air defense would not launch those missiles at all. And that thing makes that kind of thing very tragic. NATO must react in cases when somebody shoots missiles at its territory. 

And again was that shooting in Poland made on purpose? And who would make it? The strike itself doesn't serve Ukraine at all. The Ukrainian military needs Western support all the time. If Ukraine strikes against western nations that cause the stop military aid to Ukraine immediately. 

So when we are investigating crimes we should ask, whose benefit is the crime? If somebody made those shootings on purpose. Would the purpose of that action be the end of military aid to Ukraine? Maybe some members of organized crime want that Russia will win. Or there is a possibility that some people in Ukraine's military think that they are tired of war. 

The reason why Russians attack against energy infrastructure in Ukraine is to maximize the suffering of Ukrainians. And Russians hope that this will cause a collapse of morale. In all nations are people, who believe that the authoritarian dictatorship is the right way to lead states. 

Those people are always near us. There are people also in Ukraine, who served in KGB about 30 years ago. And some of those people were participants in political arrests and they worked for the KGB for a better position. Some of those people might feel very embarrassed if the KGB files of the will turn public. 

https://abc13.com/poland-russia-missile-russian/12458356/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-16/missiles-poland-ukarine-russia-invasion-nato-weapons/101659026

https://www.msn.com/fi-fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/nato-l%C3%A4hde-reutersille-joe-biden-vahvisti-ett%C3%A4-puolaan-osui-ukrainan-ilmatorjuntaohjus/ar-AA14as8S?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=48c36f7ae0b440eba9002f4e6a973dc1

https://www.reuters.com/world/poland-blast-caused-by-missile-fired-by-ukrainian-forces-incoming-russian-2022-11-16/

https://curiosityanddarkmatter.home.blog/2022/11/16/white-house-confirmed-that-the-missiles-dropped-on-poland-were-ukrainian-air-defense-missiles/

Who likes Hierarchy?

Who likes Hierarchy?

In everywhere inside our society is some kind of hierarchy, this is the thing, what we must confess. Every team has a leader, whose mission is to make a different kind of particles like people, who have different backgrounds working together. And the leader has a responsibility, that the team does the work, as well it can. If somebody has problems with that, this means discussion. Hierarchy means that the leader, or person who is acting as a leader has power and authority to the workers, and that thing is always one of the most difficult things in the world.

The position of the leader is to be the representer of the supreme leaders of the company, and if there is something wrong in the team, that thing causes divorcement. So leaders are giving orders and henchmen are following those orders. This is the way, as it works. But then we must remember, that if the team leader would not give orders, the fault for unsuccessful action is the leader. And that's why the team leader must not think to be a member of the team. The position of the leader is being outside of the team, and the role is like a coach in some ice-hockey match. And if the thing goes wrong the person, who is responsible for those things should be found.

So this is one version of hierarchy, but some people like to keep the hierarchical pyramids. In this model is three or four levels of leaders in the organization, and in this model, somebody would start to work as a middleman. This person just looks at the order from the Email and then resends that thing to henchmen. That kind of person ever does anything and they just resend the emails. And this is the thing, what we must remember when we are thinking hierarchy.

What is the person's position in hierarchy?

Another person would carry responsibility, and that actor would just say, that other people have given orders. They couldn't do anything in the cases, where chemicals are delivered to nature. There is always somebody else, who has responsibility with that kind of thing, and the email has been sent, that there corrosion in the tube. But that kind of person is always against reforms. Their benefit is that the traditional way to make things is continuing in their environment.

At last, I must say something about hierarchy in social life. When somebody wants to replace the working democratic system with hierarchy, you should ask, what is that person's position in this system? Here we must remember, that all life is not spent on the work. We have also free time, where we are facing another kind of thing.

Sometimes people are thinking that democracy is always the best thing because the vote cannot be sold or buy. But when we are thinking about sports clubs, what is acting as trusts, we must ask, "how many times the chairman of those trusts have been selected, because that person can get a sale from the gynḿansiums".  Think about this, when you are reading this kind of thing.

The thing about the eavesdropping what Amazon and Google are doing

The thing about the eavesdropping what Amazon and Google are doing

The thing in this kind of eavesdropping is that Google and the other kind of actors can get every information about the people, who are using its products. And why this is so difficult question is that data, what Google and other actors are collecting is very wanted and those companies have money. The information is collected even people know about that thing and sometimes is introduced an idea, that the people will shut down their mobile devices, but that thing is impossible. 

This is the reason, why people and politicians have problems with this kind of actors because if the politician would not please Google, that thing would cause a lack of funding. So be very nice with those companies, and the way as they are working is simple, they say that people have a choice to select the product, what Google makes, or some other product. That means that the user would turn the collector of the personal data to another actor in Internet marketing, and that's it.

Of course, a politician can cooperate with Google, or somehow the artificial intelligence or the page ranker of Google would not notice the homepages of that politician. When we are thinking about the offer to choose some other search engine, we don't actually know, how many search engines are owned by Google or how many of these alternative search engines are using the results, what they take from Google. 

Google will also offer more and more services like payment tool for mobile telephones, which means that the system will control more and more data about our private life. And the private life of the people is always going thinner. And because Google has ordering position in the search engines, that means that everybody, who would not please Google can be removed from the page ranks, and this guarantees that media will be really nice to that actor, or it can register the new domains.

The new type of stealth cargo plane can refuel and drop equipment and men behind the enemy lines.

The new type of stealth cargo plane can refuel and drop equipment and men behind the enemy lines. 

When we are thinking about the SST (Super Sonic Transportation) concepts, we are facing the sad thing. Most of those concepts have turned to military systems. The origin of the most supersonic bombers of the world has been in the SST programs.

But the thing is that also modern parachutist and other rapid reaction teams can get the benefit from the super fast transport vehicles. Here I'm talking about the transport plane, which uses stealth technology. This kind of advantage makes possible to operate deep inside the enemy airspace.

When we are thinking about those extremely high-flying aircraft, there is needed a new type of protective suits, what keeps the pressure on the body, but what is allowing also operate on the ground wearing those gears. Those new type of suits need the testing and that might be one reason why NASA has made test jump by using a parachute from over 30 km high. In the parachute jumps, what are made from that altitude is a couple of problems. The first of the problems is that the pressure of air is so low, that the liquids in the body are starting to boil.

That means that the jumper needs a pressure suit for surviving alive from this thing. The problem is that those suits would not allow a person to operate on the ground. The temperature in high-stratosphere is extremely low, and the suit must use active warming because without that thing the person would freeze to ice bite.

And one of the biggest problems, what must be solved is the wind-effect. The wind in the high stratosphere is the thing, what will move the jumper in a vertical way and sometimes this thing would cause that parachutist would land far away from the place, what was planned.

The purpose of this study is to determine the wind effect, or how the wind will take elected to the parachutist. When we are returning to the SST, the traditional version of the mission, where is needed the fast reaction is that the team goes in the C-130 or some Antonov if they are Russians and then flies to the airbase, where those operators move to operation. But the problem is that the C-130 is very slow.

And when we are thinking about the cases, where some intelligence services safe house is captured by terrorists or something like that, has been happening, the reaction team must move extremely high speed, and probably that movement must happen in hostile airspace.

Also, stealth attack planes need the refueling probably deep inside enemy airspace. Normally those missions are giving to MC-130 "Combat Talon"  type aircraft, but they are really slow, and the new type of equipment must get in use in this kind of area of the use of force.

The way to get support for own opinions

The way to get support for own opinions

One of the best ways to get support for the opinions is to write the book for supporting the thing, what might be actually pure opinion. The thing is that the book is a good way to show the "official way of view" of something, and of course, if I would be the leader of some society, I would give that book for every person to show, that they are supporting my opinion. The thing is very interesting in the cases of social media and written literature, which is printed on paper.

The paper print would make things more trustable than the thing, what we are writing on the Internet, but in fact, there are many writings, what are basically the opinions. The opinion is different than pure scientific writings, and in fact, when we are introducing some theories on the Internet, we are writing about opinions.  When we are thinking about the lifeforms, what might be totally different than we are, we are writing about a thing, what is coming straight from our imaginations.

Actually, there are many people who have written the instructions, how we should behave on the Internet, and the thing is that people have the right to show their opinions in some things, what might be far away from some other people opinions, or maybe the cosmological things and extraterrestrial life-forms are not some person's hobby. Maybe they want to follow some other things like advancing of the financial environment. Or maybe they just watch sports on the TV sets.

That kind of things is their own business. And maybe they are not interested in other people. Maybe they are interesting only things, which are funny. And I would also like to read positive news from the Internet. But the world is a tough place for living, and we are living in a turbulent environment, where the changes happen all the time. When we are talking about things, like living conditions of the mokes somewhere in Africa, we are facing the thing, that bad environment would hurt those animals in Africa as well as in Europe.

And maybe we are starting to think that we cannot hide the bad things anymore by transferring the food production to some other country, and say that our legislation is well done.  And then the social media will leak the pictures of reality in the faces of all people. Or it can share the manipulated truth. In that case, the persons would cheese the sick animals for their pictures, and then everything would seem worse, that it really is.

Another way is to make stories only about the farms, where the things are not all right, and then say that the situation is similar in all other farms. That is called the "selective use of sources". That means that the person takes only the samples or cases, what supports own interests and leave the rest out from the report. And that kind of thing can give the wrong information about the common situation in some area. So this is the thing, what we should remember when we are using the Internet. The information can be polarized, and that means that the homepages, what seems like trustable might actually maintain by some lobby. And this is the thing, what makes social media so complicated. Social media can rise things in front of the public eye what have kept silent but it also can give the wrong image of some cases.

The political game with numbers

The political game with numbers

The popularity of Vladimir Putin has been decreased, and maybe the dropping from the 80 to 64 percent would be caused that Putin has hard to explain the demonstrations all around Russia, and it seems better in public media if the number of supporters of the official president is 64 than some 80 percent of the people. This is the thing, what we must understand in the popularity records of the people. The thing is that the lower numbers of the supporters would be lower than 60% is more trustable than some support ratio, what will be near 100%. The trusting and giving the information, what seems trustable and real are the key element in the information operations, and the thing is that 51% of given votes is enough to keep the man in the rule of the nation.

If I will make faked information of the politician or some other person, I would use lower numbers than some 99%. The thing is that if the winner would win by numbers 52-48% that would seem very good in the public network. And the thing is that the person, who has got the support would win the game. That kind of result would give an image of the fair campaign, and the things like 80% support would seem that the race has been fair and the thing is that the "better man wins". In this case, the number of abandoned votes would not be very big.

And in fact, I sometimes think how many politicians have bought their election to parliament by the way, what uses minimum numbers for victory. In the modern days, the attempt to buy the "miscalculation" is quite difficult, because of the Internet, but before global information network would be a possibility to manipulate the numbers of the supporting votes. But there is no evidence that this kind of things has done in western election campaigns.