Constitutional state and populism

Constitutional state and populism

Populists say that independent justice system would not serve democracy, because judges are living far away from reality. Normally the argument for that is that judges make solutions, which is not in the line with common opinion. In many arguments, the judge is the government official, whose mission is to serve the state as well as the police organization. And sometimes I have heard opinions that when the prosecution has been raised against foreign people, those people just should kick off from the country because the legal proceedings are just a waste of money. 

That kind of argumentation is sometimes very effective for the "regular people", who have not have to see things, what they don't want to see. And this kind of thing the argument about the laws, what are criminalizing things like homosexuality and another kind of that, whom person self cannot effect. 

But do you know, why we have a court system? Its mission is to deny the police and government officials make crimes. If we would not have neutral trials, where also persecuted people have a chance to defend themselves, the officials would try to put their illegal acts to other people's fault. 

The thing in the populism is that it is a very good tool in the hands of the politicians. We must remember that the destruction of the Warsaw Pact caused the new kind of information technology, which allowed people to communicate with together without state control. 

And new popular politicians revolutionize democracy. But that advantage continues, and the problem in the ex-eastern block nations is that there has ever been a democracy. People are grown for respecting or rather saying obey the government, and they have ever been in the world, where the politician is the same kind of person as they are. 

They are not adjusted to the public decision-making process, and because of the rights like gathering are new, the politicians use that kind of thing for making their position stronger. When we are thinking about people's relationship with governments, we are seeing one very interesting thing, and that is that police is more confessing in the eyes of the people than some judge, who gives the convictions in the closed rooms. 

In the past, some people had an attitude, that when police arrested people, that person was convicted at the same moment. The model was taken from Mickey Mouse cartoon, where police take criminals to prison right away when they are put to the handcuffs. This is the problem with publicity. When the police would arrest people, the interest in the case ends. People thought that the person was convicted right away, and they were ever returned. 

This happened in countries like Finland, where the press was free, at least if we would compare the situation to the Eastern block. And in Eastern block the political arresting caused that people believe, that police ever made mistakes. In fact, in some criminal cases, the officials raised two prosecutions, another was about normal crime, and the second one was a political crime like agitation. And the person left to jail anyway, what made sure that police must ever confess that it makes mistakes. 

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Statua_Iustitiae.jpg/255px-Statua_Iustitiae.jpg

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11018346

Graphology and the psychoanalysis

Graphology and the psychoanalysis

We all have sometimes got the letters or paper bites from the mailbox, and those letters are written by the angry neighbor, who claimes that we have been noisy. But there is something strange in those letters. The thing is that, if our neighbor would be disturbed, why that person would not make contact with the police?

Why that neighbor would call the steward after days when that person claims to be disturbed? That person would know, that there is nothing, what the steward can do if there is no police report of that case. So why that person would write a message to the mailbox? Is there some information, what makes that inmate believe, that there is no need for police?

Is somebody claimed that the receiver of the note is somehow incompetent? And that thing might encourage that inmate act against the law. Or maybe that person thinks, that some rumor would justify everything that is made. This kind of things are reasons, why the nursery staff is bound to secrecy because that denies the possibilities of misunderstanding.

Normally threating messages are some tangles, which are drawn to the paper very fast. And those things are normally made by a person, who is drunk or angry. But the thing is that normal people would not act like that.  They don't drop papers to the mailbox, even if they are angry. 

The way, how people use language is uncovering their training, and especially, when the high-educated person uses language, what is full of misspelling, that thing would make some people suspicious, that everything is not, how people would like other inmates to see the thing.

If the person would get a threatening letter, the thing, what the investigator would search are things like how clear those writings are. Also, the selection of words and things like is the receiver mentioned are telling, is the writer dangerous, and if the person is dangerous, what kind of training that suspect has.

The thing is that highly educated people are writing some threats to the paper is very extraordinary. And in this kind of cases, that the threated letters are well-argued and it is used nice language makes the writer of those letters is dangerous.

If the texts seem written by the plan, that thing would be alerting. Written words are stronger than spoken words, and if the person would threat some inmate by using verbal violence, there is something wrong, and those kinds of threats should take under the discussions. But if the threats are written, those things are more serious.

The silent media

The silent media

There have been rumors that the people, who have been family members of the social media activists have been offered cheap trips to Russia and China, and that thing has been used to force the activists to keep their mouth shut. The social media is the thing, what has been uncovered the problems in western society, as well as the problems in the authoritarian nations.

The authoritarian leaders are always offering support to each other, and this thing is one of the saddest notifications from history. When the people who were resisting the dictatorship got the power, the new rulers have used the same methods, what their predecessors have been used. The reality is that the name of the leader and the faces in the photographs on the wall have been changed, but the way to use power has stayed similar, what the ruler, what have been lost in history had.

The name of the secret police changes, but methods are the same. And the worst thing, what the nation can face is the popular dictator. Even if the first dictator is a civilized person, sooner or later would the power would go to the hands of despots, as we have seen many times in history. Sooner or later the ruler would change to the tyrant, who has started the persecutions against people, who are talking against them.

The defects in society might be kept silent by the press because it is controlled by some authoritarian leaders. The censorship of the media is a very good tool to claim people that resistance is useless, and the "reasonable" people are flexing in the prevalent situation. If a person is not reasonable, the results would be very bad. This is the agenda, how the authoritarian leaders are operating in the media. They are claiming, that they are so popular, that people should not even try to resist them.

And the weapon of those people is the "qualified journalism", as they are telling to people. If we are thinking about the agenda of qualified journalism in the point of view of religion, what is a good way to order people to keep their mouth shut, we must notice one really interesting thing in those writings, what bases on the Holy Bible. Those qualified journalists are taking only a couple of words of this book or only the parts, what are supporting their opinions, and leave the rest of it without notice.

One thing what is the most popular way to read that book is it offers authority to elder people. And in that book is mentioned that people have the right to punish their children, but the golden rule is always forgotten. That means that if a person really wants to get bitten because of the opinions or things, what are against other people opinions, means that the person must be real sadomasochist. But that kind of things is always forgotten from the so-called qualified journalist's way to write about the things.

When we are thinking about the newspapers, they have been the greatest supporters of democracy. But they have also been the greatest weapons in the hands of the bloodiest dictators in history. When we are thinking about violence and other kinds of things in history, there have always claimed that torture and another kind of things, what is made by the authoritarian police have been only the single cases, but would you feel nice, if you were one of those single cases?

The persons who own the newspaper or media-house are ruling the line of that thing. And if the trusted media house is turning to the hands of the authoritarian leaders, would the results be devastating. The problem is that buying the media houses can be done by using middlemen, and that means that the real owners would be really difficult to track. If the owner is operating behind the threads of many companies, what is registered in the multiple countries the real ruler can hide behind those threads.

A story about the Holocaust and why somebody wants to forget those things.

A story about the Holocaust and why somebody wants to forget those things.

In the next text, I will write about Jew informants, who worked for Gestapo. In the beginning, I must say that there is no knowledge, were those people really Jews or did some Gestapo agents used the identities of the murdered Jews during the Second World War?  And also I will write about rewriting about history, and here I must say, that antisemitism was not only the German phenomenon. There were many other countries, where Jews and gypsies were persecuted by police and local authorities, and during the Second World War, there were people, who believed that informing Gestapo about Jews would give that person better live and benefits. And also some people saw that selling trips to Jews and working as the informant of Gestapo would their own smuggling and black market forgot by Nazi authorities. And those people could be sold Jews for money to Nazis.

Making the nation proud again is the motto, what normally is used when the history is rewritten for please the new rulers of the nation. And the history of East Europe is rewritten many times because the rulers have been changed many times, and every ruler those nations have a different point of view in history. And when we are thinking about the Holocaust, we are seeing people, who are over 90 years old, and those people seem helpless and maybe we are thinking that "let it be". But 20 years ago those same people were 70 years old, and they might be able to answer the questions about the Holocaust in the court of law.

This is the problem with the law. Should we let other this kind of crimes to get old, if the person is old?  The thing about the Holocaust is very complicated. The Jews were not tolerated people in many countries in the 1930s and when Germany occupied small countries around it, it recruited local people to the police, and the thing was that in the Baltic states were the political situation that the first the Communists were persecuted other people when Stalin occupied those nations. And then the German army occupied those areas and used the propaganda, what connected Jews and communists together, what caused the hate in the people's mind. Of course, German propaganda must enlarge the willing of co-operating with occupation governments, but there were people, who thought that Nazis were the change to increase their position in the eyes of society.

That caused the situation, that the local police, under the supervision of the SS took part in the persecution. Those police-units were also operated against partisans, and during those "cleaning operations," many civilians were killed because of punishment or revenge of the partisan actions, and if some partisans were killed an officer, the entire village in some area could be killed by Einsatzgruppen, what were assisted the police and members of those police units were worked as the translators for Gestapo during the interrogations. During the Second World War, the British intelligence recruited Jews, because they were trusted operators. Jews were sent to concentration camps and executed if they were arrested, and that's why SOE wanted to recruit those people for their operations. The thing in the 1930s was that many people in Europe were antisemites and the antisemitism was seen also in the school books.

And when Nazis arrested those persons, they commandeer the property of those inmates in their control. And after the war, the houses and real estates, what belonged to Jews should return to the persons, who owned that property. But if there was nobody, who was survived from the Holocaust that property was free to take. In fact, some people, who helped those inmates made it because of money. They asked money for the cargo, and this is the thing, what has sometimes forgotten. They were actually human traders, who operated with the same methods, like people, who sold trips away from Syria.

And those people took sometimes very big money from that kind of actions. But in fact, the antisemitism did not belong only in German society. Many other nations were also separated Jews from their society, and isolated that group. Many leaders who were served Gestapo and the German government during the Second World War wanted to forget their role in the occupation government. The most well-known co-operatives were the Vichy-France personnel, who wanted to fight along with Germans, but as we know, that many people in Norway and Denmark had Nazi sympathies, and they served in Waffen SS.

But there is one little thing, what has always forgotten in the sad story of the Holocaust. And that is the "Blue Police". The police, what was served Nazis in the Ghettos. Those persons were actually Jews, and they were worked under Nazi supervision. They were working as the uniformed police, but there were also undercover Gestapo informants, whose mission was to uncover the locations of Jews and other resistance. Gestapo used those people in the operations, where they destroyed the resistance cells and some of those persons bought the freedom or life for their own people, and in fact, there is claiming that some of those persons got the papers that they were Arians. That thing could also be fake, but the thing is that maybe some Gestapo undercover officials used the identities, what was taken from the people, whose family and themselves were murdered in the concentration camps.

And also some SS-officials could have played Jews, and they have used the identities, what have taken from the murdered people. Nobody actually knows how many of those people served in the Foreign Legion or even in the Israeli Army after the Second World War. When we are thinking or searching this thing, we are facing the thing, that famous SS-Commando Otto Skorzeny were made the bombs, what were used in the bomb campaigns against Nazi engineers, who were worked for the Kamel Nasser in the 1960s before the Six Days War. So that kind of things causes rumors, that maybe some SS-officials have given instructions, how to handle terrorists or Arabs?

And nobody actually ever investigated the thing, that some Jews were destroyed the membership archives of their Synagoga, and some of those people were served even in Waffen-SS. There are tales that some Jews, who could hide their identities served also under the command of the notorious SS-General Odilo Globocnik, the person who was responsible for the extermination camps. That kind of things is really complicated to investigate. Of course, Jew personality and identity were a good cover up or role for the undercover Gestapo officials, who were trying to slip in the partisan groups.

How easy access to information influences society?

Easy access to information by using the Internet is the biggest revolution in history, and the thing is that this allows also deliver so-called hoax information by an easier way than ever before. And this kind of things are also challenges for security and even for all society. But the problem is that persons, who are using very fast internet connections are able to look at different sources and compile information on those sources together.

And this is the problem in the world. In the western world, the fast internet is the base element of infrastructure and it should allow us to look for the right information freely. But are we actually victims of this misunderstanding? The thing is that if we think something, we are good targets for cheaters.

We just believe that the Internet is free, and also we believe, that there would be no limits about the information, what to share. And that makes us a good target for provocation. The thing is that we can be connected to servers, what would be loaded with home pages, what seems authentic and this is the thing, what we should afraid. In the real world, the best way to uncover the propaganda is that the censorship would remove the homepages and denies the critics against the government.

But in the real world, the thing is that there is possible to use so-called "virtual critics". That means that there would be homepages, what are criticize the government, but there is also the way to make those persons, who criticize the government look like something, what we would not ever vote in the elections. One way is to make so-called "opposition homepages", what are full of garbage.

The parliament houses can be portrayed as the "houses of shame", and that kind of things would remove every vote from the opposition. Another way is to pay agent provocateurs, who are throwing  Molotov cocktails and blow the bombs in the name of opposition. And that will give the government permission to use police and military against those terrorists. That kind of things can be made for supporting the governments, and the best way to guarantee the support is to show that somebody else would be more undemocratic than the own government is. If somebody has different opinions the terror-attack make sure, that nobody sees anything wrong in the use of military force or militarized police against persons who have working against the government.