Somebody always sees

Somebody always sees

Even if we want to use the Internet anonymously, and our bosses cannot get the data from our workstations, we must remember that somebody always knows who we are are, and what kind of data we are searching for. The thing is that there can be many security levels in the routers and switches, which means that some of those levels can sometimes use only the persons, who have special access to that kind of thing.

When we are thinking about the news, where people are giving statements about some kind of things, those algorithms are analyzing those words, and then they are classifying the statement as "positive", "neutral" or "negative". The process is similar to the "speech-to-text" algorithm, which is used as the voice command programs, and the system can also follow the speech, and notice if the person seems nervous.

Those systems are also metering the breaks and other things, what is uncovering is there is something difficult to say. Also, algorithms see things, that the human eye cannot see, and one is the action of the pupil, and many little things that people normally don't notice.

So the thing is that those systems are used because they are neutral themselves. The system doesn't have prejudice and other kinds of things that can affect to analyze, and that's why they are used in the investigation. The thing is that the very negative attitude for some theoretical research and another kind of thing like the use of infrared cameras to track guns and other weapons on streets.

The negative attitude for that kind of thing would bring officials to the place, especially if the same person accepts things like forcing undressing for the same reason. The thing is that the government denies knowledge and that means that the electronic locking system can be opened by using the mobile application, which will break the code.

And if the mobile telephone would not have enough calculation power, it can ask for assistance from the internet. In that case, the mobile telephone would use the NFC (Near Field Communication)- antenna or system as the electronic key. The thing is that that highly advancing artificial intelligence-based systems can also delete all data about that visiting from the surveillance systems of the house. So the surveillance camera images would be manipulated, that those officials would not be seen in those films.

If the person would be arrested the government would also hide that kind of thing. That means that the authorities would put the person in jail for the weekend, and there will prove about payments like receipts in the wallet and rendered images on social media, that suspect has been on board of a cruise ship. That kind of manipulated data can deny, that a person cannot even prove to be on the arresting. This kind of tactic is created for destroying the trust of suspected people in the eyes of the social network of that person.

Constitutional state and populism

Constitutional state and populism

Populists say that independent justice system would not serve democracy, because judges are living far away from reality. Normally the argument for that is that judges make solutions, which is not in the line with common opinion. In many arguments, the judge is the government official, whose mission is to serve the state as well as the police organization. And sometimes I have heard opinions that when the prosecution has been raised against foreign people, those people just should kick off from the country because the legal proceedings are just a waste of money. 

That kind of argumentation is sometimes very effective for the "regular people", who have not have to see things, what they don't want to see. And this kind of thing the argument about the laws, what are criminalizing things like homosexuality and another kind of that, whom person self cannot effect. 

But do you know, why we have a court system? Its mission is to deny the police and government officials make crimes. If we would not have neutral trials, where also persecuted people have a chance to defend themselves, the officials would try to put their illegal acts to other people's fault. 

The thing in the populism is that it is a very good tool in the hands of the politicians. We must remember that the destruction of the Warsaw Pact caused the new kind of information technology, which allowed people to communicate with together without state control. 

And new popular politicians revolutionize democracy. But that advantage continues, and the problem in the ex-eastern block nations is that there has ever been a democracy. People are grown for respecting or rather saying obey the government, and they have ever been in the world, where the politician is the same kind of person as they are. 

They are not adjusted to the public decision-making process, and because of the rights like gathering are new, the politicians use that kind of thing for making their position stronger. When we are thinking about people's relationship with governments, we are seeing one very interesting thing, and that is that police is more confessing in the eyes of the people than some judge, who gives the convictions in the closed rooms. 

In the past, some people had an attitude, that when police arrested people, that person was convicted at the same moment. The model was taken from Mickey Mouse cartoon, where police take criminals to prison right away when they are put to the handcuffs. This is the problem with publicity. When the police would arrest people, the interest in the case ends. People thought that the person was convicted right away, and they were ever returned. 

This happened in countries like Finland, where the press was free, at least if we would compare the situation to the Eastern block. And in Eastern block the political arresting caused that people believe, that police ever made mistakes. In fact, in some criminal cases, the officials raised two prosecutions, another was about normal crime, and the second one was a political crime like agitation. And the person left to jail anyway, what made sure that police must ever confess that it makes mistakes. 

Image:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Statua_Iustitiae.jpg/255px-Statua_Iustitiae.jpg

https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11018346

About attacks against cyber guerillas

About attacks against cyber guerillas

Cyber attacks are the new threat to national security, and they are effective tools for delivering propaganda and embarrassing the opponent. Normal propaganda tactics, what the propaganda operators use is to get as many Facebook, and why not other social media accounts in use and they would get as many connections as possible to those attacks. And when the time has come, they would start to deliver propaganda by using those accounts, and even if those accounts will be closed, the cleaning that material from service takes a very long time.

When we are thinking the back-operations against cyber, and troll accounts, attacking to those cyber guerillas must be done by using the same force, what they use. That means that the new version of the combat would be epic troll battle between those nations. The cyber guerillas are the new kind of operators in the network. Those persons are attacking other people by using disinformation like fake news to get sympathy, and also they would use manipulated information for causing the situation, that some other nation attacks to their enemies.

Disinformation and manipulated information are the greatest threat in the modern world. The thing is that the faked information might not be separated from reality. In the worst situation, the recon images of some area are manipulated by using Photoshop, and there might involve the mobile missile sites or images of Auschwitz, which are introduced as the images from some modern conflict, what mission is to cause the attack against that target.

But when we are thinking about the attacks against cyber bandits, the use of missiles and aircraft might feel a simple and effective solution.  When the aircraft are destroying the headquarters of the cyber attackers, that kind of operations might not have any effect about the group itself. The persons who are operating those cyberattacks might use remote-controlled computers, which are controlled over the Internet by using a VPN connection, which allows the operators to sit even to another side of the Atlantic ocean.

And in the worst case, those computers are taken there without the people, who are living in those houses what means that the airstrikes can kill innocent civilians. Civilian casualties are things, what terrorists would want because that gives sympathy for them, and when we are thinking about houses in somewhere restless areas, those servers and computers can be used also delivering "deep web" material. That means that normal criminals can buy the needed material for terrorists, and give them the needed micro support. And for the return service, those people can deliver prohibited and illegal data to the Internet.

This is the reason, why police would use SWAT-team in that kind of actions. Then those law enforcements can take fingerprints and other evidence from those devices, what will be destroyed in an airstrike by the bombs, and there is very few evidence, what can be collected from the destroyed site.

The most qualified persons with the best ICT-skills of that organizations would ever sit on those places. Airstrike will kill those people, who might only copypaste things or follow the orders, what somebody will give them by using some social media application.

The rule in those cyber operations is similar to other military actions are they legal or illegal. The field team ever knows important things. But they can notice if the person who is another side of social media application speaks or writes something with strange ways, or uses some strange words, what would uncover the identity of those supporters or control team. If a person is tired that inmate can give own email address accidentally in the discussions in the social media.

One wrong name in the discussions might uncover the identity of the speaker. So the idea of the strikes must be that there is something, what can be used to track the people, who have bought those computers, and the thing is that the supporters of those groups would be tracked by using the information, like serial numbers of microchips.