How does the Internet effects history writing, from the point of view of 50 years in the future?

When a historian writes a book we must ask should that book please the audience? If research brings something new but uncomfortable things about the well-known person, should that thing keep secret? Or should that thing tell to the whole world? Even if that thing is breaking the myth or legend the historian should uncover those things. But there are always people who are not accepting something. 

Should the researcher tell only things that people want to hear? Or should they uncover also other things? Those things are sometimes hidden from a great audience because they are uncomfortable. And what would you think about the cases like some respected statesman changing the land area of the homeland to the half-liter whiskey bottle? Should people know about that kind of thing? That thing is an example and not basing the real case. In some cases, the people who were the close comrades of some great person are covering the myths very sharply. 

And if something is against the public image of some person that thing causes anger. The criticism is a nice thing. But it doesn't mean that the researcher should lynch. Because the text that this person would not please somebody. If some text causes a violent reaction that means it has mean. Meanless texts don't bring cat-size letters on the front page of the newspapers. 

What historians will write about us 50 years later? What kind of sources do they use? Today researchers are researching the people. Those who lived about 50 years ago use their diaries as the source. When we are thinking about things like Facebook and other social media. Things what those people wrote on social media meant to publish. In social media, people want to introduce themselves from the best point of view. 

And that's why some people say that social media is not a trustworthy source about the things how people are handling things and how people think about something. But is diary or old fashion paper writing the objective port to the mind of people? The thing is that diaries are always the window to thoughts about people. 

But still, there is one thing, that we must remember. The writings that are written in diaries are the things that people want to read later. So diaries are also offering a window to the mind of the person. But when a person writes things like diaries there is still the opinion of how the writer wants to handle things. When we are writing diaries there is always the possibility that the diary is not introducing all truth. 

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

Should researchers write only things that the audience wants to read? Or should they also write about things that might be uncomfortable for somebody? 

The meanless looking things can be great things of the private life of the person whose biography is written. And should that kind of thing also bring in the front of the eyes of the readers? 

X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X

The person who writes the diaries might remember that some other person can read it. So there might be only things, what the writer of diary wants to handle. But how trustworthy diary is anyway? The thing is that there are many types of diaries. And some diaries meant for supporting the decisions. 

The project diaries are meant to tell the project team what is done in the project. But when we are thinking about personal diaries, which are not meant for a public audience, we must remember that they might involve things that are not nice to read. 

So should the historian remove things like the drinking problem from the research which object is the person who died a couple of tens of years ago? This is a good question. The fact is that the heirloom of the person might not want to handle that kind of thing in public. 

But when we are thinking about the things like the statesmen or very public people. That kind of thing affects the decisions. When we are thinking of some people as idols or national heroes, we want to see them as the "pure boys". We don't want to hear things like alcoholism because it breaks the myth in front of our eyes.

That is one problematic thing in the research of history we always offend somebody's emotions. There is always somebody who doesn't like that personal life of some respected person hides tragedies. And that thing is problematic. If the historian writes only things that are supporting the myths that means the research is meanless. 

The purpose of research is to bring new points of the way to those topics. If the researcher just repeats the mantras that are told before. Or refer to some other texts that thing would not bring new things in the topics. Those texts and tales can be very nice to read.

But they are not research. The writer can make some research for the book. But we must remember that they are not meant for study books. Maybe there are some historical characters. But they are novels or fiction. Those books are sold in the bookstore. Some of them are found in Christmas gifts. But their place is on the fiction shelf. 

https://thebrightchronicle.blogspot.com

Devil's Tower

Image I

Devil's Tower 

Devil's Tower (1) what is locating at Wyoming, USA is a well-known national monument, which is known in spectacle Close Encounters of the Third Kind from 1977. The shape of this mountain is a little bit different than others, and there are stripes on the hillside, which makes that thing look like there was something like mud that came in the mountain and that would make this monument the biggest mud volcano in the world. 

But there is a couple of details in this remainings of the melted core, what makes some people think that there have been extremely, of far higher tower-shaped structure in that place, which top have been melted for some reasons, and then the melted material would flow down of the valley and made the unique shape for that thing. The reason what made "Devil's Tower" is found from the annex 2(2).

The monument itself is protected and sometimes people afraid the erosion could damage this mountain. The name of that place is interesting, and we must sometimes ask, what makes it the "Devil's tower"? Where is the devil? When we are looking at that strange-looking mountain, we must ask, have native Americans seen the creation of this form, what is visible in many pictures, and what has made this place well-known. 

And when we are thinking about the mysteries, we must realize, that there should be something connection between some kind of devil, and this pylon. So is this pylon artificial? That thing seems taken from far from the reasonable world. Who and why would you build something like this? And this has one very interesting answer, what might come straight from some kind of science fiction novel. 

There is a couple of non-scientific ideas, what this tower might be, but what is without scientific evidence. But those imaginational theories are fascinating, and that's why I will put them here. 

People have always said that I have a good imagination. So I think that I dare to say, that could it be possible that the Devil's Tower has been the basis for some kind of space elevator. That means that there has been some kind of artificial counterweight over this place and that would keep the cables to the space straight. But this is only theory or writing about this thing. 

That is one modification about that hypothesis, and that is that "Devil's Tower" would be the remainings of the Tower of Babel. The argument for that is claimed that the original Tower of Babel has lost somewhere in history. And the thing that the real place for that Tower is in America could explain why that tower lost in history. And of course, this kind of idea is fascinating. But there is not enough scientific evidence for proving those ideas. 

(1)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devils_Tower

(2)

http://www.geologyin.com/2018/04/new-insight-into-how-giants-causeway.html

Image I

https://www.nps.gov/common/uploads/grid_builder/deto/crop16_9/893914AB-C506-A2AD-D41690FD11B7B348.jpg?width=950&quality=90&mode=crop

One writing about political commercials

One writing about political commercials

Donald Trump is one of the best examples, why we should interest more in politics. That man is a colorful personality, who has used media very effectively to get people voting himself. And I think that the clear way to speak has made this man very popular. But is that man, what people like, or what they want to see in the White House?

But we must realize that those Donland Trumps are mostly harmless. They are very colorful, but the thing is that this kind of person might be dangerous. If we think the case that every commercial TV-or net-TV-site would be owned by one person, and then those channels would open public for the time of election campaign and the people are allowing to see good movies in those channels. But inside those movies would be the commercials of a certain candidate. That kind of thing offers very good benefits for the people, who are supported by owners of the channel.

Twitter has prohibited the political commercials in their channel, and now we must ask, what is the difference between political marketing and advisement? This is the thing, what we should ask before we are prohibiting anything? When we are thinking about the form of political and other marketing, we are always forgetting that political marketing might be camouflaged as the discussion, and in there the persons might send links or something like that, what are linking the homepages, where might be made for supporting some politicians.

Or they might be some kind of meme-pages, what might look like humorous, but where are the links to the political pages, or what is full of political propaganda. I know, that I use word propaganda, and it has negative content, but in my opinion, every kind of political commercial is propaganda.

Propaganda or psychological operations are styles, where people are telling their opinions about things, and many times we have forgotten that when we are making political commercials, we are making commercials for the political party. This thing is one of the most remarkable ideas in the world. The problem with internet marketing is that everybody would get the same audience, and by using minimum budgets would the commercial get very many lookers.

But the problem is that politics is ever been in fashion because it's not interesting "normal people". But are we interesting things, what are decided by politicians? Political leaders are ruling nations, and they make decisions about things, what would be done in the next election season. And that's why this kind of thing should interest people.

We are living in a democracy, or shaper saying we are living in a republic. That means that we are electing people in the parliament, who are making decisions. And the reason for that is the people, who are sitting in parliament have the chance to read the information, what is needed to make good decisions.

And then we must realize the thing that we should describe the word "good". Is the decision good only for politician self, and the support team for a political party, what this person represents. Or is is it good for the majority of the country? That is enough, but what the same decision makes for the minority? When on opposite sides are economy, humanity, and defense we are facing big ideologies. And that kind of thing is really good to think when we will I hope to go next time to go to give our votes.

How much is much?

How much is much?

Sometimes we all see the news about nursery services, which has not enough workers. Sometimes I have thought, that how those nursery companies even dare to take patients because there are only two or three nurses for maybe tens of patients, and that number of staff is enough? So what if something happens during those shifts?

And in the cases that there is so little personnel on work, that it's dangerous for patients, that thing brings my mind the question, should there be some nurses or doctors, who have not come to work? If the thing is like that, why that thing has not mentioned in reports? Or why those people have not called to authorities, that nurses have not come to work?

One thing, what is interesting is, why that thing satisfies patients and their families? Why the small number of personnel is not caused reclamations, and why people who are living in that kind of institutes are not telling a thing to their families?

The things, what satisfies us might be different to someone else, and the things what are dare to us might be meaningless to other people. If a person repeats some words, they are important to that inmate and gives satisfaction. The satisfaction is very well seen in the writings and speeches, what a person makes. When we are thinking about things, what seems meaningless for us, we almost ever think, that for someone else those things are very important.

So what this means? When we will go to the city, we might want to drink a cup of coffee, and then we just go to the cafeteria and take that cup, it doesn't cost very much and that's it. But have you ever thought about an underage person, who wants that cup of coffee? Buying that thing is not so easy thing to them. 

They must find the place, where is no age limit, and then they must have money for buying that cup of coffee. This kind of things is what we must realize when we are making something. Things that are easy to get might be hard for somebody else. So when we are thinking about the way, how people write about things what they have written or spoken? Have you ever thought about cases, where people have written or spoken something that is not tolerated about some other person?

When somebody has mentioned, that some other person has mental problems or that person is somehow incompetent in public writing, and the knowledge is wrong, that could cost very much because of the juridical payments. In those cases, a person must believe, that the thing, what has been written is right. Or actually, the writer must hope that the thing, what has been spread is true. And sometimes this hope causes the phenomenon, that the writer just uses or fixes some term, what supports the last thing, what that person has been spread.

Here I must ask one little question, what is "is it right to leave a customer without service, even that person is incompetent"? This is a very interesting question. Incompetence is not a thing, what justifies to act how people want to act, and that kind of things are not meant for justifying criminal activities and other kinds of things like unnecessary removings from the area.

When we are talking about things like sending faked job applications, I have thought that maybe those people, who are making practical jokes, like sending job applications for other people would like to do those jobs themselves, because they are asking them to others? If somebody thinks that it's a very good improvement to social skills, that person washes some stairways, that person should make those jobs one summer. This kind of thing could be very teaching lesson, how that kind of jobs is improving social skills.

Writing about dictatorship

Writing about dictatorship

Do you know that the laws, what is protecting the dictatorship are created for protecting the state against the outland enemies? When the Roman Empire was under threat the power was put in one hand for protecting the state. After that, some people have thought that the leader of the state must have dictatorial authority in the state.

One of the defense for that thing is simply, what we would do with the head of the state, who has no power? Why we have presidential elections if that person would not have the right to scatter the parliament? 

The problem those things is, that when the policy in parliament is similar to policy and opinions of the headman of the state, there is no problem with those laws, what is supporting the personal power of the head of the state. But when the head of state is in opposition to the majority of people or members of the parliament, would there always find people, who are supporting the constitution, what gives the head of the state authorities and justifies the disbanding or scatter the parliament.

And there are many people, who want to support that kind of actions, end their argument is many times that the constitution has given those powers for the head of the state. So why the head of the state might not use those authorizations, because the constitution justifies those kinds of actions? The answer to the differences of opinions would be simple. The riot police would deny the parliamentarians enter their workplace, and then the power would be in the hands of the head of the state. The reason for that is the head of the state would perceive being over politics.

This kind of thing is a very dangerous way to think. When the laws, what supported the limitless power of the monarchy were establish the monarchs were civilized and enlightened persons, but sooner or later the power was given to a person, who was a despot. 

In this case, we must say that one thing what could be worse to the state than a dictator is a popular dictator. That means that the popularity in the eyes of the majority would hide the merciless persecution and use of power, and that would drive the nation to chaos.

Sometimes the dictator will get old and after that, the closest men of that person would start to fight, who would get the power in their hand, and that might drive the nation to civil war. The problem with strong leadership is, this kind of places will want to get by using the force.

If the person, who has power self has made crimes against own people, that means that maybe nobody cares, what happens to that dictator. This fate has faced the King of England Henry VIII and Joseph Stalin, who just left without help when they faced their final moments. That tells about the attitude of people to those men. When they couldn't give orders anymore, that thing caused that own men attacked them, because they wanted to get the same power, what those leaders have.

The way I talk is the way I talk

The way I talk is the way I talk

The headline for this writing has taken from the song, what is presented by the Finnish rock band "Leningrad Cowboys" a long time ago. The thing is that when we are thinking about the feedback, what we get from writings and speeches, we must follow things, what those feedbackers are giving to us. The things like we had wrong pants or wrong slips are things, what we should not care because the writings and speeches are the important things. Not what kind of clothes we use, when we are writing about texts.

And here we are facing the real thing, what we should consider, and that is when we are facing cheating, we should find, what thing the cheater would use as an argument? Many times that thing uncovers, who has given those pieces of information for the cheater because the argumentation would uncover the source, what that person uses.

If some person would seem very prideful, we must think that maybe that thing is seen because that person would think somehow, that the blog would be closed by some other persons. And in this case, we are facing the things, that the rumors are not involving real information at all. Those rumors are sometimes fictional stories about things, what is not true. 

Sometimes I have seen stories, that I'm a dead or somehow incompetent person, but that thing is not true. I don't know who has told those things, but they are pure creation of the imagination, and I would not normally even comment on those things. But this is a very suitable situation to comment about that thing, what might be behind some bad feedback, what I have got. And here I must say that the persons, who have created those story, are made those claiming in their head.

Many times people say, that there is nothing, what can harm them. And the thing, what the blogger of some other person would write on the Internet is like some kind of wind. That thing would not have any real mean in real life. And then we would say, that it would not look like that if the trollers would like to kill some writer. And if some people are starting to cheat or treat some writer or talker, that means that the thing has got meaning, what is so big, that person wants to lose the weapons carrying license or get other kinds of troubles.

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud

The term "libido" in the writings of Dr. Sigmund Freud 

Dr. Sigmund Freud has been written lots of things about libido and orgasm. In the case of Freud, those things have many more meanings that for some normal person. The terminology what Freud uses is very complicated, even it seems simple at first sight. The texts of that person are full of symbol, and sexuality symbolizes the secret world, what is in the human mind.

In this text, I will write the thing about the psychoanalysis. There are actually two types of versions of psychoanalysis. The original or so-called classic version, which was created by Dr. Sigmund Freud. In that version, the psychoanalyst doesn't give medicals to the patient. And in the "modern" version of psychoanalysis created Dr. Carl Jung, under the supervision of Freud. That version of the medical treatment would be accepted in this therapy.

Normal people would at the same time shame and protect that world, and the thing what that term means is the thing what people should handle in the psychoanalysis. Libido is the thing, what satisfies the person, and what person also wants to keep in mind.  When Freud created his methodology, what is called as the Freudian psychoanalysis, the first thing, what the person, who operate with client or patient must be done is to make the map about things, what patient wants to speak, and what that inmate wants to hide.

So the psychoanalysis is not the medical treatment. It is meant for the tool, what is used to analyze the mind of the patient, and that thing is the most important thing when the medical, and treatment would be planned and executed.

Of course, the psychoanalysis can help a person to handle feelings and willings, and those things are really important when the behavior of the patient wanted to change. The psychoanalysis is handling very personal things, and it can be used with or without medical treatment.

The role of the psychoanalyst is to follow the reactions of the patient when the discussion handles things, which is very sensitive and personal. Those reactions are things like yelling, violent behavior like punching the analyst or treating the analyst or some other members of the medical team.

If the patient is violent, the psychoanalyst would punish the patient and if the reaction is what is willing to get, the patient would be gifted. And that makes psychoanalysis very effective tool for qualified persons for supporting the other methods.

But still, in today the remarkable thing about the psychoanalysis is that sometimes this method is used as therapy, and in other cases that are purely the method, what to use as finding out the problems, what the patient has. The thing what makes this method the long and very hard for the patient is that Dr. Freud was not used medical treatment during this process. That has caused blaming, and Freud explained that thing in this case medicals would cover some dangerous things in the patient's mind.

Modern psychiatry is using different methods and more advancing tools than Sigmund Freud, but even in the most modern research rooms, the main role is the sofa. Of course, modern medical treatment is more advancing, than some cocaine injections. And in the version, what created Dr. Carl Jung the medical treatment is, how we should say, accepted.

In the most modern version, all electronic equipment would be covered, and the psychoanalyst can record things like speech, but also the functions of the parasympathetic nervous system. Those things would cause that in the modern world the classic psychoanalysis would be the most effective tool for finding out things, what person wants to cover. And for the effective medical treatment, the patient must be honest or therapy would fail.

The Philosopher's Stone (Why one stone is different?)

The Philosopher's Stone (Why one stone is different?)

The Philosopher's Stone is a mythical item like some kind of version of the "Holy Grail". And sometimes I have thought that this kind of Item is not actually physical thing like some real stone or something like that. Or maybe The Philosopher's Stone was the stone, what was painted by using a certain way, and that would be marked for membership of some community. So it was the stone, what Philosopher owned.

Or maybe it was the thought about the group of stones. And the mission, what master gave the student was to think, why there is a couple of stones, and why one of those stones was different? Was The Philosopher's Stone actually the item, what every philosopher carried in their pocket, and why did they do that?

The alchemists looked for the spiritual aspects from their experiments, and that means that The Philosopher's Stone is not actually the item. I could also be a way of think. or maybe it's the stone, what is painted, and what shows the membership of the secret community of alchemists. 

But then we must realize one thing, and that is the alchemists talked by using the allegories, and maybe The Philosopher's Stone is the thing, what alchemists used to make people think about things more carefully. And if we are thinking about things like Philosopher, we should ask one thing, when we see the stone in some rack. That question is, why this stone is put on the rack, and if there is something special like painting, we must realize, that the paint could be the white phosphorous.

If that thing is put on the papers, and somebody steals them, that would cause that entire house will burn. When we are thinking about the role of the alchemists, we must realize, that those people must hide their real purpose of the experiments, and that's why they must use the allegories and another kind of things.

The thing is that alchemists were proto-scientists, who made many interesting and remarkable notifications and inventions in the field of early science. But as we know, they were also looking for the spiritual roads to things like living forever and making gold from every part on the Earth.

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

Short writing about technical poltergeist and technical remote viewing

In the future, the eavesdropping and motoring tools can installed in the human body by using surgery. That kind of system would transmit every word and think what people would speak or see around to the NSA headquarters. And this kind of things might revolutionize the spying and dark operations.

There is a very interesting thing, that some poltergeist phenomenon would be created by using the TRW (Technical Remote View), which means that the camera prosthesis of the eye would be connected to the cell phone. Or the prosthesis itself can be equipped with the data connection straight to the internet, or by using the GPS system, that prosthesis would be connected straight to the satellites.

Because the eye prosthesis where is the camera is connected to the nervous system, the user would not probably know, that the prosthesis is sending data to the third party. And then if the system is operated by NORAD, it can use laser satellites to create the poltergeist. That means that if the person, who has this system looks at something, the operator of NORAD must only target the killer satellite to that point.

When we are thinking the implanted microphone on the ear, that implant can put in the ear, by using the same method with a surgically implanted hearing aid. And the difference between eavesdropping system and hearing aid would be that the other would send the discussions to the third party.

The thing is that that equipment can installed in the body without the inmate would not even recognize this thing. The cornea can cover the entire camera and the person would feel the touch to the eye similar, what it is normally felt. The eavesdropping system can installed behind the eardrum during some other medical operation, and the inmate would not even recognize that surgically installed eavesdropping equipment.

The thoughts about Hvitträsk mansion

The thoughts about Hvitträsk mansion

If we would think that Geselius or other architects were neopagans. Neopaganism was the in the late 19th. century version of the heavy metal music and it was the youngster's way to rebel against the values of the elder people. If modern rebel youngsters are listening to rock music, the rebel youngsters were searching the national romantic writings in the late 19th. and early 20th. century.

And when we are thinking about that the three architects, Geselius, Lindgren, and Saarinen were quite difficult personalities, because they were made creative work, and those persons were very gifted architects and artists. Maybe some neopagans took those things more seriously than they should, and could Geselius or some other persons in the threesome try to contact with spirits in that beautiful place. Of course, the ancient Finns have noticed the beauty of this place and pursuit their rituals in this beautiful environment.

The Hvitträsk mansion is claimed to be a copy of the ancient Finnish noblemen house, but there is no proof about that. The thing is true that the house is representing the national romantic style, and it's a mixture of the church, castle, and mansion. Every single detail in that house is dressed to the nines detailed and perfectly finished.

Sibelius found the first rock painting in Finland in 1911

So that kind of person's egos was very big, and the Hvitträsk was too small to them. But when we are searching the tales that there are living ghosts in that area, and the first rock painting of Finland was found by Jean Sibelius in 1911, we must realize that this story might be fiction. If those architects found that rock painting, they might hide that thing because that might cause the ridicule and those men might think that they were kept weird if they were told about that rock painting. Or maybe they thought that they were claimed as fakers if they were told that thing to other people.

The thing that Sibelius would find that painting was like straight from some movie, and it seems like some stories, what the children tell their parents.  Maybe those architects found that thing before Sibelius, but hide that thing. You can look at the picture of that rock painting from the homepage, what is linked below this text, and somebody sees even UFO in that red image, what is maybe painted in the ancient holy place. But who knows what that thing really portrays.

And if those architects were neopagans, that thing might be the reason, that they moved to that place. And when we are thinking about the thing, that their maid died in her bedroom in suspicious conditions, there might be rumors, that this girl saw something, what she should not see. But there is no evidence about the violence or murder. That kind of things made those architects real interesting people. And was there some kind of laboratory in the house, and what those persons made with that thing is a mystery. And maybe I just imagine this thing.

https://retkipaikka.fi/kummituksia-taitelijoita-ja-suomen-ensimmainen-tunnettu-kalliomaalaus-vittrask/

Writing about truth and lies

Writing about truth and lies

If we want to find the absolute truth, we must find the evidence, and that kind of things are really difficult things. When somebody comes to the courtroom, that person would tell, that the fault was that inmate, who is sitting on the chair of prosecuted. This is the fictional example of how human brains work, and I have read it from some magazine.  But then that person starts to tell that other person made something unexpected during the situation, like accelerated speed, while the charged person came to the main road from behind the triangle.

That thing means that the person who is charged got hit to the right side of the vehicle, but another person accelerated the speed and the distance was safe when the turning was done. Without evidence that case would be difficult to the solute. The thing is that we cannot know who is telling lies if there are no marks for the burning rubber what is the mark of the fast accelerating or something like that. In that case, would the person confess about being guilty, but then the mind would change.

In fact, in the mind of the person, who came in the front to another vehicle behind the triangle, would create in the mind the model, where another person is guilty anyway, and this kind of things are really dangerous. That inmate would start to tell the stories about the acceleration of another vehicle and cause very bad problems to the opposite side.

This is one thing, the law doesn't mean a thing when the person would feel to be on the right side. And the behavior would be pumped full of energy when that person stands in the bar with the whiskey glass and surrounded by friends, who are supporting that story, without even seen what has been happened. Or they haven't even seen that accident car. But this thing, what might feel really nice could cause problems for the opponent.

Problems with social media and hate writers

Problems with social media and hate writers

https://kimmonesittely.blogspot.com/p/problems-with-social-media-and-hate.html

Would Lenin be so popular, if he would use modern social media?

In the beginning, I would ask you one question, "would Lenin be so liked and popular, if that man would use modern social media?". What if people would recognize him as the imperial official?. In modern social media operates many hate writer and agitator, and if Lenin would use that thing, somebody would recognize him as the imperial official. Actually, there were people, who recognize this man, but that thing was not published in the bolsheviks media.

Would somebody follow that man in that case? Hate writers are an interesting part of social media. Many of those people are writing colorful texts, which makes them interesting and that means that especially youngsters are following those persons. That means that the hate writers are actually very nice guys at the first, and then they are starting to agitate against some minorities. When we are thinking about arguments, what those people use is always individual rights, and of course, they are representing the "advanced forces".

Many people want to be members of advanced forces.

The thing what makes them "advanced" is that they uphold things like abort, and then that thing makes them very democratic and advanced persons. Many of those people are forgotten the communist era of the Soviet Union, where the "advanced politics" allowed women to make aborts and the second thing what those "advanced forces" gave was atheism. There was a one really bad thing about abortions, and that was that the women were forced to take them if they got pregnant from some high-rank government officials.

But then we are facing some things, which are really interesting parts of the discussions of the abort. And that thing is that there have been many modern people, who want to deny the E-pills from the underage women, but at the same time they are supporting abortion. Sometimes I have wondered, why the underage women would not be implanted with the E-capsules, what denies the pregnancy, and also stabilizes the hormone level, what makes life easier, because the feelings of young women would be more stable.

Sometimes abortion rights are misused in some countries

That is one way to misuse the abortion right. In many countries, the law of abortion is really problematic, because there are many religious groups, who are against abortion but at the same time, they want to deny the E-pills, what would deny the unwanted pregnancy with very effective way. And there is one argument about this thing, there are some cases, where the court system must take a part of the question, have the parents got right to get an abortion for their daughter because that woman is underage.

There are many ways to make abortion, and one of them is the so-called abortion pill, and there are many discussions, is it allowed to give abortion pills to teenager, who got pregnant. If the person wanted to visit in the churches that meant the blacklisting, and sending to forest work to Sibir. This is a very good thing to show, how to tolerate many of those "advanced forces" have been. When we are thinking about things like "Arab spring", we must realize, that those people promised many things for people, and now they are using the same touch for their own political opposition.

But there are two things, which are problematic in the Arab nations the women's rights and children's rights. But the last one has been problematic also in Western society. There is always been an attitude that the children are the property of the adults, who must not hear in the legislation processes. And in that case, the political movements should remember, that in Finland the 15 years old people are right to use their votes in the next elections, and political parties are really interesting also those people because they would bring votes to the parties.

Radical is promising many things

They are promising  many good things for people, but when they were taken control of their government, the thing was that the people had the right to say, what they want to say if that thing is supporting their own opinion, and of course, those people were very wise, and everybody who wrote and talked against the wise men were some kind of maniacs, whose role was to send to the forest work or uranium mines, for the working therapy. Here I must say, that if we would meet Lenin in Switzerland when he was the refugee, we might like that man and many Bolshevists could be really nice men and women, but when the got the power, the situation was that there was a new emperor in Russia. This is one way to see things.

When somebody would write something in social media, there is always a danger that the writer would be some kind of radical, who would agitate the hate against some other people. But when we think this kind of people in the context of the Russian revolution in 1917, we might ask one question, and that is "would Lenin be so popular if he would use modern social media"?. "What if somebody would recognize that man as the imperial civil servant?". This means that social media would uncover some secrets, what those hate writers don't want other people to know. And one thing is that we might say, that there are many theories in the "what if" front, and as I wrote at the beginning, what if Lenin and Hitler would use social media, would they be so popular, as they were?

A couple of hazards what intelligence can cause for the human race

A couple of hazards what intelligence can cause for the human race

https://kimmoswritings.blogspot.com/

One of the greatest threats, what mankind can imagine is the intelligent artificial species, what can act against us like we would be the enemies of that species. Those artificial organisms can be robots, which is connected to the brains, or some kind of genetic research like a monkey, what would be the test animal, where is injected the genomes, what would make it more intelligent than normal monkeys are.

The thing is that those intelligent organisms would not probably tell people, that they are more intelligent than others. And that means that the intelligent species can hide that ability from the research team. The thing in the artificial organisms is that the genetic material would be connected to its genomes and transfer to the next generation.

The thing what would deny the advance the brains of the adult monkeys would be that the skull of those animals is too small, that it would allow the increase the size of the brains, and the second thing is that the form of the skull is different with people, and the frontal lobe would not space to advance. That means that the adult monkey, what would get the injection of the genomes, that would not have influence for advancing the intelligence level.

But the baby monkeys would have a skull, what would be more flexible and that allows the increasing the size of the brains. The size of the brains would not mean everything and the importance of the number of connections of the neurons have also a great role in advancing the level of intelligence. And the thing is that this kind of things is actually in a very big role in the advancing of intelligence. The monkeys are very dangerous animals, because they are normally very intelligent, and they learn to use weapons and release themselves from jail.

If we would create the intelligent species on the Earth, we might face the situation, that this creature would become rebellious.  In the point of view of morality, we would create the slave for us. And the information is in the main role of slavery. If the slaves would get information, that the things could be better, or they realize that their master is not invulnerable, the result would be terrifying, in the point of view the master.


An interesting scenario of the treat, what the defective programming of artificial intelligence might make in the distant future.


The intelligent life forms would have the ability to defend themselves against an attacker, and if we would send the intelligent probe to the other solar system, that system might attack against other civilization, if it denies something important things from that probe. In this scenario, the programmers would not program the probe to face another intelligent species, because there is no evidence about those alien civilizations. The probe would be a couple of hundred light years away from the Earth, and it would continue its mission, what began thousands of years ago.

And then it would face alien, what denies the landing. The race, what has created that thing have already forgotten that probe, and then the programmers have made artificial intelligence, what has the mission to destroy the things, what would be treated for that machine. And that case would cause decision, that the probe will open fire against the alien.

The idea of this imaginational scenario would be that we would create the spacecraft, what will have the same intelligence level as a human. After that, we would send that spacecraft to another solar system, and there would cause damage. The probe would ask permission to get some important mineral for the repairments, and it would not understand the answer, or it would translate it as the denying. That means that the probe believes that the other species would attack against it, and starts the war between the stars.

The thing in the gothic script

The thing in the gothic script

Blackletter or the gothic font or gothic script is very difficult to read for modern people. In the modern writings are used normally the fonts, what are simpler to make, and this is the thing, what sometimes wonder me. This font was used in Europe from the 12th century to the year 1945. The thing in the gothic font and gothic texts are that those letters are very difficult to make for the physical letter stamp, what was made by iron.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackletter

The simpler form would make easier to folding the letters for the printing press and maybe the things like copywriters would be more common if there were used simpler forms than the gothic font, and there is a possibility that this font was made hard to read in purpose. If the person would write text, what is written by using gothic font, must the person put more focus on the text, than if they would be made by use common fonts.

Sometimes I have thought that maybe the gothic font has been used in the texts, what was meant for the university people for giving the book a more effective way to teach things, because if the person must focus to the text would that be more influential than text what is written by using some other fonts. And of course, the Blackletter is used for mark the important texts, because it seems really nice or solemn.

Because the person must think all the time while reading the text, would that teach the person to think, and when the person must check things from the other books, would that reader learn the things like checking facts by using multiple sources.  And then focusing on writing gives the text more influence than if the font would be easier to read.  But the Blackletter is marking for things, which are important.

The thing is that letter type was really hard to copy, and the old books are full of markings. Those markings were easy to notice, but hard to copy, and they were things like some letters were red, because that guaranteed the authentication of the book, and denied the allowance to put some faked texts in the law books or something like that because those things might cause terrible problems in the society.

But otherwise, if we would learn to write gothic letters in the schools, reading that text would be so easy, as reading things, what are written by using the normal text. And that's why some texts, what were meant only for the people, who have been in the high societies were written by using the gothic font. This might be one of the reasons, why some elder important books are written by using the gothic script. At the link below this text is the same writing by using the Gothic script. It looks quite different or interesting, and go to see, what this looks like. And the font is in the list of Blogger as little bit different name, but you might recognize that font very easily.

https://fontsantexts.blogspot.com/2019/04/the-thing-in-gothic-script.html

Social media and the problems with strong leadership and racism

Social media and the problems with strong leadership and racism

People are asking about strong leadership always when their own point of view is opposite to the decision, what was made in the parliament. And always if the strong leader is against our own point of view the things, we are blaming them as the dictators. The social media has brought one thing in the people mind, and that is even in the 21st century is the people, who are not tolerating other people, because they have a different skin color than other people have.

Racism is the thing, what is always connected to the strong leadership and the same thing is identified with militarism and authoritarian governments. And that thing is the thing, where we should put more focus on the educational system. Of course, we can focus the police work against those groups, but the thing is that prevention of racism also prevents the violation, because racism is causing hate, and then the minorities are starting to buy guns, and that will cause the spiral of hate, what would stand in the time of generations, like what has been happened in Northern Ireland.

The revenge and counter-revenge have continued decades, and the hate is the thing, what cannot sweep away with the peace contract. The thing is that the hate and racist writings have sometimes made because of the opposite block wanted to denigrate. Sometimes those writings are meant for denying the freedom of speech acts, and the thing is that the strong leaders are sometimes using those things for making the freedom of speech and publishing more difficult by putting the limits of the use of social media and another kind of things. When somebody is supporting the changes in political laws or some new system, we should ask those people, what would be their own position in the new system?

The thing that the racistic discussions have been noticed on the Internet, would help to locate those persons, and that kind of thing would make the world safer. The thing is that the normal skinhead is a similar gang member with other gang members, and we can live with those people. But the problem is the people, who are working as the police and security guards, and who have a racist attitude on their work. Those persons, who use the trusted position against other people are more dangerous than any normal gang member can ever be.

Daring to write is daring to introduce thoughts.

Daring to write is daring to introduce thoughts.

Sometimes I have got a silly idea or thought that maybe there is another intelligent species on Earth. I know, that this kind of things are not scientifically proven, but I have freedom to write everything, what I want, but sometimes I have thought that in some pond would create the situation, that the neurons would connect to the lichen, and then the entire pond would work with the same way as the human brains.

On the bottom of the pond would be another group of neurons, what would work like mirror neurons. And that thing would make the pool the intelligent organism. This would be an extreme version of the intelligent life form, what can live on the earth. That kind of organism can be the individual thing. I got the idea of this hypothetical life form from the giant mycoplasmas, what I wrote recently.

The thing is very fascinating because we might think that some bugs would be acting like this. In this scenario, the hypothetical organisms, what are called here as ants and wasps would operate together. The wasps what can fly would act like brain core, and the ants would act as a mirror layer of the brains. This kind of life forms can live on another planet. The thing is that those aliens might be absolutely different than we are. When we are making some ideas, we must keep our minds open, and we should not close any doors.

Or we must go to an embarrassing situation, where we must take back our words. While we are making science, we must keep our minds open, and the words like "of course there are no other planetary systems at universe" are seeming a little bit naive, when we are telling people, that there are multiple planetary systems in near of us. And is it so serious that somebody believes in UFO:s that the person must close in the mental hospital.

Modern humans have one illusion, what is dangerous, and that is that everything, what we are creating and inventing is under our control. We have a need to control everything and if we are creating something, we must believe that this thing obeys us. When we are talking about the scientific way to think, we are believing that everything, what some scientists write are scientifically proven, and the thing that should make us think our relationship with science again is the thing, that we have found exoplanets so close to Earth like Alpha Centauri system. And that thing is that we should think again our relationship with nature and another species because we might have one problem with that thing, that there is not another intelligent species on the planet Earth.

Of course, we can and want to believe that we are "only one intelligent species on the Earth", and when we are thinking about bio- and genetic manipulation, we might think, that by connecting the genomes of neurons with some mycoplasmas could cause the most terrifying situation, what mankind can ever imagine. The living organisms are things, what defend themselves, and also they are growing, if they have enough nutrient. If artificial intelligence would be released on the Internet, there is a possibility, that the computer would become more intelligent than a human can ever be.

The way to get support for own opinions

The way to get support for own opinions

One of the best ways to get support for the opinions is to write the book for supporting the thing, what might be actually pure opinion. The thing is that the book is a good way to show the "official way of view" of something, and of course, if I would be the leader of some society, I would give that book for every person to show, that they are supporting my opinion. The thing is very interesting in the cases of social media and written literature, which is printed on paper.

The paper print would make things more trustable than the thing, what we are writing on the Internet, but in fact, there are many writings, what are basically the opinions. The opinion is different than pure scientific writings, and in fact, when we are introducing some theories on the Internet, we are writing about opinions.  When we are thinking about the lifeforms, what might be totally different than we are, we are writing about a thing, what is coming straight from our imaginations.

Actually, there are many people who have written the instructions, how we should behave on the Internet, and the thing is that people have the right to show their opinions in some things, what might be far away from some other people opinions, or maybe the cosmological things and extraterrestrial life-forms are not some person's hobby. Maybe they want to follow some other things like advancing of the financial environment. Or maybe they just watch sports on the TV sets.

That kind of things is their own business. And maybe they are not interested in other people. Maybe they are interesting only things, which are funny. And I would also like to read positive news from the Internet. But the world is a tough place for living, and we are living in a turbulent environment, where the changes happen all the time. When we are talking about things, like living conditions of the mokes somewhere in Africa, we are facing the thing, that bad environment would hurt those animals in Africa as well as in Europe.

And maybe we are starting to think that we cannot hide the bad things anymore by transferring the food production to some other country, and say that our legislation is well done.  And then the social media will leak the pictures of reality in the faces of all people. Or it can share the manipulated truth. In that case, the persons would cheese the sick animals for their pictures, and then everything would seem worse, that it really is.

Another way is to make stories only about the farms, where the things are not all right, and then say that the situation is similar in all other farms. That is called the "selective use of sources". That means that the person takes only the samples or cases, what supports own interests and leave the rest out from the report. And that kind of thing can give the wrong information about the common situation in some area. So this is the thing, what we should remember when we are using the Internet. The information can be polarized, and that means that the homepages, what seems like trustable might actually maintain by some lobby. And this is the thing, what makes social media so complicated. Social media can rise things in front of the public eye what have kept silent but it also can give the wrong image of some cases.

Does writing create ideas and thoughts?

Does writing create ideas and thoughts?

This is a good question because writing is proof about thinking, and it would show other people the thing, what is in the writer's mind. And that is a very interesting point of view because the writings are proof of the thoughts of the ancient philosophers' opinions. The thing is that without writings the persons like Socrates would remain in history, and nobody knows about them. And the thing that is always forgotten is that Socrates has not written anything, and the things what this man said were written by Platon. This thing makes me think that could the Sokrates really teach other people, or was he only speak himself?

This is one of the ideas, what this ancient philosopher has brought in my mind. When we are thinking about Plato's academy, where the philosophers have spoken together, we might ask, what kind of place that academy really was? I think that the old garden, where those people talked together was not anything else than some bulletin board, where those philosophers hang their texts, and copied the other philosopher's texts, and gave answers to the problems.

This might seem very much against the persons, who thought that the philosophers sat in the temple or somewhere like that. The thing was that those people would be persecuted if they were against the leaders, and that's why they might hide their identities. When we are talking about the academy, Plato might mean the life itself.

He spoke and write by using symbolic language, and when we are facing thoughts, that this man was some kind of traveler, I must say that it is possible that he was a sailor in some part of his life, and he wrote a letter to his comrades and portrayed the ideas to them, and maybe he did it on the last day in the harbors. But then we can think about this problem with the other way. Maybe Plato ever visited in the places, where he claimed to visit.

Maybe he played some kind of novelist, who wrote novels for the people. Here I mean,  there is a possibility, that Plato's trips were only symbols, and he heard the Ultima Thule from some tradesmen. And the tale of the Atlantis might also hear some sailors, and the "priest from Egypt" is the fake identity, what is made for covering the real identity of that person. There are things that are really interesting, and when we are thinking about the man, Plato, and other philosophers, they are living forever in the middle of the people by their texts, what is still impressive.

Writing about radicalism and hate

Writing about radicalism and hate

The minorities are a good target for political provocation, and the thing is that this kind of provocation is, that it feeds the hate in another side.  The isolation is the key element in the radicalism and political violence because it gives a good environment for political provocateurs, who are offering freedom, but then the route would go straight to another dictatorship. The way of an act of Bolsheviks in 1917 is that they promised freedom for the people and one of the promises was religious freedom. The reason, why I don't write Nazis in here is that they used the same methods when they got the power and the same route has been chosen many more dictator countries in the World.

In the beginning, were promised freedom, but then the permissions were forgotten, and the state would turn to the pressing police state, where the arrests because of the political reasons and talking are very usual. But then the clock hammer swing another side, and the religion became prohibited in the Soviet Union, and the thing, why the Orthodox church has so big influence in the political environment in Russia is that everything, what is prohibited is fascinating.

This is why drug dealers would market their merchandise. Otherwise, the radical political movements are marketing their ideology to the people in the same way. The radical movements are always acting in the same way. They are promising freedom, and then the leaders of the group would take power in the movement. They would addict people by using religion and national proud to the candidates and also drugs are used in the addiction process. In that environment, the radical movement members would always find the reason in their bad condition.

And that reason is persons, who are outsiders. The solution for unemployment and bad social situation is kicking foreigners out because it will free many workplaces, where those pilot jacket users would send their job applications. On the other side, the radical Muslims would be recruited to operate in the middle east as the fighter, but the main role for those movements just gives the government justify to ask foreign military aid. The terrorists are a very good excuse to buy combat helicopters and that kind of actions would justify the political arresting, and turn the international eye away from the actions against the opposition. And if the terrorist actions would happen in the Western world, would that make possible to get the most modern surveillance and targeting equipment and military advisers from the western military and intelligence communities.

About ethnic profiling and use of minorities as the political weapon by making people fear of foreigners is a very sad thing. In New Zealand, many people died because some persons thought that they have the right to punish people, who went to the mosque. That kind of things is expected when the press is yelling the ethnic background of some terrorists. When the press is full of writings against minorities and foreigners, and everything, what is seen in those people is negative, would some "national hero" start to shoot them because those persons are thinking that they have justified as legal actors, and the public opinion is in their side.

After that comes some Islamic hero and make the same things in some church and airport. The thing is terrorists are looking for publicity, and the violence is feeding the violence.  The thing is that the terror attacks by using the automobiles are actually the cases, where the driver might use drugs and alcohol and then in psychotic condition believes that playing some political or religion actor, would those people get support from some Middle-East countries.

 Or maybe that actor just came in psychosis and believes that he is acting in the orders of some Islamic group.  Because the driver belongs in some ethnic minority that gives to some press men very good chance to write articles, where the main role is in ethnic background. That kind of writings is feeding the hate also on the other side, and make the atmosphere favorable for the recruiters of the radical Islamic movements, what is offering the place in paradise for their terrorists.

Also, the far side radical nationalist movements are recruiting the new members in their groups, and the thing is that those movements are believing in guns and violence for making people afraid of them. In this point of the texts, I must say that those persons would ever meet people who are white enough to them.

That means that this kind of people is always finding new targets for their violence, and if they will get some area ethnically cleaned the next stage is to target their hate and humiliating companies to other groups like bartenders, who are not giving free beer to the skinheads. And the thing is that the press is normally taking too often the ethnic background of those people in the main question. The thing is that this kind of writings are feeding the hate, and then the thing would be very devastating.

The thing about the writing was it scientific or art

The thing about the writing was it scientific or art

The thing is that every person in the world should know that we are all supporting freedom of speech, but when somebody has different opinions, what we have, we would become very angry against those persons. This is an interesting thing when we are thinking about our relationship with media and democracy. Those things seem and feel nice when they are supporting our personal opinions. But when somebody has a different opinion, the thing would cause the anger movement against those persons, who dare to think against the normal people.

On the internet, you might hear about the blood types, like RH-, what is claimed not belonging on the Earth, and that kind of things would justify the persecution against those people, and this kind of things are dangerous. There are things, what we hear, but what we don't actually think about. Is there really people, who have the most exotic RH- blood type in the world? I think that some blood types are really extraordinary.  And when we are thinking about the thing, called "blue blood" in the case of the noblemen, we must ask, has some noblemen got blue blood? Were they so isolated, that they did not even have similar blood, what normal people have?

Then we must realize, that if we are thinking about the Genesis, and creation of the human, we must realize that those stories are actually made for supporting the power of the priests and other noblemen in the Sumerian civilization. When we are talking about the blue blood, we must say that the legend of the blue blood of the noblemen was created to make sure that the persons who are standing in the front of the people were not same, who gave orders. And as we know, some of the members of the ruling class would play the game, that the orders came from somebody else.

The test of the person would be easy. The real rulers would have blue blood, and that would protect the priests from the hate of people when they were walking at the market place. There is also a similar test in Romania. The test of the vampires will go that the person, who is suspected as the vampire would just need to eat the food, where is white onion. That kind of test was safe and trusted way to uncover the vampires, who are hiding in some taverna. But the white onion uncovers if a person has just eaten, before coming in the house, and in the case, that quest smells the white onion and claims to go to eat, would that uncover the lie.

And the blood of the Moluccan crayfish is blue. That animal is a very old species. If the test of the being priest was that this blood was injected to the body of the candidate, that thing would be very dangerous. Because if the blood has the Rhesus actor, the blood cells would be rough, which means that the blue blood of the crayfish would kill that RH+ person because the antigens of the blue blood would seize to the core of the blood cells. And this can cause the immune reaction in blood veins, what makes own immune cells to destroy the blood.

If a person is RH- the thing would be that the blood cells will be smooth, and the other antigens would not seize so easily. RH+ blood would seize the oxygen more effectively than RH- blood. And that's why this kind of blood type is a little bit more common than RH- blood. But in the first time, I have faced the people, who are claiming, that some persons are mentioned that they are not belonging on earth because they have certain blood types. This kind of things is very sad disinformation and dangerous pseudoscience.